计算机科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (9): 395-404.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.250700112

• 信息安全 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于多粒度语义双重反思的科技风险结构识别

李振南1, 钱佳妍1, 王欣芝1, 张辉2   

  1. 1上海大学计算机工程与科学学院 上海 200444
    2 清华大学安全科学学院 北京 100084
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-21 修回日期:2025-10-24 出版日期:2026-09-15 发布日期:2026-09-10
  • 通讯作者: 王欣芝(wxz2017@shu.edu.cn)
  • 作者简介:(vellichor1999@shu.edu.cn)
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(72574136)

Technology Risk Structure Recognition Based on Multi-granularity Semantic Dual Reflection

LI Zhennan1, QIAN Jiayan1, WANG Xinzhi1, ZHANG Hui2   

  1. 1 School of Computer Engineering and Science,Shanghai University,Shanghai 200444,China
    2 School of Safety Science,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China
  • Received:2025-07-21 Revised:2025-10-24 Published:2026-09-15 Online:2026-09-10
  • About author:LI Zhennan,born in 1999,postgra-duate.His main research interests include substructure mining and technology risk recognition.
    WANG Xinzhi,born in 1989,Ph.D,associate professor,is a member of CCF(No.E2829M).Her main research interests include knowledge science and engineering,intelligent decision-ma-king,and substructures recognition in complex networks.
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(72574136).

摘要: 中美科技竞争背景下,科技领域呈现出传统风险与新兴风险非线性叠加、内生脆弱性与外源威胁性深度耦合的态势。科技网络中多风险交织隐匿,现有研究多聚焦于单一风险特征的检测,存在跨层风险耦合建模与动态语义表征方面的不足。针对该问题,提出基于多粒度语义双重反思的科技风险结构识别方法,构建知识与学习共同驱动的潜在多粒度耦合科技风险结构挖掘框架。首先,基于多源科技文本逐层提取科技信息并构建多层多粒度科技网络;其次,采用8种中心性指标识别多层多粒度科技网络中的显式风险结构;为了弥补中心性度量方法准确度高但覆盖不到隐匿风险结构的固有局限,进一步提出基于子结构事实与大语言模型双重反思的科技风险结构识别方法,通过建模科技风险结构高阶语义特征并建立双重反思机制,自动挖掘以关键子结构为载体的潜在科技风险。该方法自适应聚类构建风险结构特征模式,采用动态阈值策略筛选潜在不可靠风险识别结果,并通过风险特征模式差异驱动的反思机制修正初始决策。同时,利用大语言模型的预训练知识集成多模型评估结果,实现大模型引导的决策二次优化。基于中心性度量的方法与基于双重反思的方法互补协同,实现识别结果中准确度与覆盖范围的均衡优化。在两个私有数据集(Tech-Graph,Teen-Graph)和一个公共数据集(Citeseer)上的实验结果表明了提出方法的有效性,其在英文科技风险结构数据集上的F1值达到99.55%,提升达2.88个百分点。

关键词: 风险结构识别, 子结构识别, 科技风险特征模式, 大语言模型, 双重反思

Abstract: In the context of Sino-US technology competition,the technology field confronts the challenge of managing the non-li-near overlap of traditional and emerging risks,as well as the deep coupling of endogenous vulnerabilities and external threats.Multiple risks are intertwined and concealed in the technological intelligence network.Existing research primarily focuses on detecting individual risk features,with inadequate attention paid to cross-layer risk coupling modeling and dynamic semantic representation.Faced with that,this study proposes a method for recognizing technology risk structures based on multi-granularity semantic dual reflection,and constructs a potential multi-granularity coupled technology risk structure mining framework driven by both knowledge and learning.Firstly,it extracts scientific information layer by layer from multi-source technology texts and constructs a multi-layer and multi-granularity technology network.Next,eight centrality indicators are used to identify explicit risk structures within the multi-layer and multi-granularity network.However,while centrality-based methods offer high accuracy,they have an inherent limitation in covering concealed risk structures.Therefore,this study introduces a dual reflection approach based on substructure facts and large language models(LLMs).By modeling the high-order semantic features of technology risk structures and establishing a dual reflection mechanism,the mining of technology risks carried by key substructures is realized.This method is capable of constructing risk structure feature patterns leveraging adaptive clustering.A dynamic threshold strategy is utilized to screen potentially unreliable prediction results,and they are corrected through a reflection mechanism driven by differences in risk feature patterns.Meanwhile,the pre-trained knowledge of LLMs is used to integrate multi-model evaluation results,realizing the secondary optimization of decisions guided by LLMs.The methods based on centrality and dual reflection are complementary and synergistic,achieving balanced optimization between accuracy and coverage in recognition results.Experimental results on two private datasets(Tech-Graph and Teen-Graph) and one public dataset(Citeseer) demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.The F1 score on the English technology risk structure dataset reaches 99.55%,representing an improvement of 2.88%.

