Computer Science ›› 2021, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (12): 286-296.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.210100209

• Artificial Intelligence • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Review on Interactive Question Answering Techniques Based on Deep Learning

HUANG Xin1, LEI Gang1, CAO Yuan-long1, LU Ming-ming2   

  1. 1 School of Software,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang 330022,China
    2 School of Electronics and Information Engineering,Tongji University,Shanghai 200092,China
  • Received:2021-01-27 Revised:2021-04-24 Online:2021-12-15 Published:2021-11-26
  • About author:HUANG Xin,born in 1984,lecturer,is a member of China Computer Federation.His main research interests include machine learning,natural language processing and biological information.
    LEI Gang,born in 1974,associate professor,master tutor.His main research interests include natural language processing,knowledge discovery and machine learning.
  • Supported by:
    Science and Technology Research Project of Jiangxi Provincial Department of Education(GJJ200318)and National Natural Science Foundation of China(61962026).

Abstract: Compared to the traditional question answering(QA),interactive question answering(IQA) considers dialogue context and background information,which brings new challenges to understand user input and reason answers.First of all,user input is not only limited to questions,but can also be utterances that inform the details of the question and give feedback on whether the answer is feasible or not.Therefore,it is necessary to understand the intent of each utterance in the dialogue.Secondly,IQA allows multiple characters to discuss a question at the same time,generating personalized answers.So,it is necessary to understand different characters and identify them from each other.Thirdly,when IQA revolves around a background document,it is necessary to understand this document and extract answers from it.This paper reviews recent development in three subareas:IQA without background,IQA with background,and the application of transfer learning in IQA,and finally discusses the future perspective of interactive question answering.

Key words: Background, Dialogue system, Interactive question answering, Pre-trained models

CLC Number: 

  • TP391
[1]SARIKAYA R.The technology behind personal digital assis- tants:An overview of the system architecture and key components[J].IEEE Signal Processing Magazine,2017,34(1):67-81.
[2]REDDY S,CHEN D,MANNING C D.CoQA:A Conversational Question Answering Challenge[J].Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics,2019,7:249-266.
[3]LI X,CHEN Y N,LI L,et al.End-to-End Task-Completion Neural Dialogue Systems[C]//Proceedings of the Eighth International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing.2017:733-743.
[4]WEI Z,LIU Q,PENG B,et al.Task-oriented dialogue system for automatic diagnosis[C]//Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2018:201-207.
[5]SERBAN I V,SORDONI A,BENGIO Y,et al.Building end-to-end dialogue systems using generative hierarchical neural network models[C]//Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2016.
[6]YAN R,SONG Y,WU H.Learning to respond with deep neural networks for retrieval-based human-computer conversation system[C]//Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval.2016:55-64.
[7]WANG B X.Research on semantic mining for online community Q&A pairs [D].Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology,2017.
[8]ZHOU X Q.Research on interactive question answering tech- nology based on deep learning [D].Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology,2017.
[9]MITCHELL T M,BETTERIDGE J,CARLSON A,et al.Populating the semantic web by macro-reading internet text[C]//International Semantic Web Conference.2009:998-1002.
[10]LOWE R,POW N,SERBAN I V,et al.The Ubuntu Dialogue Corpus:A Large Dataset for Research in Unstructured Multi-Turn Dialogue Systems[C]//Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue.2015:285-294.
[11]QU C,YANG L,CROFT W B,et al.Analyzing and characterizing user intent in information seeking conversations[C]//The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval.2018:989-992.
[12]ALIANNEJADI M,ZAMANI H,CRESTANI F,et al.Asking clarifying questions in open-domain information-seeking conversations[C]//Proceedings of the 42nd International ACMSIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval.2019:475-484.
[13]WANG S,JIANG J.A compare-aggregate model for matching text sequences[C]//5th International Conference on Learning Representations(ICLR).2019.
[14]SUTSKEVER I,VINYALS O,LE Q V.Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks[C]//Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.2014:3104-3112.
