Computer Science ›› 2019, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (10): 209-214.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.180801554

• Software & Database Technology • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Evaluation Model of Software Quality with Interval Data

YUE Chuan, PENG Xiao-hong   

  1. (College of Mathematics and Computer Science,Guangdong Ocean University,Zhanjiang,Guangdong 524088,China)
  • Received:2018-08-23 Revised:2019-01-06 Online:2019-10-15 Published:2019-10-21

Abstract: For the defects of traditional evaluation methods,a new evaluation model of software quality was developed in this paper.First,aimed at the existing problems of present projection measures,a new normalized projection measure is provided in this research.Second,an evaluation model of software quality with interval data is established,which is based on the new projection model and TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) technique.Then an assessment procedure is elaborated in a group decision-making setting.The evaluation matrices,weighted evaluation matrices,positive and negative ideal decisions and relative closeness are involved in this model.The evaluation information is based on a questionnaire survey.Finally,the effectiveness and feasibility of the developed method are illustrated by a practical example and an experimental analysis.The experimental results show that the evaluation model has the advantages in robustness and practicability.

Key words: Evaluation method, Group decision-making, Interval data, Normalized projection, Software quality, TOPSIS technique

CLC Number: 

  • TP311.5
[1]HU W S,YANG J F,ZHAO M.Methodology for classes design quality assessment[J].Computer Science,2017,44(12):150-155.(in Chinese)
胡文生,杨剑锋,赵明.类设计质量评估方法的研究[J].计算机科学,2017,44(12):150-155.
[2]YUE C.A model for evaluating software quality based on symbol information[J].Journal of Guangdong Ocean University,2016,36(1):85-92.(in Chinese)
岳川.基于符号信息的软件质量评价模型[J].广东海洋大学学报,2016,36(1):85-92.
[3]YUE C.A projection-based estimation approach to software usa-bility[J].Computer Engineering & Science,2017,39(6):1112-1117.(in Chinese)
岳川.基于投影的软件易用性评价方法[J].计算机工程与科学,2017,39(6):1112-1117.
[4]LIU Q L,DONG W,YIN L Z,et al.Research on mixed source software quality model and measurement method.Computer Science,2017,44(4):82-84,95.(in Chinese)
刘启林,董威,尹良泽,等.混源软件质量模型与度量方法研究[J].计算机科学,2017,44(4):82-84,95.
[5]ÇAGLAYAN B,BENER A B.Effect of developer collaboration activity on software quality in two large scale projects[J].Journal of Systems & Software,2016,118:288-296.
[6]JAAFAR F,LOZANO A,GUÉHÉNEUC Y G,et al.Analyzing software evolution and quality by extracting Asynchrony Change patterns[J].Journal of Systems & Software,2017,131:311-322.
[7]BANDYOPADHYAY S,BHATTACHARYA S,SENSARMA R.An analysis of the factors determining crime in England and Wales:A quantile regression approach[J].Discussion Papers,2011,35(2):235-242.
[8]ENRÍQUEZ J G,SÁNCHEZ-BEGINES J M,DOMíNGUEZ-MAYO F J,et al.An approach to characterize and evaluate the quality of Product Lifecycle Management Software Systems[J].Computer Standards & Interfaces,2019,61:77-88.
[9]YUE C.A projection-based approach to software quality evaluation from the users’ perspectives[J].International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics,2018.DOI:/10.1007/s13042-018-0873-y.
[10]IRSHAD M,PETERSEN K,POULDING S.A systematic literature review of software requirements reuse approaches[J].Information and Software Technology,2018,93:223-245.
[11]YUE C.A novel approach to interval comparison and application to software quality evaluation [J].Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence,2018,30(5):583-602.
[12]KHOSRAVI A,HUSSIN A R C,NILASHI M,et al.Toward software quality enhancement by customer knowledge management in software companies[J].Telematics & Informatics,2018,35(1):18-37.
[13]CARROZZA G,PIETRANTUONO R,RUSSO S.A software quality framework for large-scale mission-critical systems engineering [J].Information & Software Technology,2018,102:100-106.
[14]SIAVVAS M G,CHATZIDIMITRIOU K C,SYMEONIDIS A L.QATCH-An adaptive framework for software product quality assessment[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2017,86:350-366.
[15]NGUYEN-DUC A,CRUZES D S,CONRADI R.The impact of global dispersion on coordination,team performance and software quality-A systematic literature review[J].Information and Software Technology,2015,57(1):277-294.
