计算机科学 ›› 2015, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2): 39-42.doi: 10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2015.02.008

• 网络与通信 • 上一篇    下一篇

AS的地理分布对Internet网络稳定性的影响

孟亚坤,孙景昶   

  1. 东北大学信息科学与工程学院 沈阳110004,四川大学计算机科学学院 成都610225
  • 出版日期:2018-11-14 发布日期:2018-11-14
  • 基金资助:
    本文受国家自然科学基金项目(61300194),河北省自然科学基金项目(F2013501048)资助

Effect of AS’s Geographic Locations on Internet’s Stability

MENG Ya-kun and SUN Jing-chang   

  • Online:2018-11-14 Published:2018-11-14

摘要: 探索了AS(自治域)的地理分布以及路由器的建连距离对Internet稳定性的影响。与仅关注AS网络现状和发展趋势的传统研究角度不同,侧重研究了受到经济宏观调控或者技术突破等因素影响后AS网络的性能变化,从而为制定宏观调控措施和把握网络技术导向提供了理论依据。提出了一种AS地理超图结构,弥补了传统模型中未能正确刻画AS地理分布的缺陷,并建立了地理超图和AS网络的双层网络模型。实验结果表明:AS网络的稳定性随着路由器间建连距离的增大而表现出上升趋势,然而,若AS在地理上随机分布,则路由器建连距离对网络稳定性无明显影响。

关键词: 复杂网络,AS地理分布,超图,网络稳定性,坚韧度

Abstract: This paper analyzed how the AS’s geographic locations and transmission distances affect on Internet’s stability.In contrast to the traditional studies focusing on the future AS network which is based on nowadays,this paper emphasized particularly on the change of AS network’s performance under the effect of the economic adjusting or the technology innovation to make adjusting measures and to lead the technological trend.A double-deck network model of geographic hypergraph and AS network was presented to simulate the geographic locations,which is not reflected in traditional models.The simulate results of our model show that Internet’s stability ascends with the increase of transmission distances.However,if AS’s geographic locations are random,the transmission distances has no obvious effects on Internet’s stability.

Key words: Complex network,AS’s geographic location,Hypergraph,Network stability,Toughness

[1] Faloutsos M,Faloutsos P,Faloutsos C.On power-law relationships of the Internet topology[J].ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review,1999,29(4):251-262
[2] Siganos G,Faloutsos P,Faloutsos C.Power laws and the AS-level Internet topology[J].IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,2003,11(4):514-524
[3] Bu T,Towsley D.On Distinguishing between Internet PowerLaw Topology Generators[J].IEEE INFOCOM,2002,2:638-647
[4] Klemm K,Eguiluz V M.Highly Clustered Scale-Free Networks[J].Physical Review E,2002,65(3)
[5] Zoltán Toroczkai,Bassler K E.Jamming is limited in scale-free systems[J].Nature,2004,428(15)
[6] Albert R,Jeong H,Barabasi A L.Attack an error tolerance in complex networks[J].APRIL,2000,406:387-482
[7] Winick J,Jamin S.Inet-3.0:Internet topology generator[R].Technical report CSE-TR-456-02,Department of EECS,University of Michigan,2002
[8] Albert R,Barabasi A L.Topology of evolving networks:Local events and university[J].Phys.Rev.E,2004,70:066108
[9] Medina A,Lakhina A,Matta I,et al.BRITE:An approach to universal topology generation[C]∥Proceedings of MASCOTS.Washington,2001:346-353
[10] Bu T,Towsley D.On distinguishing between Internet power law topology generators[C]∥Proceeding of INFCOCOM.NewYork,2002,2:638-647
[11] Zhou S,Mondragon R J.Accurately modeling the Internet topo-logy[J].Phys.Rev.E,2004,70:066108
[12] Zhou S,Mondragon R J.Towards modeling the Internet topology-the interactive growth model[J].Teletraffic science and engineering,2003,5:121-130
[13] Park S T,Pennock D M,Giles C L.Comparing static and dy-namic measurements and models of the Internet’s topology[C]∥Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.2004,3:1616-1627
[14] Sagy B,Mira G,Avishai W.An incremental super-linear preferential Internet topology model[C]∥Proc 5th Annual Passive and Active Measurement Workshop.LNCS 3015,2004:53-62
[15] Wang Xiao-ming,Loguinov D.Wealth-Based Evolution Modelfor the Internet AS-Level Topology[C]∥Proceeding of INFOCOM.New York,2006
[16] Sagy B,Mira G,Avishai W.A geographic directed preferentialInternet topology model[J].Arxiv:CS,2005,NI/0502061
[17] Lakhina A,Byers J W,Crovella M,et al.On the geographic location of Internet resources(short abstract)[C]∥Proc.SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Workshop(IMW’02).2002:249-250
[18] Lakhina A,Byers J W,Crovella M,et al.On the geographic location of Internet resources[J].IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications,2003,21:934-948
[19] Yook S H,Jeong H,Barabasi A L.Modeling the Internet’slarge-scale topology[J].Proc.Nat.Acad.Sci.,2002,9(21):13382-13386
[20] Sterbenz J P G,etinkaya E K,Hameed M A,et al.Evaluation of network resilience,survivability,and disruption tolerance:analysis,topology generation,simulation,and experimentation[J].Telecommunication systems,2013,52(2):705-736
[21] Willinger W,Roughan M.Internet Topology Research Redux.http://sigcomm.org/education/ebook/SIGCOMMeBook 201301_chapter1.pdf
[22] Aditya A,Shuchi C,Arvind K,et al.On the Scaling of Congestion in the Internet Graph[J].ACM SIGCOMM ComputerCommunication Review,2004,34(3):43-56
[23] Tangmunarunkit H,Doyle J,Govindan R,et al.Does AS size determine degree in AS topology[J].ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review,2001,31(5):7-10
[24] Chvatal V.Tough graphs and hamiltonian circuits[J].DiscreteMath,1973,5:215-228

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!