计算机科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (8): 85-93.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.250700115

• 数据库 & 大数据 & 数据科学 • 上一篇    下一篇

社交网络对股价同步性的影响——基于图注意力网络的预测建模与特征解释

卢珊1, 刘岳龙1, 赵之琦1, 顾杰2   

  1. 1 中央财经大学统计与数学学院 北京 100081
    2 中国农业银行 北京 100005
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-21 修回日期:2025-11-16 出版日期:2026-08-15 发布日期:2026-08-17
  • 通讯作者: 顾杰(gujie@pku.edu.cn)
  • 作者简介:(shan.lu@cufe.edu.cn)
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(72371257)

Social Networks and Stock Price Synchronicity:Explainable Predictive Model Based on GraphAttention Network

LU Shan1, LIU Yuelong1, ZHAO Zhiqi1, GU Jie2   

  1. 1 School of Statistics and Mathematics, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China
    2 Agricultural Bank of China, Beijing 100005, China
  • Received:2025-07-21 Revised:2025-11-16 Published:2026-08-15 Online:2026-08-17
  • About author:LU Shan,born in 1992,Ph.D,associate professor.Her main research interests include complex data analysis,deep learning and big data analysis in finance.
    GU Jie,born in 1991,Ph.D.His main research interests include complex data analysis and machine learning.
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(72371257).

摘要: 社交媒体正逐渐成为金融信息传播与投资者决策互动的重要场域。利用海量用户行为数据解析金融市场运行规律,已成为行为金融学与计算社会科学交叉研究的前沿方向。社交网络中的信息传播深刻影响着资产定价效率,但现有研究多依赖财务因子等结构化数据,难以刻画市场参与者社交网络结构的动态演化及情绪互动。为此,聚焦投资者社交网络与资产定价效率之间的关系,基于大规模社交媒体数据,构建投资者关注关系网络,并将其发布的短文本作为节点特征,进一步建立基于图注意力网络的股价同步性预测模型,同时引入可解释性方法识别引发同步性上升的关键文本特征与典型网络结构。实证结果表明,融合投资者社交网络结构与文本信息显著提升了股价同步性预测精度。在解释性分析方面,所提方法识别出显著影响股价同步性预测的关键文本词与典型子图模式。这为资产定价与市场有效性提供了新的数据驱动与可解释分析视角,并推动了深度学习与网络科学在金融领域的交叉应用。

关键词: 股价同步性, 社交网络, 投资者情绪, 图注意力网络, 可解释性分析

Abstract: Social media is increasingly becoming an important arena for financial information dissemination and investor decision-making interactions.Leveraging massive investor behavior data to analyze financial market dynamics has emerged as a frontier direction in the intersection of behavioral finance and computational social science.Information diffusion within social networks profoundly influences asset pricing efficiency.However,existing studies largely rely on structured data,such as financial factors,ma-king it difficult to capture the dynamic evolution of investors’ network structures and emotional interactions.This study focuses on the relationship between investor social networks and asset pricing efficiency.Based on large-scale social media data,it constructs an investor-following network and uses the short-text posts published by users as node features.A stock price synchroni-city prediction model is then developed using a graph attention network,and interpretability methods are introduced to identify key textual features and typical network structures that drive synchronicity increases.Empirical results show that integrating investor network structures with textual information significantly improves the accuracy of stock price synchronicity prediction.Furthermore,interpretability analyses reveal key words and subgraph patterns that exert substantial influence on synchronicity prediction.This research provides a new data-driven and interpretable analytical perspective for asset pricing and market efficiency,and extends the intersection of deep learning and network science into financial research.

Key words: Stock price synchronicity, Social network, Investor sentiment, Graph attention network, Explainability analysis

中图分类号: 

