计算机科学 ›› 2018, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (10): 150-154.doi: 10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2018.10.028

• 信息安全 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于可信评价的医疗社区咨询检索优化算法

曹艳蓉, 章韵, 李涛, 李华康   

  1. 南京邮电大学计算机软件学院 南京210003
    江苏省大数据安全与智能处理实验室 南京210003
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-21 出版日期:2018-11-05 发布日期:2018-11-05
  • 作者简介:曹艳蓉(1992-),女,硕士生,主要研究方向为智能问答系统,E-mail:775702944@qq.com;章 韵(1963-),男,博士,教授,主要研究方向为计算机网络、物联网技术,E-mail:zhangyun@njupt.edu.cn(通信作者);李 涛(1975-),男,博士,教授,主要研究方向为数据挖掘;李华康(1982-),男,博士,讲师,主要研究方向为智慧城市、大数据应用。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(61502247,11501302,61502243,91646116),中国博士后科学基金(2016M600434),江苏省科技支撑计划(社会发展)项目(BE2016776),江苏省“六大人才高峰”项目(XYDXXJS-CXTD-006),江苏省博士后科研基金(1601128B)资助

Online Health Community Searching Method Based on Credible Evaluation

CAO Yan-rong, ZHANG Yun, LI Tao, LI Hua-kang   

  1. Institute of Computer Software,Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications,Nanjing 210003,China
    Jiangsu Province Key Lab of Big Data Security and Intelligent Processing,Nanjing 210003,China
  • Received:2017-08-21 Online:2018-11-05 Published:2018-11-05

摘要: 随着移动互联网技术和医疗社区平台的普及,越来越多的市民在去医院就诊前会上医疗社区平台进行症状查询或者寻医咨询。医疗社区平台上的商业导向、广告植入乃至无良偏方很容易诱导患者采用不恰当的治疗手段。针对这些信息给综合检索平台的通用医疗信息检索带来了巨大噪声的问题,提出一种基于医疗社区平台信息提供方的可信评价机制。该方法通过分析医疗咨询信息提供者的专业等级、关注领域、信息认可度等社区平台公开数据对一个医疗社区问答集中的多个回答进行排序筛选,解决了医疗社区问答系统中“一问多答”现象给检索系统带来的干扰;同时将新的医疗咨询检索内容进行科室分类,并与信息提供方的关注领域进行匹配,从而有效提高了检索系统对医疗社区平台问答数据的检索命中率。

关键词: 科室分类, 可信评价, 一问多答, 医疗社区

Abstract: With the rapid development of moile Internet tehnology and online health community (OHC),more and more patients and caregivers would search the health information andseek medical advice before going to hsopital.However,there will be plenty of answers forpatients and they may be influenced by unrelated advertisements,inaccurate suggestions and unreliable regiments.In order to reduce the noise of unreliable data for sorting algorithm,this paper proposed a new algorithm to optimize the ranking of searching results with some credible information on OHC platforms.The method utilizes the information of every OHC answer provider,including professional knowledge level,focused fields,answer-accepted rate,and so on,to estimate a credible score.For each new question searching,a combined sorting function with the content similarity and credible score for provider is provided to obtain the results ranking.To improve the accuracy in a further step,the category of searching question is given to match the interested area of answer provider.The experiment compares several optimizing factors and their corresponding results,and the results show that this new algorithm can effectively select more accurate answers on OHC platforms.

Key words: Credible evaluation, Office classification, One-question multi-answer, Online health community

中图分类号: 

  • TP391
[1]HANBURY A.Medical information retrieval:an instance of domain-specific search[C]∥International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval.New York:ACM,2012:1191-1192.
[2]KANTHAWALA S,VERMEESCH A,GIVEN B,et al.Answers to Health Questions:Internet Search Results Versus Online Health Community Responses[J].Journal of Medical Internet Research,2016,18(4):e95.
[3]FAN Q Q,FANG Y.Research and analysis of semantic retrieval technology for health question and answer community[J].Electronic Technology & Software Engineering,2017(2):202-204.(in Chinese)
范桥青,方钰.面向健康问答社区的语义检索技术研究与分析[J].电子技术与软件工程,2017(2):202-204.
[4]XU K,REDDY S,FENG Y,et al.Question answering on freebase via relation extraction and textual evidence[C]∥Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2016:2326-2336.
[5]ESKANDARI F,SHAYESTEHMANESH H,HASHEMI S. Predicting best answer using sentiment analysis in community question answering systems[C]∥Signal Processing and Intelligent Systems Conference (SPIS)2015.Tehran:IEEE,2015:53-57.
[6]CAO X,CONG G,CUI B,et al.Approaches to exploring category information for question retrieval in community question-answer archives[J].ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS),2012,30(2):1-38.
[7]WU Y Z,ZHAO J,DUAN X Y,et al.Research on Question Answering &Evaluation:A Survey[J].Journal of Chinese Infomation Processing,2005,19(3):2-14.(in Chinese)
吴友政,赵军,段湘煜,等.问答式检索技术及评测研究综述[J].中文信息学报,2005,19(3):2-14.
[8]GUO C W,DING X W.Retrieval of Web Medical Consultation Data based on Segmented Vector Model[J].Intelligent Compu-ter and Applications,2015,5(1):9-13(in Chinese). 郭成伟,丁祥武.基于分段向量模型的 Web 医疗咨询数据检索[J].智能计算机与应用,2015,5(1):9-13.
[9]LUO G,TANG C,YANG H,et al.MedSearch:a specialized search engine for medical information retrieval[C]∥Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conferent on Information and Knowledge Management.California:2008:143-152.
[10]STANTON I,IEONG S,MISHRA N.Circumlocution in diagnostic medical queries[C]∥Proceedings of the 37th InternationalACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval.Gold Coast,Queensland:ACM,2014:133-142.
[11]SOLDAINI L,YATES A,YOM-TOV E,et al.Enhancing web search in the medical domain via query clarification[J].Information Retrieval Journal,2016,19(1/2):149-173.
[12]SUN Y,WANG X,LIU S,et al.A retrieval model for question in community question answering system[C]∥2012 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Cloud Computing and Intelligent Systems (CCIS).IEEE,2012:1534-1539.
[13]YIH W,TOUTANOVA K,PLATT J C,et al.Learning discriminative projections for text similarity measures[C]∥Proceedings of the Fifteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning.Association for Computational Linguistics.Portland,Oregon:ACM,2011:247-256.
[1] 杨玉丽, 李宇航, 邓岸华.
面向个性化需求的云制造服务可信评价模型
Trust Evaluation Model of Cloud Manufacturing Services for Personalized Needs
计算机科学, 2022, 49(3): 354-359. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.210200116
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!