Computer Science ›› 2018, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (12): 166-169.doi: 10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2018.12.026

• Artificial Intelligence • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Decision Making Approach Based on Evidential Reasoning Considering SemanticRelationship among Assessment Grades

ZHANG Mei-jing1,2, WANG Ying-ming1   

  1. (Decision Sciences Institute,Fuzhou University,Fuzhou 350106,China)1
    (Department of Computer and Information Security Management,Fujian Police College,Fuzhou 350108,China)2
  • Received:2017-11-06 Online:2018-12-15 Published:2019-02-25

Abstract: In the framework of evidential reasoning,assessment information is aggregated by Dempster-Shafter Theory,which will bring the disadvantage of information leak in the process of aggregation using orthogonal summationmode without considering the semantic relationship among assessment grades.From the viewpoint of semantics and degree of assessment grades,a new algorithm for separately aggregating information was proposed based on the relationship among assessment grades.An improved framework for evidential reasoning was established based on the new fusion algorithm,and relevant decision-making model and decision-making process were provided.At last,a complete numerical example was utilized to demonstrate the application of this approach.Compared with the application of new and old methods in the example,the feature of the new method was investigated.

Key words: Evidential reasoning, Information fusion, Multi-attribute decision making, Semantic relationship among assessment grades

CLC Number: 