Key words: Risk structures recognition, Substructure recognition, Technology risk feature patterns, Large language models, Dual reflection

中图分类号: 

  • TP391
[1] ZHANG J N,ZHAO Y.Research on Security Intelligence ofScience and Technology from the Perspective of “Structure-Process-Output” Framework[J].Information Studies:Theory & Application,2022,45(9):7.
[2] ALBERT R,JEONG H,BARABÁSI A L.Error and attack tolerance of complex networks[J].Nature,2000,406(6794):378-382.
[3] WALDROP M M.Complexity:The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos[M].New York:Simon and Schuster,1993.
[4] ALLISON G,KLYMAN K,BARBESINO K,et al.The greattech rivalry:China vs.the US[J].Science Diplomacy Review,2021,3(3):73-76.
[5] KENNEDY S.China’s Uneven High-tech Drive:Implications for the United States[M].Washington:Center for Strategic & International Studies,2020.
[6] ROSSETTI G,CAZABET R.Community discovery in dynamic networks:a survey[J].ACM Computing Surveys,2018,51(2):1-37.
[7] LIU Y,JIN X,ZHANG Y.Identifying risks in temporal supernetworks:an IO-SuperPageRank algorithm[J].Humanities and Social Sciences Communications,2024,11(1):1-21.
[8] FRAGUA Á,JIMÉNEZ-MARTÍN A,MATEOS A.Complexnetwork analysis techniques for the early detection of the outbreak of pandemics transmitted through air traffic[J].Scientific Reports,2023,13(1):18174.
[9] QIAO W,GUO H,DENG W,et al.Complex network-based risk analysis for maritime heavy casualties in China during 2012-2021[J].Ocean Engineering,2024,308:118258.
[10] KIPF T N,WELLING M.Semi-supervised classification withgraph convolutional networks[C] //Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations.2017:1-14.
[11] VELIČKOVIĆ P,CUCURULL G,CASANOVA A,et al.Graph attention networks[C] //Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Learning Representations.2018:1-12.
[12] HAMILTON W,YING Z,LESKOVEC J.Inductive representation learning on large graphs[J].Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems,2017,30:1-11.
[13] TANG J,LI J,GAO Z,et al.Rethinking graph neural networks for anomaly detection[C] //International Conference on Machine Learning.2022:21076-21089.
[14] XIAO C,XU X,LEI Y,et al.Counterfactual graph learning for anomaly detection on attributed networks[J].IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering,2023,35(10):10540-10553.
[15] MESGARAN M,HAMZA A B.Graph fairing convolutionalnetworks for anomaly detection[J].Pattern Recognition,2024,145:109960.
[16] MA J,HE M,WEI Z.Polyformer:Scalable node-wise filters via polynomial graph transformer[C] //Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.2024:2118-2129.
[17] CHEN J,GAO K,LI G,et al.NAGphormer:A tokenized graph transformer for node classification in large graphs[C] //Procee-dings of the 11th International Conference on Learning Representations.2023:1-18.
[18] ZHOU Z,LU Z,WEI X,et al.Tokenphormer:Structure-aware Multi-token Graph Transformer for Node Classification[C] //Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2025:13428-13436.
[19] SHEN T,CAMBRIA E,WANG J,et al.Insight at the right spot:Provide decisive subgraph information to Graph LLM with reinforcement learning[J].Information Fusion,2025,117:102860.
[20] TIAN Y,SONG H,WANG Z,et al.Graph neural prompting with large language models[C] //Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2024:19080-19088.
[21] HE X,BRESSON X,LAURENT T,et al.Harnessing explanations:Llm-to-lm interpreter for enhanced text-attributed graph representation learning[C] //Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Learning Representations.2024:1-22.
[22] JEONG S,PARK J,CHOI M,et al.LLM-powered scene graph representation learning for image retrieval via visual triplet-based graph transformation[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2025,286:127926.
[23] YANG Z,COHEN W,SALAKHUDINOV R.Revisiting semi-supervised learning with graph embeddings[C] //International Conference on Machine Learning.PMLR,2016:40-48.
[24] CHAI Z,YOU S,YANG Y,et al.Can Abnormality be Detected by Graph Neural Networks[C] //Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence(IJCAI).2022:23-29.
[25] WANG X Z,YU H,GUO J Y,et al.Towards Fraud Detection Via Fine-Grained Classification of User Behavior[J].IEEE Transactions on Big Data,2025,11(4):1994-2007.
[26] WU Q,ZHAO W,LI Z,et al.Nodeformer:A scalable graphstructure learning transformer for node classification[J].Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems,2022,35:27387-27401.
[27] WU Q,ZHAO W,YANG C,et al.Sgformer:Simplifying and empowering transformers for large-graph representations[J].Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems,2023,36:64753-64773.
[28] AI G,PANG G,QIAO H,et al.GrokFormer:Graph FourierKolmogorov-Arnold Transformers[J].arXiv:2411.17296,2024.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!