用于计算辩论的论据本体研究

计算机科学 ›› 2014, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 226-231.

用于计算辩论的论据本体研究

刘斌,姚莉,郝智勇,龚勇

国防科学技术大学军事信息系统工程重点实验室长沙410073;国防科学技术大学军事信息系统工程重点实验室长沙410073;国防科学技术大学军事信息系统工程重点实验室长沙410073;国防科学技术大学军事信息系统工程重点实验室长沙410073

出版日期:2018-11-14 发布日期:2018-11-14
基金资助:
本文受国家自然科学基金(70971134),博士点专项科研基金(20124307110023)资助

Research on Argument Ontology for Computational Argumentation

LIU Bin,YAO Li,HAO Zhi-yong and GONG Yong

Online:2018-11-14 Published:2018-11-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 近年来辩论技术在人工智能领域获得广泛关注。然而,在辩论过程中,如何高质高效地构建攻击论据仍然是难以解决的问题。通过分析论据的本质属性,形式定义论据的相关概念及相互关系,结构化论据的知识表示,实现了论据本体的建模。该论据本体的一致性和可用性通过一个辩论实例得以验证。在此基础上构建了一个原型系统,该系统能够在辩论过程中基于论据本体查找和构建论据,重用已构建的论据,从而有效提高了自动辩论的计算效率。

关键词: 辩论,论据,知识表示,本体中图法分类号TP393文献标识码A

Abstract: Argumentation techniques have been widely concerned by AI researchers in recent years．How to construct qualified counter-arguments efficiently for the argumentation process still remains to be a difficult problem．The nature of arguments was analyzed,and concepts relating to arguments and relations between these concepts were formally defined,and the knowledge representation of arguments was structured．Then an argument ontology was implemented．An instance of an argumentation process was used to testify consistency and usability of the argument ontology.In a prototype system built on this ontology,arguments needed in argumentation processes can be aquired by quering or constructing based on the ontology．Arguments constructed previously are reused,thus the computing efficiency of automatic argumentation is enhanced．

Key words: Argumentation,Argument,Knowledge representation,Ontology

刘斌,姚莉,郝智勇,龚勇. 用于计算辩论的论据本体研究[J]. 计算机科学, 2014, 41(2): 226-231. https://doi.org/

LIU Bin,YAO Li,HAO Zhi-yong and GONG Yong. Research on Argument Ontology for Computational Argumentation[J]. Computer Science, 2014, 41(2): 226-231. https://doi.org/

参考文献

[1] Greco M S．Argumentation in dispute mediation:a reasonable way to handle conflict[M]．Amsterdam,Philadelphia:John Benjamins Pub.Company,2011
[2] Alexy R．A theory of legal argumentation:the theory of rational discourse as theory of legal justification[M]．Oxford England；New York:Oxford University Press,2010
[3] 袁金平.多AGENT协同辩证推理方法及实现技术研究 [D].长沙:国防科技大学,2012
[4] Toulmin S E．The Uses of Argument [M].The EdinburghBuilding,Cambridge,United Kingdom:Cambridge University Press,2003
[5] Baroni P,Caminada M,Giacomin M．An introduction to argumentation semantics[J]．Knowledge Engineering Review,2011,26(4):365-410
[6] Bryant D,Krause P J,Vreeswijk G A W．Argue tuProlog:A lightweight argumentation engine for agent applications[J]．Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications,2006,144:27
[7] Rahwan I,Banihashemi B．Arguments in OWL:A progress report[J]．Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications,2008,172:297
[8] Muoz A,Botía J A．ASBO:Argumentation system based on ontologies[M]∥Cooperative Information Agents XII．Berlin Heidelberg:Springer,2008:191-205
[9] Prakken H．An abstract framework for argumentation withstructured arguments[J]．Argument and Computation,2010,1(2):93-124
[10] Vreeswijk G A W．Abstract argumentation systems[J]．Artificial intelligence,1997,90(1):225-279
[11] Martlnez D C,Garcla A J,Simari G R．Modelling well-structured argumentation lines[C]∥Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artifical Intelligence．2007:465-470
[12] 姚莉,佟濛,苏建欣,等.用于辩证分析的多Agent辩论对话系统MAS-Arguing的设计与实现[J].小型微型计算机系统,2011,2(10):2109-1233

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed