Started in January,1974(Monthly)
Supervised and Sponsored by Chongqing Southwest Information Co., Ltd.
ISSN 1002-137X
CN 50-1075/TP
Editorial and Publishing Policies

  • Computer Science is an open access journal, and has the following policies.

    Submission policies

    When you submit a manuscript to Computer Science, we will take it to imply that the manuscript has not already been published or submitted elsewhere. If similar or related work has been published or submitted elsewhere, then you must provide a copy with the submitted manuscript. You may not submit your manuscript elsewhere while it is under consideration at Computer Science.

    The primary affiliation for each author should be the institution where the majority of their work was done. If an author has subsequently moved, the current address may also be stated.

    If the manuscript includes personal communications, please provide a written statement of permission from any person who is quoted. Permission by email is acceptable.

    We reserve the right to reject a paper even after it has been accepted if it becomes apparent that there are serious problems with its scientific content, or our publishing policies have been violated.

    If your paper has been previously submitted to another journal, you can use our automated manuscript transfer service to submit the paper to Computer Science. Alternatively, you may choose to submit afresh, in which case you should not use the automated transfer link, and your paper will be evaluated without reference to the previous decision process.

    Computer Science is editorially independent, and Editorial Board Members make decisions independently from other journals. It is for authors alone to decide where to submit their manuscripts. For papers that satisfy the scope of more than one journal, the choice of which journal to submit to first lies with the authors.

    Author responsibilities

    Being an author

    Computer Science does not require all authors of a research paper to sign the cover letter upon submission, nor do they impose an order on the list of authors. Submission to Computer Science is taken by the publication to mean that all the listed authors have agreed to all of the contents. The corresponding (submitting) author is responsible for having ensured that this agreement has been reached, and for managing all communication between the publication and all co-authors, before and after publication.

    Responsibilities of senior team members on multi-group collaborations

    Computer Science assumes that at least one member of each collaboration, usually the most senior member of each submitting group or team, has accepted responsibility for the contributions to the manuscript from that team. This responsibility includes, but is not limited to: (1) ensuring that original data upon which the submission is based is preserved and retrievable for reanalysis; (2) approving data presentation as representative of the original data; and (3) foreseeing and minimizing obstacles to the sharing of data, materials, algorithms or reagents described in the work.


    Inclusion of a consortium in the author list indicates that all members of the consortium have contributed sufficiently to the work to justify authorship status. The consortium name ONLY – not the names of each consortium member – should be included in the main author list in the manuscript (when submitting a manuscript, the consortium name should also be entered as an author in the online submission system, together with the contact details of a nominated consortia representative). In a separate section at the end of the manuscript (after the ‘References’ section) under the heading ‘Consortium’, the names of each consortium member should be listed. Affiliations of consortium members should be indicated by superscript numbers (as per the main author list); consortium affiliations continue numerically from the main author list (and do not duplicate affiliations). Names of individual authors should appear either in the main author list OR in the separate list of consortium members, not in both.

    Author contributions statements

    Authors are required to include a statement of responsibility in the manuscript that specifies the contribution of every author. The level of detail varies; some disciplines produce manuscripts that comprise discrete efforts readily articulated in detail, whereas other fields operate as group efforts at all stages.  For example, 'AB and CD wrote the main manuscript text and EF prepared figures 1–3. All authors reviewed the manuscript.'

    Corresponding author – prepublication responsibilities

    The corresponding (submitting) author is solely responsible for communicating with Computer Science and for managing communication between co-authors. Before submission, the corresponding author ensures that all authors are included in the author list, its order has been agreed by all authors, and that all authors are aware that the paper was submitted.

    After acceptance, the proof is sent to the corresponding author, who deals with Computer Science on the behalf of all co-authors; Computer Science will not necessarily correct errors after publication if they result from errors that were present on a proof that was not shown to co-authors before publication. The corresponding author is responsible for the accuracy of all content in the proof, in particular that names of co-authors are present and correctly spelled, and that addresses and affiliations are current.

    Corresponding author- responsibilities after publication

    Computer Science regards the corresponding author as the point of contact for queries about the published paper. It is this author's responsibility to inform all co-authors of matters arising and to ensure such matters are dealt with p_r_o_m_p_tly. This author does not have to be the senior author of the paper or the author who actually supplies materials; this author's role is to ensure enquiries are answered p_r_o_m_p_tly on behalf of all the co-authors. The name and email address of this author is published in the paper.

    Correcting the record

    Authors of published material have a responsibility to inform Computer Science p_r_o_m_p_tly if they become aware of any part that requires correcting.

