Computer Science ›› 2023, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (2): 300-309.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.220800169

• Artificial Intelligence • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on Abductive Analysis of Auto Insurance Fraud Based on Network Representation Learning

LI Weizhuo1,3,4, LU Bingjie2, YANG Junming1, NA Chongning2   

  1. 1 School of Modern Posts,Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications,Nanjing 210003,China
    2 Fintech Research Center,Zhejiang Lab,Hangzhou 311100,China
    3 State Key Laboratory for Novel Software Technology,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093,China
    4 Key Laboratory of Computer Network and Information Integration(Southeast University),Ministry of Education,Nanjing 211189,China
  • Received:2022-08-16 Revised:2022-11-06 Online:2023-02-15 Published:2023-02-22
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(62006125),Foundation of Jiangsu Provincial Double-Innovation Doctor Program(JSSCBS20210532),NUPTSF(NY220171) and Key Research Project of Zhejiang Lab(2020NF0AC01,2022NF0AC01)

Abstract: Auto insurance fraud detection plays an important role in promoting the healthy development of auto insurance.As the judgment of fraud involves the core content of civil rights,it is necessary for auto insurance experts to check the case and provide the reasons for fraud.Although the method based on machine learning have strongscalability and high accuracy,it lacks interpre-tability,while the rule method based on expert system has good interpretability,but it is limited by the trigger conditions of complex rules.To address the unexplainable problem of cases detected as“fraud” by machine learning methods without triggering the expert system fraud rules,this paper puts forward an analysis method of auto insurance fraud traceability based on network representationlear-ning.It first defines the abductive analysis task of auto insurance fraud.That is,for cases that are identified as “fraud ”ones by machine learning methods without triggering the expert system,it returns the ranking of the most likely fraud rules to auto insurance experts.Then,the method models the case-rule factor network based on the network representation lear-ning according to the fraud cases that have triggered the rules of the expert system,and learns the vector representation of these factors in fraud rules.To better measure the similarity between fraud cases and rules with incomplete triggering factors in the expert system,a weighted splicing strategy of factors in fraud rules is designed based on the principle of abductive reasoning,which can alleviate the problem of insufficient training data to some extent.Experimental results show that the proposed method can obtain better performances than existing methods in terms of three metrics.

Key words: Auto insurance fraud, Network representation learning, Abductive reasoning, Expert system, Interpretability

CLC Number: 

