计算机科学 ›› 2016, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2): 277-282.doi: 10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2016.02.058

• 人工智能 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于短期记忆与遗忘系数的用户个性化建模方法研究

陈海燕,徐峥,张辉   

  1. 华东政法大学计算机科学与技术系 上海201620,清华大学公共安全研究院 北京100084,清华大学公共安全研究院 北京100084
  • 出版日期:2018-12-01 发布日期:2018-12-01
  • 基金资助:
    本文受国家社会科学基金项目(06BFX051),国家自然科学基金(6130202),上海高校选拔培养优秀青年教师科研专项基金(hzf05046)资助

Building User Personalization Model Based on Short Term Memory and Forgetting Factor

CHEN Hai-yan, XU Zheng and ZHANG Hui   

  • Online:2018-12-01 Published:2018-12-01

摘要: 搜索引擎的一个标准是不同的用户用相同的查询条件检索时,返回的结果相同。为解决准确性问题,个性化搜索引擎被提出,它可以根据用户的不同个性化特征提供不同的搜索结果。然而,现有的方法更注重用户的长时记忆和独立的用户日志文件,从而降低了个性化搜索的有效性。获取用户短时记忆模型来提供准确有效的用户偏好的个性化搜索方法被广泛采用。首先,根据基于查询关键词的相关概念生成短期记忆模型;接着,基于用户的时序有效点击数据生成用户个性化模型;最后,在用户会话中引入了遗忘因子来优化用户个性化模型。实验结果表明,所提出的方法可以较好地表达用户信息需求,较为准确地构建用户的个性化模型。

关键词: 个性化搜索,用户模型,语义挖掘,用户语境

Abstract: One criticism of search engines is that when queries are submitted,the same results are returned to different users.To address the accuratcy problem,personalized search was proposed,since it could provide different search results based upon the preferences of users.However,the existing methods concentrate more on the long-term and independent user profile,thus reducing the effectiveness of personalized search.We introduced an approach that captures the user context to provide accurate preferences of users for effectively personalized search.First,the short-term query context is generated to identify related concepts of the query.Second,the user context is generated based on the click through data of users.Finally,a forgetting factor is introduced to merge the independent user context in a user session,which maintains the evolution of user preferences.The experimental results fully confirm that our approach can successfully represent user context according to individual user information needs.

Key words: Personalized search,User model,Semantic mining,User context

[1] Lau T,Horvitz E.Patterns of search:Analyzing and modelingWeb query refinement[C]∥Proceedings of the UM.1999:119-128
[2] Lawrence S.Context in Web Search[J].IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin,2000,23(3):25-32
[3] Jansen M,Spink A,Bateman J,et al.Real Life Information Retrieval:A Study of User Queries on the Web[C]∥Proceedings of ACM SIGIR Forum,vol.32,1998:5-17
[4] Pandit S,Olston C.Navigation-aided retrieval[C]∥Proceedings of the 16th International World Wide Web Conference.2007:477-486
[5] Dou Z,Hua R,et al.Evaluating the effectiveness of personalized Web search[J].IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering,2009,21(8):1178-1190
[6] Shen X,Tan B,Zhai C.Context-sensitive information retrievalusing implicit feedback[C]∥Proceedings of SIGIR’05.New York,NY,USA:ACM Press,2005:43-50
[7] Chirita P A,Nejdl W,Paiu R,et al.Using ODP metadata to personalize search[C]∥Proceedings of SIGIR ’05.New York,NY,USA:ACM Press,2005:178-185
[8] Trajkova J,Gauch S.Improving ontology-based user profiles[C]∥Proceedings of RIAO.2004:380-389
[9] Sugiyama K,Hatano K,Yoshikawa M.Adaptive Web searchbased on user profile constructed without any effort from users[C]∥Proceedings of WWW’04.New York,NY,USA:ACM Press,2004:675-684
[10] Teevan J,Dumais S T,Horvitz E.Personalizing search via automated analysis of interests and activities[C]∥Proceedings of SIGIR’05.New York,NY,USA:ACM Press,2005:449-456
[11] Billsus D,Hilbert D,Maynes-Aminzade D.Improving proactive information systems[C]∥Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI).2005:159-166
[12] Henzinger M,Chang B-W,Milch B,et al.Query-free newssearch[C]∥Proceedings of the 12th International World Wide Web Conference.2003:1-10
[13] Yu C T,Lam K,Salton G.Term weighting in information re-trieval using the term precision model[J].Journal of the ACM,1982,29(1):152-170
[14] Kraft R,Chang C C,et al.Searching with contexts[C]∥Proceedings of the 15th International World Wide Web Conference.2006:477-486
[15] Baeza-Yates R A,Hurtado C A,Mendoza M.Query Recommendation Using Query Logs in Search Engines[C]∥Proceedings of EDBT Workshop.vol.3268,2004:588-596
[16] Leung K W T,Ng W,et al.Personalized Concept-Based Clustering of Search Engine Queries[J].IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering,2008,20(11):1505-1518
[17] Agrawal R,Imielinski T,Swami A.Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases[C]∥Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD.1993
[18] Bilenko M,White W R.Mining the search trails of surfingcrowds:identifying relevant websites from user activity[C]∥Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web.2008:51-60
[19] Raghavan V,et al.Modeling Temporal Activity Patterns in Dynamic Social Networks[J].IEEE Transactions on ComputationalSocial Systems,2014,1(1):89-107
[20] Bian J,et al.User Action Interpretation for Online Content Optimization[J].IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering,2013,25(9):2161-2174
[21] Yang D,et al.Modeling User Activity Preference by Leveraging User Spatial Temporal Characteristics in LBSNs[J].IEEE Transactions on Systems,Man,and Cybernetics:Systems,2015,45(1):129-142
[22] He Li,Jia Yan,Han Wei-hong,et al.Mining user interest in microblogs with a user-topic model[J].Communications,2015,11(8):131-144
[23] Liu Yao,Wang Shao-xuan,Dey S.Content-Aware Modeling and Enhancing User Experience in Cloud Mobile Rendering and Streaming[J].IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems,2014,4(1):43-56
[24] Beeferman D,Berger A.Agglomerative Clustering of a SearchEngine Query Log[C]∥Proc.of ACM SIGKDD Conference.2000:407-416

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!