计算机科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (5): 13-21.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.250600159

• 智能教育技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

学习轨迹研究综述

王碧璇1, 陈仕明2, 高志泽樟2, 冯筠2, 王惠亚1   

  1. 1 西北大学数学学院 西安 710127
    2 西北大学计算机学院 西安 710127
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-24 修回日期:2025-08-29 发布日期:2026-05-08
  • 通讯作者: 王惠亚(mathswhy@126.com)
  • 作者简介:(wangbixuan@stumail.nwu.edu.cn)
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省教师教育改革与教师发展研究项目(SJS2023ZD030);西北大学人才培养项目(JX2024068)

Survey of Learning Trajectories

WANG Bixuan1, CHEN Shiming2, GAO Zhizezhang2, FENG Jun2, WANG Huiya1   

  1. 1 School of Mathematics, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China
    2 School of Computer Science, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China
  • Received:2025-06-24 Revised:2025-08-29 Online:2026-05-08
  • About author:WANG Bixuan,born in 2002,postgra-duate.Her main research interest is intelligent education.
    WANG Huiya,born in 1980,Ph.D,associate professor.Her main research interests include data science and statistical machine learning.
  • Supported by:
    Research Program on Teacher Education Reform and Teacher Development of Shaanxi Province(SJS2023ZD030)and Talent Fostering Program of Northwest University(JX2024068).

摘要: 随着智能教育的发展,学习轨迹成为研究热点,其研究旨在理解学习者发展路径,探索影响因素,为教育决策提供依据。近年来,学习轨迹研究在多方面取得显著成果,如轨迹构建方式的创新、分析方法的优化以及应用范围的逐步拓展。但不可忽视的是,该领域仍面临一系列严峻挑战,如理论体系尚未达成统一标准、分析方法之间的融合度不高以及实证分析相对匮乏等。与此同时,目前还缺少对学习轨迹全面、系统的综述研究。为此,基于当前学习轨迹研究的发展现状,从理论基础与技术实践两个方面出发,梳理了当前研究中面临的主要挑战,并以学习轨迹的构建流程、分析方法与典型应用场景为线索,系统总结了相关研究成果。在此基础上,从理论深化和技术创新、应用拓展两方面对未来学习轨迹研究的发展方向进行了分析与展望,提出未来可行的优化方向,有望推动学习轨迹分析在智能教育领域的深入融合与落地应用。

关键词: 智能教育, 学习轨迹, 教育决策, 轨迹构建, 实证分析

Abstract: With the development of intelligent education,learning trajectories have become a research hotspot.Its research aims to understand the development paths of learners,explore influencing factors,and provide a basis for educational decision-making.In recent years,the research on learning trajectories has achieved remarkable results in many aspects,such as the innovation of tra-jectory construction methods,the optimization of analysis methods,and the gradual expansion of application scopes.However,it cannot be ignored that this field still faces a series of severe challenges,including the fact that the theoretical system has not yet reached a unified standard,the integration degree among analytical methods is not high,and empirical analysis is relatively scarce.Meanwhile,at present,there is still a lack of comprehensive and systematic review studies on the learning trajectory.Based on the current development status of learning trajectory research,this article starts from two aspects:theoretical basis and technical practice,sorts out the main challenges faced in the current research,and takes the construction process,analysis methods and ty-pical application scenarios of learning trajectories as the clues to systematically summarize the relevant research results.On this basis,the development direction of future learning trajectory research is analyzed and prospected from two aspects:theoretical deepening and technological innovation,as well as application expansion.Proposing feasible optimization directions for the future is expected to promote the in-depth integration and application of learning trajectory analysis in the field of intelligent education.

