Computer Science ›› 2019, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (11A): 315-319.

• Pattern Recognition & Image Processing • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Multi-focus Image Fusion Based on Fractional Differential

MAO Yi-ping, YU Lei, GUAN Ze-jin   

  1. (College of Computer and Information Science,Chongqing Normal University,Chongqing 401331,China)
  • Online:2019-11-10 Published:2019-11-20

Abstract: Multi-focus image fusion uses many complementary information of the image to obtain a clear fused image.In traditional multi-scale analysis methods,image information is easily lost due to sampling and fusion strategies.In sparse representation methods,due to the lack of dictionary expression ability,the fusion details are blurred and the fusion time complexity is very high.For multi-focus image fusion method based on spatial domain method,the algorithm for measuring image activity level is very critical.A fractional differential feature is proposed to measure the activity level of the image.The algorithm first convolves the image with a fractional mask in eight directions,and then accumulates the absolute value after convolution in each direction to obtain the activity level measurement of the original image.Each metric map is then compared separately by using a sliding window technique.The sum of the windows and the large ones is regarded as the focus,and the corresponding score map is incremented by one.The decision map is obtained by the score map information.Finally,the final fused image is obtained by weighting the original image by decision graph.Through experimental comparison and analysis,this algorithm has certain advantages over traditional algorithm.

Key words: Fractional differential, Multi-focus image fusion, Activity level, Sliding window

CLC Number: 

