计算机科学 ›› 2014, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (Z6): 98-102.

• 智能计算 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于认知语言学的自然语言语义表示方法

叶锡君,尹岩   

  1. 南京农业大学信息科技学院 南京210095;南京农业大学信息科技学院 南京210095
  • 出版日期:2018-11-14 发布日期:2018-11-14
  • 基金资助:
    本文受国家自然科学基金(31301691)资助

Natural Language Semantic Representation Based on Cognitive Linguistics

YE Xi-jun and YIN Yan   

  • Online:2018-11-14 Published:2018-11-14

摘要: 语义网对语义理解和常识推理是有效的,但粗粒度语义无法表示复杂的对象间的关系。认知语言学提供了表示复杂对象关系的方法,但由于其抽象性而难以应用于自然语言处理。文中提出一种基于认知语言学理论的自然语言语义表示方法。该方法使用意象图式表示语义网中对象节点间的关系,使用属性空间表示可以数值化的语义(如颜色)。在此基础上,将语义网和属性空间的构建和修改过程转化为语义操作序列,实现了句子语义的动态重构。相比于传统的基于语义网的语义表示方法,提出的方法能够表示动态关系,具有更强的推理能力。文中通过实例证明了这一方法的可行性。

关键词: 认知语言学,语义网,属性空间,意象图式,语义操作,推理 中图法分类号TP391.1文献标识码A

Abstract: Semantic network is valid to semantic understanding and common sense reasoning,but coarse-grained semantic is difficult to represent complex relationship between objects.Though cognitive linguistics provides approaches to represent complex object-relational,it’s difficult to support natural language processing because of its abstract.This paper presented a method of natural language semantic representation based on cognitive linguistics.The method uses image schema to represent the relationship between object nodes in semantic network,and attribute spaces to represent the semantic of object which can be digitized(such as color).On this basis,we transformed the building and modifying process on semantic network and attribute space into a sequence of semantic operations,so that we could reconstruct the semantics of sentences dynamically.Compared to the traditional method of semantic representation based on semantic network,the proposed method can express dynamic relationship and has stronger reasoning ability.The paper gave examples to prove the feasibility of this approach.

Key words: Cognitive linguistics,Semantic network,Attribute space,Image schema,Semantic operation,Reasoning

[1] 危辉.人工智能形式概念系统[M].北京:科学出版社,2011
[2] 袁毓林.基于统计的语言处理模型的局限性[J].语言文字应用,2004,5(2):99-107
[3] 袁毓林,陈振宇,张秀松,等.从认知假设到计算分析和程序实现——一种认知语言学研究的计算范式与技术路线[J].当代语言学,2010,12(2):97-114
[4] 陈振宇.时间系统的认知模型与运算[M].上海:学林出版社,2007
[5] 陈振宇.疑问系统的认知模型与运算[M].上海:学林出版社,2010
[6] Kedad Z,Métais E.Ontology-Based Data Cleaning [M]∥Andersson B,Bergholtz M,Johannesson P.Natural Language Processing and Information Systems.Springer Berlin Heidelberg,2002:137-149
[7] Luger G F.人工智能:复杂问题求解的结构和策略[M].史忠植,张银奎,赵志崑,等译.北京:机械工业出版社,2006
[8] 朱海平.基于概念图匹配的语义搜索[D].上海:上海交通大学,2006
[9] 王寅.认知语言学[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2007
[10] Barwise J,Perry J.Semantic innocence and uncompromising situations[M]∥Martinich A P,ed.The Philosophy of Language(2nd Edition).New York:Oxford University Press,1990:392-404
[11] Barwise J,Perry J.Situations and Attitudes[M].Stanford,CA:CSLI Publications,1999
[12] 巴斯 D M.进化心理学:心理的新科学(第二版)[M].熊哲宏,张勇,晏倩,译.华东师范大学出版社,2007
[13] 朱跃.语义论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2006
[14] 张维鼎.意义与认知范畴化[M].成都:四川大学出版社,2007
[15] Sowa J F.Conceptual structures:Information precessing in mind and machine[M].Anddison-Wesley,1984
[16] Talmy L.Force dynamics in language and cognition [J].Cognitive Science,1988,12(1):49-100
[17] Sternberg R J.认知心理学(第三版)[M].杨炳钧,陈燕,邹枝玲,译.北京:中国轻工业出版社,2006

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!