Key words: Intelligent education, Learning trajectory, Educational decision-making, Trajectory construction, Empirical analysis

中图分类号: 

  • TP399
[1]CLEMENTS D H,SARAMA J.Learning trajectories in mathematics education[J].Mathematical Thinking and Learning,2004,6(2):81-89.
[2]SIMON M A.Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective[J].Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,1995,26(2):114-145.
[3]SIMON M A,TZUR R.Explicating the Role of Mathematical Tasks in Conceptual Learning:An Elaboration of the Hypothetical Learning Trajectory[J].Mathematical Thinking and Learning,2004,6(2):91-104.
[4]SIMON M,SALDANHA L,MCCLINTOCK E,et al.A Developing Approach to Studying Students’ Learning through Their Mathematical Activity[J].Cognition and Instruction,2009,28(1):70-112.
[5]DUSCHL R,MAENG S,SEZEN A.Learning progressions and teaching sequences:a review and analysis[J].Studies in Science Education,2011,47(2):123-182.
[6]HUANG H,YUAN S.Research on Sequential Pattern Analysis Method of Online Learning Behavior Based on Process Mining[J].Journal of Guangxi Radio and TV University,2023,34(3):11-18.
[7]MENG X F,SHI G Q,ZHANG X Y,et al.A survey of trajectory similarity measurement methods based on deep learning[J].Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology,2025,19(3):623-644.
[8]MENG X F,SUN S N,ZHANG X Y,et al.A survey of trajecto-ry representation learning methods[J].Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology,2025,19(6):1437-1454.
[9]RICH K M,STRICKLAND C,BINKOWSKI T A,et al.K-8Learning Trajectories Derived from Research Literature:Sequence,Repetition,Conditionals[C]//Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research(ICER ’17).New York:ACM,2017:182-190.
[10]RICH K M,BINKOWSKI T A,STRICKLAND C,et al.Decomposition:A K-8 Computational Thinking Learning Trajectory[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research(ICER ’18).New York:ACM,2018:124-132.
[11]DU H X,XING W L,ZHANG Y L.A Debugging LearningTrajectory for Text-Based Programming Learners[C]//Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V.2(ITiCSE ’21).New York:ACM,2021:645.
[12]CONFREY J,GIANOPULOS G,MCGOWANW,et al.Scaffolding learner-centered curricular coherence using learning maps and diagnostic assessments designed around mathematics learning trajectories[J].ZDM Mathematics Education,2017,49:717-734.
[13]RICH K M,STRICKLAND C,BINKOWSKI T A,et al.A K-8 Debugging Learning Trajectory Derived from Research Literature[C]//Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education(SIGCSE ’19).New York:ACM,2019:745-751.
[14]STRICKLAND C,RICH K M,EATINGER D,et al.ActionFractions:The Design and Pilot of an Integrated Math+CS Elementary Curriculum Based on Learning Trajectories[C]//Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education(SIGCSE 4’21).New York:ACM,2021:1149-1155.
[15]GAO Z,CUI C,YAN H,et al.Towards a Quantitative Competency Model for CS1 via Five-Channel Learning Sequences[C]//Proceedings of the 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V.1(SIGCSETS 2025).New York:ACM,2025:367-373.
[16]LUO F Y,ISRAEL M,GANE B.Elementary ComputationalThinking Instruction and Assessment:A Learning Trajectory Perspective[J].ACM Transactions on Computing Education,2022,22(2):1-26.
[17]VAN DIJKE-DROOGERS M,DRIJVERS P,BAKKER A.In-troducing Statistical Inference:Design of a Theoretically and Empirically Based Learning Trajectory[J].International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,2022,20:1743-1766.
[18]GARON-CARRIER G,BOIVIN M,LEMELIN J P,et al.Early developmental trajectories of number knowledge and math achievement from 4 to 10 years:Low-persistent profile and early-life predictors[J].Journal of School Psychology,2018,68:84-98.
[19]ZHANG M L,GUO K Y,LI H X,et al.Perceived School Climate and the Developmental Trajectory of Math Anxiety in Late Childhood:The Longitudinal Mediating Role of Math Self-Efficacy[C]//Chinese Psychological Society.Abstracts of the 24th National Academic Conference of Psychology.School of Psychology,Shandong Normal University;Party School of the CPC Shandong Provincial Committee(Shandong Administration Institute),2022:683-684.
