Computer Science ›› 2020, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (10): 194-199.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.190700185

• Computer Graphics & Multimedia • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Brain CT and MRI Image Fusion Based on Morphological Image Enhancement and PCNN

LI Chang-xing1, LEI Liu2, ZHANG Xiao-lu2   

  1. 1 School of Science,Xi’an University of Posts and Telecommunications,Xi’an 710121,China
    2 School of Communication and Information Engineering,Xi’an University of Posts and Telecommunications,Xi’an 710121,China
  • Received:2019-07-25 Revised:2019-10-27 Online:2020-10-15 Published:2020-10-16
  • About author:LI Chang-xing,born in 1962,postgra-duate,professor,postgraduate supervisor.His main research interests include the research of matrix theory and application of wavelet transform in image compression.
    LEI Liu,born in 1993,postgraduate.Her main research interests include di-gital image information processing and so on.
  • Supported by:
    Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (2018JM1054)

Abstract: To compensate for the problems that arise during brain CT and MRI image fusion,such as the false Gibbs pheno-menon,the lack of detailed information,ringing,a fusion method of brain CT and MRI image based on morphological image enhancement and the PCNN(Pulse Coupled Neural Network) is proposed.Firstly,the source image is enhanced by open and closed operation based on morphology.The enhancement processed image is input into the PCNN fusion model as an input stimulus of the PCNN receiving domain,to determine the final weight map of the model output.Finnaly,a clear and easily processed image is formed.Experimental results show that the proposed method is superior to other methods in maintaining image edge clearness,preserving effective information and balancing redundancy.Compared with the unenhanced PCNN method,the average gradient and spatial frequency of image after morphological enhancement and PCNN fusion increases by 24.59% and 42.56% respectively.Compared with the image fusion based on Laplacian method,the standard deviation increases by 16.67%.

Key words: Morphological image enhancement, Pulse coupled neural network model, Fusion weight, Link strength, Medical image fusion

CLC Number: 

  • TP391
[2]ZHANG H,CAO X.A Way of Image Fusion Based on Wavelet Transform[C]//IEEE Ninth International Conference on Mobile Ad-hoc & Sensor Networks.IEEE,2013.
[3]MALIK S S,KUMAR S P P,MARUTHI G B.DT-CWT:Feature level image fusion based on dual-tree complex wavelet transform[C]//International Conference on Information Communication & Embedded Systems.2015.
[4]SONG Y,XIAO J,YANG J,et al.Research on MR-SVD based visual and infrared Image fusion[C]//International Symposium on Optoelectronic Technology and Application 2016.2016.
[5]SUN J,HAN Q,KOU L,et al.Multi-focus image fusion algorithm based on Laplacian pyramids[J].Journal of the Optical Society of America A Optics Image Science & Vision,2018,35(3):480.
[6]QU X,HU C,YAN J.Image fusion algorithm based on orientation information motivated Pulse Coupled Neural Networks[C]//World Congress on Intelligent Control & Automation.IEEE,2008.
[7]LI C X,WU J.Infrared and Visible Images Fusion Based onFPDEs and CBF[J].Computer Science,2019,46(1):297-302.
[8]ECKHORN R,REITBOECK H,ARNDT M,et al.FeatureLinking via Synchro-nization among Distributed Assembles:Simulations of Results from Cat Visual Cortex[J].Neural Computation,2014,2(3):293-307.
[9]WANG Z,WANG S,ZHU Y.Multi-focus Image Fusion Based on the Improved PCNN and Guided Filter[J].Neural Processing Letters,2017,45(1):75-94.
[10]WANG Z,WANG S,GUO L J.Novel multi-focus image fusion based on PCNN and random walks[J].Neural Computing & Applications,2016,29(5):1-14.
[11]DING S F,ZHAO X Y,XU H,et al.NSCT-PCNN image fusion based on image gradient motivation[J].IET Computer Vision,2018,12(4):377-383.
[12]JIANG P,ZHANG Q,LI J,et al.Fusion algorithm for infrared and visible image based on NSST and adaptive PCNN[J].LASER & IR,2014,44(1):108-113.
[13]DAS S,KUNDU M K.NSCT-based multimodal medical image fusion using pulse-coupled neural network and modified spatial frequency[J].Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing,2012,50(10):1105-1114.
[14]ZHAO Z,SUN Q,YANG H,et al.Compression artifacts reduc-tion by improved generative adversarial networks[J].EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing,2019,2019(1):62.
[15]MONICA SUBASHINI M,SAHOO S K.Pulse coupled neuralnetworks and its applications[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2014,41(8):3965-3974.
[16]LI S,KANG X.Fast multi-exposure image fusion with median filter and recursive filter[J].IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics,2012,58(2):626-632.
[17]CHANDA B.Morphological Algorithms for Image Processing[J].IETE Technical Review,2008,25(1):9-18.
[18]LIU Y L,GUI Z G.Contrast enhancement using extracted details based on multi-scale top-hat transformation[J].Computer Engineering and Design,2014,35(4):1332-1335,1340.
[19]YANG Y,DANG J,WANG Y.Medical image fusion method based on lifting wavelet transform and dual-channel PCNN[C]//Industrial Electronics & Applications.IEEE,2014.
[20]WU D S,WU L N,HUANG B.Texture and Non-texture Images Retrieval Based on Wavelet Fuzzy Clustering[J].Journal of Image and Graphics,2018,8(12):1400-1405.
[21]YU R X,ZHU B,ZHANG K.New Image Fusion AlgorithmBased on PCNN[J].Optoelectronic Engineering,2008(7):956-959.
[22]GONG J,WANG B,QIAO L,et al.Image Fusion Method Based on Improved NSCT Transform and PCNN Model[C]//2016 9th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design (ISCID).IEEE,2016.
[23]SHREYAMSHA KUMAR,B K.Image fusion based on pixel significance using cross bilateral filter[J].Signal Image & Video Processing,2015,9(5):1193-1204.
[24]ZHANG X,CHEN W B.Medical image fusion based on weighted Contourlet transformation coefficients[J].Journal of Image and Graphics,2014,19(1):133-140.
[1] ZHANG Wen-hua, LIU Xiao-ge, WANG Pei-pei, LIU Jing-jing, CHENG Jing-liang. 3D Registration for Multi-b-value Diffusion Weighted Images of Liver [J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(11A): 241-243.
[2] ANG Li-fang, SHI Chao-yu, LIN Su-zhen, QIN Pin-le, GAO Yuan. Multi-modal Medical Image Fusion Based on Joint Patch Clustering of Adaptive Dictionary Learning [J]. Computer Science, 2019, 46(7): 238-245.
[3] WANG Nan, LI Zhi, CHENG Xin-yu, CHEN Yi. Reversible Visible Watermarking Algorithm for Medical Image Based on Support Vector Regression [J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(9): 195-201.
[4] ZHANG Wen-hua, ZHANG Ming-hui, GUO Yi-hao, LU Zhen-tai and LIU Ying. Fitting Accuracy Guided Registration for Diffusion Weighted Images [J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(5): 243-249.
[5] . Method of Medical Image Fusion Based on Nonsubsampled Contourlet Transform [J]. Computer Science, 2013, 40(3): 310-313.
[6] . Medical Image Fusion Method Based on Lifting Wavelet Transform [J]. Computer Science, 2011, 38(12): 266-268.
Full text