[15]WANG S,JIANG J.Learning Natural Language Inference with LSTM[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics:Human Language Technologies.2016:1442-1451.
[16]SCHUSTER M,PALIWAL K K.Bidirectional recurrent neural networks[J].IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing,1997,45(11):2673-2681.
[17]LECUN Y,BOSER B,DENKER J S,et al.Backpropagation applied to handwritten zip code recognition[J].Neural Computation,1989,1(4):541-551.
[18]ZHOU X,DONG D,WU H,et al.Multi-view response selection for human-computer conversation[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Proces-sing.2016:372-381.
[19]WU Y,WU W,XING C,et al.Sequential Matching Network:A New Architecture for Multiturn Response Selection in Retrieval-Based Chatbots[C]//Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2017:496-505.
[20]VASWANI A,SHAZEER N,PARMAR N,et al.Attention is all you need[C]//Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.2017:5998-6008.
[21]BAHDANAU D,CHO K,BENGIO Y.Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate[C]//3rd International Conference on Learning Representations(ICLR).2015.
[22]ZHOU X,LI L,DONG D,et al.Multi-turn response selection for chatbots with deep attention matching network[C]//Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2018:1118-1127.
[23]ZHANG Z,LI J,ZHU P,et al.Modeling Multi-turn Conversation with Deep Utterance Aggregation[C]//Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics.2018:3740-3752.
[24]ZONG C Q.Statistical natural language processing(Second Edition) [M].Beijing:Tsinghua University Press,2013:83-85.
[25]TAO C,WU W,XU C,et al.Multi-representation fusion net- work for multi-turn response selection in retrieval-based chatbots[C]//Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining.2019:267-275.
[26]MAO G,SU J,YU S,et al.Multi-Turn Response Selection for Chatbots With Hierarchical Aggregation Network of Multi-Representation[J].IEEE Access,2019,7:111736-111745.
[27]TAO C,WU W,XU C,et al.One time of interaction may not be enough:Go deep with an interaction-over-interaction network for response selection in dialogues[C]//Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2019:1-11.
[28]LOWE R T,POW N,SERBAN I V,et al.Training end-to-end dialogue systems with the ubuntu dialogue corpus[J].Dialogue &Discourse,2017,8(1):31-65.
[29]GUNASEKARA C,KUMMERFELD J K,POLYMENAKOS L,et al.Dstc7 task 1:Noetic end-to-end response selection[C]//Proceedings of the First Workshop on NLP for Conversational AI.2019:60-67.
[30]CHEN Q,WANG W.Sequential attention-based network for noetic end-to-end response selection[J].arXiv:1901.02609,2019.
[31]GU J C,LING Z H,RUAN Y P,et al.Building sequential infe- rence models for end-to-end response selection[J].arXiv:1812.00686,2018.
[32]SUN S,TAM Y C,CAO J,et al.End-to-end Gated Self-attentive Memory Network for Dialog Response Selection[C]//Workshop on DSTC7.2019.
[33]SUKHBAATAR S,WESTON J,FERGUS R,et al.End-to-end memory networks[C]//Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.2015:2440-2448.
[34]CHIANG T R,HUANG C W,SU S Y,et al.Learning Multi-Level Information for Dialogue Response Selection by Highway Recurrent Transformer[J].arXiv:1903.08953,2019.
[35]LU J,XIE Z,LING G,et al.Spatio-Temporal Matching Net- work for Multi-Turn Responses Selection in Retrieval-Based Chatbots[C]//Workshop on DSTC7.2019.
[36]WHANG T,LEE D,LEE C,et al.Enhanced Sequential Representation Augmented with Utterance-level Attention for Response Selection[C]//Workshop on DSTC7.2019.
[37]SERBAN I V,SORDONI A,LOWE R,et al.A hierarchical latent variable encoder-decoder model for generating dialogues[C]//Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2017.
[38]XING C,WU W,WU Y,et al.Topic aware neural response ge- neration[C]//Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2017.
[39]WU Y,WU W,YANG D,et al.Neural response generation with dynamic vocabularies[C]//Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2018.
