计算机科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (6): 306-314.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.201200194

• 信息安全 • 上一篇    下一篇

假消息认知机理研究综述

吴广智, 郭斌, 丁亚三, 成家慧, 於志文   

  1. 西北工业大学计算机学院 西安710129
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-22 修回日期:2021-03-10 出版日期:2021-06-15 发布日期:2021-06-03
  • 通讯作者: 郭斌(guob@nwpu.edu.cn)
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点科研项目(2017YFB1001803);国家自然科学研究基金(61772428,61725205,61902320,61972319)

Cognitive Mechanisms of Fake News

WU Guang-zhi, GUO Bin, DING Ya-san, CHENG Jia-hui, YU Zhi-wen   

  1. School of Computer Science,Northwestern Polytechnical University,Xi’an 710129,China
  • Received:2020-12-22 Revised:2021-03-10 Online:2021-06-15 Published:2021-06-03
  • About author:WU Guang-zhi,born in 1997,postgra-duate.His main research interests include cognitive mechanisms of fake news and so on.(1137225311@qq.com)
    GUO Bin,born in 1980,Ph.D,professor,Ph.D supervisor,is a member of China Computer Federation.His main research interests include pervasive computing,mobile group intelligence perception and big data intelligence.
  • Supported by:
    National Key R&D Program of China(2017YFB1001803) and National Natural Science Foundation of China(61772428,61725205,61902320,61972319).

摘要: 社交媒体时代的到来在加速信息流动的同时也为假消息的迅速传播提供了温床。假消息可能会对群众的认知产生严重的干扰,致使群众做出错误的决策,从而扰乱社会秩序,干扰政治选举,对社会造成许多负面影响。现有研究缺乏对假消息认知机理的总结归纳,为了探索人在阅读假消息时的心理与神经生理基础,文中对假消息的来源、传播和社会影响进行了更深入的研究,从而为纠正假消息提供指导。文中定义了假消息认知机理,总结了两种研究假消息认知机理的方法:认知实验方法和数据分析方法。认知实验方法分为内部心理状态、外部社会环境、纠正假消息、跨领域认知机理4部分。数据分析方法分为政治类假消息认知机理和非政治类假消息认知机理两部分。最后对未来研究方向提出3点思考,分别是辟谣策略、深度假消息认知机理挖掘和疫情类假消息认知机理研究。

关键词: 假消息, 脑电信号, 认知机理, 数据分析, 眼动追踪

Abstract: The advent of the social media era not only accelerates the flow of information,but also provides a breeding ground for the rapid spread of fake news.Fake news may seriously interfere with the perception of the masses` cognition,causing the masses to make wrong decisions,disrupt social order,interfere with political elections,and cause many negative social effects.Existing research lacks a summary of the cognitive mechanism of fake news.In order to explore the psychological and neural basis of reading fake news,this paper has a deeper understanding of the source,spread and social impact of fake news,so as to provide guidance for correcting fake news.This paper defines the cognitive mechanism of fake news,and summarizes two methods for studying the cognitive mechanism of fake news:cognitive experiment method and data analysis method.Cognitive experiment methods are summarized into four parts:internal mental state,external social environment,correcting fake news,and cross-domain cognitive mechanism.The data analysis method is summarized into two parts:the cognitive mechanism of political fake news and the cognitive mechanism of non-political fake news.Finally,three points of thinking are put forward for the future research direction,namely,rumor-defying strategies,deep fake news cognitive mechanism mining,and epidemic-type fake news cognitive mechanism research.

Key words: Cognitive mechanism, Data analysis, EEG signal, Eye tracking, Fake news

中图分类号: 