[1] GENG Hai-jun, SHI Xin-gang, WANG Zhi-liang, YIN Xia and YIN Shao-ping. Energy-efficient Intra-domain Routing Algorithm Based on Directed Acyclic Graph[J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(4): 112 -116 .
[2] HAN Kui-kui, XIE Zai-peng and LV Xin. Fog Computing Task Scheduling Strategy Based on Improved Genetic Algorithm[J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(4): 137 -142 .
[3] ZHENG Xiu-lin, SONG Hai-yan and FU Yi-peng. Distinguishing Attack of MORUS-1280-128[J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(4): 152 -156 .
[4] GUO Shuai, LIU Liang and QIN Xiao-lin. Spatial Keyword Range Query with User Preferences Constraint[J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(4): 182 -189 .
[5] ZHAN Yun-jiao, WEI Ou and HU Jun. Formal Description of Requirement of Slats and Flaps Control System for DO-178C Case[J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(4): 196 -202 .
[6] HOU Yan-e, KONG Yun-feng and DANG Lan-xue. Greedy Randomized Adaptive Search Procedure Algorithm Combining Set Partitioning for Heterogeneous School Bus Routing Problems[J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(4): 240 -246 .
[7] TONG Ze-ping, LI Tao, LI Li-jie and REN Liang. Study on Collaborative Optimization of Supply Chain with Uncertain Demand and Capacity Constraint[J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(4): 260 -265 .
[8] CUI Jian-jing, LONG Jun, MIN Er-xue, YU Yang and YIN Jian-ping. Survey on Application of Homomorphic Encryption in Encrypted Machine Learning[J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(4): 46 -52 .
[9] SI Nian-wen, WANG Heng-jun, LI Wei, SHAN Yi-dong and XIE Peng-cheng. Chinese Part-of-speech Tagging Model Using Attention-based LSTM[J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(4): 66 -70 .
[10] HUANG Dong-mei, DU Yan-ling, HE Qi, SUI Hong-yun, LI Yao. Marine Monitoring Data Replica Layout Strategy Based on Multiple Attribute Optimization[J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(6): 72 -75 .