计算机科学 ›› 2014, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 232-237.

• 人工智能 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于知识情感等级BDI主体的决策行为模型研究

张晓君,林颖,周昌乐   

  1. 四川师范大学政治教育学院 成都610066;宁德师范学院经济管理系 宁德352100;厦门大学智能科学与技术系 厦门361005
  • 出版日期:2018-11-14 发布日期:2018-11-14
  • 基金资助:
    本文受2013年教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目:基于BDI(信念、愿望和意图)逻辑的慎思Agent的行为决策研究(13YJA72040001),四川师范大学重点研究课题,国家自然科学基金项目:针对涉身行为的自我意识机器人构建方法及其实现(61273338,F030603)资助

Modeling Decision-making Behavior Based on Knowledge of Emotional Graded BDI Agents

ZHANG Xiao-jun,LIN Ying and ZHOU Chang-le   

  • Online:2018-11-14 Published:2018-11-14

摘要: 为了将知识、信念、愿望和意图以及害怕、焦虑和自信对决策行为的影响的强烈程度进行形式化,把无穷值的卢卡斯维茨逻辑的真值取值范围从[0,1]扩展到[-1,1]。知识情感等级BDI主体的决策行为通过添加了具体条件的不同背景的不同测度来决定;知识情感等级BDI主体模型清晰地表示了主体的知识状态、心智状态和情感状态的不确定性;此模型可以轻易地向其他类型的主体进行推广。在给出了知识情感等级BDI模型的语言、语义以及此模型的不同背景之间的相互关系之后,对知识情感等级BDI主体的军事决策行为进行了实例分析。此研究旨在为分布式人工智能和军事仿真提供形式支持。

关键词: 知识情感等级BDI主体,决策行为,知识状态,心智状态,情感状态 中图法分类号TP18/TP302文献标识码A

Abstract: In order to formalize the degree of influence of knowledge,belief,desire,intention,fear,anxiety and self-confidence on decision-making behavior,we extended the truth value of infinite-valued ukasiewicz Logic from [0,1] to [-1,1].The knowledge of emotional graded BDI agent’s decision-making behavior is determined by the different measure of each context which is added by concrete conditions.The knowledge of emotional graded BDI agent model in this paper explicitly represents the uncertainty of knowledge states,mental attitudes and emotional states.This model is general enough to specify other types of agents.After presenting the language and semantics for this model and illustrating interrelations between contexts for the model,an application of the knowledge of emotional graded BDI agent in military decision-making behavior was given.It is hoped that this study will make contribution to provide a formal support for distributed artificial intelligence and military simulation.

Key words: Knowledge of emotional graded BDI (Belief-Desire-Intention) agents,Decision-making behavior,Knowledge states,Mental attitudes,Emotional states

[1] 蔡自兴,徐光佑.人工智能及其应用(第4版)[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2010:208-209
[2] Rao A S,Georgeff M P.Modeling rational agents within a BDI-architecture [C]∥Proc.of the 2nd International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR-92).1991:473-484
[3] Rao A S,Georgeff M P.BDI agents:from theory to practice [C]∥Proc.of the 1st International Conference on Multi-Agents Systems.1995:312-319
[4] Rao A S,Georgeff M P.Decision procedures for BDI logic [J].Journal of Logic and Computation,1998,8(3):293-294
[5] Busetta P,et al.A reliable computational model for BDI agent [C]∥1st International Workshop on Safe Agents.2003:1-10
[6] 陈中祥.基于BDI Agent的CGF主体行为建模理论与技术研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2004
[7] Bordini R H,Hübner J F.BDI agent programming in agentspeak using Jason [C]∥Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems.Springer,2006:143-164
[8] G-Hernández A,et al.Learning in BDI multi-agent systems[C]∥Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems.Springer,2004:218-233
[9] 刘刚,等.基于活动的BDI主体形成机制及其应用[J].中南大学学报:自然科学版,2009(9增刊):25-28
[10] Pereira D,et al.Formal modeling of emotions in BDI agents[C]∥Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems.Springer,2008:62-81
[11] Casali A,et al.Graded BDI models for agent architecture [C]∥Computational Logic in Multi-agent Systems.Springer,2005:126-143
[12] Xiaojun Zhang,et al.Graded BDI models for agent architectures based on ukasiewicz logic and propositional dynamic logic [C]∥Lecture Notes in Computer Science 7529.Springer,2012:439-450
[13] Zhang Xiao-jun.Modelling emotional agents based on gradedBDI architectures [C]∥Communications in Computer and Information Science 345.Springer,2012:606-616
[14] Harel D,et al.Dynamic Logic [M].The MIT Press,2000
[15] Hájek P.Mathematics of Fuzzy Logic [M].Kluwer,1998
[16] Richard W P,Mavor A S.Modeling Human and Organization behavior:Application to Military Simulations [M].America:National Academic Press,1998
[17] Richard W P,Mavor A S.Representation Human Behavior inMilitary Simulation:Interim Report [M].America:National Academic Press,1997

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!