  • C934
[1]WALCAZAK D,RUTKOWSKA A.Project rankings for participatory budget based on the fuzzy TOPSIS method[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2017,260(2):706-714.
[2]REN P,XU Z,HAO Z.Hesitant Fuzzy Thermodynamic Methodfor Emergency Decision Making Based on Prospect Theory[J].IEEE Transactionson on Cybernetics,2016,47(9):2531-2543.
[3]YU X,ZHANG S,LIAO X,et al.ELECTRE Methods in Prioritized MCDM Environment[J].Information Sciences,2018,424:301-316.
[4]AHN B S.The analytic hierarchy process with interval prefe-rence statements[J].Omega,2016,67:177-185.
[5]YANG J B,SINGH M G.An evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision making with uncertainty[J].IEEE Transactions on Systems Man & Cybernetics,1994,24(1):1-18.
[6]ZHANG M J,WANG Y M,LI L H,CHEN S Q.A general evidential reasoning algorithm for multi-attribute decision analysis under interval uncertainty[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2017,257(3):1005-1015.
[7]WANG Y M,YANG J B,XU D L.Environmental impact as-sessment using the evidential reasoning approach[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2006,174(3):1885-1913.
[8]CHEN S Q,WANG Y M.Grouping method for combining evi-dence[J].Control and Decision,2013,8(4):574-578.(in Chinese)
陈圣群,王应明.证据的分组合成法[J].控制与决策,2013,8(4):574-578.
[9]FU Y G,YANG L H,WU Y J.Evidential Reasoning Approach for Solving Complex Evaluation Models[J].Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence,2014,27(4):313-326.(in Chinese)
傅仰耿,杨隆浩,吴英杰.面向复杂评价模型的证据推理方法[J].模式识别与人工智能,2014,27(4):313-326.
[10]XU D L,YANG JB,WANG Y M.The evidential reasoning approach for multi-attribute decision analysis under interval uncertainty[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2006,174(3):1914-1943.
[11]WANG Y M,YANG J B,XU D L,et al.The evidential reaso-ning approach for multiple attribute decision analysis using interval belief degrees[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2006,175(1):35-66.
[12]KE X L,MA L Y,LI Z Y,et al.PropertyResearch and Approach Modification of Evidential Reasoning Rule[J].Information and Control,2016,45(2):165-170.(in Chinese)
柯小路,马荔瑶,李子懿,等.证据推理规则的性质研究及方法修正[J].信息与控制,2016,45(2):165-170.
[13]DU Y W,WANG Y M.Evidence combination rule with contrary support in the evidential reasoning approach[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2017,88:193-204.
[14]CHEN S Q,WANG Y,SHI H L,et al.Evidential reasoningwith discrete belief structures[J].Information Fusion,2018,41:91-104.
[15]段新生.证据决策[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1996.
[16]WANG Y M,YANG J B,XU D L,et al.On the combination and normalizationof interval-valued belief structures[J].Information Sciences,2007,177(5):1230-1247.CHEN P,HE K,YU X S.Non-Subjective Approximation Algorithm Based on Evidential Levels .Journal of Chongqing Institute of Technology(Natural Science),2018,32(9):137-143,156.(in Chinese)
陈鹏,何凯,余肖生.基于证据等级的非主观近似算法[J].重庆理工大学学报(自然科学),2018,32(9):137-143,156.
[1] YAN Jia-dan, JIA Cai-yan. Text Classification Method Based on Information Fusion of Dual-graph Neural Network [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(8): 230-236.
[2] ZHANG Yuan, KANG Le, GONG Zhao-hui, ZHANG Zhi-hong. Related Transaction Behavior Detection in Futures Market Based on Bi-LSTM [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(7): 31-39.
[3] ZHOU Chu-lin, CHEN Jing-dong, HUANG Fan. WiFi-PDR Fusion Indoor Positioning Technology Based on Unscented Particle Filter [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(6A): 606-611.
[4] LIU Zhi-xin, ZHANG Ze-hua, ZHANG Jie. Top-N Recommendation Method for Graph Attention Based on Multi-level and Multi-view [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(4): 104-110.
[5] LIU Shan-shan, ZHU Hai-long, HAN Xiao-xia, MU Quan-qi, HE Wei. Enterprise Risk Assessment Model Based on Principal Component Regression and HierarchicalBelief Rule Base [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(11A): 570-575.
[6] ZHANG Liang-cheng, WANG Yun-feng. Dynamic Adaptive Multi-radar Tracks Weighted Fusion Method [J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(11A): 321-326.
[7] SUN Zhi-gang, WANG Guo-tao, JIANG Ai-ping, GAO Meng-meng, LIU Jin-gang. Monitoring System of Traffic Safety Based on Information Fusion Technology [J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(11A): 642-650.
[8] ZHANG Biao, DONG Meng-yu, FAN Bei-bei. Enterprise Performance Evaluation Model Based on Triangular Fuzzy Multi-attribute Decision Making [J]. Computer Science, 2019, 46(6A): 547-549.
[9] LU Cheng-hua, KOU Ji-song. Multi-attribute Decision Making and Adaptive Genetic Algorithm for Solving QoS Optimization of Web Service Composition [J]. Computer Science, 2019, 46(2): 187-195.
[10] CHEN Ting-ting,WANG Ying-ming. Structure Identification of Belief-rule-base Based on AR Model [J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(6A): 79-84.
[11] GUO Song-hui, GONG Xue-rong, WANG Wei, LI Qing-bao and SUN Lei. I/O Scheduling Algorithm Based on Dynamic Prioritization in Virtual Machines [J]. Computer Science, 2017, 44(1): 13-19.
[12] ZHAO Ying-xiu, LIU Wen-qi, LI Jin-hai and ZHAO Ning. Credit Evaluation of P2P Lending User Based on Granular Computing and Information Fusion [J]. Computer Science, 2016, 43(9): 242-246.
[13] DENG Zhen-wen, SUN Qi-yuan, JIA Yun-wei and YUAN Zhi-qian. Some Fusion Algorithms Used in Localization of Gas Leakage Source [J]. Computer Science, 2016, 43(8): 212-215.
[14] LIU Zhe-xi, HONG Chun-zhe, YANG Jian-hong and YANG De-bin. Improved Combination Approach for Bodies of Evidence Containing Non-singleton Evidence [J]. Computer Science, 2015, 42(Z6): 10-12.
[15] LI Zhao-ni,MA Zhan-you and LI Yong-ming. Research on Management Decision of Project Based on Possibility Measure [J]. Computer Science, 2014, 41(8): 118-121.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!