    A confidential process

    Computer Science treats the submitted manuscript and all communication with authors and referees as confidential. Authors must also treat communication with Computer Science as confidential: correspondence with Computer Science, referee reports and other confidential material must not be posted on any website or otherwise publicized without prior permission from the Computer Science publishing team, regardless of whether or not the submission is eventually published.

    Referee suggestions

    Authors are welcome to suggest suitable independent referees when they submit their manuscript, but these suggestions may not be used by Computer Science. Authors may also request that Computer Science excludes a few (usually not more than two) individuals or laboratories. Computer Sciencesympathetically considers such exclusion requests and usually honours them, but the decision of the Editorial Board Member on the choice of referees is final.

    Copyright & License

    For all articles published in Computer Science, copyright is retained by the authors. Anyone can download and read the paper for free, meaning that Computer Science is Open Access. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work, while ensuring that the authors receive proper credit.
    In exceptional circumstances articles may be licensed differently. If you have specific condition (such as one linked to funding) that does not allow this license, please mention this to the editorial office of the journal at submission. Exceptions will be granted at the discretion of the publisher.

    Reproducing Published Material from other Publishers

    It is absolutely essential that authors obtain permission to reproduce any published material (figures, schemes, tables or any extract of a text) which does not fall into the public domain, or for which they do not hold the copyright. Permission should be requested by the authors from the copyrightholder (usually the Publisher, please refer to the imprint of the individual publications to identify the copyrightholder).
    Permission is required for:
     ● Your own works published by other Publishers and for which you did not retain copyright.
     ● Substantial extracts from anyones' works or a series of works.
     ● Use of Tables, Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks if they are unaltered or slightly modified.
     ● Photographs for which you do not hold copyright.
    Permission is not required for:
     ● Reconstruction of your own table with data already published elsewhere. Please notice that in this case you must cite the source of the data in the form of either 'Data from...' or 'Adapted from...'.
     ● Reasonably short quotes are considered fair use and therefore do not require permission.
     ● Graphs, Charts, Schemes and Artworks that are completely redrawn by the authors and significantly changed beyond recognition do not require permission.

    Obtaining Permission

    In order to avoid unnecessary delays in the publication process, you should start obtaining permissions as early as possible. If in any doubt about the copyright, apply for permission. Computer Science cannot publish material from other publications without permission.
    The copyright holder may give you instructions on the form of acknowledgement to be followed; otherwise follow the style: 'Reproduced with permission from [author], [journal title]; published by [publisher], [year].' at the end of the caption of the Table, Figure or Scheme.

    Availability of materials and data

    An inherent principle of publication is that others should be able to replicate and build upon the authors' published claims. Therefore, a condition of publication in Computer Science is that authors are required to make materials, data and associated protocols p_r_o_m_p_tly available to readers without undue qualifications in material transfer agreements. Any restrictions on the availability of materials or information must be disclosed to the publishing team at the time of submission. Any restrictions must also be disclosed in the submitted manuscript, including details of how readers can obtain materials and information. If materials are to be distributed by a for-profit company, this must be stated in the paper.

    Supporting data must be made available to Editorial Board Members and referees at the time of submission for the purposes of evaluating the manuscript. Referees may be asked to comment on the terms of access to materials, methods and/or data sets; Computer Science reserves the right to refuse publication in cases where authors do not provide adequate assurances that they can comply with the publication's requirements for sharing materials.

    Sharing datasets

    A condition of publication in Computer Science is that authors make materials, data and associated protocols p_r_o_m_p_tly available to others without preconditions.

    Datasets must be made freely available to readers from the date of publication, and must be provided to Editorial Board Members and referees at submission, for the purposes of evaluating the manuscript.

    Digital image integrity and standards

    High-resolution images are required at initial submission. A certain degree of image processing is acceptable for publication (and for some experiments, fields and techniques is unavoidable), but the final image must correctly represent the original data and conform to community standards. The guidelines below will aid in accurate data presentation at the image processing level; authors must also take care to exercise prudence during data acquisition, where misrepresentation must equally be avoided. Manuscripts should include an 'equipment and settings' section with their methods that describes for each figure the pertinent instrument settings, acquisition conditions and processing changes, as described in this guide. 

     Authors should list all image acquisition tools and image processing software packages used. Authors should document key image-gathering settings and processing manipulations in the methods.

    Images gathered at different times or from different locations should not be combined into a single image, unless it is stated that the resultant image is a product of time-averaged data or a time-lapse sequence. If juxtaposing images is essential, the borders should be clearly demarcated in the figure and described in the legend.

     The use of touch-up tools, such as cloning and healing tools in Photoshop, or any feature that deliberately obscures manipulations, is to be avoided.

     Processing (such as changing brightness and contrast) is appropriate only when it is applied equally across the entire image and is applied equally to controls. Contrast should not be adjusted so that data disappear. Excessive manipulations, such as processing to emphasize one region in the image at the expense of others (e.g. through the use of a biased choice of threshold settings), is inappropriate.

