计算机科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (6A): 619-622.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.201000070

• 交叉&应用 • 上一篇    下一篇

多模型集成学习在机械钻速预测中的新应用

许明泽, 韦明辉, 邓霜, 蔡卫   

  1. 西南石油大学机电工程学院 成都610500
  • 出版日期:2021-06-10 发布日期:2021-06-17
  • 通讯作者: 韦明辉(wmh881988@163.com)
  • 作者简介:xmz881122@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油大学石油资源与勘探国家重点实验室(北京)资助(PRP/open-1610);国家自然科学基金(51804267)

Application of Multi-model Ensemble Learning in Prediction of Mechanical Drilling Rate

XU Ming-ze, WEI Ming-hui, DENG Shuang, CAI Wei   

  1. School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering,Southwest Petroleum University,Chengdu 610500,China
  • Online:2021-06-10 Published:2021-06-17
  • About author:XU Ming-ze,born in 1996.His main research interests include ROP and big data processing.
    WEI Ming-hui,born in 1988,Ph.D,associate professor.His main research interests include downhole acceleration and downhole instrument cooling.
  • Supported by:
    State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting,China University of Petroleum,Beijing(PRP/open-1610) and National Natural Science Foundation of China(51804267).

摘要: 钻井的机械钻速与钻井操作参数、钻井液性能以及钻具组合等因素有关。准确预测机械钻速可以有效计算钻井成本和钻进时间,从而优化钻进参数、合理安排钻机工作人员,并为钻井设计人员提供依据。结合目前机器学习和大数据处理,利用中国西部吐哈油田历史钻井数据,建立了一种基于集成学习的钻速预测模型。其成员包括KNN(K近邻)、DT(决策树)、SVR(支持向量机)、RF(随机森林),输入7个特征影响因素,包括井深、钻压、泵压、密度、粘度、排量和转速,将拟合优度作为机械钻速预测的评价指标,结果显示集成模型的预测输出优于任何一种单一模型的结果。以7-13井为例,拟合优度R2达到了0.93以上。文中还探讨了不同集成成员的组合,结合时间成本和拟合优度发现最优组合为KNN+SVR+RF,其拟合优度在7-13,8-17,4-10井分别达到了0.937 8,0.918 7,0.912 4。最后,以SVR为例,优化后的单一模型拟合准确性依旧低于任何一组组合模型。进一步的研究表明,有效的集成模型需要集成成员的多样性和较高的精度。这些预测结果表明,该模型为机械钻速预测提供了一种有前途的替代方案。

关键词: 回归预测, 机械钻速, 集成模型, 平均原则, 组合优化

Abstract: The drilling rate is related to drilling operation parameters,drilling fluid performance and drilling tool assembly.Accurate prediction of ROP can effectively calculate drilling costs and drilling time,thereby guiding the design of drilling process parameters,optimizing drilling parameters,rationally arranging drilling rigs and drilling staff,and providing a basis for drilling designers.Combined with current machine learning and big data processing,a drilling rate prediction model based on integrated learning is established by using the historical drilling data of Tuha oilfield in western China.The ensemble members include k-nearest neighbour (KNN),support vector ma-chine (SVM),decision tree (DT),random forest (RF).Seven feature influencing factors are input,including well depth,bit pressure,pump pressure,density,viscosity,pump flow rate,and rotary speed.The goodness of fit used as the evaluation method of ROP prediction,and the results show that the prediction output of the ensemble learning model is higher than that of any single model.Taking well 7-13 as an example,the prediction effect reaches more than 0.93.In addition,this study also explores the combination of different ensemble members.Combined with time cost and goodness of fit,it is found that the optimal combination is KNN+SVR+RF.The goodness of fit is in wells 7-13,8-17,and 4-10 reaches 0.937 8,0.918 7 and 0.912 4.Finally,taking SVR as an example,the fitting accuracy of the optimized single model is still lower than any group of combined models.Further investigation reveals that both the diversity and high accuracy of ensemble members are required to obtain an effective integrated model.These observations demonstrate that the proposed model offers a promising alternative solution for ROP prediction.

