计算机科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (6A): 250400123-16.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.250400123

• 交叉&应用 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于Lasso优化的AHP-FEC气象设备健康度评估技术研究

姚烨1, 郭康宁2, 朱怡安1, 廖少春1, 张妮1   

  1. 1 西北工业大学计算机学院 西安 710129
    2 西北工业大学软件学院 西安 710129
  • 出版日期:2026-06-16 发布日期:2026-06-12
  • 通讯作者: 郭康宁(18722720099@163.com)
  • 作者简介:(yaoye@nwpu.edu.cn)
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2021YFC2802503)

Research on Health Evaluation Technology of AHP-FEC Meteorological Equipment Based onLasso Optimization

YAO Ye1, GUO Kangning2, ZHU Yian1, LIAO Shaochun1, ZHANG Ni1   

  1. 1 School of Software,Northwestern Polytechnical University,Xi'an 710129,China
    2 School of Computing,Northwestern Polytechnical University,Xi'an 710129,China
  • Published:2026-06-16 Online:2026-06-12
  • About author:YAO Ye,born in 1972,associate professor.His main research interests include network information security,digital twin technology,system health management and operation and maintenance etc.
    GUO Kangning,born in 2000,postgra-duate.His main research interests include relability analysis of digital twin system,system health management and operation and maintenance etc.
  • Supported by:
    National Key Research and Development Program of China(2021YFC2802503).

摘要: 气象设备在极端气候条件下长期运行,及时准确获得健康状态对于确保其持续、可靠运行至关重要。然而,气象设备健康度评估面临评价指标复杂、器件间关联程度低、数据采集周期长、定性指标参数多以及定量指标缺少等问题,使得已有健康度评价方法难以直接应用于气象设备健康度评估。针对这些问题,系统地提出具有工程实践价值的气象设备健康度评价指标体系,通过数据预处理方法获得有效数据集合。在此基础上,首先,使用Lasso回归进行气象设备健康度特征提取,得到各指标在评估结果中的优先级;然后,结合层次分析法和专家打分,构建重要性矩阵,计算出各指标的权重;最后,采用模糊综合评价法,针对不同指标构建评语集及其对应的隶属度函数,结合权重及隶属度矩阵计算分析出气象设备的健康状态。实验测试结果表明:所提方法在气象仪器健康状态的识别和评估上展现出较好的性能,精确度达到0.949,召回率为0.966,F1-Score为0.957,为气象设备健康度评估提供了一种新方法,有助于更好地维护和管理气象设备,确保其在极端气候条件下稳定运行。

关键词: 健康度评估, 层次分析法, 模糊综合评价法, Lasso特征提取, 气象设备

Abstract: Meteorological equipment operates for long periods of time under extreme climatic conditions,and obtaining timely and accurate health status is essential to ensure its continued,reliable operation.However,the health assessment of meteorological equipment faces the problems of complex evaluation indexes,low degree of correlation between devices,long data collection pe-riod,many parameters of qualitative indexes and lack of quantitative indexes.Current health evaluation methods are difficult to be directly applied to the health assessment of meteorological equipment.To address these issues,this study aims to systematically propose a set of evaluation index system with value for engineering practice,and to obtain the data set through multiple data preprocessing methods.On this basis,this paper firstly uses Lasso regression for feature extraction to get the priority queue of each indicator in the assessment result.Then,combining AHP and expert scoring,an importance matrix is constructed and the weights of the indicators are calculated.Finally,the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is used to construct comment sets and their corresponding affiliation functions for different indicators,and the health status of meteorological equipment is analysed by combining the weights and affiliation matrix calculation.The experimental test results show that the proposed method exhibits good performance in the recognition of health status,with the accuracy of 0.949,the recall rate of 0.966,and the F1 Score of 0.957.This study provides a new method for assessing the healthiness of meteorological equipment,which can help to better maintain and manage meteorological equipment and ensure its stable operation under extreme weather conditions.