  • TP391
[1]ALLEN J,HOWLAND B,MOBIUS M,et al.Evaluating the fake news problem at the scale of the information ecosystem[J].Science Advances,2020,6(14):eaay3539.
[2]SMITH A.Algorithms in action:The content people see on social media[R].Pew Research Centre,2018.
[3]ZHAO Z,RESNICK P,MEI Q.Enquiring minds:Early detec-tion of rumors in social media from enquiry posts[C]//Procee-dings of the 24th Internatio-nal Conference on World Wide Web.International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee,2015:1395-1405.
[4]JIN Z,CAO J,GUO H,et al.Detection and analysis of 2016 US presidential election related rumors on twitter[C]//Internatio-nal Conference on Social Computing,Behavioral-cultural Mode-ling and Prediction and Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation.Cham:Springer,2017:14-24.
[5]CAO J,GUO J,LI X,et al.Automatic rumor detection on microblogs:A survey[J].arXiv:1807.03505,2018.
[6]LAZER D M J,BAUM M A,BENKLER Y,et al.The science of fake news[J].Science,2018,359(6380):1094-1096.
[7]BOVET A,MAKSE H A.Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election[J].Nature Communications,2019,10(1):1-14.
[8]GRINBERG N,JOSEPH K,FRIEDLAND L,et al.Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election[J].Science,2019,363(6425):374-378.
[9]GUO B,DING Y,SUN Y,et al.The Mass,Fake News,and Cognition Security[J].arXiv:1907.07759,2019.
[10]PIERRI F,CERI S.False news on social media:a data-driven survey[J].ACM Sigmod Record,2019,48(2):18-27.
[11]ZHANG P,SOERGEL D.Cognitive mechanisms in sense-making:A qualitative user study[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2020,71(2):158-171.
[12]PENG X,JIAO C,CUI F,et al.The time course of indirect mo-ral judgment in gossip processing modulated by different agents[J].Psychophysiology,2017,54(10):1459-1471.
[13]PENG X,LI Y,WANG P,et al.The ugly truth:negative gossip about celebrities and positive gossip about self entertain people in different ways[J].Social Neuroscience,2015,10(3):320-336.
[14]NUMMENMAA L,GLEREAN E,VIINIKAINEN M,et al.Emotions promote social interaction by synchronizing brain activity across individuals[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2012,109(24):9599-9604.
[15]GUMELAR G,ERIK E,MAULANA H.The Effect of Need for Cognition and Need for Affection on the Intention of Spreading Fake News[J].Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun,2020,8(1):99-108.
[16]LEWANDOWSKY S,ECKER U K H,SEIFERT C M,et al.Misinformation and its correction:Continued influence and successful debiasing[J].Psychological Science in the Public In-terest,2012,13(3):106-131.
[17]KANTOWITZ B H,ROEDIGER III H L,ELMES D G.Experimental psychology[M].Nelson Education,2014.
[18]ARIELY D,BERNS G S.Neuromarketing:the hope and hype of neuroimaging in business[J].Nature Reviews Neuroscience,2010,11(4):284-292.
[19]HASSON U,NIR Y,LEVY I,et al.Intersubject synchronization of cortical activity during natural vision[J].Science,2004,303(5664):1634-1640.
[20]FALK E B,O’DONNELL M B,TOMPSON S,et al.Functional brain imaging predicts public health campaign success[J].Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience,2016,11(2):204-214.
[21]PENNYCOOK G,RAND D G.Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity,overclaiming,familiarity,and analy-tic thinking[J].Journal of Personality,2020,88(2):185-200.
[22]GOTO N,MUSHTAQ F,SHEE D,et al.Neural signals of selective attention are modulated by subjective preferences and buying decisions in a virtual shopping task[J].Biological Psychology,2017,128:11-20.
[23]SCHOLZ C,BAEK E C,O’DONNELL M B,et al.A neural model of valuation and information virality[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2017,114(11):2881-2886.
[24]BAGO B,RAND D G,PENNYCOOK G.Fake news,fast and slow:Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,2020,149(8):1608-1613.
[25]PENNYCOOK G,RAND D G.Lazy,not biased:Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning[J].Cognition,2018,188:39-50.
[26]BASOL M,ROOZENBEEK J,VAN DER LINDEN S.Goodnews about bad news:gamified inoculation boosts confidence and cognitive immunity against fake news[J].Journal of Cognition,2020,3(1):2.
[27]BERGSTROM C T,BAK-COLEMAN J B.Information gerrymandering in social networks skews collective decision-making[J].Nature,2019,573(7772):40-41.
