计算机科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (11A): 520-523.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.200200062

• 大数据&数据科学 • 上一篇    下一篇

企业数据应用影响力评估模型方法研究

乐雯娇1,2, 李朋1, 文俊浩2, 邢镔1,3   

  1. 1 重庆工业大数据创新中心 重庆 400000
    2 重庆大学大数据与软件学院 重庆 400000
    3 工业大数据应用技术国家工程实验室 北京 100000
  • 出版日期:2020-11-15 发布日期:2020-11-17
  • 通讯作者: 李朋(cheney535@163.com)
  • 作者简介:wenjiao_yue@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划课题(2019YFB1706104)

Study on Impact Assessment Model of Enterprise Data Application

YUE Wen-jiao1,2, LI Peng1, WEN Jun-hao2, XING Bin1,3   

  1. 1 Chongqing Industrial Big Data Innovation Center,Chongqing 400000,China
    2 School of Big Data and Software,Chongqing University,Chongqing 400000,China
    3 National Engineering Laboratory of Industrial Big Data Application Technology,Beijing 100000,China
  • Online:2020-11-15 Published:2020-11-17
  • About author:YUE Wen-jiao,born in 1995,postgra-duate.Her main research interests include data processing,and edge computing.
    LI Peng,born in 1985,Ph.D,resear-cher,is a member of China Computer Federation.His main research interests include and data analysis.
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Project(2019YFB1706104).

摘要: 针对企业数据利用率低、数据质量评估难等问题,考虑中国企业数据治理和应用需求,联合美国RMDS实验室从企业数据应用的角度,创造性地加入数据科学评估维度,提出了兼容现有主流评估模型且更满足中国企业需求的企业数据影响力评估模型(Data Impact Assessment Model,DIAM)框架。考虑到现有DIAM模型尚未提出具体可行的评估方式,在模型框架研究的基础上,对DIAM模型的评估方法和评级策略进行研究。首先采用改进的层次分析法对DIAM模型的4个层次,涵盖数据顶层设计、数据科学、数据管理三大维度的240个评估指标进行权重计算;然后在权重计算的基础上,研究自上而下的模型评估方法;进而提出五级的数据影响力评估等级,定义了评级结果的综合性评级调整策略。通过分析,改进的DIAM模型能够适用企业数据应用影响力评估,为企业进行数据治理和应用能力提供科学的评估依据。

关键词: DIAM模型, 层次分析法, 数据成熟度模型, 数据应用影响力, 数据治理

Abstract: Aiming at the problems of low data utilization rate and difficult data quality assessment,considering Chinese enterprise data governance and application requirements,in conjunction with the US RMDS laboratory,from the perspective of enterprise data application,the data science assessment dimension is creatively added,and compatible with existing mainstream assessments is proposed Enterprise data impact assessment model (DIAM) framework that is based on the model and better meets the needs of Chinese enterprises.Considering that the existing DIAM model has not yet proposed a specific and feasible evaluation method,based on the model framework research,this paper studies the evaluation method and rating strategy for the DIAM model.To carry out the research,first,this paper uses an improved analytic hierarchy process to calculate the weights of 240 evaluation indicators covering the four dimensions of the DIAM model,covering the three dimensions of data top-level design,data science,and data management.Then,based on the weight calculation,it researches Top-down model evaluation method.Further,it proposes a five-level data impact evaluation level,and defines a comprehensive rating adjustment strategy for the rating results.Through analysis,the improved DIAM model can be applied to enterprise data application impact evaluation for enterprises,and provides a scientific basis for enterprise data governance and application capability.

Key words: Analytic hierarchy process, Data application impact, Data governance, Data maturity model, DIAM model

中图分类号: 

