计算机科学 ›› 2013, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (9): 111-115.

• 信息安全 • 上一篇    下一篇

冲突可衡量多源信息融合技术研究

陈超,陈性元,汪永伟,王义功   

  1. 信息工程大学 郑州450004 河南省信息安全重点实验室 郑州450004;信息工程大学 郑州450004 河南省信息安全重点实验室 郑州450004;信息工程大学 郑州450004 河南省信息安全重点实验室 郑州450004;信息工程大学 郑州450004 河南省信息安全重点实验室 郑州450004
  • 出版日期:2018-11-16 发布日期:2018-11-16
  • 基金资助:
    本文受国家高技术研究发展技术(863计划)(2012AA012704),国家973重点基础发展计划(2011CB311801)资助

Research on Conflict-measurable Multiple Information Fusion Technology

CHEN Chao,CHEN Xing-yuan,WANG Yong-wei and WANG Yi-gong   

  • Online:2018-11-16 Published:2018-11-16

摘要: 针对传统的基于D-S证据理论的多源信息融合系统中不能衡量冲突程度等问题,提出了冲突可衡量多源信息融合系统。首先提出了一种基于决策表的主客观相结合的获取BPA的方法,其次在得到冲突矩阵和一致矩阵的基础上定义了基于冲突/一致度的冲突衡量标准,然后根据证据的平均冲突度确定其在组合公式中的权重系数,最后在充分利用冲突证据所带来的信息的基础上提出了基于冲突信息的组合规则。仿真实验表明,合成结果不仅符合人类逻辑推理,而且极大地减少了不确定性。

关键词: 多源,D-S证据理论,冲突衡量,组合规则,信息融合,基本概率分配 中图法分类号TP393.08文献标识码A

Abstract: As traditional multiple source information fusion system based on D-S evidence theory can not measure conflict and solve other problems,a conflict-measurable multiple source information fusion system was presented.Firstly,we presented a method which takes subjectivity and objectivity into consideration to get BPA based on decision-making table.Secondly,we defined a conflict measure based on conflict value and consistent value followed in the conflict matrix and consistent matrix.Next,we determined the weight value of the evidence in the combination rules based on the avera-ge conflict value of the evidence with others.Finally,we made full use of information produced from conflict evidence,and presented a new combination rules based on conflict information.Simulation experiment shows that the conclusion obtained by the fusion method is not only in accordance with human logical reasoning,but also reduces the uncertainty of the conclusion greatly.

Key words: Multiple source,D-S evidence theory,Conflict measure,Combination rules,Information fusion,BPA

[1] Edlund J,Gronkvist M,Lingvall A,et al.Rule Based Situation Assessment for Sea-Surveillance[C]∥Multisensor,Multisource Information Fusion.2006,3
[2] Lefever E,Colot O.Belief function combination and conflictmanagement[J].Information Fusion,2002,3(2):149-162
[3] Fouque L,Appriou A,Pieczynski W.An evidential Markovian model for data fusion and unsupervised image classification[C]∥Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Information Fusion.2000:25-32
[4] Brodzik A K,Enders R H.Semigroup structure of sing Leton Dempster-Shafer evidence accumulation[J].IEEE Transactions on Information Theory,2009,5(11):5241-5250
[5] Quost B,Masson M H,Denoeux T.Classifier fusion in theDempster-Shafer framework using optimized t-norm based combination rules[J].International Journal of Approximate Rea-soning,2011,52:353-374
[6] Quost B,Denoeux T,Masson M H.Pairwise classifierc Ombination using belief functions[J].Pattern Recogn Itionletters,2007,8(5):644-653
[7] Weiru L.Analyzing the degree of conflict among belie F funetions[J].Artificial Intelligent,2006,0:909-924
[8] 路艳丽.雷英杰.王晶晶.基于粗糙D-S理论的身份融合方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2007,9(10):1749-1752
[9] 康兵义,李娅,邓勇,等.基于区间数的基本概率指派生成方法及应用[J].电子学报,2012,0(6):1092-1096
[10] Lefevre E,Colot O.Belief function comnibation and conflictmanagement[J].Information Fusion,2002,3(2):149-162
[11] 杨风暴,王肖霞.D-S证据理论的冲突证据合成方法[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2010
[12] Yager R R.On the Dempster-Shafer Framework and NewCombintion rules[J].Information Systems,1987,1(4):93-138
[13] 孙全,叶秀清,顾伟康.一种新的基于证据理论的合成公式[J].电子学报,2000,28(8):117-119
[14] Zadeh L A.Review of Shafer’s mathematical theory of evidence[J].Artificial Intelligent Magazine,1984,5(3):81-83
[15] 胡昌华,司小胜,周志杰,等.新的证据冲突衡量标准下的D-S改进算法[J].电子学报,2009,37(7):1578-1583
[16] 杨凯,马建峰,杨超.无线网状网中基于D-S证据理论的可信路由[J].通信学报,2011,32(5):89-96
[17] Leung Y,Ji Nan-nan,Ma Jiang-hong.An integrated information fusion approach based on the theory of evidence and group decision-making[J].Information Fusion,2012,8(2):1-13
[18] 叶芝慧.信息论与编码[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2011
[19] Florea M C,Jousselme A L,Bosse E,et al.Robust combination rules for evidence theory[J].Information Fusion,2009,0:183-197
[20] Shafer G.A Mathematical Theory of Evidence[M].PriNceton University Press,1976

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!