Key words: Health evaluation, Analytic hierarchy process, Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, Lasso feature extraction, Meteorological equipment

中图分类号: 

  • TP391
[1] WANG L,JIA J X.The National Meteorological Work Confe-rence 2024 convenes[N].China Meteorological News,2024-01-11(001).
[2] HU Y,MIAO X,SI Y,et al.Prognostics and health management:A review from the perspectives of design,development and decision[J].Reliability Engineering & System Safety,2022,217:108063.
[3] ZHAO J.A Method of Power Supply Health State Estimation Based on Grey Clustering and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation[J].IEEE Access,2023,11:12226-12236.
[4] NGUYEN K T P,MEDJAHER K,TRAN D T.A review of artificial intelligence methods for engineering prognostics and health management with implementation guidelines[J].Artificial Intelligence Review,2023,56(4):3659-3709.
[5] ZHANG L,QIAO F,WANG J,et al.Equipment Health Assessment Based on Improved Incremental Support Vector Data Description[J].IEEE Transactions on Systems,Man,and Cybernetics:Systems,2021,51(5):3205-3216.
[6] WANG H,WANG B,LUO P,et al.State Evaluation Based on Feature Identification of Measurement Data:for Resilient Power System[J].CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems,2022,8(4):983-992.
[7] LIN L.Research on the use of data fusion technology to evaluate the state of electromechanical equipment[J].AIP Conference Proceedings,2018,1955(1):040157.
[8] NAMGUNG K,YOON H,BAEK S,et al.Estimating SystemState through Similarity Analysis of Signal Patterns[J].Sensors,2020,20(23):6839.
[9] LI Y,ABDEL-MONEM M,GOPALAKRISHNAN R,et al.A quick on-line state of health estimation method for Li-ion batterywith incremental capacity curves processed by Gaussian filter[J].Journal of Power Sources,2018,373:40-53.
[10] XU H,CUI J,CAO Y,et al.Construction of a Green-Comprehensive Evaluation System for Flotation Collectors[J].Processes,2023,11(5):1563.
[11] LI W,YIN H,SONG Y,et al.Evaluating the Risk of Social Isolation in Older People:AHP-Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation[J].Risk Management and Healthcare Policy,2023,16:79-92.
[12] XIAO B,ZENG Y,ZOU Y,et al Hydropower Unit State Evaluation Model Based on AHP and Gaussian Threshold Improved Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation[J].Energies,2023,16(15):5592.
[13] PENG Z,SU P,CHEN W.Indoor Air Quality Assessment ofMetro Stations Based on the Optimal Combination Weight and Improved Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering,2023,149(4):04023001.
[14] LIU J P,WU F,WANG R,et al.Quantitative Risk Assessment of Deep Passage Damage Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation[J].Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science Edition),2022,43(5):733-739.
[15] LI J Y,LI Y,FENG B,et al.Health status assessment of wind turbine units based on random combination weighted fuzzy evaluation[J].Journal of Solar Energy,2022,43(8):340-351.
[16] SHAO Z,ZHANG T,KOSASIH B.Compound Faults Diagnosis in Wind Turbine Gearbox Based on Deep Learning Methods:A Review[C]// 2024 Global Reliability and Prognostics and Health Management Conference(PHM-Beijing).2024:1-8.
[17] HOU J G.GJB 9001C-Interpretation of the Characteristics of the 2017 Standard-Applicability is the Soul of the Standard [J].Quality and Reliability,2018(2):30-34.
[18] ZADEH L A.Fuzzy sets[J].Information and Control,1965,8(3):338-353.
[19] GRANDINI M,BAGLI E,VISANI G.Metrics for multi-classclassification:an overview[J].arXiv:2008.05756.2020.
[20] DING Y,YANG P,FENG K J,et al.Health assessment of unmanned aerial vehicles based on node importance and AHP [J].Control Engineering,2024,31(10):1805-1811.
[21] LIANG Y,LI Z,SHI Y,et al.Dynamic flood risk assessment of substations based on fuzzy Bayesian networks [J].High Voltage Technology,2023,49(S1):153-159.
[22] CHEN R P,WANG Z T,WU H N,et al.Risk Assessment of Shield Tunnel Underpassing Buildings Based on FAHP Method and Improved TOPSIS Method with Interval Numbers [J].Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University,2022,56(12):1710-1719.
[23] KONG Z,CUI Y,XIA Z,et al.Convolution and Long Short-Term Memory Hybrid Deep Neural Networks for Remaining Useful Life Prognostics[J].Applied Sciences,2019,9(19):4156.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!