一种考虑等级语义关联的证据推理决策方法

doi:10.11896／j.issn.1002-137X.2018.12.026

计算机科学 ›› 2018, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (12): 166-169.doi: 10.11896／j.issn.1002-137X.2018.12.026

一种考虑等级语义关联的证据推理决策方法

张美璟^1,2, 王应明¹

(福州大学决策科学研究所福州350106)¹
(福建警察学院计算机与信息安全管理系福州350108)²

收稿日期:2017-11-06 出版日期:2018-12-15 发布日期:2019-02-25
作者简介:张美璟(1981-),男,博士,讲师,CCF会员,主要研究方向为信息融合与决策分析,E-mail:zmjm2@163.com(通信作者);王应明(1964-),男,博士后,教授,博士生导师,主要研究方向为决策理论与方法、数据包络分析、规则库推理,E-mail:ymwang@fzu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
本文受国家自然科学基金项目(71371053),教育部人文社科青年项目(17YJC630213),福建省自然科学基金项目(2017J01514),福建省教育厅中青年教师教育科研项目(JAT160548)资助。

Decision Making Approach Based on Evidential Reasoning Considering SemanticRelationship among Assessment Grades

ZHANG Mei-jing^1,2, WANG Ying-ming¹

(Decision Sciences Institute,Fuzhou University,Fuzhou 350106,China)¹
(Department of Computer and Information Security Management,Fujian Police College,Fuzhou 350108,China)²

Received:2017-11-06 Online:2018-12-15 Published:2019-02-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 现有证据推理方法以证据理论为信息融合规则,并未考虑评估等级在语义上的关联关系,导致以正交求和方式进行信息融合时出现信息流失现象。从评估等级的语义和级别出发,提出一种基于等级语义关联的证据分类融合方法。基于新的证据融合模型,构建一个基于改进证据推理方法的多属性决策框架,并给出决策模型和决策流程。最后,通过一个案例演示了新方法的决策过程,并通过比较新旧方法在案例上的应用分析了新方法的特点。

关键词: 等级语义关联, 多属性决策, 信息融合, 证据推理

Abstract: In the framework of evidential reasoning,assessment information is aggregated by Dempster-Shafter Theory,which will bring the disadvantage of information leak in the process of aggregation using orthogonal summationmode without considering the semantic relationship among assessment grades.From the viewpoint of semantics and degree of assessment grades,a new algorithm for separately aggregating information was proposed based on the relationship among assessment grades.An improved framework for evidential reasoning was established based on the new fusion algorithm,and relevant decision-making model and decision-making process were provided.At last,a complete numerical example was utilized to demonstrate the application of this approach.Compared with the application of new and old methods in the example,the feature of the new method was investigated.

Key words: Evidential reasoning, Information fusion, Multi-attribute decision making, Semantic relationship among assessment grades

中图分类号:

C934

张美璟, 王应明. 一种考虑等级语义关联的证据推理决策方法[J]. 计算机科学, 2018, 45(12): 166-169. https://doi.org/10.11896／j.issn.1002-137X.2018.12.026

ZHANG Mei-jing, WANG Ying-ming. Decision Making Approach Based on Evidential Reasoning Considering SemanticRelationship among Assessment Grades[J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(12): 166-169. https://doi.org/10.11896／j.issn.1002-137X.2018.12.026

参考文献

[1]WALCAZAK D,RUTKOWSKA A.Project rankings for participatory budget based on the fuzzy TOPSIS method[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2017,260(2):706-714.
[2]REN P,XU Z,HAO Z.Hesitant Fuzzy Thermodynamic Methodfor Emergency Decision Making Based on Prospect Theory[J].IEEE Transactionson on Cybernetics,2016,47(9):2531-2543.
[3]YU X,ZHANG S,LIAO X,et al.ELECTRE Methods in Prioritized MCDM Environment[J].Information Sciences,2018,424:301-316.
[4]AHN B S.The analytic hierarchy process with interval prefe-rence statements[J].Omega,2016,67:177-185.
[5]YANG J B,SINGH M G.An evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision making with uncertainty[J].IEEE Transactions on Systems Man & Cybernetics,1994,24(1):1-18.
[6]ZHANG M J,WANG Y M,LI L H,CHEN S Q.A general evidential reasoning algorithm for multi-attribute decision analysis under interval uncertainty[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2017,257(3):1005-1015.
[7]WANG Y M,YANG J B,XU D L.Environmental impact as-sessment using the evidential reasoning approach[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2006,174(3):1885-1913.
[8]CHEN S Q,WANG Y M.Grouping method for combining evi-dence[J].Control and Decision,2013,8(4):574-578.(in Chinese)
陈圣群,王应明.证据的分组合成法[J].控制与决策,2013,8(4):574-578.
[9]FU Y G,YANG L H,WU Y J.Evidential Reasoning Approach for Solving Complex Evaluation Models[J].Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence,2014,27(4):313-326.(in Chinese)
傅仰耿,杨隆浩,吴英杰.面向复杂评价模型的证据推理方法[J].模式识别与人工智能,2014,27(4):313-326.
[10]XU D L,YANG JB,WANG Y M.The evidential reasoning approach for multi-attribute decision analysis under interval uncertainty[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2006,174(3):1914-1943.
[11]WANG Y M,YANG J B,XU D L,et al.The evidential reaso-ning approach for multiple attribute decision analysis using interval belief degrees[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2006,175(1):35-66.
[12]KE X L,MA L Y,LI Z Y,et al.PropertyResearch and Approach Modification of Evidential Reasoning Rule[J].Information and Control,2016,45(2):165-170.(in Chinese)
柯小路,马荔瑶,李子懿,等.证据推理规则的性质研究及方法修正[J].信息与控制,2016,45(2):165-170.
[13]DU Y W,WANG Y M.Evidence combination rule with contrary support in the evidential reasoning approach[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2017,88:193-204.
[14]CHEN S Q,WANG Y,SHI H L,et al.Evidential reasoningwith discrete belief structures[J].Information Fusion,2018,41:91-104.
[15]段新生.证据决策[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1996.
[16]WANG Y M,YANG J B,XU D L,et al.On the combination and normalizationof interval-valued belief structures[J].Information Sciences,2007,177(5):1230-1247.CHEN P,HE K,YU X S.Non-Subjective Approximation Algorithm Based on Evidential Levels .Journal of Chongqing Institute of Technology(Natural Science),2018,32(9):137-143,156.(in Chinese)
陈鹏,何凯,余肖生.基于证据等级的非主观近似算法[J].重庆理工大学学报(自然科学),2018,32(9):137-143,156.

