Computer Science ›› 2020, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3): 206-210.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.190200265

• Artificial Intelligence • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Document-level Event Factuality Identification Method with Gated Convolution Networks

ZHANG Yun,LI Pei-feng,ZHU Qiao-ming   

  1. (School of Computer Sciences and Technology, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215006, China)
  • Received:2019-02-05 Online:2020-03-15 Published:2020-03-30
  • About author:ZHANG Yun,born in 1993,postgradua-te,is member of China Computer Fede-ration.His main research interests include natural language processing. LI Pei-feng,born in 1971,Ph.D,professor,Ph.D supervisor,is member of China Computer Federation.His main research interests include natural language processing,and machine lear-ning.
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61836007, 61772354, 61773276).

Abstract: Event factuality represents the factual nature of events in texts,it describes whether an event is a fact,a possibility,or an impossible situation.Event factuality identification is the basis of many relative tasks,such as question-answer system and discourse understanding.However,most of the current researches of event factuality identification focus on the sentences level,and only a few aim at the document-level.Therefore,this paper proposed an approach of document-level event factuality identification (DEFI) with gated convolution network.It first uses gated convolution network to capture both the semantic information and the syntactic information from event sentences and syntactic path,and then uses the self-attention layer to capture the feature representation of the overall information that is more important for each sequence itself.Finally,it uses the above information to identify the document-level event factuality.Experimental results on both the Chinese and English corpus show that the proposed DEFI outperforms the baselines both on macro-F1 and micro-F1.In Chinese and English corpus,the macro-average F1 value increased by 2.3% and 4.4%,while the micro-average F1 value increased by 2.0% and 2.8%,respectively.The training speed of this method is also increased by three times.

Key words: Discourse understanding, Event factuality identification, Gated convolution network

CLC Number: 

