计算机科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (3): 392-399.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.250600011

• 计算机网络 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于服务器无感知计算的网络带宽快速测量方法

杨若萱1, 金飞宇1, 曲连威1, 周子杰1, 郑奇斌2, 李振华1   

  1. 1 清华大学软件学院 北京 100084
    2 北京大数据先进技术研究院 北京 100195
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-03 修回日期:2025-09-05 出版日期:2026-03-15 发布日期:2026-03-12
  • 通讯作者: 曲连威(qlw@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn)
  • 作者简介:(rosheenanea@outlook.com)
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2022YFB4500703);国家自然科学基金(62332012,62472245)

A Serverless-based Approach to Fast Measurement of Network Bandwidth

YANG Ruoxuan1, JIN Feiyu1, QU Lianwei1, ZHOU Zijie1, ZHENG Qibin2, LI Zhenhua1   

  1. 1 School of Software, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
    2 Advanced Institute of Big Data, Beijing 100195, China
  • Received:2025-06-03 Revised:2025-09-05 Published:2026-03-15 Online:2026-03-12
  • About author:YANG Ruoxuan,born in 2000,postgraduate.Her main research interests include network measurement and cloud computing.
    QU Lianwei,born in 1995,Ph.D,research associate,is a member of CCF(No.V0464G).His main research interests include privacy protection,cloud computing and cellular network.
  • Supported by:
    National Key Research and Development Program of China(2022YFB4500703) and National Natural Science Foundation of China(62332012,62472245).

摘要: 以5G/6G和WiFi 6/7为代表的新一代移动网络在显著提升接入带宽(简称网速)的同时,也加剧了网络性能(如吞吐量、时延和丢包率)的波动,导致测速时间延长、流量开销增加、用户体验下降,并且难以满足基于微内核的泛在计算系统(如MINIX,QNX和seL4)在任务管理与进程间通信时对网络低成本、高实时性的迫切需求。基于云函数和云容器的服务器无感知计算虽然提供了潜在的解决思路,但现有的以 Swiftest 为代表的快速带宽测量方法深受长尾流量效应的制约,造成了严重的流量浪费。为此,提出一种基于服务器无感知计算的智能化网络带宽快速测量方法。首先,结合底层传输机制与实际测量数据分析了现有方法中长尾效应存在的原因。在此基础上,设计了突发式快启动的数据传输机制,将传统的平滑递增数据包发送策略分解为多轮短时的突发传输模式,通过客户端的动态反馈,实时调控发送速率、缩短传输时间并提高测量精度,规避因控制反馈延迟而引起的长尾流量浪费问题。多个典型网络场景下的实验结果表明,相比Swiftest,所提出的方法将服务端的发包流量减少了85%,测量时间缩短到平均1.6秒,显著降低了服务端资源压力和用户端流量开销,并且具备良好的泛在计算环境工程可部署性。

关键词: 网络带宽测量, 微内核, 泛在计算, 服务器无感知计算, 突发式快启动

Abstract: Next-generation mobile networks,represented by 5G/6G and WiFi 6/7,have substantially increased access bandwidth(i.e.,network speed).At the same time,they have also amplified fluctuations in network performance-such as throughput,latency,and packet loss-thereby prolonging speed tests,increasing traffic overhead,and degrading user experience.More importantly,this volatility makes it difficult to meet the pressing requirement for low-cost and highly real-time networking in microkernel-based ubiquitous computing systems(e.g.,MINIX,QNX,and seL4),where task management and inter-process communication critically depend on timely and lightweight network support.Although serverless computing built on cloud functions and cloud containers offers a potential solution path,existing rapid bandwidth measurement methods(e.g.,Swiftest) remain heavily constrained by the long-tail traffic effect,leading to considerable traffic waste.To address this challenge,this paper propose a serverless-based approach to fast measurement of network bandwidth.We first analyze the causes of the long-tail effect in prior approaches by combining transport-layer mechanism analysis with real-world measurement data.Building on these insights,we design a bursty fast-start transmission mechanism that decomposes the conventional smoothly ramped packet-sending strategy into multiple rounds of short-duration burst transmissions.With dynamic feedback from the client,the sender regulates its transmission rate in real time to shorten measurement duration and improve estimation accuracy,thereby avoiding long-tail traffic waste induced by delayed control feedback.Experiments across multiple representative network scenarios show that,compared with Swiftest,the proposed method reduces server-side transmitted traffic by 85% and shortens the average measurement time to 1.6 se-conds.These gains significantly alleviate server resource pressure and reduce client data consumption,while exhibiting strong engineering deployability in ubiquitous computing environments.

