计算机科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (6A): 250600050-6.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.250600050
韩志耕, 付纯硕
HAN Zhigeng, FU Chunshuo
摘要: 图神经网络(Graph Neural Networks,GNNs)因其天然适合处理图结构数据的特性,能够有效捕捉欺诈行为中的复杂关系模式,已成为欺诈检测的主流方法。然而,现有基于GNN的欺诈检测模型在数据处理上存在局限性:基于同质图神经网络的欺诈检测模型难以应对欺诈图中的异质关系,而基于异质图神经网络的欺诈检测模型在处理异质关系时通常仅针对单一属性或结构空间,导致检测性能受限。为解决这一问题,提出了基于双空间异质图神经网络的欺诈检测模型。该模型将用户关系建模为多关系异质有向图,并采用多层图卷积架构,每层卷积由以下3个模块构成:(1)异质度学习模块,利用关系子图中已标记节点的标签信息,在属性空间和结构空间中分别学习异质度,并通过加权融合策略实现双空间异质度的特征交互;(2)跨空间图聚合模块,基于融合后的异质度计算注意力权重,通过多关系图聚合更新节点表示;(3)原型引导分类模块,基于已标记节点的表示及标签,利用原型学习构建类别原型,并指导未标记节点的分类。为应对标记数据稀缺和标签不平衡问题,模型采用平衡采样策略进行半监督训练。实验结果表明,在YelpChi和Amazon数据集上,所提模型的Recall指标分别比9个基线模型的最佳值提升0.962 6%和0.644 4%,AUC指标分别提升0.859 4%和0.147 9%。
中图分类号:
| [1] CHAN P P K,ZHANG C,CHEN H,et al.Evasion on general GAN-generated image detection by disentangled representation [J].Information Sciences,2024,683:121267. [2] CHENG D,ZOU Y,XIANG S,et al.Graph neural networksfor financial fraud detection:A review[J]. Frontiers of Compu-ter Science,2025,19:199609. [3] DOU Y,LIU Z,SUN L,et al.Enhancing graph neural net-work-based fraud detectors against camouflaged fraudsters[C]//Proc.29th ACM Int.Conf.Inf.Knowl.Manag.(CIKM).Galway,Ireland,2020:315-324. [4] LIU Y,AO X,QIN Z,et al.Pick and choose:A GNN-based imbalanced learning approach for fraud detection[C]//Proc.Web Conf.2021(WWW).Lisbon,Spain,2021:3168-3177. [5] WANG X,LIU Z,LIU J,et al.Fraud detection on multi-relation graphs via imbalanced and interactive learning[J].Information Sciences,2023,642:119153. [6] ZHANG J,XU Z,LV D,et al.DiG-In-GNN:Discriminativefeature guided GNN-based fraud detector against inconsistencies in multi-relation fraud graph[C]//Proc.AAAI Conf.Artif.Intell.(AAAI).Vancouver,Canada,2024:9323-9331. [7] HAN Z,ZHOU T,CHEN G,et al.A robust rating prediction model for recommendation systems based on fake user detection and multi-layer feature fusion[J].Big Data Mining and Analy-tics,2025,8(2):292-309. [8] SHI F,CAO Y,SHANG Y,et al.H2-FDetector:A GNN-based fraud detector with homophilic and heterophilic connections[C]//Proc.ACM Web Conf.2022(WWW).Lyon,France,2022:1486-1494. [9] GAO Y,WANG X,HE X,et al.Alleviating structural distribution shift in graph anomaly detection[C]//Proc.16th ACM Int.Conf.Web Search Data Min.(WSDM),Singapore,2023:357-365. [10] WU B,YAO X,ZHANG B,et al.SplitGNN:Spectral graph neural network for fraud detection against heterophily[C]//Proc.32nd ACM Int.Conf.Inf.Knowl.Manag.(CIKM).Birmingham,United Kingdom,2023:2737-2746. [11] XU F,WANG N,WU H,et al.Revisiting graph-based fraud detection in sight of heterophily and spectrum[C]//Proc.38th AAAI Conf.Artif.Intell.(AAAI).Vancouver,Canada,2024:9214-9222. [12] FU C,LIU G,YUAN K,et al.Nowhere to H2IDE:Fraud detection from multi-relation graphs via disentangled homophily and heterophily identification[J]. IEEE Trans.Knowl.Data Eng.2025,37(3):1380-1393. [13] WANG T,JIN D,WANG R,et al.Powerful graph convolutional networks with adaptive propagation mechanism for homophily and heterophily[C]//Proc.36th AAAI Conf.Artif.Intell.(AAAI).California,USA,2022:4210-4218. [14] CHIEN E,PENG J,LI P,et al.Adaptive universal generalized PageRank graph neural network[C]//Proc.Int.Conf.Learn.Represent.(ICLR).Virtual Event,2021. [15] KIPF T N,WELLING M.Semi-supervised classification withgraph convolutional networks[C]//Proc.Int.Conf.Learn.Represent.(ICLR).Toulon,France,2017. [16] WU F,SOUZA A,ZHANG T,et al.Simplifying graph convolutional networks[C]//Proc.36th Int.Conf.Mach.Learn.(ICML),California,USA,2019:6861-6871. [17] VELICˇKOVIC′ P,CUCURULL G,CASANOVA A,et al.Graph attention networks[C]//Proc.Int.Conf.Learn.Represent.(ICLR).Vancouver,Canada,2018. [18] BO D,WANG X,SHI C,et al.Beyond low-frequency information in graph convolutional networks[C]//Proc.35th AAAI Conf.Artif.Intell.(AAAI).Virtual Event,2021:3950-3957. |
|
||