Computer Science ›› 2018, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6A): 58-62.

• Intelligent Computing • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Learning Effect Evaluation Method Based on Fine-granularity Learning Emotion Ontology
——Taking Algorithm Design and Analysis Course as Example

ZHANG Chun-xia,NIU Zhen-dong,SHI Chong-yang, SHANG Jian-yun   

  1. School of Computer Science,Beijing Institute of Technology,Beijing 100081,China
  • Online:2018-06-20 Published:2018-08-03

Abstract: Education goals include cognitive domain goal,motor skill domain goal and emotional domain goal.Education of emotional domain goal has received attentions and research of more and more pedagogues and scholars of many domains.Emotions of learners play an important role in traditional education and network education,and they affect lear-ning initiative,enthusiasm,creativity and learning effects of learners.According to authors’ teaching practices of algorithm related courses of undergraduates and master graduates for many years,this paper built a fine-granularity learning emotion ontology,and proposed a learning effect evaluation method based on fine-granularity learning emotion ontology.The characteristics of the fine-granularity learning emotion ontology are that it introduces multiple semantic relations among knowledge points of courses,and constructs a classification of emotion feedback actions of teachers.The traits of the learning effect evaluation method are that it builds the evolutional model of learning emotion based on relational paths of knowledge points in the fine-granularity learning emotion ontology,and this model can be used to evaluate learning effects of learners.

Key words: Algorithm course, Evolutional model of learning emotion, Fine-granularity learning emotion ontology, Learning effect evaluation

CLC Number: 

  • TP182
[1]耿显亚.影响高校数学学习的情感因素分析.教育教学论坛,2014,6(18):102-103.
[2]BLOOM B S,ENGELHART M D,FURST E J,et al.Taxonomy of Educational Objectives:The Classification of Educational Goals.Handbook I:Cognitive Domain [M].New York:Longman,1956.
[3]刘万友.网络教育和传统教育之比较.科技信息,2007,25(14):164.
[4]邓妍祯,莫建萍.积极情感因素在网络自主学习中的作用及培养途径分析.中国电力教育,2014,30(32):52-53.
[5]邓铁辉.教师教学正面情感的提高与差生学习负面情感的消除.湖南科技学院学报,2015,36(7):146-147.
[6]沈映珊,汤庸.社交学习网络中基于学习认知的情感交互研究.现代教育技术,2015,25(9):90-96. [7]陶小梅,牛秦洲. 基于情感学习本体的教学反馈策略生成算法的研究[J]. 计算机工程与科学,2015,37(2):320-328.
[8]盛群力,褚献华.布卢姆认知目标分类修订的二维框架.课程教材教法,2004,24(9):90-96. [9]唐晓波,朱娟,杨丰华.基于情感本体和KNN算法的在线评论情感分类研究.信息系统,2016,39(6):110-114. [10]ANDERSON L W,KRATHWOHL D R,AIRASIAN P W, et al.A Taxonomy for Learning,Teaching and Assessing:A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives .New York:Longman,2001.
[11]EKMAN P.Chapter 3:Basic Emotions.DALGLEISH T and POWER MJ.Handbook of Cognition and Emotion[M].Chichester:John Wiley & Sons,2000.
[12]ECONOMIDESA A.Emotional Feedback in CAT[J].International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Lear-ning,2006,3(2):11-20.
[13]EKMAN P.An Argument for Basic Emotions[J].Cognition and Emotion,1992,6(3/4):169-200.
[1] WANG Jie, LI Xiao-nan, LI Guan-yu. Adaptive Attention-based Knowledge Graph Completion [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(7): 204-211.
[2] FANG Lian-hua, LIN Yu-mei, WU Wei-zhi. Optimal Scale Selection in Random Multi-scale Ordered Decision Systems [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(6): 172-179.
[3] XU Si-yu, QIN Ke-yun. Topological Properties of Fuzzy Rough Sets Based on Residuated Lattices [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(6A): 140-143.
[4] CAI Xiao-juan, TAN Wen-an. Improved Collaborative Filtering Algorithm Combining Similarity and Trust [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(6A): 238-241.
[5] LI Yan-yan, QIN Ke-yun. On Topological Properties of Generalized Rough Approximation Operators [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(3): 263-268.
[6] ZHAO Yang, NI Zhi-wei, ZHU Xu-hui, LIU Hao, RAN Jia-min. Multi-worker and Multi-task Path Planning Based on Improved Lion Evolutionary Algorithm forSpatial Crowdsourcing Platform [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(11A): 30-38.
[7] XU Jin. Construction and Application of Knowledge Graph for Industrial Assembly [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(6A): 285-288.
[8] DING Ling, XIANG Yang. Chinese Event Detection with Hierarchical and Multi-granularity Semantic Fusion [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(5): 202-208.
[9] LU Xun, LI Yan-yan, QIN Ke-yun. Relationship Among Three Types of Rough Approximation Pairs [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(4): 49-53.
[10] HU Ping, QIN Ke-yun. Similarity Construction Method for Pythagorean Fuzzy Set Based on Fuzzy Equivalence [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(1): 152-156.
[11] GUO Qing-chun,MA Jian-min. Judgment Methods of Interval-set Consistent Sets of Dual Interval-set Concept Lattices [J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(3): 98-102.
[12] FENG Chen-jiao,LIANG Ji-ye,SONG Peng,WANG Zhi-qiang. New Similarity Measure Based on Extremely Rating Behavior [J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(2): 31-36.
[13] SHI Xiao-ling, CHEN Zhi, YANG Li-gong, SHEN Wei. Matrix Factorization Recommendation Algorithm Based on Adaptive Weighted Samples [J]. Computer Science, 2019, 46(6A): 488-492.
[14] CHEN De-jiang, WANG Jun, ZHANG Hao-wei. Dynamic Threat Assessment Model Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making [J]. Computer Science, 2019, 46(4): 183-188.
[15] LIN Hong, QIN Ke-yun. Attribute Reduction for Decision Formal Contexts Based on Threek-way Decision Rules [J]. Computer Science, 2019, 46(3): 248-252.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!