[20]GUO K Y,ZHU H X,XU Y L,et al.Heterogeneous Developmental Trajectories of Mathematical Ability in Primary School Children:The Longitudinal Predictive Roles of Teacher Support and Math Anxiety[C]//Chinese Psychological Society.Abstracts of the 25th National Academic Conference of Psychology-Group Oral Presentations.School of Psychology,Shandong Normal University,2023:24-26.
[21]YANG B K,TANG H T,HAO L,et al.Untangling chaos indiscussion forums:A temporal analysis of topic-relevant forum posts in MOOCs[J].Computers & Education,2022,178:104402.
[22]SAQR M,LÓPEZ-PERNAS S,JOVANOVIĆ J,et al.Intense,turbulent,or wallowing in the mire:A longitudinal study of cross-course online tactics,strategies,and trajectories[J].The Internet and Higher Education,2023,57:100902.
[23]RITTLE-JOHNSON B,FYFE E R,HOFER K G,et al.Early math trajectories:Low-income children’s mathematics knowledge from ages 4 to 11[J].Child Development,2017,88(5):1727-1742.
[24]ROBINSON K A,PEREZ T,CARMEL J H,et al.Science identity development trajectories in a gateway college chemistry course:Predictors and relations to achievement and STEM pursuit[J].Contemporary Educational Psychology,2019,56:180-192.
[25]MORRIS B,TRIVEDI M.Learning trajectory patterns by clustering:Experimental studies and comparative evaluation[C]//2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.2009:312-319.
[26]GENOLINI C,PINGAULT J B,DRISS T,et al.KmL3D:Anon-parametric algorithm for clustering joint trajectories[J].Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine,2013,109(1):104-111.
[27]DRAGER J,KLEIN M,SOSU E.School absence trajectoriesand their consequences for achievement[EB/OL].https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/85724/1/Drager_etal_EdArXiv_2023_School_absence_trajectories_and_their_consequences.pdf.
[28]GENOLINI C,ALACOQUE X,SENTENAC M,et al.kml and kml3d:R Packages to Cluster Longitudinal Data[J].Journal of Statistical Software,2015,65(4):1-34.
[29]AGRAWAL R,SRIKANT R.Mining sequential patterns[C]//Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Data Engineering.1995:3-14.
[30]LÓPEZ-PERNAS S,SAQR M.From Variables to States toTrajectories(VaSSTra):A Method for Modelling the Longitudinal Dynamics of Learning and Behaviour[C]//Proceedings TEEM 2022:Tenth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality.Singapore:Springer,2023:1169-1178.
[31]GABADINHO A,RITSCHARD G,MüLLER N S,et al.Analyzing and Visualizing State Sequences in R with TraMineR[J].Journal of Statistical Software,2011,40(4):1-37.
[32]KINNEBREW J S,LORETZ K M,BISWAS G.A Contextual-ized,Differential Sequence Mining Method to Derive Students’ Learning Behavior Patterns[J].Journal of Educational Data Mining,2013,5(1):190-219.
[33]PARK Y,YU J H,JO I H.Clustering blended learning courses by online behavior data:A case study in a Korean higher education institute[J].The Internet and Higher Education,2016,29:1-11.
[34]HELSKE S,HELSKE J.Mixture Hidden Markov Models for Sequence Data:The seqHMM Package in R[J].Journal of Statistical Software,2019,88(3):1-32.
[35]AZCONA D,HSIAO I H,SMEATON A F.Detecting students-at-risk in computer programming classes with learning analytics from students’ digital footprints[J].User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction,2019,29:759-788.
[36]MATCHA W,GAŠEVIĆ D,UZIR N A,et al.Detection ofLearning Strategies:A Comparison of Process,Sequence and Network Analytic Approaches[C]//European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning.Cham:Springer,2019:525-540.
[37] LÓPEZ-PERNAS S,SAQR M.Bringing Synchrony and Clarity to Complex Multi-Channel Data:A Learning Analytics Study in Programming Education[J].IEEE Access,2021,9:166531-166541.
[38]LIM H J,KIM S H,CHUNG K M,et al.Is college students’ trajectory associated with academic performance?[J].Compu-ters & Education,2022,178:104397.