Key words: Average principle, Integrated model, Parameter optimization, Regression prediction, ROP

中图分类号: 

  • TP391.1
[1] HUNT S G.Drilling Forecast Model[C]//SPE Eastern Regional Meeting.Society of Petroleum Engineers,1984.
[2] CAICEDO H U,CALHOUN W M,EWYRT.Unique ROP Predictor Using Bit-specific Coefficient of Sliding Friction and Mechanical Efficiency as a Function of Confined Compressive Strength Impacts Drilling Performance[C] //SPE/IADC Drilling Conference. Amsterdam,Netherlands,2005.
[3] ABBAS A,ELHAM K.Simulation Study of Drilling Horizontal Wells in One Iranian Oil Field [C] //Latin American & Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference.Buenos Aires,Argentina,2007.
[4] MOHAN K,ADIL F,SAMUEL R.Tracking Drilling Efficiency Using Hydro-Mechanical Specific Energy[C]//SPE/IADC Drilling Conference and Exhibition.Society of Petroleum Engineers.2009.
[5] YUANHUA L,YUYU Z,ZHENG L,et al.The Developments of ROP Prediction for Oil Drilling[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2004,1:10-13.
[6] BOURGOYNE A T,YOUNG F S.A Multiple Regression Approach to Optimal Drilling and Abnormal Pressure Detection[J].Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal,1974,14(4):371-384.
[7] AMER M M,DAHAB A S,EL-SAYED A A H.An ROP Predictive Model in Nile Delta Area Using Artificial Neural Networks[C] //SPE Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Annual Technical Symposium and Exhibition.Dammam,Saudi Arabia,2017.
[8] ELKATATNY S.Rate of Penetration Prediction Using Self-Adaptive Differential Evolution-Artificial Neural Network [C] //SPE Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Annual Technical Symposium and Exhibition.Dammam,Saudi Arabia,2018.
[9] ALKINANI H H,AL-HAMEEDI A T,DUNN-NORMAN S,et al.Dynamic Neural Network Model to Predict the Rate of Penetration Prior to Drilling[C] //The 53rd U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium.New York City,New York,2019.
[10] BING Z,WEINAN L,ZHEN W,et al.Identification Strategy of Driving Style Based on Random Forest[J].Automotive Engineering,2019,41(2):213-218,224.
[11] JIANJUN H,SHAOWEI N,JIANPING L,et al.Research onPrediction and Control of Mechanical Ventilation Temperature of Grain Pile Based on Random Forest Algorithm[J].Journal of Henan University of Technology (Natural Science Edition),2019,40(5):107-113.
[12] LIU Y,CHENG H,KONG X,et al.Intelligent wind turbineblade icing detection using supervisory control and data acquisition data and ensemble deep learning[J].Energy Science & Engineering,2019,7(6):2633-2645
[13] LIU Z,WEI M,ZHANG P,et al.Drilling Localization and Error Analysis of Radial Horizontal Jet Drilling Based on Magnetic Gradient Tensor[J].Energies,2020,13:4989.
[14] NAN L,WENCHUN Z,YING L,et al.Prediction of DeepFoundation Pit Horizontal Displacement Based on Random Forest Model in Seasonal Frozen Region[J].Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering,2018,14(S1):357-362.
[15] ARABJAMALOEI R,EDALATKHAH S,JAMSHIDI E.ANew Approach to Well Trajectory Optimization Based on Rate of Penetration and Wellbore Stability[J].Liquid Fuels Technology,2011,29(6):588-600.
[16] YUANHUA L,YUYU Z,ZHENG L,et al.The Developments of ROP Prediction for Oil Drilling[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2004,1:10-13.
