Computer Science ›› 2023, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (6A): 220600013-5.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.220600013

• Artificial Intelligence • Previous Articles     Next Articles

L-type Redundancy Property in Propositional Logic

LIU Lingrong, CHEN Shuwei, JIANG Shipan   

  1. 1 School of Mathematics,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 611756,China;
    2 National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of System Credibility Automatic Verification,Chengdu 611756,China
  • Online:2023-06-10 Published:2023-06-12
  • About author:LIU Lingrong,born in 1996,postgra-duate.His main research interests include automated reasoning and so on. CHEN Shuwei,born in 1977,Ph.D, as-sociate professor.His main research interests include logic based automated reasoning and decision analysis.
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(61976130).

Abstract: The technique of clause set simplification is a crucial part in the process of propositional logic SAT solving.The clause elimination methods corresponding to the redundancy property can accurately identify and delete redundant clauses.Either in the pre-processing stage or in the process of SAT solving,the embedded clause elimination methods in the SAT solver accelerate the solving efficiency of the solver. A large number of efficient clause elimination methods are extended based on the redundancy properties of blocked clauses and implication module resolution clauses.In order to check whether clause C is redundant,we need only to consider whether clause C satisfies the redundancy conditions.The proposed L-type redundancy is an extension of the blocked redundancy property,subsumption redundancy property and implication module resolution redundancy. It extends the judgement condition of redundant clause from the resolution of single literal to the combination of the set of literals.According to the properties of L-type redundancy,this paper analyzes the properties of L-type redundancy clause,and applies comparison analy-sis on the efficiency of L-type redundancy clauses and other existed redundant clauses,so as to illustrate the efficiency of L-type redundancy clauses.

Key words: Propositional logic, Clause elimination method, L-type redundancy property

CLC Number: 

  • TP181
[1]LIU X H.Automatic Reasoning Based on Reduction Method[M].Beijing:Science Press,1994.
[2]EEN N,BIERE A.Effective preprocessing in SAT through variable and clause elimination[C]//International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing(SAT 2005).Berlin:Springer-Verlag,2005,3569:61-75.
[3]JARVISALO M,BIERE A.Blocked Clause Elimination[C]//International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems.Berlin:Springer,2010:129-144.
[4]CHEN J C.Fast blocked clause decomposition with high quality[EB/OL].[2015-12-09][2022-05-28].https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.00459v2,2015.
[5]HEULE M,JARVISALO M,BIERE A.Clause Elimination Procedures for CNF Formulas[C]//Logic for Programming,Artificial Intelligence,Reasoning International Conference.DBLP,2010:357-371.
[6]HEULE M,JARVISALO M,BIERE A.Covered Clause Elimination[M]//Logic for Programming.Aritficial Intelligence and Reasoning-LPAR17,2010:41-46.
[7]JARVISALO M,HEULE M,BIERE A.Inprocessing Rules[C]//International Joint Conference on Automated Reasoning.Berlin:Springer,2012:355-370.
[8]KIESL B,SEIDL M,TOMPITS H,et al.Super-Blocked Clauses[C]//International Joint Conference on Automated Reasoning,IJCAR 2016.Springer International Publishing,2016:45-61.
[9]HEULE M,KIESL B, BIERE A.Short Proofs Without NewVariables[C]//International Conference on Automated Deduction.Berlin,Springer-Verlag,2017:130-147.
[10]HEULE M,KIESL B,BIERE A.Encoding Redundancy for Satisfaction-Driven Clause Learning[M]//Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems(ACAS 2019).2019:41-58.
[11]NING X R,XU Y,CHEN Z S.Novel preprocessing clauseelimination methods for propositional SAT solvers[J].ComputerIntegrated Manufacturing Systems,2020,26(8):131-140.
[12]NING X R,XU Y,CAO F,et al.Clause elimination methods in first-order logic lifted from proposition logic[J].Computer Engineering and Applications,2019,55(5):18-25.
[13]NING X R.The study of redundancy property of propositional logic and first-order logic[D].Chengdu:Southwest Jiaotong University,2019.
[14]LIU L R,CHEN S W,WU G F.A class of extended clause elimination methods in propositional logic[J].Journal of Sichuan Normal University,2023,46(1):117-124.
[1] LI Jie, ZHONG Xiao-mei. Redundant Literals of Ternary Clause Sets in Propositional Logic [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(6A): 109-112.
[2] TANG Lei-ming, BAI Mu-chen, HE Xing-xing, LI Xing-yu. Complete Contradiction and Smallest Contradiction Based on Propositional Logic [J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(11A): 83-85.
[3] LIU Ting, XU Yang, CHEN Xiu-lan. Unit Clauses and Their Complementary Literals and Redundant Clauses in Propositional Logic [J]. Computer Science, 2019, 46(8): 255-259.
[4] CHEN Qing-shan, XU Yang, WU Guan-feng. Learnt Clause Evaluation Algorithm of SAT Problem Based on Trend Strength [J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(12): 137-141.
[5] CHEN Cheng, PAN Zheng-hua and LV Yong-xi. Fuzzy Modal Propositional Logic with Three Kinds of Negation [J]. Computer Science, 2017, 44(4): 263-268.
[6] XU Wei, LI Xiao-fen and LIU Duan-yang. Propositional Logic-based Association-rule Mining Algorithm L-Eclat [J]. Computer Science, 2017, 44(12): 211-215.
[7] CHEN Qing-shan, XU Yang, WU Guan-feng and HE Xing-xing. Path Identification Based Delaying Restart Algorithm for CDCL SAT Solver [J]. Computer Science, 2017, 44(11): 279-283.
[8] WU Xiao-gang and PAN Zheng-hua. Fuzzy Reasoning and its Application Based on Fuzzy Propositonal Logic [J]. Computer Science, 2015, 42(Z11): 100-103.
[9] LIU Yi, XU Yang and JIA Hai-rui. Notes on Multi-ary α-Resolution Principle Based on Lattice-valued Logical System LP(X) [J]. Computer Science, 2015, 42(4): 249-252.
[10] GHANG Jia-feng,XU Yang,HE Xing-xing. Lattice-valued Semantic Resolution Reasoning Method [J]. Computer Science, 2011, 38(9): 201-203.
[11] LIU Hong-lan,GAO Qing-sh,YANG Bing-ru. Set Algebra is Semantic Interpretation for Classical Formal System of Propositional Calculus [J]. Computer Science, 2010, 37(9): 194-197.
[12] TIAN Cong,DUAN Zhen-hua,WANG Xiao-bing. Solving Einstein's Puzzle with SAT [J]. Computer Science, 2010, 37(5): 184-186.
[13] . [J]. Computer Science, 2008, 35(9): 230-232.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!