    When submitting revised final figures upon conditional acceptance, authors may be asked to submit original, unprocessed images.


    Authors should be prepared to supply Computer Science with original data on request, at the resolution collected, from which their images were generated.

    Adjustments should be applied to the entire image. Threshold manipulation, expansion or contraction of signal ranges and the altering of high signals should be avoided. If 'pseudo-colouring' and nonlinear adjustment (e.g. 'gamma changes') are used, this must be disclosed. Adjustments of individual colour channels are sometimes necessary on 'merged' images, but this should be noted in the figure legend.

    We encourage inclusion of the following with the final revised version of the manuscript for publication:

    ● In the methods, specify the type of equipment (microscopes/objective lenses, cameras, detectors, filter model and batch number) and acquisition software used. Although we appreciate that there is some variation between instruments, equipment settings for critical measurements should also be listed.

    ● An 'equipment and settings' section within the methods should list for each image: acquisition information, including time and space resolution data (xyzt and pixel dimensions); image bit depth; experimental conditions such as temperature and imaging medium.

    ● Processing software should be named and manipulations indicated (such as type of deconvolution, three-dimensional reconstructions, surface and volume rendering, 'gamma changes', filtering, thresholding and projection).

    ● Authors should state the measured resolution at which an image was acquired and any downstream processing or averaging that enhances the resolution of the image.

    Biosecurity concerns

    Policy on biosecurity

    Computer Science’s Editorial Board Members may seek advice from the Editorial Advisory Panel and the in-house publishing team about any aspect of a submitted manuscript that raises concerns. These may include, for example, ethical issues or issues of data or materials access. Very occasionally, concerns may also relate to the implications to society of publishing a paper, including threats to security. In such circumstances, advice will usually be sought simultaneously with the technical peer-review process.

    Corrections and retractions

    Correction and retraction policy

    Computer Science operates the following policy for making corrections to its peer-reviewed content.The publishers and editors are willing to present correction,retractions and apologies.

    Publishable amendments must be represented by a formal online notice because they affect the publication record and/or the scientific accuracy of published information. Where these amendments concern peer-reviewed material, they fall into one of four categories: Publisher Correction (formerly Erratum), Author Correction (formerly Corrigendum), Retraction or Addendum.

    Publisher Correction (formerly Erratum). Notification of an important error made by the journal that affects the publication record or the scientific integrity of the paper, or the reputation of the authors or the journal.

    Author Correction (formerly Corrigendum). Notification of an important error made by the author(s) that affects the publication record or the scientific integrity of the paper, or the reputation of the authors or the journal.

    Retraction. Notification of invalid results. All co-authors must sign a Retraction specifying the error and stating briefly how the conclusions are affected, and submit it for publication. In cases where co-authors disagree, the in-house editors may seek advice from independent referees and impose the type of amendment that seems most appropriate, noting the dissenting author(s) in the text of the published version.

    Addendum. Notification of additional information. Addenda are published when the in-house editors decide that the addendum is crucial to the reader's understanding of a significant part of the published contribution.

    Editorial decision-making

    Decisions about types of correction are made by the journal's in-house editors, sometimes with the advice of referees, Editorial Advisory Panel or Editorial Board Members. This process involves consultation with the authors of the paper, but the in-house editors make the final decision about whether an amendment is required and the category in which the amendment is published.

    Authors sometimes request a correction to their published contribution that does not affect the contribution in a significant way or impair the reader's understanding of the contribution (e.g. a spelling mistake or grammatical error). Computer Science does not publish such corrections. The online article is part of the published record and hence its original published version is preserved.

    Detailed description of correction types

    Publisher Corrections (formerly Errata) concern the amendment of mistakes introduced by the journal in production, including errors of omission such as failure to make factual proof corrections requested by authors within the deadline provided by the journal and within journal policy. Publisher Corrections are generally not published for simple, obvious typographical errors, but are published when an apparently simple error is significant (e.g. a greek mu for an ‘m' in a unit, or a typographical error in the corresponding author's name).

    If there is an error in the lettering on a figure, the usual procedure is to publish a sentence of rectification. A significant error in the figure itself is corrected by publication of a new corrected figure as a Publisher Correction. The figure is republished only if the Editorial Board Member considers it necessary for a reader to understand it.

    Author Corrections (formerly Corrigenda) are judged on their relevance to readers and their importance for the published record. Author Corrections are published after discussion among the Editorial Board Members, Editorial Advisory Panel and the publishing team. All co-authors must sign an agreed wording.

