Computer Science ›› 2020, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6A): 616-621.doi: 10.11896/JsJkx.190600097

• Interdiscipline & Application • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Emergency Plan Evaluation of Special Equipment Accident Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process

ZHENG Geng-feng   

  1. FuJian Special Equipment Inspection and Research Institute,Fuzhou 350008,China
  • Published:2020-07-07
  • About author:ZHENG Geng-feng, born in 1983, doctor.His main research direction include robot and intelligent algorithm.
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the 2018 Intelligent Manufacturing Comprehensive Standardization ProJect of Ministry of Industry and Information Technology(GXSP20181001),Science and Technology ProJect of FuJian Quality Supervision Bureau(FJQI2018029),National key Research and Development Program(2019YFB1310704) and Research ProJect of Quality Inspection Public Welfare Industry of the Ministry of Science and Technology(201410139).

Abstract: In view of the problems that most of the existing emergency plans for special equipment accidents have not been proved by practice and lack of scientific and reasonable evaluation system,this paper proposed an evaluation method of emergency plan for special equipment based on intuitionistic fuzzy AHP.Firstly,the performance evaluation index system of the emergency plan is constructed from three aspects:preparation before implementation,execution in implementation and improvement after implementation.Secondly,considering the uncertainty in the emergency process and the subJectivity of the evaluation process,the weights of each index are calculated by intuitionistic fuzzy AHP,and the performance of each index is determined by combining the scores of the expert group on the emergency simulation.Finally,the feasibility and effectiveness of this method are proved by comparing with the results of artificial evaluation.

Key words: Emergency plan evaluation, Emergency simulation, Intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, Special equipment

CLC Number: 

  • TE319
[1] 质检总局关于2015年全国特种设备安全状况情况的通报.中国特种设备安全,2016(4):15-18,37.
[2] 张英菊.基于灰色多层次评价方法的应急预案实施效果评价模型研究.计算机应用研究,2012(9):3312-3315,3319.
[3] 张素丽,康泉胜,方元.浙江省突发事件应急预案评价指标体系研究.中国安全科学学报,2012(10):164-169.
[4] 汤兆平,刘欢,孙剑萍.基于改进FAHP法的铁路应急预案评价研究.重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版),2016(10):1-7.
[5] 程翠云,钱新,万玉秋,等.水库大坝突发事件应急预案可行性评价方法初探.水利水运工程学报,2009(1):71-75.
[6] 陕振沛,张转周,宁宝权.基于直觉模糊集TOPSIS决策方法的应急预案综合评价研究.数学的实践与认识,2016(3):160-166.
[7] 承奇,张礼敬,邢培育,等.基于层次分析法的化工事故应急演练模糊综合评估.南京工业大学学报(自然科学版),2009(4):98-102.
[8] TABER M J,MCCABE J,KLEIN R M,et al.Development and evaluation of an offshore oil and gas Emergency Response Focus Board.International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,2013,43(1):40-51.
[9] SHARMA R K,GURJAR B R,SINGHAL A V,et al.Automation of emergency response for petroleum oil storage terminals.Safety Science,2015(72):262-273.
[10] 崔文,罗云,曾珠,等.机电类特种设备典型事故风险分级预警预控方法研究.工业安全与环保,2014(5):59-62.
[11] 杨振林,刘金兰.基于层次分析法的特种设备风险评价体系研究.压力容器,2008,25(9):28-33.
[12] 江书军,郝素俐,丁日佳.基于层次分析法的特种设备使用单位风险评价体系研究.工业安全与环保,2012,38(11):1-4.
[13] XU Z.Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making.Information Sciences,2007,177(11):2363-2379.
[14] XU Z,LIAO H.Intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process.IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems,2014,22(4):749-761.
[15] XU Z.Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators.IEEE Transactions on fuzzy Systems,2007,15(6):1179-1187
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!