  • TP319
[1] MENG X F,CI X.Big data management:concepts,technologies and challenges[J].Computer Research and Development,2013,50(1):146-169.
[2] SCALA N M,RAJGOPAL J,VARGAS L G,et al.Group Decision Making with Dispersion in the Analytic Hierarchy Process [J].Group Decision and Negotiation,2016,25(2):355-372.
[3] EDM Council.DCAM:the data management capability assess-ment model[EB/OL].[2019-09-25].https://edmcouncil.org/page/aboutdcamreview.
[4] CMMI Institute.Data Management Maturity (DMM)[EB/OL].https://www.cmmiinstitute.com/data-manage-ment-maturity.
[5] China national engineering laboratory of industrial big data application technology,Global Association for Research Methods and Data Science[M]//Enterprise Data Application Influence White Paper.Guizhou,China,California,USA,2019.
[6] YANG Y,WANG H T,JANG Y,et al.Research on software quality evaluation model based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process[J].Computer and Digital Engineering,2017,45(4).
[7] WANG J L,WU B,XU Y,et al.Study on optimizing water supply performance index weight by improving AHP method[J].Science and Technology Management Research,2019,39(9):49-55.
[8] GAYTHER S.The Analytic Hierarchy process[M]//Encyclopedia of Biostatistics.John Wiley & Sons,2017:19-28.
[9] QIN Z Y.Research on university library data governance andmaturity model under big data environment[J].New Century Library,2019(11):62-67.
[10] XU L X,YUAN L.Research on maturity assessment of local government data opening portal[J].Library and Information Work,2019,63(12):52-58.
[11] LI C,ZHOU C L,HUA B,et al.Information system application maturity evaluation model [J].East China Electric Power,2014,42(11):2428-2431.
[12] FAN Y S.Strategic framework and maturity model of enterprise information management [J].Computer IntegratedManufactu-ring System,2008(7):1290-1296.
[1] 王俊, 王修来, 庞威, 赵鸿飞.
面向科技前瞻预测的大数据治理研究
Research on Big Data Governance for Science and Technology Forecast
计算机科学, 2021, 48(9): 36-42. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.210500207
[2] 刘子琦, 郭炳晖, 程臻, 杨小博, 殷子樵.
基于熵值模糊层次分析法的科技战略评价
Science and Technology Strategy Evaluation Based on Entropy Fuzzy AHP
计算机科学, 2020, 47(6A): 1-5. https://doi.org/10.11896/JsJkx.190700078
[3] 冯沈峰, 高建华.
基于AHP的回归测试用例优先级排序方法
Test Case Prioritization Method Based on AHP for Regression Testing
计算机科学, 2019, 46(8): 233-238. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2019.08.038
[4] 郑志蕴,贾春园,王振飞,李钝.
基于微博的用户相似度计算研究
Computing Research of User Similarity Based on Micro-blog
计算机科学, 2017, 44(2): 262-266. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2017.02.043
[5] 万雪莲,张京河.
基于攻、防的信息系统安全综合评估方法的研究
Research on Comprehensive Assessment Method of Information System Security Based on System Attack and Defense
计算机科学, 2016, 43(Z6): 322-327. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2016.6A.077
[6] 丁卫涛,徐开勇.
基于软件行为的可信评价研究
Research of Trustworthiness Evaluation Model Based on Software Behavior
计算机科学, 2016, 43(1): 202-206. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2016.01.045
[7] 张翠苹,郭振洲,拱长青.
云存储环境下副本选择策略研究
Study on Strategy of Replica Selection in Cloud Storage Environment
计算机科学, 2015, 42(Z11): 408-412.
[8] 单美静.
基于AHP法的移动支付安全风险评估
Analytic Hierarchy Process-based Assessment Method on Mobile Payment Security
计算机科学, 2015, 42(Z11): 368-371.
[9] 陈希宏,金跃辉,杨 谈.
3G网络中移动视频质量评估模型的研究
Study on Quality Assessment Model for Mobile Videos over 3G Network
计算机科学, 2015, 42(9): 86-93. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2015.09.018
[10] 张钰,刘胜美.
基于多属性判决的网络选择算法
Network Selection Algorithm Based on Multi-attribute Decision
计算机科学, 2015, 42(6): 120-124. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2015.06.027
[11] 张华伟,李志华.
基于多目标优化的云存储副本分布策略的研究
Research on Data Distribution Strategy in Cloud Storage System Based on Multi-objective Optimization
计算机科学, 2015, 42(4): 44-50. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2015.04.007
[12] 殷星,周剑雄,王明哲.
企业云应用演进策略多时段分析
Multi-epoch Analysis to Evolution Strategy of Enterprise Cloud Computing Application
计算机科学, 2014, 41(6): 188-192. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2014.06.037
[13] 王磊,叶军,张鸿莉.
一种基于粗糙集和层次分析法的供应商选择方法
Rough Set and Analytic Hierarchy Process-based Approach on Supplier Selection
计算机科学, 2014, 41(3): 80-84.
[14] 姜政伟,赵文瑞,刘宇,刘宝旭.
基于等级保护的云计算安全评估模型
Model for Cloud Computing Security Assessment Based on Classified Protection
计算机科学, 2013, 40(8): 151-156.
[15] 周红琼,周宇,叶庆卫,王晓东.
基于IP应用的网络质量评价研究
Study of Network Quality Evaluation Based on IP Application
计算机科学, 2012, 39(Z6): 125-128.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!