    Author Corrections submitted by the original authors are published if the scientific accuracy or reproducibility of the original paper is compromised; occasionally, on investigation, these may be published as Retractions. In cases where some co-authors decline to sign an Author Correction or Retraction, we reserve the right to publish it with the dissenting author(s) identified. 

    Retractions are judged according to whether the main conclusion of the paper no longer holds or is seriously undermined as a result of subsequent information coming to light of which the authors were not aware at the time of publication. In the case of experimental papers, this can include further experiments by the authors or by others that do not confirm the main experimental conclusion of the original publication. Readers wishing to draw the Editorial Board Members' attention to published work requiring retraction should first contact the authors of the original paper and then write to the publishing team, including copies of the correspondence with the authors (whether or not the correspondence has been answered). The publishing team and Editorial Board Member will seek advice from referees if they judge that the information is likely to draw into question the main conclusions of the published paper.

    Addendum. Notification of additional information about a paper, usually in response to readers' request for clarification. Addenda, including Editorial Expressions of Concern, are published when the in-house editors decide that the addendum is crucial to the reader's understanding of a significant part of the published contribution.

    Duplicate publication

    Material submitted to Computer Science must be original and not published or submitted for publication elsewhere. This rule applies to material submitted elsewhere while the Computer Science contribution is under consideration.

    Authors submitting a contribution to Computer Science who have related material under consideration or in press elsewhere should upload a clearly marked copy at the time of submission, and draw the Editorial Board Members' attention to it in their cover letter. Authors must disclose any such information while their contributions are under consideration by Computer Science – for example, if they submit a related manuscript elsewhere that was not written at the time of the original Computer Science submission.

    If part of a contribution that an author wishes to submit to Computer Science has appeared or will appear elsewhere, the author must specify the details in the covering letter accompanying the submission. Consideration by Computer Science is possible if the main result, conclusion, or implications are not apparent from the other work, or if there are other factors, for example if the other work is published in a language other than English.

    Computer Science allows publication of meeting abstracts before the full contribution is submitted. Such abstracts should be included with the submission and referred to in the cover letter accompanying the manuscript. This policy does not extend to meeting abstracts and reports available to the media or which are otherwise publicized outside the scientific community during the submission and consideration process.

    Computer Science is happy to consider submissions containing material that has previously formed, and continues to form, part of an online scientific collaboration such as a wiki or blog, provided that the information has not been publicized outside the scientific community, and is not publicized until the publication date of the work in Computer Science . In case of any doubt, authors should seek advice from the Editorial Board Member handling their contribution.

    If an author of a submission is re-using a figure or figures published elsewhere, or that is copyrighted, the author must provide documentation that the previous publisher or copyright holder has given permission for the figure to be re-published. Computer Science Editorial Board Members consider all material in good faith that the publication has full permission to publish every part of the submitted material, including illustrations.

    Confidentiality and pre-publicity


    Computer Science keeps all details about a submitted manuscript confidential and does not comment to any outside organization about manuscripts that are either under consideration or that have been rejected.

    After a manuscript is submitted, correspondence with Computer Science, referees' reports and other confidential material, regardless of whether or not the submission is eventually published, must not be posted on any website or otherwise publicized without prior permission. The Editorial Board Members themselves are not allowed to discuss manuscripts with third parties or to reveal information about correspondence and other interactions with authors and referees.

    Referees of manuscripts submitted to Computer Science undertake in advance to maintain confidentiality of manuscripts and any associated supplementary data.


    Our policy on the posting of particular versions of the manuscript is as follows:
    1. You are welcome to post pre-submission versions or the original submitted version of the manuscript on a personal blog, a collaborative wiki or a recognised preprint server at any time. The website and URL must be identified in the cover letter accompanying submission of the paper to Computer Science.
    2. Computer Science supports open communication between researchers, whether on a recognised preprint server, through discussions at research meetings, or via online collaborative sites such as wikis.  Neither conference presentations nor posting on recognised preprint servers constitute prior publication. 

    Computer Science' s Editorial Board members assess all such cases on their individual merits. When plagiarism becomes evident post-publication, we may correct or retract the original publication depending on the degree of plagiarism, context within the published article and its impact on the overall integrity of the published study.

    Due credit for others' work

    Discussion of unpublished work: Manuscripts are sent out for review on the condition that any unpublished data cited within are properly credited and the appropriate permission has been sought. Where licensed data are cited, authors must include at submission a written assurance that they are complying with originators' data-licensing agreements.

    Referees are encouraged to be alert to the use of appropriated unpublished data from databases or from any other source, and to inform Computer Science of any concern they may have.

    Discussion of published work: When discussing the published work of others, authors must properly describe the contribution of the earlier work. Both intellectual contributions and technical developments must be acknowledged as such and appropriately cited.

2019-03-19 Visited: 765