相关文章 15

[1]	闫佳丹, 贾彩燕. 基于双图神经网络信息融合的文本分类方法 Text Classification Method Based on Information Fusion of Dual-graph Neural Network 计算机科学, 2022, 49(8): 230-236. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.210600042
[2]	张源, 康乐, 宫朝辉, 张志鸿. 基于Bi-LSTM的期货市场关联交易行为检测方法 Related Transaction Behavior Detection in Futures Market Based on Bi-LSTM 计算机科学, 2022, 49(7): 31-39. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.210400304
[3]	周楚霖, 陈敬东, 黄凡. 基于无迹粒子滤波的WiFi-PDR融合室内定位技术 WiFi-PDR Fusion Indoor Positioning Technology Based on Unscented Particle Filter 计算机科学, 2022, 49(6A): 606-611. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.210700108
[4]	刘志鑫, 张泽华, 张杰. 基于多层次多视角的图注意力Top-N推荐方法 Top-N Recommendation Method for Graph Attention Based on Multi-level and Multi-view 计算机科学, 2021, 48(4): 104-110. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.200800027
[5]	刘栅杉, 朱海龙, 韩晓霞, 穆全起, 贺维. 基于主成分回归和分层置信规则库的企业风险评估模型 Enterprise Risk Assessment Model Based on Principal Component Regression and HierarchicalBelief Rule Base 计算机科学, 2021, 48(11A): 570-575. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.201200038
[6]	张良成, 王运锋. 动态自适应的多雷达信息加权融合方法 Dynamic Adaptive Multi-radar Tracks Weighted Fusion Method 计算机科学, 2020, 47(11A): 321-326. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.2004000145
[7]	孙志刚, 王国涛, 蒋爱平, 高萌萌, 刘金钢. 基于信息融合技术的行车安全监测系统 Monitoring System of Traffic Safety Based on Information Fusion Technology 计算机科学, 2020, 47(11A): 642-650. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.200400133
[8]	张彪, 董梦雨, 樊蓓蓓. 基于三角模糊多属性决策的企业绩效评估模型 Enterprise Performance Evaluation Model Based on Triangular Fuzzy Multi-attribute Decision Making 计算机科学, 2019, 46(6A): 547-549.
[9]	陈德江, 王君, 张浩为. 基于直觉模糊多属性决策的动态威胁评估模型 Dynamic Threat Assessment Model Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making 计算机科学, 2019, 46(4): 183-188. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2019.04.029
[10]	鲁城华, 寇纪淞. 求解Web服务组合QoS优化的多属性决策及自适应遗传算法 Multi-attribute Decision Making and Adaptive Genetic Algorithm for Solving QoS Optimization of Web Service Composition 计算机科学, 2019, 46(2): 187-195. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2019.02.029
[11]	陈婷婷,王应明. 基于AR模型的置信规则库结构识别算法 Structure Identification of Belief-rule-base Based on AR Model 计算机科学, 2018, 45(6A): 79-84.
[12]	袁伟伟,孟繁伦,彭钧,孙宵,刘日初. 一种基于TOPSIS的卫星资源选择模型 TOPSIS Based Model for Satellite Resource Selection 计算机科学, 2018, 45(6A): 275-278.
[13]	郭松辉,龚雪容,王炜,李清宝,孙磊. 一种动态优先级排序的虚拟机I/O调度算法 I/O Scheduling Algorithm Based on Dynamic Prioritization in Virtual Machines 计算机科学, 2017, 44(1): 13-19. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2017.01.003
[14]	严聪,纪墨轩,纪庆革. 基于时空域信息融合的视频拷贝检测算法研究 Research on Video Copy Detection Algorithm Based on Spatial-Temporal Domain Informative Fusion 计算机科学, 2016, 43(9): 274-279. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2016.09.055
[15]	赵颖秀,刘文奇,李金海,赵宁. 基于粒计算与信息融合的P2P网贷用户信用评估 Credit Evaluation of P2P Lending User Based on Granular Computing and Information Fusion 计算机科学, 2016, 43(9): 242-246. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2016.09.048

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

一种考虑等级语义关联的证据推理决策方法

Decision Making Approach Based on Evidential Reasoning Considering SemanticRelationship among Assessment Grades

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0