Key words: Network bandwidth measurement, Microkernel, Ubiquitous computing, Serverless computing, Bursty fast start

中图分类号: 

  • TP393
[1]YOU X H,PAN Z W,GAO X Q.5G Mobile CommunicationTrends and Key Technologies[J].Scientia Sinica,2014,44(5):551-563.
[2]Federal Communications Commission.Measuring broadbanda-merica fixed broadband report:A report on consumer fixed broadband performance in the US[R].Federal Communications Commission,2014.
[3]BURGER E W,KRISHNASWAMY P,SCHULZRINNE H.Measuring broadbandamerica:A retrospective on origins,achievements and challenges[J].ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review,2023,53(2):11-21.
[4]BISCHOF Z S,OTTO J S,SÁNCHEZ M A,et al.Crowdsourcing ISP characterization to the network edge[C]//Proceedings of W-MUST.2011:61-66.
[5]LI Z,LI X,YANG X,et al.Fast uplink bandwidth testing for in-ternet users[J].IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,2023,31(4):1886-1901.
[6]HEWLETTPACKARD.HewlettPackard/netperf[EB/OL].[2025-03-06].https://github.com/HewlettPackard/netperf.
[7]GUEANTV.iPerf-The TCP,UDP and SCTP network band-width measurement tool[EB/OL].[2025-03-06].https://iperf.fr/.
[8]OOKLA.Speedtest by Ookla-The Global Broadband Speed Test[EB/OL].[2025-03-06].https://www.speedtest.net/.
[9]NETFLIX.Internet Speed Test |Fast.com[EB/OL].[2025-03-06].https://fast.com./.
[10]QAMAR F,HINDIA M N,DIMYATI K,et al.Interferencemanagement issues for the future 5g network:a review[J].Tele-communication Systems,2019,71:627-643.
[11]YANG X,LIN H,LI Z,et al.Mobile access bandwidth in practice:Measurement,analysis,and implications[C]//Proceedings of SIGCOMM.2022:114-128.
[12]LI Y,DENG H,PENG C,et al.iCellular:Device-customized cellular network access on commodity smartphones[C]//Procee-dings of NSDI.2016:643-656.
[13]SUNDARESAN S,DENG X,FENG Y,et al.Challenges in inferring internet congestion using through put measurements[C]//Proceedings of IMC.2017:43-56.
[14]DENG H,PENG C,FIDA A,et al.Mobility support in cellular networks:A measurement study on its configurations and implications[C]//Proceedings of IMC.2018:147-160.
[15]LI F,NIAKI A A,CHOFFINES D,et al.A large-scale analysis of deployed traffic differentiation practices[C]//Proceedings of SIGCOMM.2019:130-144.
[16]HUANG J,XU Q,TIWANA B,et al.Anatomizing applicationperformance differences on smart-phones[C]//Proceedings of MobiSys.2010:165-178.
[17]HUANG J,QIAN F,GERBER A,et al.A close examination of performance and power characteristics of 4G LTE networks[C]//Proceedings of MobiSys.2012:225-238.
[18]HUANG J,QIAN F,GUO Y,et al.An in-depth study of LTE:Effect of network protocol and application behavior on perfor-mance[J].ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review,2013,43(4):363-374.
[19]XU D,ZHOU A,ZHANG X,et al.Understanding operational 5G:A first measurement study on its coverage performance and energy consumption[C]//Proceedings of SIGCOMM.2020:479-494.
[20]NARAYANAN A,RAMADAN E,CARPENTER J,et al.Afirst look at commercial 5G performance on smartphones[C]//Proceedings of WWW.2020:894-905.
[21]NARAYANANA,ZHANG X,ZHU R,et al.A variegated look at 5G in the wild:Performance,power,and QoE implications[C]//Proceedings of SIGCOMM.2021:610-625.
[22]HU N,STEENKISTE P.Evaluation and characterization ofavailable bandwidth probing techniques[J].IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications,2003,21(6):879-894.
[23]DISCHINGER M,HAEBERLEN A,GUMMADI K,et al.Characterizing residential broadband networks[C]//Proceedings of IMC.2007:43-56.
[24]YANG T,JIN Y,CHEN Y,et al.RT-WABest:A novel end-to-end bandwidth estimation tool in IEEE 802.11 wireless network[J].International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks,2017,13(2):1550147717694889.
[25]HU N,LI L,MAO Z M,et al.Locating internet bottlenecks:Al-gorithms,measurements,and implications[J].ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review,2004,34(4):41-54.
[26]MELANDER B,BJORKMAN M,GUNNINGBERG P.Regres-sion-based available bandwidth measurements[C]//Proceedings of SPECTS.2002:14-19.
[27]YANG X,WANG X,LI Z,et al.Fast and light bandwidth testing for internet users[C]//Proceedings of NSDI.2021:1011-1026.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!