[39]SAQR M,LÓPEZ-PERNAS S,HELSKE S,et al.The longitudinal association between engagement and achievement varies by time,students’ profiles,and achievement state:A full program study[J].Computers & Education,2023,199:104787.
[40]VIEIRA J M F,ZAINA L A M.Representation,navigation and exploration:a three layered approach on learning trajectories[C]//Proceedings of the 19th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems(IHC ’20).Association for Computing Machinery,New York:ACM,2020:1-10.
[41]VIEIRA J M F,ZAINA L A M.Learning Trajectories Visuali-zations of Students Data on the Computational Thinking Context[C]//Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação.2021:705-717.
[42]SZTAJN P,CONFREY J,WILSON P H,et al.Learning Trajectory Based Instruction:Toward a Theory of Teaching[J].Educational Researcher,2012,41(5):147-156.
[43]WILSON P H,MOJICA G F,CONFREY J.Learning trajectories in teacher education:Supporting teachers’ understandings of students’ mathematical thinking[J].The Journal of Mathematical Behavior,2013,32(2):103-121.
[44]WILSON P H,SZTAJN P,EDGINGTON C,et al.Teachers’Uses of a Learning Trajectory in Student-Centered Instructional Practices[J].Journal of Teacher Education,2015,66(3):227-244.
[45]TANG M W,WANG Z X,CAO Y M.A Review of Research on Learning Trajectories in Mathematics Education[J].Shanghai Educational Research,2025,1:34-40,72.
[46]CEYLAN M,ASLAN D.The effect of learning trajectories-based coding education program on preschoolers’ mathematical measurement skills[J].Education and Information Technologies,2024,29:7737-7757.
[47]INCHAUSTEGUI Y A,ALSINA Á.Learning patterns at three years old:Contributions of a learning trajectory and teaching itinerary[J].Australasian Journal of Early Childhood,2020,45(1):14-29.
[48]LUO F Y,ISRAEL M,LIU R H,et al.UnderstandingStudents’ Computational Thinking through Cognitive Interviews:A Learning Trajectory-based Analysis[C]//Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education(SIGCSE ’20).New York:ACM,2020:919-925.
[49]KAFETZOPOULOS G I,PSYCHARIS G.Conceptualization of function as a covariational relationship between two quantities through modeling tasks[J].The Journal of MathematicalBeha-vior,2022,67:100993.
[50]CEYLAN M,ASLAN D.The effect of learning trajectories-based coding education program on preschoolers’ mathematical measurement skills[J].Education and Information Technologies,2024,29:7737-7757.
[51]SAQR M,LÓPEZ-PERNAS S.Idiographic learning analytics:A single student(N=1) approach using psychological networks[C]//Proceedings of the NetSciLA21 Workshop.2021:16-22.
[52]SAQR M.Modelling within-person idiographic variance couldhelp explain and individualize learning[J].British Journal of Educational Technology,2023,54(5):1077-1094.
[53]HEIKKINEN S,SAQR M,MALMBERG J,et al.A longitudinal study of interplay between student engagement and self-regulation[J].International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education,2025,22:article number 21.
[54]LÓPEZ-PERNAS S,SAQR M.How the dynamics of engage-ment explain the momentum of achievement and the inertia of disengagement:A complex systems theory approach[J].Computers in Human Behavior,2024,153:108126.
[55]ERSTAD O.Learning lives across educational boundaries:Continuity and discontinuity in learning trajectories[J].International Journal for Research on Extended Education,2015,3(2):7-8.
[56]PUIGCERCóS R M.Young people’s learning trajectories in the digital age[J].Digital Education Review,2018,33:39-54.
[57]MEMBRIVE A,SILVA N,ROCHERA M J,et al.Advancingthe conceptualization of lear-ning trajectories:A review of learning across contexts[J].Learning,Culture and Social Interaction,2022,37:100658.
[58]SAQR M.Group-level analysis of engagement poorly reflects individual students’ processes:Why we need idiographic learning analytics[J].Computers in Human Behavior,2024,150:107991.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!