计算机科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (9): 298-302.doi: 10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2019.09.045
张壮1, 李琳琳1, 余宏锋1, 范宝庆2
ZHANG Zhuang1, LI Lin-lin1, YU Hong-feng1, FAN Bao-qing2
摘要： 针对指标权重求解易受主观因素干扰,从而影响决策分析的指挥控制系统效能评估问题,提出了一种改进投影寻踪-灰色关联的效能评估方法。首先,对投影寻踪法进行改进,利用样本聚集程度和类间分散度定义了一种新的投影指标函数,通过求解投影指标函数最大值模型获得指标权重;其次,基于灰色关联投影算法,将待评估对象到参考数列的投影值作为综合效能度量的标准,实现了指挥控制系统效能评估;最后,以5个指挥控制系统为例,进行了实验验证,得出评估对象5的综合效能最高,与组合赋权法得出的结论一致,并且当指标数目大于18时,相比于AHP和组合赋权法,所提方法的运算效率最高。
中图分类号:
| [1]LI J.A study on capability-based methods for evaluating the architecture of Command and Control System[D].Nanjing:Nanjing University,2017.(in Chinese)李军.基于能力的指挥与控制系统体系结构评估方法研究[D].南京:南京大学,2017. [2]DAS S,GUHA D.Attribute weight computation in a decision making problem by particle swarm optimization[J].Neural Computing & Applications,2017(1):1-11. [3]ČEREŠKA A,ZAVADSKAS E,CAVALLARO F,et al.Sus-tainable Assessment of Aerosol Pollution Decrease Applying Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Methods[J].Sustainability,2016,8(7):586. [4]PELORUS,KARAHALIOS H.The application of the AHP-TOPSIS for evaluating ballast water treatment systems by ship operators[J].Transportation Research Part D Transport & Environment,2017,52(Part A):172-184. [5]SONG D M,LIU C X,SHEN C,et al.Multiple objective andattribute decision making basedonthe subjective and objective weighting[J].Journal of Shandong University (Engineering Science),2015,45(4):1-9.(in Chinese)宋冬梅,刘春晓,沈晨,等.基于主客观赋权法的多目标多属性决策方法[J].山东大学学报(工学版),2015,45(4):1-9. [6]WANG C Y,CHEN S M.Multiple Attribute Decision Making Based on Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets,Linear Programming Methodology,and the Extended TOPSIS Method[J].Information Sciences,2017,397(8):155-167. [7]SAHIN R,LIU P D.Maximizing Deviation Method for Neutrosophic Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Incomplete Weight Information[J].Neural Computing and Applications,2016,27(7):2017-2029. [8]HUANG J,JIN G,YU Y B.Application of projection pursuit model to risk assessment of flood detention zones[J].Journal of Economics of Water Resources,2016:34(5):60-63. [9]PEI W,FU Q,LIU D,et al.Assessing agricultural drought vulnerability in the Sanjiang Plain based on an improved projection pursuit model[J].Natural Hazards,2016,82(1):683-701. [10]ZHANG X,WANG T,LI S.A Projection Pursuit CombinedMethod for PPP Risk Evaluation[C]//International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management.Cham:Springer,2017:1522-1534. [11]HOU M M,SHAO X H.Optimization of irrigation-drainagescheme for tomato crop based on multi-index analysis and projection pursuit model[J].Zemdirbyste-agriculture,2016,103(2):221-228. [12]YU S,ZHU S,MA Y,et al.A variable step size firefly algorithm for numerical optimization[J].Applied Mathematics and Computation,2015,263(C):214-220. [13]GAO C L,LI S C,WANG J,et al.The Risk Assessment of Tunnels Based on Grey Correlation and Entropy Weight Method[J].Geotechnical & Geological Engineering,2017(4):1-11. [14]FAN D C,DU M Y.Dynamic Comprehensive Evaluation of the High-tech Industry TechnologyInnovation Ability Based on TOPSIS Grey Relation Projection Method[J].Operations Research and Management Science,2017,26(7):154-163. [15]LI L L,LU Y F,ZHANG Z,et al.Construction and model of command and control system index based on information superiority [J/OL].System Engineering and Electronics.