[17] DENG Y,CHEN M,JIN Y,et al.Theoretical and experimental study on the penetration rate for roller cone bits based on the rock dynamic strength and drilling parameters[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2016,36:117-123.
[18] YAN T,JINGLIN D.Temperature prediction using long short term memory network based on random forest[J].Computer Engineering and Design,2019,40(3):737-743.
[19] WANG Z,LAI C,CHEN X,et al.Flood hazard risk assessment model based on random forest[J].Journal of Hydrology,2015,527:1130-1141.
[20] 刘胜娃,孙俊明,高翔,等.基于人工神经网络的钻井机械钻速预测模型的分析与建立[J].计算机科学,2019(Z6):605-608.
[1] 吴兰, 王涵, 李斌全.
基于自监督任务最优选择的无监督域自适应方法
Unsupervised Domain Adaptive Method Based on Optimal Selection of Self-supervised Tasks
计算机科学, 2021, 48(6A): 357-363. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.201000030
[2] 陈靖邦, 潘俊哲, 沈皓朗, 谷培, 扈明涛.
一种多趋势指标结合与择时引入峰值的投资组合优化系统
Portfolio Optimization System Based on Multiple Trend Indices with Time Picking of Inducing Peak Prices
计算机科学, 2021, 48(11A): 693-698. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.210300215
[3] 王晓晖, 张亮, 李俊清, 孙玉翠, 田捷, 韩睿毅.
基于遗传算法与随机森林的XGBoost改进方法研究
Study on XGBoost Improved Method Based on Genetic Algorithm and Random Forest
计算机科学, 2020, 47(11A): 454-458. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.200600002
[4] 张洋, 姬波, 卢红星, 娄铮铮.
基于LSTM神经网络的短期高压负荷电流预测方法
Short-term High Voltage Load Current Prediction Method Based on LSTM Neural Network
计算机科学, 2019, 46(6): 49-54. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2019.06.006
[5] 张贵军,丁情,王柳静,周晓根.
柔性车间生产排产调度优化方法
Optimization Method of Production Scheduling in Flexible Job
计算机科学, 2018, 45(2): 269-275. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2018.02.046
[6] 郑巧仙,何国良,李明,唐秋华.
第2类U型装配线平衡问题的双阶段蚁群算法
Two Stage Ant Colony Optimization for Type 2 of U-shaped Assembly Line Balancing Problem
计算机科学, 2017, 44(6): 206-211. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2017.06.034
[7] 张艳梅,曹怀虎.
基于覆盖网络模型的跨领域组合服务优化问题研究
Research on Routing Problem of Inter-domain Composed Service Based on Overlay Network
计算机科学, 2014, 41(4): 70-74.
[8] 范菁,熊丽荣,徐聪.
分布式企业服务总线平台数据集成研究及应用
Research and Application of Data Integration in Distributed Enterprise Service Bus Platform
计算机科学, 2014, 41(2): 206-214.
[9] 郭树行,丁娴,王坚.
基于改进微粒群算法的信息化需求组合优选模型研究
Study on Optimal Combination of Model of Information Needs Based on Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm
计算机科学, 2013, 40(6): 238-241.
[10] 夏欣.
批处理机调度问题的蚁群算法求解
Scheduling Single Batch Processing Machine Using Ant Colony Algorithm
计算机科学, 2013, 40(5): 247-250.
[11] 陈乙雄,吴中福,李华,冯永.
一种基于Max-Flow的协同学习活动调度算法
Collaborated E-learning Scheduling Algorithm Based on Max-Flow
计算机科学, 2012, 39(9): 43-46.
[12] 张庆科,杨 波,王 琳,朱福祥.
基于GPU的现代并行优化算法
Research on Parallel Modern Optimization Algorithms Using GPU
计算机科学, 2012, 39(4): 304-311.
[13] 刘超,王文杰.
一个由接口路径求Hamilton回路的算法研究
Research on Hamiltonian Cycle Based on Path with Interface
计算机科学, 2010, 37(9): 252-256.
[14] 许昌,常会友,徐俊,衣杨.
一种新的融合分布估计的蚁群优化算法
Novel Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm with Estimation of Distribution
计算机科学, 2010, 37(2): 186-188.
[15] 郭文忠 陈国龙.
求解TSP问题的模糊自适应粒子群算法

计算机科学, 2006, 33(6): 161-162.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!