[40]LI J,GALLEY M,BROCKETT C,et al.A Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Models[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics:Human Language Technologies.2016:110-119.
[41]TIAN Z,YAN R,MOU L,et al.How to make context more useful? an empirical study on context-aware neural conversational models[C]//Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2017:231-236.
[42]ZHANG W,CUI Y,WANG Y,et al.Context-sensitive generation of open-domain conversational responses[C]//Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics.2018:2437-2447.
[43]SANKAR C,SUBRAMANIAN S,PAL C,et al.Do Neural Dialog Systems Use the Conversation History Effectively? An Empirical Study[C]//Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2019:32-37.
[44]LI J,MONROE W,RITTER A,et al.Deep Reinforcement Learning for Dialogue Generation[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Proces-sing.2016:1192-1202.
[45]LI J,MONROE W,SHI T,et al.Adversarial Learning for Neural Dialogue Generation[C]//Proceedings of the 2017 Confe-rence on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2017:2157-2169.
[46]XU Z,LIU B,WANG B,et al.Neural response generation via gan with an approximate embedding layer[C]//Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2017:617-626.
[47]SONG Y,LI C T,NIE J Y,et al.An ensemble of retrieval-based and generation-based human computer conversation systems[C]//Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2018:4382-4388.
[48]YAN R,ZHAO D.Coupled context modeling for deep chit-chat:towards conversations between human and computer[C]//Proceedings of the 24th ACMSIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining.2018:2574-2583.
[49]WU Y,WEI F,HUANG S,et al.Response generation by context-aware prototype editing[C]//Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2019,33:7281-7288.
[50]LI H,MIN M R,GE Y,et al.A context-aware attention network for interactive question answering[C]//Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.2017:927-935.
[51]GAO Y,LI P,KING I,et al.Interconnected Question Generation with Coreference Alignment and Conversation Flow Mode-ling[C]//Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Asso-ciation for Computational Linguistics.2019:4853-4862.
[52]CAO Y T,RAO S,DAUM III H.Controlling the Specificity of Clarification Question Generation[C]//Proceedings of the 2019 Workshop on Widening NLP.2019:53-56.
[53]RAO S,DAUM III H.Learning to Ask Good Questions:Ran- king Clarification Questions using Neural Expected Value of Perfect Information[C]//Proceedings of the 56th Annual Mee-ting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2018:2737-2746.
[54]QU C,YANG L,CROFT W B,et al.User intent prediction in information-seeking conversations[C]//Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval.2019:25-33.
[55]YU Y,PENG S,YANG G H.Modeling Long-Range Context for Concurrent Dialogue Acts Recognition[C]//Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Know-ledge Management.2019:2277-2280.
[56]JUDY D,RON Z.Pragmatic determinants of intonation contours for dialogue systems[J].International Journal of Speech Technology,1997,1(2):109-120.
[57]STOLCKE A,RIES K,COCCARO N,et al.Dialogue act mode- ling for automatic tagging and recognition of conversational speech[J].Computational linguistics,2000,26(3):339-373.
[58]PARK S,KIM D,OH A.Conversation Model Fine-Tuning for Classifying Client Utterances in Counseling Dialogues[C]//Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics:Human Language Technologies.2019:1448-1459.
[59]SONG W.Research on topic based query intention recognition [D].Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology,2013.
[60]LU W,ZHOU H X,ZHANG X J.Review of Research on Query Intent[J].Journal of Library Science in China,2013,39(1):100-111.
[61]CHEN H C.Mining consumption intention based on microblog [D].Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology,2014.
[62]JIA Y L,HAN D L,LIN H Y,et al.Consumption Intention Recognition Algorithm for Weibo Users[J].Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis,2020,56(1):68-74.
[63]ANG J,LIU Y,SHRIBERG E.Automatic dialog act segmentation and classification in multiparty meetings[C]//Proceedings.(ICASSP’05).IEEE International Conference on Acoustics,Speech,and Signal Processing.2005.