[16]International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC),Software and Systems Engineering.ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 7 [EB/OL].[2016-11-25].http://www.jtc1.org/directives/toc.htm.
[17]CONDORI-FERNANDEZ N,LAGO P.Characterizing the contribution of quality requirements to software sustainability[J].Journal of Systems & Software,2018,137:289-305.
[18]GARCÍA-MIRELES G A,MORAGA M Á,GARCíA F,et al. Interactions between environmental sustainability goals and software product quality:A mapping study[J].Information & Software Technology,2018,95:108-129.
[19]YUE C.A geometric approach for ranking interval-valued intui-tionistic fuzzy numbers with an application to group decision-making[J].Computers & Industrial Engineering,2016,102:233-245.
[20]YUE Z L,JIA Y Y.A direct projection-based group decision-making methodology with crisp values and interval data [J].Soft Computing,2017,21(9):2395-2405.
[21]LU L L,YUAN Y Y.A novel TOPSIS evaluation scheme for cloud service trustworthiness combining objective and subjective aspects[J].Journal of Systems and Software,2018,143:71-86.
[22]WU Y N,XU H,XU C B et al.Uncertain multi-attributes decision making method based on interval number with probability distribution weighted operators and stochastic dominance degree[J].Knowledge-Based Systems,2016,113:199-209.
[23]YUE C.Two normalized projection models and application to group decision-making [J].Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems,2017,32 (6):4389-4402.
[24]YUE C.Normalized projection approach to group decision-making with hybrid decision information [J].International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics,2018,9(8):1365-1375.
[25]YUE C.Entropy-based weights on decision makers in group decision-making setting with hybrid preference representations[J].Applied Soft Computing,2017,60:737-749.
[1] MI Qing, GUO Li-min, CHEN Jun-cheng. Code Readability Assessment Method Based on Multidimensional Features and Hybrid Neural Networks [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(12): 94-99.
[2] WEI Jian-hua, XU Jian-qiu. Efficient Top-k Query Processing on Uncertain Temporal Data [J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(9): 67-73.
[3] MENG Fan-yi, WANG Ying, YU Hai, ZHU Zhi-liang. Refactoring of Complex Software Systems Research:PresentProblem and Prospect [J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(12): 1-10.
[4] ZANG Han-lin, LI Yan-ling. Intuitionistic Fuzzy Group Decision Making Information Aggregation Method Based on D-S Evidence Theory [J]. Computer Science, 2019, 46(6A): 102-105.
[5] ZHANG Jie-hui, PAN Chao, ZHANG Yong. Network System Risk Assessment Model with Optimal Weights [J]. Computer Science, 2019, 46(6): 148-152.
[6] ZONG Peng-yang, WANG Yi-chen. Software Quality Evaluation Based on Neural Network:A Systematic Literature Review [J]. Computer Science, 2019, 46(11A): 507-516.
[7] LENG Qiang, YANG Ying-jie, HU Hao. Self-adaption Adjustment Method for Experts in Risk Assessment [J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(12): 98-103.
[8] LIU Chang and FAN Bin. Weighted Least Squares Support Vector Machine Based on Entropy Evaluation [J]. Computer Science, 2017, 44(Z11): 428-431.
[9] LI Hong-jun, CUI Xi-ning, MU Ming and HAN Wei. Research on Distributed Embedded Computer Performance Evaluation Model [J]. Computer Science, 2017, 44(4): 153-156.
[10] WU Ju-hua, CHENG Xiao-yan, CAO Qiang and MO Zan. Trustworthy Web Servcie Selection Based on Social Network [J]. Computer Science, 2016, 43(1): 141-144.
[11] LIU Jin-hang and XIA Hong-xia. New Methods of Software Requirements Risk Assessment Using UML [J]. Computer Science, 2014, 41(6): 131-135.
[12] PANG Hong-biao,LI Zhi-bo and GAO Xiao-ya. Software Safety Test Analysis for Fire Control System of Remote Multi-barrel Rocket [J]. Computer Science, 2013, 40(Z6): 361-364.
[13] WANG Tian-qing and XIE Jun. Neighborhood Based Rough Sets in Incomplete Interval-valued Information System [J]. Computer Science, 2013, 40(4): 231-235.
[14] YOU Meng-li and LEI Xiu-juan. Study and Application of Evaluating Methods of PPI Network Clustering [J]. Computer Science, 2013, 40(12): 254-258.
[15] . Quantitative Assessing Method of Software Quality Evaluation Based on Software Testing and KDD [J]. Computer Science, 2012, 39(Z11): 28-30.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!