  • TP391
[1]DIAO L,WANG N.Research on Premium Income ForecastBased on X12-GLSTM Model [J].Computer Science,2020,47(S1):512-516.
[2]YU W,FENG G F,ZHANG W J.A Research on Fraud Detection System and Gang Identification of Vehicle Insurance [J].Insurance Studies,2017(2):63-73.
[3]ZHANG B Y,XIAO Y G,ZENG Y Z.A Comparative Study on Measuring Variable Importance in Auto Insurance Pricing—Based on Ensemble Learning and Generalized Linear Regression [J].Insurance Studies,2019(10):73-83.
[4]ŠUBELJ L,FURLAN Š,BAJEC M.An expert system for detecting automobile insurance fraud using social network analysis[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2011,38(1):1039-1052.
[5]LU B,LI W,NA C,NIU Z,et al.Auto Insurance Fraud Detection with Machine Learning Models:A Survey [J].Computer Engineering and Applications,2022,58(5):34-49.
[6]DING M,LAN X,PENG R,et al.Progress and Prospect of Machine Reasoning [J].Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence,2021,34(1):1-13.
[7]CONG Y,WANG Z,ZHU J,et al.Insights into Dataset and Algorithm Related Problems in Artificial Intelligence for Law [J].Computer Science,2022,49(4):74-79.
[8]VIAENE S,DEDENE G,DERRIG R A.Auto claim fraud detection using Bayesian learning neuralnetworks[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2005,29(3):653-666.
[9]PAYAM H,NEDA R P.A Data Mining Model for Risk Assessment and Customer Segmentation in the Insurance Industry[J].International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences(IJSDS),2013,4(1):52-78.
[10]KAŠĆELAN L,KAŠĆELAN V,NOVOVI-BURIĆ M.A Data Mining Approach for Risk Assessment in Car Insurance:Evidence from Montenegro[J].International Journal of Business Intelligence Research(IJBIR),2014,5(3):11-28.
[11]LI Y,YAN C,LIU W,et al.A principle component analysis-based random forest with the potential nearest neighbor method for automobile insurance fraud identification[J].Applied Soft Computing,2018,70:1000-1009.
[12]HE X,CHUA T S.Neural factorization machines for sparse predictive analytics[C]//Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval.2017:355-364.
[13]GUO J,LIU G,ZUO Y,et al.Learning sequential behavior representations for fraud detection[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining(ICDM).IEEE,2018:127-136.
[14]WANG R,FU B,FU G,et al.Deep & cross network for ad click predictions[C]//Proceedings of the ADKDD'17.2017:1-7.
[15]SUBUDHI S,PANIGRAHI S.Use of optimized Fuzzy C-Means clustering and supervised classifiers for automobile insurance fraud detection[J].Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences,2020,32(5):568-575.
[16]MAJHI S K.Fuzzy clustering algorithm based on modifiedwhale optimization algorithm for automobile insurance fraud detection[J].Evolutionary intelligence,2021,14(1):35-46.
[17]GUO G Z,DUAN J X.Game analysis of insurance fraud [J].Journal of Capital University of Economics and Business,1999(3):51-54.
[18]LIU X H,JIN J L.The Insurance Fraud Game and Insurance Contract Based on Optimal Game Strategies [J].System Engineering Theory and Practice,2004(2):19-24.
[19]ZHAO G Q,WU H.Is There Moral Hazard in Chinese Automobile Insurance Market? —— Evidence from Dynamic Renewal Data [J].Journal of Financial Research,2010(6):175-188.
[20]TANG J,MO Y W.Construction of auto insurance anti-fraud system based on data mining technology [J].Shanghai Insu-rance,2013(11):39-42,63.
[21]WANG H W.A Research on Chinese Insurers' Moral Hazard Screening in Operation:From the Big Data Hadoop Clustering Analysis Technology Perspective [J].Insurance Studies,2016(2):59-67.
[22]YAN C,LI Y Q,SUN H T.A Research on Automobile Insurance Fraud Identification Based on Random Forest Model and Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm [J].Insurance Studies,2017(6):114-127.
[23]YU W,FENG G F,ZHANG W J.A Research on Fraud Detection System and Gang Identification of Vehicle Insurance [J].Insurance Studies,2017(2):63-73.
[24]XU X,WANG Z X,WANG M Q.The model and empirical studyof motor vehicle insurance fraud identification based on deep learning technology [J].Shanghai Insurance,2019(8):53-58.
[25]PANIGRAHI S,PALKAR B.Comparative analysis on classification algorithms of auto-insurance fraud detection based on feature selection algorithms[J].International Journal of Computational Science and Engineering,2018,6(9):72-77.
[26]HASSAN A K I,ABRAHAM A.Modeling insurance fraud detection using imbalanced data classification[C]//Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Nature and Biologically Inspired Computing.Cham:Springer,2016:117-127.
[27]PADHI S,PANIGRAHI S.Decision Templates based EnsembleClassifiers for Automobile Insurance Fraud Detection[C]//Proceedings of the 2019 Global Conference for Advancement in Technology(GCAT).IEEE,2019:1-5.
[28]KUANG K,LI L,GENG Z,et al.Causal Inference [J].Engineering,2020,6(3):107-130.
[29]CHEN R,JIANG Y F,LIN L.Study of Abductive Reasoning:State of the Art and Problems[J].Computer Science,2003(5):25-27,38.
[30]SUN J G,LIU R S,CHEN R.Abductive Diagnosis from Propositional Default Theories[J].Journal of Jilin University(Science Edition),1998(4):34-38.
[31]LIN Y.The risk of motor vehicle and the principle of the study of the proxy commission in China[J].Journal of Central South University(Social Sciences) 2006,12(3):274-278.