[64]SURENDRAN D,LEVOW G A.Dialog act tagging with support vector machines and hidden Markov models[C]//Ninth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing.2006.
[65]JI G,BILMES J.Dialog act tagging using graphical models[C]//Proceedings.(ICASSP’05).IEEE International Conference on Acoustics,Speech,and Signal Processing.2005.
[66]KIM S N,CAVEDON L,BALDWIN T.Classifying dialogue acts in one-on-one live chats[C]//Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2010:862-871.
[67]FERNANDEZ R,PICARD R W.Dialog Act Classification from Prosodic Features Using Support Vector Machines[C]//Speech Prosody 2002,International Conference.2002.
[68]VENKATARAMAN A,FERRER L,STOLCKE A,et al. Training a prosody-based dialog act tagger from unlabeled data[C]//2003 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics,Speech,and Signal Processing.2003.
[69]DIELMANN A,RENALS S.Recognition of dialogue acts in multiparty meetings using a switching DBN[J].IEEE Transactions on Audio,Speech,and Language Processing,2008,16(7):1303-1314.
[70]QUARTERONI S,IVANOV A V,RICCARDI G.Simultaneous dialog act segmentation and classification from human-human spoken conversations[C]//2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics,Speech and Signal Processing(ICASSP).2011:5596-5599.
[71]CHEN L,DI EUGENIO B.Multimodality and dialogue act classification in the RoboHelper project[C]//Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2013 Conference.2013:183-192.
[72]RIBEIRO E,RIBEIRO R,DE MATOS D M.The influence of context on dialogue act recognition[J].arXiv:1506.00839,2015.
[73]BARAHONA L M R,GASIC M,MRKI N,et al.Exploiting Sentence and Context Representations in Deep Neural Models for Spoken Language Understanding[C]//Proceedings of COLING 2016,the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics:Technical Papers.2016:258-267.
[74]KHANPOUR H,GUNTAKANDLA N,NIELSEN R.Dialogue act classification in domain-independent conversations using a deep recurrent neural network[C]//Proceedings of COLING 2016,the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics:Technical Papers.2016:2012-2021.
[75]LIU Y,HAN K,TAN Z,et al.Using context information for dialog act classification in dnn framework[C]//Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2017:2170-2178.
[76]HERMANN K M,KOCISKY T,GREFENSTETTE E,et al. Teaching machines to read and comprehend[C]//Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.2015:1693-1701.
[77]ONISHI T,WANG H,BANSAL M,et al.Who did What:A Large-Scale Person-Centered Cloze Dataset[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2016:2230-2235.
[78]HILL F,BORDES A,CHOPRA S,et al.The goldilocks principle:Reading children’s books with explicit memory representations[C]//Proceedings of the Forth International Conference on Learning Representations.2016.
[79]BAJGAR O,KADLEC R,KLEINDIENST J.Embracing data abundance:Booktest dataset for reading comprehension[J].ar-Xiv:1610.00956,2016.
[80]DHINGRA B,LIU H,YANG Z,et al.Gated-Attention Readers for Text Comprehension[C]//Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2017:1832-1846.
[81]MA K,JURCZYK T,CHOI J D.Challenging Reading Comprehension on Daily Conversation:Passage Completion on Multiparty Dialog[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics:Human Language Technologies.2018:2039-2048.
[82]YANG Z,CHOI J D.FriendsQA:Open-domain question answering on TV show transcripts[C]//Proceedings of the 20th Annual SIGdial Meeting on Discourse and Dialogue.2019:188-197.
[83]LI J,LIU M,KAN M Y,et al.Molweni:A Challenge Multiparty Dialogues-based Machine Reading Comprehension Dataset with Discourse Structure[J].arXiv:2004.05080,2020.
[84]CHEN D,BOLTON J,MANNING C D.A Thorough Examination of the CNN/Daily Mail Reading Comprehension Task[C]//Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2016:2358-2367.
[85]HOCHREITER S,SCHMIDHUBER J.Long short-term memory[J].Neural Computation,1997,9(8):1735-1780.