  • TP391
[1]LI S,KANG X,FANG L,et al.Pixel-level image fusion:a survey of the state of the art[J].Inf.Fusion,2017,33:100-112.
[2]STATHAKI T.Image Fusion:Algorithms and Applications[M].Academic Press,2008.
[3]TOET A.A morphological pyramidal imagedecomposition[J].Pattern Recognit.Lett.,1989,9(4):255-261.
[4]LI H,MANJUNATH B,MITRA S.Multisensor image fusionusing the wavelet transform[J].Graphical Models Image Process,1995,57(3):235-245.
[5]LEWIS J,OÍCALLAGHAN R,NIKOLOV S,et al.Pixel- and region based image fusion with complex wavelets[J].Inf.Fu-sion,2007,8(2):119-130.
[6]NENCINI F,GARZELLI A,BARONTI S,et.al.Remote sensing image fusion using the curvelet transform[J].Inf.Fus,2007,8(2):143-156.
[7]ZHANG Q,GUO B.Multifocus image fusion using the nonsubsampled contourlet transform[J].Signal Process,2009,89(7):1334-1346.
[8]PIELLA G.A general framework for multiresolution image fusion:from pixels to regions[J].Inf.Fusion,2003,4(4):259-280.
[9]MITIANOUDIS N,STATHAKI T.Pixel-based and region-based image fusion schemes using icabases[J].Inf.Fusion,2007,8(2):131-142.
[10]YANG B,LI S.Multifocus image fusion and restoration with sparse representation[J].IEEE Trans.Instrum.Meas.,2010,59(4):884-892.
[11]LIU Z,CHAI Y,YIN H,et al.A novel multi-focus image fusion approach based on image decomposition[J].Inf.Fusion,2017,35:102-116.
[12]YANG B,LI S.Pixle-level image fusion with simultaneously orthogonal matching pursuit[J].Inf.Fusion,2012,13(1):10-19.
[13]YIN H.Sparse representation with learned multiscale dictionary for image fusion[J].Neurocomputting,2015,148:600-610.
[14]KIM M,HAN D K,KO H.Multimodal image fusion via sparse representation with local patch dictionaries[C]∥Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.2013:1301-1305.
[15]MINJAEKIM,DAVID H K,HANSEOKKO.Joint patch clustering-based dictionary learning for multimodal image fusion[J].Information Fusion,2016,27:198-214.
[16]ZHANG Q,LIU Y,BLUM R S,et al.Sparserepresentationbased multi-sensor image fusion for multi-focus and multi-modality images:A review[J].Information Fusion,2018,40:57-75.
[17]HUANG W,JING Z.Evaluation of focus measures in multi-focus image fusion[J].Pattern Recognit.Lett.,2007,28(4):493-500.
[18]ASLANTAS V,KURBAN R.Fusion of multi-focus imagesusing differential evolution algorithm[J].Expert Syst.,Appl,2010,37(12):8861-8870.
[19]DE I,CHANDA B.Multi-fucous image fusion using a morphology-based focus measure in a quad-tree structure[J].Inf.Fusion,2013,14(2):136-146.
[20]LI S,YANG B.Multi-focus image fusion using region segment and spatial frequency[J].Image Vis.Comput.,2008,26(7):971-979.
[21]LIU Y,LIU S,WANG Z.Multi-focus image fusion with dense SIFT[J].Inf.Fus,2015,23(1):139-155.
[22]LIU Y,LIU S,WANG Z.A general framework for image fusion based on multi-scale transform and sparse representation[J].Inf.Fusion,2015,24(1):147-164.
[23]LIU Y,CHEN X,WARD R.et al.Image fusion with convolutional sparse representation[J].IEEE Signal Processing Letters,2016,23(12):1882-1886.
[24]QU G,ZHANG D,YAN P.Information measure for performance of image fusion[J].Electron,2002,38(7):313-315.
[25]WANG Z,BOVIK A,SHEIKH H,et al.Image quality assessment:from error visibility to structural similarity[J].IEEE Trans.Image Process,2004,13(4):600-612.
[26]XYDEAS C S,PETROVIC V.Objective Image Fusion Perfor-mance Measure[J].ElectronicsLetters,2000,36(4):308-309.
[27]http://www.ece.lehigh.edu/SPCRL/IF/image_fusion.html.
[1] SONG Ying, ZHONG Xian, SUN Bao-lin, GUI Chao. Sliding Window-based Network Coding Cooperative Algorithm in MANET [J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(11): 322-326.
[2] WANG Xu, YANG Xiao-chun. Study of Triangle Counting Algorithm with Sliding Windows Based on FLINK [J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(10): 83-90.
[3] ZHANG Bing, XIE Cong-hua, LIU Zhe. Multi-focus Image Fusion Based on Latent Sparse Representation and Neighborhood Information [J]. Computer Science, 2019, 46(9): 254-258.
[4] PENG Cheng, HE Jing, CHI Hao. Boundary Distance Algorithm for Determining Sliding Window Size [J]. Computer Science, 2019, 46(6A): 482-487.
[5] GUO Wei, YU Jian-jiang, TANG Ke-ming, XU Tao. Survey of Online Sequential Extreme Learning Algorithms for Dynamic Data Stream Analysis [J]. Computer Science, 2019, 46(4): 1-7.
[6] WANG Ying, LIU Fan, CHEN Ze-hua. Image Fusion Algorithm Based on Improved Weighted Method and AdaptivePulse Coupled Neural Network in Shearlet Domain [J]. Computer Science, 2019, 46(4): 261-267.
[7] DU Juan, SHEN Si-yun. Implementation and Application of Stereo Matching Method Based onImproved Multi-weight Sliding Window [J]. Computer Science, 2019, 46(11A): 241-245.
[8] YANG Yan-chun, LI Jiao, DANG Jian-wu and WANG Yang-ping. Multi-focus Image Fusion Based on Redundant Wavelet Transform and Guided Filtering [J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(2): 301-305.
[9] LI Qing, XIAO Ying-yuan, WANG Xiao-ye and LI Yu-kun. Clustering Architecture-based Skyline Query Processing in Wireless Sensor Networks [J]. Computer Science, 2017, 44(10): 177-181.
[10] ZHANG Jian-hui, WANG Hui-qing, SUN Hong-wei, GUO Zhi-rong and BAI Ying-ying. Similarity Measure Algorithm of Time Series Based on Binary-dividing SAX [J]. Computer Science, 2017, 44(1): 247-252.
[11] WANG Quan, NIE Ren-can, JIN Xin, ZHOU Dong-ming, HE Kang-jian and YU Jie-fu. Image Fusion Algorithm Using LP Transformation and PCNN-SML [J]. Computer Science, 2016, 43(Z6): 122-124.
[12] WANG Li-zhen, ZHOU Li-hua and DENG Shi-kun. Weighted Prediction Method Based on Sliding Window and Pattern Matching [J]. Computer Science, 2016, 43(Z11): 591-596.
[13] LI Yan, ZHOU Yi, LIU Yu-sheng and LIANG Zhi. Probability Routing Protocol Based on Slotted Sliding Window in Wireless Body Area Network [J]. Computer Science, 2016, 43(Z11): 259-263.
[14] CAO Chun-hong, ZHANG Jian-hua and LI Lin-feng. Multi-focus Image Fusion Based on Twin-generation Differential Evolution and Adaptive Block Mechanism [J]. Computer Science, 2016, 43(7): 67-72.
[15] ZHONG Xian, YANG Guang and LU Yan-sheng. Method of Key Frames Extraction Based on Double-threshold Values Sliding Window Sub-shot Segmentation and Fully Connected Graph [J]. Computer Science, 2016, 43(6): 289-293.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] LEI Li-hui and WANG Jing. Parallelization of LTL Model Checking Based on Possibility Measure[J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(4): 71 -75 .
[2] SUN Qi, JIN Yan, HE Kun and XU Ling-xuan. Hybrid Evolutionary Algorithm for Solving Mixed Capacitated General Routing Problem[J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(4): 76 -82 .
[3] ZHANG Jia-nan and XIAO Ming-yu. Approximation Algorithm for Weighted Mixed Domination Problem[J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(4): 83 -88 .
[4] WU Jian-hui, HUANG Zhong-xiang, LI Wu, WU Jian-hui, PENG Xin and ZHANG Sheng. Robustness Optimization of Sequence Decision in Urban Road Construction[J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(4): 89 -93 .
[5] SHI Wen-jun, WU Ji-gang and LUO Yu-chun. Fast and Efficient Scheduling Algorithms for Mobile Cloud Offloading[J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(4): 94 -99 .
[6] ZHOU Yan-ping and YE Qiao-lin. L1-norm Distance Based Least Squares Twin Support Vector Machine[J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(4): 100 -105 .
[7] LIU Bo-yi, TANG Xiang-yan and CHENG Jie-ren. Recognition Method for Corn Borer Based on Templates Matching in Muliple Growth Periods[J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(4): 106 -111 .
[8] GENG Hai-jun, SHI Xin-gang, WANG Zhi-liang, YIN Xia and YIN Shao-ping. Energy-efficient Intra-domain Routing Algorithm Based on Directed Acyclic Graph[J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(4): 112 -116 .
[9] CUI Qiong, LI Jian-hua, WANG Hong and NAN Ming-li. Resilience Analysis Model of Networked Command Information System Based on Node Repairability[J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(4): 117 -121 .
[10] WANG Zhen-chao, HOU Huan-huan and LIAN Rui. Path Optimization Scheme for Restraining Degree of Disorder in CMT[J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(4): 122 -125 .