计算机科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6A): 49-53.doi: 10.11896/JsJkx.191000074

• 人工智能 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于船舶自动识别系统与人工神经网络的船舶载重预测

王鹏, 苏伟, 张久文, 刘映杰, 王臻睿   

  1. 兰州大学信息科学与工程学院 兰州 730030
  • 发布日期:2020-07-07
  • 通讯作者: 苏伟(suwei@lzu.edu.cn)
  • 作者简介:yiyao_keJi@foxmail.com
  • 基金资助:
    广西科技重大专项(桂科AA17204096);广西科技基地和人才专项(桂科AD16380076)

Prediction of Vessel Load Based on Vessel Automatic Identification System and Artificial Neural Network

WANG Peng, SU Wei, ZHANG Jiu-wen, LIU Ying-Jie and WANG Zhen-rui   

  1. School of Information Science and Engineering,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730030,China
  • Published:2020-07-07
  • About author:WANG Peng, born in 1990, postgra-duate.His main research interests include machine learning and embedded system.
    SU Wei, associate professor, Ph.D.His main research interests include deep learning, IoT technologies and natural language processing.
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Science Foundation of Guangxi (AA17204096,AD16380076).

摘要: 传统的船舶载重获取方法多基于人工查表、经验计算和回归分析,这些方法操作麻烦,自动化水平较低,计算过程充斥着大量经验数值和统计公式,而一些统计公式和经验数值随着船型的变化已经过时,需要及时更新。目前,获取全球船舶动态载重是一项困难的工作。文中提出基于船舶自动识别系统和人工神经网络的船舶载重预测方法,该方法分析了船舶长度、宽度、吃水深度、船舶类型与船舶载重的数学关系,建立了Adam-Dropout优化的多层人工神经网络,确定了船舶载重预测的最佳输入组合;同时,还探究了该方法适用的船舶类型。实验结果表明,ANN的输入为船舶长度、宽度、吃水深度、船舶类型时,预测效果最好,MAPE误差为7.63%,最小APE误差可达0.05%;神经网络的隐含层数为4、神经元个数为11时,预测结果最优;该方法适用于原油船、散货船、化学品船、集装箱船、液化天然气船、液化石油气船、成品油船、杂货船、冷冻船,预测MAPE误差均在15%以内。

关键词: 吃水深度, 船舶载重, 船舶自动识别系统, 平均绝对百分误差, 人工神经网络

Abstract: Traditional acquisition methods of vessel load are mostly based on manual observation,empirical calculation and regression analysis.These methods are usually difficult to operate,which may also have a low level of automation.On the other way,the calculation process is full of a large number of outdated empirical values and statistical formulas which sometimes need to be updated timely with the changes of vessel type.At present,it is a difficult task to obtain vessel’s dynamic load all around the world.This paper presented a prediction method of vessel load based on vessel automatic identification system and artificial neural network,analyzed the mathematical relationship between vessel’s length,breadth,draught,vessel types and vessel load,established a multi-layer artificial neural network with Adam-Dropout optimization,found out the best input types of artificial neural network and its suitable vessel types.Experiments show that the prediction result is the best when the inputs of ANN are length,breadth,draught and vessel type,the MAPE values of ANN can reach to 7.63% while the minimum APE value reaches to 0.05%.The prediction result is the best when the number of hidden layers is 4 and the number of neurons is 11.The method is suitable for crude oil tankers,bulk carriers,chemical tankers,container vessels,liquefied natural gas tankers,liquefied petroleum gas tankers,oil products tankers,grocery cargos and refrigeration vessels.The MAPE values of them are all less than 15%.

Key words: Artificial neural network, Draught, Mean absolute percentage error, Vessel automatic identification system, Vessel load

中图分类号: 