[86]TRISCHLER A,YE Z,YUAN X,et al.Natural Language Comprehension with the EpiReader[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Proces-sing.2016:128-137.
[87]CUI Y,CHEN Z,WEI S,et al.Attention-over-Attention Neural Networks for Reading Comprehension[C]//Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2017:593-602.
[88]SAEIDI M,BARTOLO M,LEWIS P,et al.Interpretation of Natural Language Rules in Conversational Machine Reading[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2018:2087-2097.
[89]ELGOHARY A,ZHAO C,BOYD-GRABER J.A dataset and baselines for sequential open-domain question answering[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2018:1077-1083.
[90]SUN K,YU D,CHEN J,et al.DREAM:A Challenge Data Set and Models for Dialogue-Based Reading Comprehension[J].Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics,2019,7:217-231.
[91]XU H,LIU B,SHU L,et al.Review conversational reading comprehension[J].arXiv:1902.00821,2019.
[92]DAS A,KOTTUR S,GUPTA K,et al.Visual dialog[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.2017:326-335.
[93]IYYER M,YIH W T,CHANG M W.Search-based neural structured learning for sequential question answering[C]//Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2017:1821-1831.
[94]SAHA A,PAHUJA V,KHAPRA M M,et al.Complex sequential question answering:Towards learning to converse over linked question answer pairs with a knowledge graph[C]//Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2018.
[95]GUO D,TANG D,DUAN N,et al.Dialog-to-action:Conversational question answering over a large-scale know-ledge base[C]//Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.2018:2942-2951.
[96]CHRISTMANN P,SAHA ROY R,ABUJABAL A,et al.Look before you hop:Conversational question answering over know-ledge graphs using judicious context expansion[C]//Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management.2019:729-738.
[97]LI Z J,WANG C B.Survey on Deep-learning-based Machine Reading Comprehension[J].Computer Science,2019,46(7):7-12.
[98]RAJPURKAR P,ZHANG J,LOPYREV K,et al.SQuAD: 100000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2016:2383-2392.
[99]RAJPURKAR P,JIA R,LIANG P.Know What You Don’t Know:Unanswerable Questions for SQuAD[C]//Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computatio-nal Linguistics.2018:784-789.
[100]NGUYEN T,ROSENBERG M,SONG X,et al.MS MARCO:A human generated machine reading comprehension dataset[C]//CoCo 2016-Proceedings of the Workshop on Cognitive Computation:Integrating Neural and Symbolic Approaches 2016,co-located with the 30th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems,NIPS 2016.2016.
[101]CHOI E,HE H,IYYER M,et al.QuAC:Question Answering in Context[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2018:2174-2184.
[102]DEVLIN J,CHANG M W,LEE K,et al.Bert:Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding[C]//Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics:Human Language Technologies.2019.
[103]QIU X,SUN T,XU Y,et al.Pre-trained Models for Natural Language Processing:A Survey[J].arXiv:2003.08271,2020.
[104]MA L,ZHANG W N,LI M,et al.A Survey of Document Grounded Dialogue Systems(DGDS)[J].arXiv:2004.13818,2020.
[105]CHEN D,FISCH A,WESTON J,et al.Reading Wikipedia to Answer Open-Domain Questions[C]//Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2017:1870-1879.
[106]GU J,LU Z,LI H,et al.Incorporating Copying Mechanism in Sequence-to-Sequence Learning[C]//Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2016:1631-1640.
[107]SEE A,LIU P J,MANNING C D.Get To The Point:Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networks[C]//Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2017:1073-1083.
[108]ZHU C,ZENG M,HUANG X.SDNet:Contextualized Attention-based Deep Network for Conversational Question Answe-ring[J].arXiv:1812.03593,2018.
[109]SU L,GUO J,FAN Y,et al.An Adaptive Framework for Conversational Question Answering[C]//Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2019:10041-10042.
[110]MIN S,ZHONG V,SOCHER R,et al.Efficient and Robust Question Answering from Minimal Context over Documents[C]//Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Asso-ciation for Computational Linguistics.2018:1725-1735.