  • TP391.1
[1]KLENNER M,CLEMATIDE S.How factuality determines sentiment inferences[C]∥Meeting of the Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics.2016:75-84.
[2]QAZVINIAN V,ROSENGREN E,RADEV D R,et al.Rumor has it:Identifying Misinformation in Microblogs [C]∥ Meeting of the Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2011:1589-1599.
[3]SAURÍ R,VERHAGEN M,PUSTEJOVSKY J.Annotating and recognizing event modality in text[C]∥Meeting of the International FLAIRS.2006:333-339.
[4]QIAN Z.Research on Methods of Event Factuality Identification[D].Suzhou:Soochow University,2018.
[5]SAURÍ R,PUSTEJOVSKY J.FactBank:a corpus annotated with event factuality[J].Language Resources and Evaluation,2009,43(3):227-268.
[6]PUSTEJOVSKY J,PATRICK H,SAURI R,et al.The time- bank corpus[C]∥Meeting of the Corpus Linguistics.2003:647-656.
[7]SAURÍ R.A factuality profiler for eventualities in text[D]. Massachusetts:Brandeis University,2008.
[8]CAO Y,ZHU Q M,LI P F.The Construction of Chinese Event Factuality Corpus[J].Journal of Chinese Information Proces-sing,2012,27(6):38-44.
[9]VINCZE V,SZARVAS G,FARKAS R,et al.The bioscope corpus:biomedical texts annotated for uncertainty,negation and their scopes [J].Bmc Bioinformatics,2008,9(S2):S9-S9.
[10]ZOU B W,ZHU Q M,ZHOU G D.Research on natural lan- guage text oriented negation and uncertainty extraction[J].Frontiers of Computer Science,2016,10(6):1039-1051.
[11]SAURÍ R,PUSTEJOVSKY J.Are you sure that this happened? Assessing the factuality degree of events in text[J].Computational Linguistics,2012,38(2):1-39.
[12]WERNER G,VINODKUMAR P,MONA D,et al.Committed belief tagging on the factbank and lu corpora:A comparative study[C]∥Meeting of the Second Workshop on Extra-Propositional Aspects of Meaning in Computational Semantics.2015:32-40.
[13]QIAN Z,LI P F,ZHU Q M.A two-step approach for event factuality identification[C]∥Meeting of the InternationalConfe-rence on Asian Language Processing.2015:103-106.
[14]QIAN Z,LI P F,ZHANG Y,et al.Event Factuality Identification via Generative Adversarial Networks with Auxiliary Classification[C]∥Meeting of the Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2018:4293-4300.
[15]HE T X,LI P F,ZHU Q M.Identifying Chinese event factuality with convolutional neural networks[C]∥Meeting of the Chinese Lexical Semantic Workshop.2017:284-292.
[16]ZHOU X J,WAN X J,XIAO J G.Attention-based lstm network for cross-lingual sentiment classification[C]∥Meeting of the Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2016:1650-1659.
[17]DAUPHIN Y N,ANGELA F,MICHAEL A,et al.Language modeling with gated convolutional networks[C]∥Meeting of the Machine Learning.2017:933-941.
[18]PETER S,JAKOB U,ASHISH V.Self-Attention with relative position representations[J].arXiv:1803.02155.
[19]MIYATO T,MAEDA S,KOYAMA M,et al.Distributional smoothing with virtual adversarial training[J].arXiv:1507.00677.
[1] WU Zi-yi, LI Shao-mei, JIANG Meng-han, ZHANG Jian-peng. Ontology Alignment Method Based on Self-attention [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(9): 215-220.
[2] GUO Yu-xin, CHEN Xiu-hong. Automatic Summarization Model Combining BERT Word Embedding Representation and Topic Information Enhancement [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(6): 313-318.
[3] HUANG Shao-bin, SUN Xue-wei, LI Rong-sheng. Relation Classification Method Based on Cross-sentence Contextual Information for Neural Network [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(6A): 119-124.
[4] MIU Feng, WANG Ping, LI Tai-yong. Implicit Causality Extraction Method Based on Event Action Direction [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(3): 276-280.
[5] XIAO Kang, ZHOU Xia-bing, WANG Zhong-qing, DUAN Xiang-yu, ZHOU Guo-dong, ZHANG Min. Review Question Generation Based on Product Profile [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(2): 272-278.
[6] MA Jian-hong, ZHANG Tong. Expert Recommendation Algorithm for Enterprise Engineering Problems [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(1): 159-165.
[7] YUAN Jing-ling, DING Yuan-yuan, SHENG De-ming, LI Lin. Image-Text Sentiment Analysis Model Based on Visual Aspect Attention [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(1): 219-224.
[8] LIU Kai, ZHANG Hong-jun, CHEN Fei-qiong. Name Entity Recognition for Military Based on Domain Adaptive Embedding [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(1): 292-297.
[9] ZOU Ao, HAO Wen-ning, JIN Da-wei, CHEN Gang, TIAN Yuan. Study on Text Retrieval Based on Pre-training and Deep Hash [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(11): 300-306.
[10] YU Liang, WEI Yong-feng, LUO Guo-liang, WU Chang-xing. Knowledge Distillation Based Implicit Discourse Relation Recognition [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(11): 319-326.
[11] LI Jian-lan, PAN Yue, LI Xiao-cong, LIU Zi-wei, WANG Tian-yu. Chinese Commentary Text Research Status and Trend Analysis Based on CiteSpace [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(11A): 17-21.
[12] ZHANG Ming-yang, WANG Gang, PENG Qi, ZHANG Yan-feng. Data Analysis of OpenReview [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(6): 63-70.
[13] SHI Wei, FU Yue. Microblog Short Text Mining Considering Context:A Method of Sentiment Analysis [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(6A): 158-164.
[14] PEI Ying, LI Tian-xiang, WANG Ao-qing, FU Jia-sheng, HAN Xiao-song. Prediction Method of International Natural Gas Price Trends Based on News [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(6A): 235-239.
[15] HUO Shuai, PANG Chun-jiang. Research on Sentiment Analysis Based on Transformer and Multi-channel Convolutional Neural Network [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(6A): 349-356.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!