Computer Science ›› 2021, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (6): 63-70.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.200500138
• Database & Big Data & Data Science • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Ming-yang, WANG Gang, PENG Qi, ZHANG Yan-feng
CLC Number:
| [1]ALIAKSANDR B,JOSEPH R W,CLAUDIO B,et al.Alternatives to peer review:novel approaches for research evaluation[J].Computational neuroscience,2011,5:66. [2]CLARK K,LUONG M T,LE Q V,et al.ELECTRA:Pre-trai-ning Text Encoders as Discriminators Rather Than Generators[J].arXiv:2003.10555,2020. [3]DEVLIN J,CHANG M W,LEE K,et al.BERT:Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding[J].arXiv:1810.04805,2018. [4]Artificial-intelligence-terminology[EB/OL].https://github.com/jiqizhixin/Artficial Intelligence-Terminology. [5]JOE H,WARD J.Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function[J].Journal of the American Statistical Association,1963,58(301):236-244. [6]CECI S,DOUGLAS P.Peer review:A study of reliability[J].Change:The Magazine of Higher Learning,1982,14(6):44-48. [7]LEE K,BOYD E,HOLROYD L J,et al.Predictors of publication:characteristics of submitted manuscripts as sociated with acceptance at major biomedical journals[J].Med,2006,184(12):621-626. [8]LYNCH J R,CUNNINGHAM M R,WARME W J,et al.Commercially funded and united states-based research is more likely to be published;good-quality studies with negative outcomes are not[J].Bone Joint Surg,2007,89(5):1010-1018. [9]CECI S J,WILLIAMS W M.Understanding current causes of women’s under representation inscience[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2011,108(8):3157-3162. [10]KANG D,AMMAR W,DALVI B,et al.A dataset of peer reviews(peerread):Collection,insights and NLP applications[C]//NAACL.2018. [11]WANG K,WAN X.Sentiment analysis of peer review texts for scholarly papers[C]//SIGIR.2018:175-184. [12]GHOSAL T,VERMA R,EKBAL A,et al.Deepsentipeer:Harnessing sentiment in review texts to recommend peer review decisions[C]//ACL.2019:1120-1130. [13]PRICE S,FLACH P A.Computational support for academicpeer review:A perspective from artificial intelligence[J].Communication of the ACM,2017 60(3):70-79. [14]CHARLIN L,ZEMEL R.The toronto paper matching system:an automated paper reviewer assignment system[C]//ICLM.2013. [15]MROWINSKI M J,FRONCZAK P,FRONCZAK A,et al.Artificial intelligence in peer review:How can evolutionary computation support journal editors[J].PloS one,2017,12(9). [16]STELMAKH I,SHAH N B,SINGH A.On testing for biases in peer review[C]//ACM EC Workshop on Mechanism Design for Social Good.2019:5287-5297. [17]BIRUKOU A,WAKELING J R,BARTOLINI C,et al.Alternatives to peer review:novel approaches for research evaluation [J].BMJ,2015. [18]GAO Y,EGER S,KUZNETSOV I,et al.Does My RebuttalMatter?Insights from a Major NLP Conference[C]//Procee-dings of the 2019 Conference of the North.2019. [19]LI S,ZHAO W X,YIN E J,et al.A neural citation count prediction model based on peer review text[C]//EMNLP.2019:4913-4923. |
| [1] | LI Jian-lan, PAN Yue, LI Xiao-cong, LIU Zi-wei, WANG Tian-yu. Chinese Commentary Text Research Status and Trend Analysis Based on CiteSpace [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(11A): 17-21. |
| [2] | LIU Hui-qing, GUO Yan-bu, LI Hong-ling, LI Wei-hua. Short Text Feature Extension Method Based on Bayesian Networks [J]. Computer Science, 2019, 46(11A): 66-71. |
| [3] | LI Wei-jiang and WANG Feng. Method of Query Expansion Based on LCA Prune Semantic Tree [J]. Computer Science, 2015, 42(Z6): 479-483. |
| [4] | LIU Jin-long, WU Bin, CHEN Zhen and SHEN Chong-wei. Research on Influence of Micro Blogging Based on Field Division [J]. Computer Science, 2015, 42(5): 42-46. |
| [5] | LI Min,WANG Xiao-cong,ZHANG Jun and LIU Zheng-jie. Study on Check-in and Related Behaviors of Location-based Social Network Users [J]. Computer Science, 2013, 40(10): 72-76. |
| [6] | WANG Zhao-long,LI Xia,XU Rui-fang. Multi-keywords Query Expansion with OLCA Based Concept Tree Pruning [J]. Computer Science, 2010, 37(4): 132-. |
|
||
Home