计算机科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (6A): 211100070-5.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.211100070

• 人工智能 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于不定可扩展性概念再探对角线方法

段天龙   

  1. 南京大学哲学系 南京 210023
  • 出版日期:2023-06-10 发布日期:2023-06-12
  • 通讯作者: 段天龙(424087007@qq.com)

Study on Diagonal Method Based on Indefinite Extensibility Concept

DUAN Tianlong   

  1. Department of Philosophy,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210023,China
  • Online:2023-06-10 Published:2023-06-12
  • About author:DUAN Tianlong,born in 1992,Ph.D.His main research interests include mathematical logic and formal epistemology.

摘要: 使用对角线方法不仅能得到数理逻辑的基本定理,也能导致逻辑悖论。通过对达米特的不定可扩展性概念及其与对角线方法的关联的考查,指出:1)西蒙斯没有将不定可扩展性概念与对角线方法关联起来,所以其关于对角线论证不同类型的划分只是表面的;2)汤姆逊对角线引理并没有刻画出对角线方法的实质;3)对某概念可以使用对角线方法当且仅当该概念是不定可扩展的;4)使用对角线方法可以发现不定可扩展性概念,从而为刻画自然语言的动态语义模型提供思路。

关键词: 对角线方法, 悖论, 不定可扩展性概念, 自然语言

Abstract: Using diagonal method yields not only basic theorems for mathematical logic,but also leads to logical paradoxes.By exa-mining the concept of indefinite extensibility and its association with the diagonal method,this paper points out that:1)since Simmons does not associate the concept of indefinite extensibility with the diagonal method,its division of “diagonal argument types” is only superficial;2)Thomson diagonal lemma does not depict the essence of diagonal method; 3) diagonal method can be used for a concept if and only if the concept is indefinite extensibility;4)the use of diagonal method can help us to find the concept of indefinite extensibility and provide ideas for describing the dynamic semantic model of natural language.

Key words: Diagonal method, Paradox, Indefinite extensibility, Natural language

中图分类号: 

  • TP301
[1]WU MH,WANG Y J,YANG Y C,et al.Generation Mechanism and Interpretations of Paradoxes[J].Journal of Computer Science,2018,45(6):69-71.
[2]EWALD W.From Kant to Hilbert:A Source Book in the Foundations of Mathematics Volume II[M].Oxford University Press,1996.
[3]PRIEST G.Beyond the Limits of Thought[M].Oxford University Press,2002.
[4]KLEMENT K C.Russell,His Paradoxes,and Cantor’s Theorem:Part I[J].Philosophy Compass,2010,5(1):16-28.
[5]SIMMONS K.The Diagonal Argument and The Liar[J].Journal of Philosophical Logic,1990,19(3):277-303.
[6]SIMMONS K.Universality and the liar:an essay on truth and the diagonal argument[J].Cambridge University Press,1993.
[7]THOMSON J F.On Some Paradoxes[M]//Analytical Philosophy.London:Blackwell,1962.
[8]DUMMETT M.The Seas of Language[M].Oxford University Press,1993.
[9]RUMFITT I.The Boundary Stones of Thought:An Essay in thePhilosophy of Logic[M].Oxford University Press,2015.
[10]PRIEST G.Indefinite Extensibility-Dialetheic Style[J].StudiaLogica,2013,101(6):1263-1275.
[11]RUSSELL B.On some difficulties in the theory of transfinite numbers and order types[J].Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society,1906,4(14):29-53.
[12]LINNEBO Ø.Dummett on Indefinite Extensibility[J].Philoso-phical Issues,2018,28 (1):196-220.
[13]ZHANG J J.Diagonal Method,Diagonal Argument and Paradox Research[J].Journal of Studies in Dialectics of Nature,1997(12).
[14]MACKIE J K.Truth,Probability and Paradox[M].OxfordUniversity Press,1973.
[15]MAGUOLO D,VALENTINI S.An intuitionistic version ofCantor’s theorem[J].Mathematical Logic Quarterly,1996,42(1):446-448.
[16]LUNA L, TAYLOR W.Cantor’s Proof in the Full Defifinable Universe[J].Australasian Journal of Logic,2010,9:10-25.
[17]DUMMETT M.Reply to P.M.Sullivan[M]//Auxier R E,Hahn L E,eds.,The Philosophy of Michael Dummett,Open Court.2007.
[18]DUMMETT M.The philosophical significance of Gödel’s theo-rem[C]//Ratio.Duckworth,1963:186-214.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!