[28]BERNS G S,MOORE S E.A neural predictor of cultural popularity[J].Journal of Consumer Psychology,2012,22(1):154-160.
[29]ECKER U K H,HOGAN J L,LEWANDOWSKY S.Reminders and repetition of misinformation:Helping or hindering its retraction[J].Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition,2017,6(2):185-192.
[30]SWIRE B,ECKER U K H,LEWANDOWSKY S.The role of familiarity in correcting inaccurate information[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,2017,43(12):1948.
[31]DAUGHERTY T,HOFFMAN E,KENNEDY K.Research in reverse:Ad testing using an inductive consumer neuroscience approach[J].Journal of Business Research,2016,69(8):3168-3176.
[32]GOTO N,MUSHTAQ F,SHEE D,et al.Neural signals of selective attention are modulated by subjective preferences and buying decisions in a virtual shopping task[J].Biological Psychology,2017,128:11-20.
[33]GAUBA H,KUMAR P,ROY P P,et al.Prediction of advertisement preference by fusing EEG response and sentiment analysis[J].Neural Networks,2017,92:77-88.
[34]Can Brain Scans Predict Music Sales?[EB/OL].http://www.lucaslaursen.com/clips/matchmaker.pdf.
[35]DEITZ G D,ROYNE M B,PEASLEY M C,et al.EEG-basedmeasures versus panel ratings:Predicting social media-based behavioral response to Super Bowl ads[J].Journal of Advertising Research,2016,56(2):217-227.
[36]NOMURA T,MITSUKURA Y.EEG-based detection of TVcommercials effects[J].Procedia Computer Science,2015,60:131-140.
[37]ARAPAKIS I,BARREDA-ANGELES M,PEREDA-BANOSA.Interest as a proxy of engagement in news reading:Spectral and entropy analyses of EEG activity patterns[J].IEEE Tran-sactions on Affective Computing,2019,10(1):100-114.
[38]LI X,SONG D,ZHANG P,et al.Emotion recognition frommulti-channel EEG data through convolutional recurrent neural network[C]//2016 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM).IEEE,2016:352-359.
[39]LIU Y J,YU M,ZHAO G,et al.Real-time movie-induced discrete emotion recognition from EEG signals[J].IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing,2017,9(4):550-562.
[40]JENKE R,PEER A,BUSS M.Feature extraction and selection for emotion recognition from EEG[J].IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing,2014,5(3):327-339.
[41]SOLEYMANI M,PANTIC M,PUN T.Multimodal emotionrecognition in response to videos[J].IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing,2011,3(2):211-223.
[42]DING Y,HU X,XIA Z,et al.Inter-brain EEG feature extraction and analysis for continuous implicit emotion tagging during video watching[J].IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing,2018,12(1):92-102.
[43]SHU K,MAHUDESWARAN D,WANG S,et al.FakeNews-Net:A Data Repository with News Content,Social Context,and Spatiotemporal Information for Studying Fake News on Social Media[J].Big Data,2020,8(3):171-188.
[44]RIBEIRO M H,CALAIS P H,ALMEIDA V A F,et al.“Everything I Disagree With is# FakeNews”:Correlating Political Polarization and Spread of Misinformation[J].arXiv:1706.05924,2017.
[45]BRASHIER N M,SCHACTER D L.Aging in an Era of Fake News[J].Current Directions in Psychological Science,2020:0963721420915872.
[46]KUŠEN E,STREMBECK M.Politics,sentiments,and misinformation:An analysis of the Twitter discussion on the 2016 Austrian Presidential Elections[J].Online Social Networks and Media,2018,5:37-50.
[47]BALMAS M.When fake news becomes real:Combined exposure to multiple news sources and political attitudes of inefficacy,alienation,and cynicism[J].Communication Research,2014,41(3):430-454.
[48]BUDAK C.What happened? the spread of fake news publisher content during the 2016 us presidential election[C]//The World Wide Web Conference.2019:139-150.
[49]WASZAK P M,KASPRZYCKA-WASZAK W,KUBANEK A.The spread of medical fake news in social media——the pilot quantitative study[J].Health Policy and Technology,2018,7(2):115-118.
[50]ZHAO Z,ZHAO J,SANO Y,et al.Fake news propagates diffe-rently from real news even at early stages of spreading[J].EPJ Data Science,2020,9(1):7.
[51]ARIF A,SHANAHAN K,CHOU F J,et al.How information snowballs:Exploring the role of exposure in online rumor propagation[C]//Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing.2016:466-477.
[52]SHAO C,CIAMPAGLIA G L,VAROL O,et al.The spread of low-credibility content by social bots[J].Nature Communications,2018,9(1):1-9.