[2018-01-25].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2422.TN.20171208.1733.020.html.(in Chinese)李琳琳,路云飞,张壮,等.基于信息优势的指控系统指标体系构建及建模[J/OL].系统工程与电子技术.[2018-01-25].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2422.TN.20171208.1733.020.html. [16]CHATTERJEE K,KAR S.Unified Granular-number-basedAHP-VIKOR multi-criteria decision framework[J].Granular Computing,2017,2(4):1-23. |
| [1] | 孙明玮, 司维超, 董琪. 基于多维度数据的网络服务质量的综合评估研究 Research on Comprehensive Evaluation of Network Quality of Service Based on Multidimensional Data 计算机科学, 2021, 48(6A): 246-249. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.200900131 |
| [2] | 张琴, 陈红梅, 封云飞. 一种基于粗糙集和密度峰值的重叠社区发现方法 Overlapping Community Detection Method Based on Rough Sets and Density Peaks 计算机科学, 2020, 47(5): 72-78. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.190400160 |
| [3] | 王妍, 韩笑, 曾辉, 刘荆欣, 夏长清. 边缘计算环境下服务质量可信的任务迁移节点选择 Task Migration Node Selection with Reliable Service Quality in Edge Computing Environment 计算机科学, 2020, 47(10): 240-246. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.190900054 |
| [4] | 孙明玮, 齐玉东. 基于云模型和改进灰色关联分析模型的网络服务质量综合评估 Comprehensive Evaluation of Network Service Quality Based on Cloud Model and Improved Grey Relational Analysis Model 计算机科学, 2019, 46(5): 315-319. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2019.05.049 |
| [5] | 靳骁, 葛慧, 马锐. 新型网络空间防御体系的构建及效能评估 Construction and Effectiveness Evaluation of New Cyber Defense System 计算机科学, 2018, 45(11A): 377-381. |
| [6] | 路云飞, 李琳琳, 张壮, 和何. 新一代指挥控制系统信息化能力分析与评估 Information Capability Analysis and Evaluation of New Generation Command and Control System Computer Engineering and Applications 计算机科学, 2018, 45(11A): 548-552. |
| [7] | 胡文生,杨剑锋,赵明. 类设计质量评估方法的研究 Methodology for Classes Design Quality Assessment 计算机科学, 2017, 44(12): 150-155. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2017.12.029 |
| [8] | 张海涛,王鹤桥,孟祥羽,武文波. 基于类对可分和灰色决策的高光谱波段选择方法 Hyperspectral Band Selection Method Based on Conjugate Class Separability and Grey Decision 计算机科学, 2014, 41(6): 309-313. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2014.06.062 |
| [9] | 周延年，朱怡安. 基于灰嫡绝对关联分析在嵌入式计算机性能评价中的应用 New and Better Algorithm for Evaluation of Overall Performance of Embedded Computer through Combining Grey Entropy with Absolute Correlation Degree 计算机科学, 2011, 38(11): 206-207. |
| [10] | 王会梅,李旭,鲜明,王国玉. 网络抗攻击性能的遗传投影寻踪评估模型 Genetic Projection Pursuit Evaluation Method of Network Attack Resistance Ability 计算机科学, 2010, 37(6): 43-45. |
| [11] | 张市芳,刘三阳,翟任何. 直觉梯形模糊数MADM问题的灰色关联分析法 Method of Grey Relational Analysis for MADM Problem with Intuitionistic Trapezoidal Fuzzy Numbers 计算机科学, 2010, 37(11): 214-216. |
| [12] | . 基于ADC模型的侦察卫星效能评估研究 计算机科学, 2009, 36(6): 41-43. |
| [13] | 吕镇邦 周利华. 基于有序加权平均算子的概率模糊认知图 计算机科学, 2008, 35(12): 187-189. |
| [14] | . 基于核的PP主成分分析及其在离群聚类中的应用 计算机科学, 2007, 34(9): 131-134. |
| [15] | 张国平 景海峰. AHP和灰色关联分析在对象关系映射模式中的应用 计算机科学, 2006, 33(10): 124-125. |
|
||
首页