  • TP391
[1] ZHOU J H,YU X H,PENG K C.Research on the Single Floating Off-shore Ship Draft Detection System in Inland Navigation.IOP Conference Series:Earth and Environmental Science,2018,170(2).
[2] ZHANG W,LI Y.Design of ship water gauge weighing system based on image processing .Marine Engineering,2019,48(3):175-178,182.
[3] GONG G F,ZHANG J,HE Z H,et al.Application of Mixed Coding Immune Algorithms in Ship Load Measurement .Control Theory and Application,2009,26(3):349-352.
[4] KRISTENSEN H O.Determination of regression formulas for main dimensions of tankers and bulk carriers based on IHS fairplaydata.Technical University of Denmark,2010.
[5] REN J,ZHANG A,YAN L P,et al.Research on Recognition of Load State of Inland Vessels .Instrument Technology,2017(6):38-40.
[6] DENG K,YUAN H L,YAN H M.Research on Design Method of Load Weight of Super Large Container Ship .Ship and Ocean Engineering,2018,34(1):43-48.
[7] GURGEN S,ALTIN I,OZKOK M.Prediction of main particulars of a chemical tanker at preliminary ship design using artificial neural network.Ships and Offshore Structures,2018,13(5).
[8] CEPOWSKI T.Determination of regression formulas for main tanker dimensions at the preliminary design stage.Ships and Offshore Structures,2019,14(3).
[9] MA X B,DAI R,SHOU Z Y,et al.Study on ballast draft value of bulk carrier based on AIS data .Ship Science and Techno-logy,2017,39(15):51-54.
[10] YANG G C,YANG J,LI S B,et al.Improved CNN algorithm based on Dopout and ADAM optimizer .Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition),2018,46(7):122-127.
[1] 宁晗阳, 马苗, 杨波, 刘士昌.
密码学智能化研究进展与分析
Research Progress and Analysis on Intelligent Cryptology
计算机科学, 2022, 49(9): 288-296. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.220300053
[2] 郁舒昊, 周辉, 叶春杨, 王太正.
SDFA:基于多特征融合的船舶轨迹聚类方法研究
SDFA:Study on Ship Trajectory Clustering Method Based on Multi-feature Fusion
计算机科学, 2022, 49(6A): 256-260. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.211100253
[3] 游兰, 韩雪薇, 何正伟, 肖丝雨, 何渡, 潘筱萌.
基于改进Seq2Seq的短时AIS轨迹序列预测模型
Improved Sequence-to-Sequence Model for Short-term Vessel Trajectory Prediction Using AIS Data Streams
计算机科学, 2020, 47(9): 169-174. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.190800060
[4] 池昊宇, 陈长波.
基于神经网络的循环分块大小预测
Prediction of Loop Tiling Size Based on Neural Network
计算机科学, 2020, 47(8): 62-70. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.191200180
[5] 张经, 杨健, 苏鹏.
语音识别中单音节识别研究综述
Survey of Monosyllable Recognition in Speech Recognition
计算机科学, 2020, 47(11A): 172-174. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.200200006
[6] 权波, 杨博辰, 胡可奇, 郭晨萱, 李巧勤.
基于LSTM的船舶航迹预测模型
Prediction Model of Ship Trajectory Based on LSTM
计算机科学, 2018, 45(11A): 126-131.
[7] 徐凯,邱家瑜,李燕.
一种加入时间维的船舶轨迹高效离线压缩算法研究
Offline Efficient Compression Algorithm for AIS Data Retains Time Elapsing Dimension
计算机科学, 2017, 44(Z11): 498-502. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2017.11A.106
[8] 赵章明,冯径,施恩,舒晓村.
带启发信息的蚁群神经网络训练算法
h-ACOR:An ACOR Algorithm with Heuristic Information for Neural Network Training
计算机科学, 2017, 44(11): 284-288. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2017.11.043
[9] 周奚,薛善良.
基于改进的粗糙集和神经网络的WSN故障诊断
WSN Fault Diagnosis with Improved Rough Set and Neural Network
计算机科学, 2016, 43(Z11): 21-25. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2016.11A.005
[10] 乔非,葛彦昊.
基于BP神经网络的就业招聘企业客户分类问题研究
Customer Classification Model of Employers by Using BP Neural Networks
计算机科学, 2015, 42(Z11): 1-4.
[11] 丁山,宋丽晓.
一种改进的视网膜图像中微小动脉瘤的检测算法
Improved Method of Microaneurysm Detection Algorithm Based on Digital Fundus Images
计算机科学, 2014, 41(12): 269-274. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2014.12.058
[12] 尚兴宏,尚曦乐,章静,钱焕延.
无线传感器节点的故障诊断研究
Research on Fault Diagnosis of Wireless Sensor Nodes
计算机科学, 2013, 40(Z6): 327-329.
[13] 张自敏,樊艳英,陈冠萍.
改进的BP神经网络在地方GDP预测中的应用
Application of Improved BP Neural Network in Predicting of Region GDP
计算机科学, 2012, 39(Z11): 108-110.
[14] 徐步刊,周兴社,梁韵基,王海鹏,於志文.
一种场景驱动的情境感知计算框架
Situation-driven Framework for Context-aware Computing
计算机科学, 2012, 39(3): 216-222.
[15] .
基于机器学习的风险预测方法研究

计算机科学, 2009, 36(4): 205-207.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!