计算机科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (11): 230-236.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.240800140
李志康1, 邓怡辰3, 余敦辉1,2, 肖奎1,2
LI Zhikang1, DENG Yichen3, YU Dunhui1,2, XIAO Kui1,2
摘要: 现有的实体对齐方法在区分不同邻居对中心实体的表示作用时,大多利用特征相似性或实体间关系的局部特征信息来计算注意力系数,忽略了关系的全局信息,且不能很好地区分不同信息对实体对齐的作用。为此,提出一种实体对齐模型,根据(关系,邻居)在全图中出现的频率为不同类型的关系分配不同权重,并将该方法融入GAT(Graph Attention Mechanism)中,得到一种变体注意力机制以聚合不同邻居。同时,考虑(属性,属性值)在全图中的频率信息,以类似的方法聚合不同属性值,并将结构和实体名嵌入分别与两种信息结合,得到中心实体的两种嵌入表示。最后,根据实体对在两种嵌入表示上距离的加权进行实体对齐,以考虑关系和属性信息对实体对齐结果的不同影响。实验结果表明,所提模型在DBP15K的3个跨语言数据集上的表现优于其他主流方法,相比最优方法,Hit@1指标最高提升了2.15%,且Hit@10和MRR也均有明显提升,表明该模型能够有效提高实体对齐的准确性。
中图分类号:
| [1]WANG J,WANG W,MENG F,et al.A Review of Knowledge Reasoning Based on Neural Network[C]//2023 IEEE 12th International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies(CSNT).2023:580-584. [2]TAHA K,YOO P D,YEUN C,et al.Empirical and experimental perspectives on big data in recommendation systems:a comprehensive survey[J].Big Data Mining and Analytics,2024,7(3):964-1014. [3]WANG Y,LIPKA N,ROSSI R A,et al.Knowledge graphprompting for multi-document question answering[C]//Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2024:19206-19214. [4]JIANG T,BU C,ZHU Y,et al.Combining embedding-based and symbol-based methods for entity alignment[J].Pattern Recognition,2022,124:108433. [5]FANOURAKIS N,EFTHYMIOU V,KOTZINOS D,et al.Knowledge graph embedding methods for entity alignment:experimental review[J].Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery,2023,37(5):2070-2137. [6]SCARSELLI F,GORI M,TSOI A C,et al.The graph neural network model[J].IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks,2008,20(1):61-80. [7]ZHU B,BAO T,HAN R,et al.An effective knowledge graph entity alignment model based on multiple information[J].Neural Networks,2023,162:83-98. [8]ZHANG S,TONG H,XU J,et al.Graph convolu- tional networks:a comprehensive review[J].Computational Social Networks,2019,6(1):1-23. [9]ZHANG Z,YANG Y,CHEN B.Relation-aware heterogeneous graph neural network for entity alignment[J].Neurocomputing,2024,592:127797. [10]ZHANG F,YANG L Y,LI J W,et al.A Review of EntityAlignment Research [J].Journal of Computer Science,2022,45(6):1195-1225. [11]ZHU B,WANG R,WANG J,et al.A survey:know- ledge graph entity alignment research based on graph embedding[J].Artificial Intelligence Review,2024,57(9):1-58. [12]CHEN M,TIAN Y,YANG M,et al.Multilingual Knowledge Graph Embeddings for Cross-lingual Knowledge Alignment[C]//Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Confere-nce on Artificial Intelligence.2017:1511-1517. [13]SUN Z,HU W,ZHANG Q,et al.Bootstrapping entity alignment with knowledge graph embed-ding[C]//Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2018:4396-4402. [14]ZHU B,BAO T,HAN J,et al.Cross-lingual knowledge graphentity alignment by aggregating extensive structures and specific semantics[J].Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing,2023,14(9):12609-12616. [15]MAO X,WANG W,XU H,et al.MRAEA:an efficient and robust entity alignment approach for cross-lingual knowledge graph[C]//Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining.2020:420-428. [16]LIU Z,CAO Y,PAN L,et al.Exploring and Eval-uating Attri-butes,Values,and Structures for Entity Alignment[C]//Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2020:6355-6364. [17]SHI X,LI B,CHEN L,et al.Bi-Neighborhood Graph Neural Network for cross-lingual entity alignment[J].Knowledge-Based Systems,2023,277:110841. [18]VELIČKOVIĆ P,CUCURULL G,CASANOVA A,et al.Graph Attention Networks[C]//International Conference on Learning Representations.2018. [19]RAHIMI A,COHN T,BALDWIN T.Semi-supervised user geolocation via graph convolutional networks[C]//Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2018:2009-2019. [20]LIN Y,LIU Z,LUAN H,et al.Modeling relation paths for representation learning of knowledge bases[C]//Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2015:705-714. [21]FORMICA A,TAGLINO F.Semantic relatedness in DBpedia:A comparative and experimental assessment[J].Information Sciences,2023,621:474-505. [22]WU Y,LIU X,FENG Y,et al.Relation-aware entity alignment for heterogeneous knowledge graphs[C]//Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2019:5278-5284. [23]WU Y,LIU X,FENG Y,et al.Jointly Learning Entity and Relation Representations for Entity Alignment[C]//Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing.2019:240-249. [24]MAO X,WANG W,WU Y,et al.Boosting the speed of entityalignment 10×:Dual attention matching network with norma-lized hard sample mining[C]//Proceedings of the Web Confe-rence.2021:821-832. [25]ZHU Y,LIU H,WU Z,et al.Relation-aware neighborhoodmatching model for entity alignment[C]//Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2021:4749-4756. [26]MAO X,MA M,YUAN H,et al.An effective and efficient entity alignment decoding algorithm via third-order tensor isomorphism[C]//Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2022:5888-5898. |
|
||