计算机科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6A): 109-112.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.210700036

• 智能计算 • 上一篇    下一篇

命题逻辑中三元子句集的冗余文字

李洁, 钟小梅   

  1. 1 西南交通大学数学学院 成都 610031
    2 西南交通大学系统可信性自动验证国家地方联合工程实验室 成都 610031
  • 出版日期:2022-06-10 发布日期:2022-06-08
  • 通讯作者: 钟小梅(zhongxm2013@home.swjtu.edu.cn)
  • 作者简介:(1767112820@qq.com)
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究项目青年基金项目(20XJCZH016,19YJCZH048)

Redundant Literals of Ternary Clause Sets in Propositional Logic

LI Jie, ZHONG Xiao-mei   

  1. School of Mathematics,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 610031,China
    National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of System Credibility Automatic Verification,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 610031,China
  • Online:2022-06-10 Published:2022-06-08
  • About author:LI Jie,born in 1996,postgraduate.Her main research interests include intelligent information processing and automatic reasoning.
    ZHONG Xiao-mei,born in 1984,Ph.D,lecturer.Her main research interests include logic-based automatic reasoning and so on.
  • Supported by:
    Humanity and Social Science Youth Foundation of Ministry of Education(20XJCZH016,19YJCZH048).

摘要: 自动推理是人工智能领域研究的核心问题之一。由于在基于归结的自动推理过程中会产生大量的冗余文字和冗余子句,进而影响归结自动推理的效率,因此消除子句集中的冗余文字和冗余子句具有重要的意义。在命题逻辑中,依据必需文字、有用文字、无用文字的相关概念和性质,针对部分三元子句集,分类给出这些三元子句集中冗余文字的判别方法,并通过具体实例对这些判别方法进行说明。

关键词: 必需文字, 命题逻辑, 三元子句集, 无用文字, 有用文字

Abstract: Automatic reasoning is one of the core issues in the field of artificial intelligence.Since a large number of redundant li-terals and redundant clauses are generated in the process of automatic reasoning based on resolution,the resolution efficiency will be affected.It is of great significance to eliminate redundant literals and redundant clauses in the clause set.In propositional logic,according to the related concepts and properties of necessary literals,useful literals and useless literals,this paper classifies and gives the judgment methods of redundant literals in some ternary clause sets,and explains these judgment methods through specific examples.

Key words: Necessary literals, Propositional logic, Ternary clause sets, Useful literals, Useless literals

中图分类号: 