  • F832.5
[1] MORCK R,YEUNG B,YU W.The information content ofstock markets:why do emerging markets have synchronous stock price movements[J].Journal of Financial Economics,2000,58(1/2):215-260.
[2] JIN L,MYERS S C.R2 around the world:New theory and new tests[J].Journal of Financial Economics,2006,79(2):257-292.
[3] WANG C L,SHI W,SUN F F,et al.Information Transfer in Financial Market:Evidence based on Investor Attention Transfer in Chinese A-share Market[J].Chinese Journal of Management Science,2024,32(12):15-24.
[4] SUN F,SUN Z Y.How does Public Data Openness ImproveCapital Market Pricing Efficiency?[J].Business and Management Journal,2025,47(1):166-189.
[5] ROLL R.R2[J].The Journal of Finance,1988,43(3):541-566.
[6] DURNEV A,MORCK R,YEUNG B,et al.Does greater firm-specific return variation mean more or less informed stock pricing[J].Journal of Accounting Research,2003,41(5):797-836.
[7] YOU J X,ZHANG J S,JIANG W.Institution Building,Firm-specific Information and the Synchronicity of Stock Prices:A R2-Based Perspective[J].China Economic Quarterly,2007(1):189-206.
[8] DE LONG J B,SHLEIFER A,SUMMERS L,et al.The survival of noise traders in financial markets[J].The Journal of Business,1991,64(1):1-19.
[9] KELLY P J.Information efficiency and firm-specific return variation[J].The Quarterly Journal of Finance,2014,4(4):1450018.
[10] LEE D W,LIU M H.Does more information in stock price lead to greater or smaller idiosyncratic return volatility[J].Journal of Banking & Finance,2011,35(6):1563-1580.
[11] KONG D M,SHEN R.Information environment,R2,and overconfidence:a test based on asset pricing efficiency[J].South China Journal of Economics,2007(6):3-21.
[12] WANG Y P,LIU H L,WU L S.Information transparency,institutional investors,and stock price synchronicity[J].Journal of Financial Research,2009(12):162-174.
[13] LIN Z G,HAN L Y,LI W.Stock price nonsynchronicity:Information or noise?[J].Journal of Management Sciences in China,2012,15(6):68-81.
[14] SEE-TO E W K,YANG Y.Market sentiment dispersion and its effects on stock return and volatility[J].Electronic Markets,2017,27(3):283-296.
[15] ZHOU S Q.Research on the effect of investor sentiment andnetwork news on stock price synchronicity[D].Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology,2020.
[16] SUN K P,XIAO X.Social media,communication among investors,and capital market pricing efficiency[J].Review of Investment Studies,2018,37(4):140-160.
[17] DRAKE M S,JENNINGS J,ROULSTONE D T,et al.The comovement of investor attention[J].Management Science,2017,63:2847-2867.
[18] QIU B,YU J,ZHANG K.Trust and stock price synchronicity:Evidence from China[J].Journal of Business Ethics,2020,167:97-109.
[19] YI B,XIANG X.Pair analyst coverage and return comovement:Evidence from China[J].Pacific-Basin Finance Journal,2023,77:101908.
[20] LU S,ZHAO J.Investor network and stock return comove-ment:Information-seeking through intragroup and intergroup followings[J].International Review of Financial Analysis,2024,93:103204.
[21] GORI M,MONFARDINI G,SCARSELLI F.A new model for learning in graph domains[C]//Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.New York:IEEE,2005:729-734.
[22] SCARSELLI F,GORI M,TSOI A C,et al.The graph neural network model[J].IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks,2009,20(1):61-80.
[23] VELIČKOVIĆ P,CUCURULL G,CASANOVA A,et al.Graph attention networks[J].arXiv:1710.10903,2017.
[24] MATSUNAGA D,SUZUMURA T,TAKAHASHI T.Exploring graph neural networks for stock market predictions with rolling window analysis[J].arXiv:1909.10660,2019.
[25] YIN X,YAN D,ALMUDAIFER A,et al.Forecasting stock prices using stock correlation graph:A graph convolutional network approach[C]//2021 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks(IJCNN).New York:IEEE,2021:1-8.
[26] KEKANA M,SUMBWANYAMBE M,HLALELE T.Ad-vanced machine learning in quantitative finance using graph neural networks[J].Journal of Advances in Information Technology,2024,15(9):1025-1034.
[27] QIAN H,ZHOU H,ZHAO Q,et al.MDGNN:Multi-relational dynamic graph neural network for comprehensive and dynamic stock investment prediction[C]//Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.Washington DC:AAAI,2024:14642-14650.
[28] LIU M P,ZHU M Y,WANG X Y,et al.ECHO-GL:Earnings calls-driven heterogeneous graph learning for stock movement prediction[C]//Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence,Washington DC:AAAI,2024:13972-13980.
[29] SANKAR A,WU Y H,GOU L,et al.Dynamic graph representation learning via self-attention networks[J].arXiv:1812.09430,2018.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!