[32]HUANG P,LI J.Mining Model for the Insurance Retainment Rules Based on Rough Sets[J].Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University,2004(4):641-645.
[33]FAN X J.The Extraction of High Profitable Custom's Characteristics Based on Variable Precision Rough Set[J].Journal of Donghua University(Natural Science),2004(3):43-47.
[34]ZHU J Z.Research on data notification and protection mechanism of UBI auto insurance under networking[J].Financial Regulation Research,2020(8):102-114.
[35]TU C C,YANG C,LIU Z Y,et al.Network representationlearning:an overview[J].Scientia Sinica(Informationis),2017,47(8):980-996.
[36]CUI P,WANG X,PEI J,et al.A Survey on Network Embedding[J].IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering,2019,31(5):833-852.
[37]LIU X Y,TANG J.Network representation learning:A macroand micro view[J].AI Open,2021(2):43-64.
[38]TANG J,QU M,WANG M Z,et al.LINE:Large-scale Information Network Embedding[C]//Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web.ACM,Italy,2015:1067-1077.
[39]CHEN F,WANG Y C,WANG B,et al.Graph representation learning:a survey[J].Transactions on Signal and Information Processing,2020,9(1):e15.
[40]WANG Q,MAO Z,WANG B,et al.Knowledge graph embedding:A survey of approaches and applications[J].IEEE Transac-tions on Knowledge and Data Engineering,2017,29(12):2724-2743.
[41]PEROZZI B,AL-RFOU R,SKIENA S.Deepwalk:Online lear-ning of social representations[C]//Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Disco-very and Data Mining,USA.2014:701-710.
[42]GROVER A,LESKOVEC J.node2vec:Scalable Feature Lear-ning for Networks[C]//Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining,USA.2016:855-864.
[43]CAO S,LU W,XU Q.GraRep:Learning Graph Representations with Global Structural Information [C]//Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management,Australia.2015:891-900.
[44]XIAO W,CUI P,WANG J,et al.Community Preserving Net-work Embedding[C]//Proceedings of the 31st AAAI Confe-rence on Artificial Intelligence.USA,2017:203-209.
[45]JIE Z,DONG X Y,WANG Y,et al.ProNE:Fast and Scalable Network Representation Learning[C]//Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence,China.2019:4278-4284.
[46]MA R X,LI Z Y,CHEN Z K,et al.Review of Reasoning on Knowledge Graph[J].Computer Science,2022,49(S1):74-85.
[1] DONG Yongfeng, HUANG Gang, XUE Wanruo, LI Linhao. Graph Attention Deep Knowledge Tracing Model Integrated with IRT [J]. Computer Science, 2023, 50(3): 173-180.
[2] WANG Shaojiang, LIU Jia, ZHENG Feng, PAN Yicheng. Survey on Hierarchical Clustering for Machine Learning [J]. Computer Science, 2023, 50(1): 9-17.
[3] WANG Ming, WU Wen-fang, WANG Da-ling, FENG Shi, ZHANG Yi-fei. Generative Link Tree:A Counterfactual Explanation Generation Approach with High Data Fidelity [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(9): 33-40.
[4] HUANG Li, ZHU Yan, LI Chun-ping. Author’s Academic Behavior Prediction Based on Heterogeneous Network Representation Learning [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(9): 76-82.
[5] ZHAO Lu, YUAN Li-ming, HAO Kun. Review of Multi-instance Learning Algorithms [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(6A): 93-99.
[6] CHENG Ke-yang, WANG Ning, CUI Hong-gang, ZHAN Yong-zhao. Interpretability Optimization Method Based on Mutual Transfer of Local Attention Map [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(5): 64-70.
[7] FU Kun, GUO Yun-peng, ZHUO Jia-ming, LI Jia-ning, LIU Qi. Semantic Information Enhanced Network Embedding with Completely Imbalanced Labels [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(11): 109-116.
[8] CHEN Zhi-yu, SHAN Zhi-long. Research Advances in Knowledge Tracing [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(10): 83-95.
[9] JIANG Zong-li, FAN Ke, ZHANG Jin-li. Generative Adversarial Network and Meta-path Based Heterogeneous Network Representation Learning [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(1): 133-139.
[10] FU Kun, ZHAO Xiao-meng, FU Zi-tong, GAO Jin-hui, MA Hao-ran. Deep Network Representation Learning Method on Incomplete Information Networks [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(12): 212-218.
[11] PAN Yu, ZOU Jun-hua, WANG Shuai-hui, HU Gu-yu, PAN Zhi-song. Deep Community Detection Algorithm Based on Network Representation Learning [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(11A): 198-203.
[12] ZHAO Man, ZHAO Jia-kun, LIU Jin-nuo. Link Prediction Algorithm Based on Ego Networks Structure and Network Representation Learning [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(11A): 211-217.
[13] DING Yu, WEI Hao, PAN Zhi-song, LIU Xin. Survey of Network Representation Learning [J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(9): 52-59.
[14] JIANG Zong-li, LI Miao-miao, ZHANG Jin-li. Graph Convolution of Fusion Meta-path Based Heterogeneous Network Representation Learning [J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(7): 231-235.
[15] HUANG Yi, SHEN Guo-wei, ZHAO Wen-bo, GUO Chun. Network Representation Learning Algorithm Based on Vulnerability Threat Schema [J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(7): 292-298.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!