  • TP181
[1] LIBERATORE P.Redundancy in logic I:CN propositional formulae[J].Artificial Intelligence,2005,163(2):203-232.
[2] FOURDRINO Y O,ÉRIC G,MAZURE B.Eliminating Redundant Clauses in SAT Instances[C]//Proceedings of InternationalConference on Integration of Ai and Or Techniques in Constraint Programming for Combinatorial Optimization Problems.DBLP,2007:71-83.
[3] HEULE M,M JARVISALO,BIERE A.Efficient CNF simplification based on binary implication graphs[C]//Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Theory and Application of Satisfiability Testing.Springer Berlin Heidelberg,2011.
[4] ZHAI C H,QIN K Y.Redundancy clause and redundancy literal of propositional logic[J].Computer Science,2013,40(5):48-50.
[5] TANG SH H.Research redundancy of set of clauses in propositional logic[D].Chengdu:Southwest Jiaotong University,2014.
[6] DENG P.The classification of set of clauses in propositionallogic[D].Chengdu:Southwest Jiaotong University,2015.
[7] RINALDI D,SCHUSTER P,WESSEL D.Eliminating disjunc-tions by disjunction elimination[J].Bulletin of Symbolic Logic,2017,23(2):181-200.
[8] LIU T.Research on redundant clauses and redundant literals in propositional logic[D].Chengdu:Southwest Jiaotong Univer-sity,2019.
[9] ING X R,XU Y,CHEN Z S.Novel preprocessing clause elimination methods for propositional SAT solvers[J].Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems,2020,26(8):2133-2142.
[10] LIU X H.Automatic reasoning based on resolution method[M].Science Press,1994.
[11] SHI CH Y,WANG J X.Mathematical logic and set theory[M].Beijing:Tsinghua University Press,2000.
[12] HEULE M,RVISALO M,LONSING F.Clause elimination for SAT and QSAT[J].Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research,2015,53(1):127-168.
[13] HEULE M,JRVISALO M,BIERE A.Clause Elimination Pro-cedures for CNF Formulas[C]//Logic for Programming,Artificial Intelligence,& Reasoning-international Conference,Lpar-17.DBLP,2010:357-371.
[14] LIU J,ZHOU H H.New algebraic logic reduction method for boolean formula[J].Computer Science,2020,47(5):32-37.
[15] WANG G J.Introduction to mathematical logic and resolution principle[M].Science Press,2003:17-22.
[1] 唐雷明, 白沐尘, 何星星, 黎兴玉.
基于命题逻辑的完全标准矛盾体及最小标准矛盾体
Complete Contradiction and Smallest Contradiction Based on Propositional Logic
计算机科学, 2020, 47(11A): 83-85. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.200400072
[2] 刘婷, 徐扬, 陈秀兰.
命题逻辑中单元子句及其负文字和冗余子句
Unit Clauses and Their Complementary Literals and Redundant Clauses in Propositional Logic
计算机科学, 2019, 46(8): 255-259. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2019.08.042
[3] 陈青山, 徐扬, 吴贯锋.
基于趋势强度的SAT问题学习子句评估算法
Learnt Clause Evaluation Algorithm of SAT Problem Based on Trend Strength
计算机科学, 2018, 45(12): 137-141. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2018.12.021
[4] 陈成,潘正华,吕永席.
一类具有3种否定的模糊模态命题逻辑
Fuzzy Modal Propositional Logic with Three Kinds of Negation
计算机科学, 2017, 44(4): 263-268. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2017.04.055
[5] 徐卫,李晓粉,刘端阳.
基于命题逻辑的关联规则挖掘算法L-Eclat
Propositional Logic-based Association-rule Mining Algorithm L-Eclat
计算机科学, 2017, 44(12): 211-215. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2017.12.038
[6] 陈青山,徐扬,吴贯锋,何星星.
一种基于搜索路径识别的CDCL命题逻辑求解器延迟重启算法
Path Identification Based Delaying Restart Algorithm for CDCL SAT Solver
计算机科学, 2017, 44(11): 279-283. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2017.11.042
[7] 吴晓刚,潘正华.
基于模糊命题逻辑形式系统FLcom的模糊推理及应用
Fuzzy Reasoning and its Application Based on Fuzzy Propositonal Logic
计算机科学, 2015, 42(Z11): 100-103.
[8] 刘 熠,徐 扬,贾海瑞.
基于格值命题逻辑系统LP(X)的多元α-归结原理的注记
Notes on Multi-ary α-Resolution Principle Based on Lattice-valued Logical System LP(X)
计算机科学, 2015, 42(4): 249-252. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2015.04.051
[9] 张家锋,徐扬,何星星.
格值语义归结推理方法
Lattice-valued Semantic Resolution Reasoning Method
计算机科学, 2011, 38(9): 201-203.
[10] 刘宏岚,高庆狮,杨炳儒.
集合代数是经典命题演算形式系统的语义解释
Set Algebra is Semantic Interpretation for Classical Formal System of Propositional Calculus
计算机科学, 2010, 37(9): 194-197.
[11] 谷文祥,赵晓威,殷明浩.
知识编译研究
Knowledge Compilation Survey
计算机科学, 2010, 37(7): 20-26.
[12] 田聪,段振华,王小兵.
Einstein谜的SAT求解
Solving Einstein's Puzzle with SAT
计算机科学, 2010, 37(5): 184-186.
[13] .
基于语言真值格值命题逻辑系统lvpl的推理规则

计算机科学, 2008, 35(9): 230-232.
[14] .
纤维逻辑

计算机科学, 2006, 33(1): 1-3.
[15] 季秋 王万森.
发生率计算理论的研究

计算机科学, 2005, 32(4): 79-80.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!