[53]NGUYEN C T.Echo chambers and epistemic bubbles[J].Episteme,2020,17(2):141-161.
[54]DEL VICARIO M,BESSI A,ZOLLO F,et al.The spreading of misinformation online[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2016,113(3):554-559.
[55]BESSI A,PETRONI F,DEL VICARIO M,et al.Viral misinformation:The role of homophily and polarization[C]//Procee-dings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web.2015:355-356.
[56]BHATT I,MACKENZIE A.Just Google it! Digital literacy and the epistemology of ignorance[J].Teaching in Higher Education,2019,24(3):302-317.
[57]SPOHR D.Fake news and ideological polarization:Filter bub-bles and selective exposure on social media[J].Business Information Review,2017,34(3):150-160.
[58]CASSAM Q.Epistemic insouciance[J].Journal of Philosophical Research,2017,43:1-10.
[59]SOMMARIVA S,VAMOS C,MANTZARLIS A,et al.Sprea-ding the (fake) news:exploring health messages on social media and the implications for health professionals using a case study[J].American Journal of Health Education,2018,49(4):246-255.
[60]VOSOUGHI S,ROY D,ARAL S.The spread of true and false news online[J].Science,2018,359(6380):1146-1151.
[1] 杨炳新, 郭艳蓉, 郝世杰, 洪日昌.
基于数据增广和模型集成策略的图神经网络在抑郁症识别上的应用
Application of Graph Neural Network Based on Data Augmentation and Model Ensemble in Depression Recognition
计算机科学, 2022, 49(7): 57-63. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.210800070
[2] 高越, 傅湘玲, 欧阳天雄, 陈松龄, 闫晨巍.
基于时空自适应图卷积神经网络的脑电信号情绪识别
EEG Emotion Recognition Based on Spatiotemporal Self-Adaptive Graph ConvolutionalNeural Network
计算机科学, 2022, 49(4): 30-36. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.210900200
[3] 丛颖男, 王兆毓, 朱金清.
关于法律人工智能数据和算法问题的若干思考
Insights into Dataset and Algorithm Related Problems in Artificial Intelligence for Law
计算机科学, 2022, 49(4): 74-79. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.210900191
[4] 江昊琛, 魏子麒, 刘璘, 陈俊.
非均衡数据分类经典方法综述与面向医疗领域的实验分析
Imbalanced Data Classification:A Survey and Experiments in Medical Domain
计算机科学, 2022, 49(1): 80-88. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.210200124
[5] 余乐章, 夏天宇, 荆一楠, 何震瀛, 王晓阳.
面向大数据分析的智能交互向导系统
Smart Interactive Guide System for Big Data Analytics
计算机科学, 2021, 48(9): 110-117. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.200900083
[6] 张寒烁, 杨冬菊.
基于关系图谱的科技数据分析算法
Technology Data Analysis Algorithm Based on Relational Graph
计算机科学, 2021, 48(3): 174-179. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.191200154
[7] 胡腾, 王艳平, 张小松, 牛伟纳.
基于区块链的DApp数据与行为分析
Data and Behavior Analysis of Blockchain-based DApp
计算机科学, 2021, 48(11): 116-123. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.210200134
[8] 朱涤尘, 夏换, 杨秀璋, 于小民, 张亚成, 武帅.
基于文本挖掘和决策树分析的中国手游产业发展研究
Research on Mobile Game Industry Development in China Based on Text Mining and Decision Tree Analysis
计算机科学, 2020, 47(6A): 530-534. https://doi.org/10.11896/JsJkx.190700124
[9] 陈晋音, 张敦杰, 林翔, 徐晓东, 朱子凌.
基于影响力最大化策略的抑制虚假消息传播的方法
False Message Propagation Suppression Based on Influence Maximization
计算机科学, 2020, 47(6A): 17-23. https://doi.org/10.11896/JsJkx.190900086
[10] 王晓明,赵歆波.
阅读眼动追踪语料库的构建与应用研究综述
Survey of Construction and Application of Reading Eye-tracking Corpus
计算机科学, 2020, 47(3): 174-181. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.190800040
[11] 贾经冬, 张筱曼, 郝璐, 谭火彬.
工业界需求工程关注点分析
Analysis of Focuses of Requirements Engineering in Industry
计算机科学, 2020, 47(12): 25-34. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.201200048
[12] 冯贵兰, 李正楠, 周文刚.
大数据分析技术在网络领域中的研究综述
Research on Application of Big Data Analytics in Network
计算机科学, 2019, 46(6): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2019.06.001
[13] 黄美蓉, 欧博, 何思源.
一种基于特征提取的访问控制方法
Access Control Method Based on Feature Extraction
计算机科学, 2019, 46(2): 109-114. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2019.02.017
[14] 李炎, 马俊明, 安博, 曹东刚.
一个基于Web的轻量级大数据处理与可视化工具
Web Based Lightweight Tool for Big Data Processing and Visualization
计算机科学, 2018, 45(9): 60-64. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2018.09.008
[15] 达一菲, 刘旭东, 孙海龙.
大数据驱动的开发者社区中知识交流网络的分析
Big Data Driven Analysis of Knowledge Exchange Network in Developer Community
计算机科学, 2018, 45(9): 113-118. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2018.09.017
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!