Computer Science ›› 2020, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6A): 552-555.doi: 10.11896/JsJkx.190600018

• Interdiscipline & Application • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Single Departure and Arrival Procedure Optimization in Airport Terminal Area Based on Branch and Bound Method

ZHOU Jun1, 2 and WANG Tian-qi1   

  1. 1 Sino-European Institute of Aviation Engineering,Civil Aviation University of China,TianJin 300300,China
    2 China-France Research Center of Applied Mathematics for ATM,Civil Aviation University of China,TianJin 300300,China
  • Published:2020-07-07
  • About author:ZHOU Jun, born in 1988, Ph.D, lectu-rer.Her main research interests include applied mathematics and air traffic management.
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of TianJin;China (17JCYBJC43100),Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Ministry of Education of China(3122016U006) and Scientific Research Start-up Fund of Civil Aviation University of China(2017QD02S).

Abstract: Currently,the maJority of airport departure and arrival procedures are designed manually and drawn with the help of computer-aided software.There is still room for improvement in bringing airspace resources into full play.In order to provide effective decision support for actual procedure designers,an optimization methodology of single departure and arrival programming is proposed.Firstly,each route is modeled in three dimensions in compliance with the Required Navigation Performance (RNP),and flight restrictions such as obstacle avoidance are considered.Secondly,three different ways of obstacle avoidance aree proposed:bypassing clockwise or counter-clockwise along the obstacle boundary,or maintaining the current flight level below the obstacle.Then,a Branch and Bound (B&B) approach is developed,where the branching strategies corresponded to different ways of obstacle avoidance.Finally,the algorithm is tested for two different obstacle layout structures,and the computation time is compared with the A* algorithm.The results show that,the algorithm can provide optimal routes avoiding obstacles and conforming to the RNP requirements in a short computing time.Moreover,by adJusting different weight coefficients in the obJective function,the procedure of continuous climbing or descending can be obtained,which has positive impact for aircraft noise and emission reduction.

Key words: Air traffic control, Airports, Branch and Bound method, Obstacle avoidance, Path planning

CLC Number: 

  • V355
[1] Boeing.Current market outlook 2017-2036.Seattle:Boeing,2018.
[2] International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO).Doc.9613AN/937,Performance-based Navigation (PBN) Manual .Montreal:ICAO,2008.
[3] DAI F Q,JIE L.Research on Flight Program Optimization of Central and Small Airport Terminal Area Based on PBN.Scie-nce Technology and Engineering,2012,12(34):9270-9274.
[4] YANG X S,DING S B,LEI Z,et al.Optimization of the entry and exit procedures of Ningbo Lishe Airport.Journal of Civil Aviation University of China,2007,25(3):8-12.
[5] International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO).Doc.8168-OPS/611,Aircraft Operations .Montreal:ICAO,2006.
[6] EELE A,RICHARDS A.Path planning with avoidance using nonlinear branch and bound optimization .Journal of Gui-dance,Control,and Dynamics,2009,32(2):384-394.
[7] PIERRE S,DELAHAYE D,CAFIERI S.Aircraft traJectory planning with dynamical obstacles by artificial evolution and convex hull generations .Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering,2017,420:49-67.
[8] LI J J,XU R M,LIU D S,et al.Improved ant colony algorithm for route planning optimization.Journal of System Simulation,2007,19(14):3276-3280.
[9] MICHALEK D.Optimization of airport terminal-area air traffic operations under uncertain weather conditions.Cambridge:Massachusetts Institute of Technology,2011.
[10] ZHOU J,CAFIERI S,DELAHAYE D,et al.Optimization of arrival and departure routes in terminal maneuvering area//Proceedings of the 6thInternational Conference on Research in Air Transportation.Istanbul,2014:1-4.
[11] Eurocontrol Experimental Center( ECC).User manual for the base of aircraft data ( BADA),revision 3.10,EEC Technical Report No.12 /04 .France:EEC,2012.
[12] KIM D S,YU K,CHO Y,et al.Shortest Paths for Disc Obstacles//Proceedings of the International Conference onComputational Science and Its Applications.2004:62-70.
[1] WANG Bing, WU Hong-liang, NIU Xin-zheng. Robot Path Planning Based on Improved Potential Field Method [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(7): 196-203.
[2] CHEN Bo-chen, TANG Wen-bing, HUANG Hong-yun, DING Zuo-hua. Pop-up Obstacles Avoidance for UAV Formation Based on Improved Artificial Potential Field [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(6A): 686-693.
[3] TAN Ren-shen, XU Long-bo, ZHOU Bing, JING Zhao-xia, HUANG Xiang-sheng. Optimization and Simulation of General Operation and Maintenance Path Planning Model for Offshore Wind Farms [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(6A): 795-801.
[4] LUO Jing-jing, TANG Wei-zhen, DING Ji-ting. Research of ATC Simulator Training Values Independence Based on Pearson Correlation Coefficient and Study of Data Visualization Based on Factor Analysis [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(6A): 623-628.
[5] CHEN Jing-yu, GUO Zhi-jun, YIN Ya-kun. Full Traversal Path Planning and System Design of Intelligent Lawn Mower Based on Hybrid Algorithm [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(6A): 633-637.
[6] DU Wan-ru, WANG Xiao-yin, TIAN Tao, ZHANG Yue. Artificial Potential Field Path Planning Algorithm for Unknown Environment and Dynamic Obstacles [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(2): 250-256.
[7] GUO Qi-cheng, DU Xiao-yu, ZHANG Yan-yu, ZHOU Yi. Three-dimensional Path Planning of UAV Based on Improved Whale Optimization Algorithm [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(12): 304-311.
[8] ZHAO Yang, NI Zhi-wei, ZHU Xu-hui, LIU Hao, RAN Jia-min. Multi-worker and Multi-task Path Planning Based on Improved Lion Evolutionary Algorithm forSpatial Crowdsourcing Platform [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(11A): 30-38.
[9] CHEN Ji-qing, TAN Cheng-zhi, MO Rong-xian, WANG Zhi-kui, WU Jia-hua, ZHAO Chao-yang. Path Planning of Mobile Robot with A* Algorithm Based on Artificial Potential Field [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(11): 327-333.
[10] ZHAO Xiao-wei, ZHU Xiao-jun, HAN Zhou-qing. Hover Location Selection and Flight Path Optimization for UAV for Localization Applications [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(11): 345-355.
[11] WANG Zi-qiang, HU Xiao-guang, LI Xiao-xiao, DU Zhuo-qun. Overview of Global Path Planning Algorithms for Mobile Robots [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(10): 19-29.
[12] YANG De-cheng, LI Feng-qi, WANG Yi, WANG Sheng-fa, YIN Hui-shu. Intelligent 3D Printing Path Planning Algorithm [J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(8): 267-271.
[13] JIANG Chen-kai, LI Zhi, PAN Shu-bao, WANG Yong-jun. Collision-free Path Planning of AGVs Based on Improved Dijkstra Algorithm [J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(8): 272-277.
[14] ZENG Wei-liang, WU Miao-sen, SUN Wei-jun, XIE Sheng-li. Comprehensive Review of Autonomous Taxi Dispatching Systems [J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(5): 181-189.
[15] WANG Wei-guang, YIN Jian, QIAN Xiang-li, ZHOU Zi-hang. Realtime Multi-obstacle Avoidance Algorithm Based on Dynamic System [J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(11A): 111-115.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!