计算机科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (5): 21-26.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.230200202
邢存远1, 张洁2, 金莹2
XING Cunyuan1, ZHANG Jie2, JIN Ying2
摘要： 我国普通高校大学生竞赛正处于蓬勃发展期,赛事的举办和参与都呈现出积极向上的态势。大学生学科竞赛能够反映参赛院校的学科发展水平和教学水平,而基于竞赛数据对院校水平进行分析和比较也能够在一定程度上促进院校对竞赛的重视和参与度。在之前的研究和实际应用中,学校的竞赛水平评估大多局限在奖项得分的堆叠上。这种基于“唯奖项”论的模型因为忽略了院校自身发展水平等因素而存在片面性。在这项工作中,参赛院校的竞赛水平可以用参赛积极性、参赛优异度和获奖稳定性3个指标刻画并构建评估模型;通过最大化院校间得分差异确定指标的最优权重,从而获取院校的参赛得分并进行比较和分析。此外,根据学科竞赛的特点,院校在竞赛的不同赛道上的不同表现可以作为更加细化的特征。通过t-SNE降维、可视化与聚类分析,参赛高校被划分成4种类型。对于不同类型的高校,文中分别提供了提高比赛表现的针对性建议。江苏省大学生计算机设计大赛举办至今的数据被用于验证模型的合理性。
中图分类号:
| [1]LEI J H.A Research of University Students' Subject ContestManagement System[D].Hangzhou:Zhejiang University,2013. [2]GUO Y J.Theory,method and application of comprehensiveevaluation[M].Beijing:Science and Technology Press,2007. [3]FENG S,XU L D.Decision support for fuzzy comprehensiveevaluation of urban development[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1999,105(1):1-12. [4]ZOU Z H,YI Y,SU J L.Entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating indicators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment[J].Journal of Environmental Sciences,2006,18(5):1020-1023. [5]CHEN Y Y,ZHANG W Q.Comprehensive decision making and weather forecast[J].Mathematics in Practice and Theory,2000,113:32-39. [6]QIAO Y,LIU X,ZOU L.Evaluating the quality of education via linguistic aggregation operator[J].ICIC Express Letters,2010,4:1851-1856. [7]KUO Y F,CHEN P C.Selection of mobile value-added services for system operators using fuzzy synthetic evaluation[J].Expert Systems with Application,2006,30:612-620. [8]XIA D,CHEN B.A comprehensive decision-making model forrisk management of supply chain[J].Expert Systems with Application,2011,38:4957-4966. [9]LIANG Z H,YANG K,SUN Y W,et al.Decision support for choice optimal power generation projects:fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model based on the electricity market[J].Energy Policy,2006,34(17):3359-3364. [10]SAMATSU T,TACHIKAWA K,SHI Y.Usability improve-ment for a car retrieval system employing the important degrees of fuzzy grades[J].International Journal of Innovative Computing,Information and Control,2009,5:5061-5068. [11]SUN T,LIU Q.Research on the Importance Evaluation of discipline Competition based on approaching ideal point method[J].Marketing Management Review,2017(9):227. [12]WANG L,LU P,WU Y L.The Construction and Application of Subject Competition Evaluation System in Colleges[J].Journal of Yibin University,2021,21(12):62-68. [13]ZHENG L.Research on Teaching Evaluation of Discipline Competition Based on Markov Chain [J].Science & Technology Economy Market,2022(3):143-145. [14]WU B X,CHEN Y,JIANG Z K.Research on optimization of discipline competition ranking model based on ELO system[J].Changjiang Information & Communications,2021,34(10):60-64. [15]China Association of Higher Education University CompetitionEvaluation and Management System Expert Working Group.National College Student Competition White Paper(2014－2018)[M].Hangzhou:Zhejiang University Press,2019. [16]LU G D,CHEN L Q,HE Q M,et al.The Evaluation of Academic Competition in Universities:Plan,Method and Exploration[J].China Higher Education Research,2018(2):63-68,74. [17]Jiangsu Computer Society.Promoting learning by competition,teaching by competition and innovation by competition:Jiangsu University Student Computer Design Competition [EB/OL].(2022-03-21)[2023-03-30].https://www.jscs.org.cn/x4.php?id=65. [18]Jiangsu Higher Education Association.Notice on the Announcement of the recognition(cultivation) results of the 2022 Provincial Discipline Competition for undergraduate and junior College Students in Colleges and Universities [EB/OL].(2022-06-15)[2023-03-30].http://m.jsgjxh.cn/newsview/27743. [19]MAATEN L V D,HINTON G.Visualizing Data using t-SNE[J].Journal of Machine Learning Research,2008,9(86):2579-2605. [20]SHI N Q.Development Status,Common Characteristics and Ex-perience Enlightenment of Higher Vocational Colleges in Suzhou Wuxi Changzhou Metropolitan Area[J].Journal of Wuxi Institute of Technology,2022,21(2):1-6. |
|
||
首页