[111]GU Y,GUI X,LI D.TT-Net:Topic Transfer-Based Neural Network for Conversational Reading Comprehension[J].IEEE Access,2019,7:116696-116705.
[112]BAI S,KOLTER J Z,KOLTUN V.An empirical evaluation of generic convolutional and recurrent networks for sequence mo-deling[J].arXiv:1803.01271,2018.
[113]MANDYA A,BOLLEGALA D,COENEN F.Evaluating Co-re- ference Chains based Conversation History in Conversational Question Answering[C]//International Conference of the Paci-fic Association for Computational Linguistics.Springer,Singapore.2019:280-292.
[114]SEO M,KEMBHAVI A,FARHADI A,et al.Bidirectional attention flow for machine comprehension[C]//5th International Conference on Learning Representations(ICLR).2017.
[115]CLARK C,GARDNER M.Simple and Effective Multi-Para- graph Reading Comprehension[C]//Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2018:845-855.
[116]PETERS M,NEUMANN M,IYYER M,et al.Deep Contextua- lized Word Representations[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics:Human Language Technologies.2018:2227-2237.
[117]YATSKAR M.A Qualitative Comparison of CoQA,SQuAD2.0 and QuAC[C]//Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics:Human Language Technologies.2019:2318-2323.
[118]HUANG H Y,CHOI E,YIH W.FlowQA:Grasping Flow in History for Conversational Machine Comprehension[C]//7th International Conference on Learning Representations(ICLR).2019.
[119]CHEN Y,WU L,ZAKI M J.Graphflow:Exploiting conversation flow with graph neural networks for conversational machine comprehension[J].arXiv:1908.00059,2019.
[120]OHSUGI Y,SAITO I,NISHIDA K,et al.A Simple but Effective Method to Incorporate Multi-turn Context with BERT for Conversational Machine Comprehension[C]//Proceedings of the First Workshop on NLP for Conversational AI.2019:11-17.
[121]YEH Y T,CHEN Y N.FlowDelta:Modeling Flow Information Gain in Reasoning for Conversational Machine Comprehension[C]//Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Machine Reading for Question Answering.2019:86-90.
[122]QU C,YANG L,QIU M,et al.BERT with History Answer Embedding for Conversational Question Answering[C]//Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval.2019:1133-1136.
[123]QU C,YANG L,QIU M,et al.Attentive History Selection for Conversational Question Answering[C]//Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Know-ledge Management.2019:1391-1400.
[124]JU Y,ZHAO F,CHEN S,et al.Technical report on Conversational Question Answering[J].arXiv:1909.10772,2019.
[125]LIU Y,OTT M,GOYAL N,et al.RoBERTa:A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach[J].arXiv:1907.11692,2019.
[126]GOODFELLOW I J,SHLENS J,SZEGEDY C.Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples[J].arXiv:1412.6572,2014.
[127]HINTON G,VINYALS O,DEAN J.Distilling the knowledge in a neural network[J].arXiv:1503.02531,2015.
[128]RUDER S.Neural Transfer Learning for Natural Language Processing[D].Galway,Ireland:National University of Ireland,2019.
[129]QIU M,YANG L,JI F,et al.Transfer Learning for Context- Aware Question Matching in Information-seeking Conversations in E-commerce[C]//Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2018:208-213.
[130]WHANG T,LEE D,LEE C,et al.Domain adaptive training bert for response selection[J].arXiv:1908.04812,2019.
[131]YAN R,ZHAO D,E W.Joint learning of response ranking and next utterance suggestion in human-computer conversation system[C]//Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval.2017:685-694.
[132]TAO C,WU W,XU C,et al.Improving matching models with contextualized word representations for multiturn response selection in retrieval-based chatbots[J].arXiv:1808.07244,2018.
[133]CHO K,VAN MERRIËNBOER B,GULCEHRE C,et al. Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation[C]//Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing(EMNLP).2014:1724-1734.
[134]WOLF T,SANH V,CHAUMOND J,et al.TransferTransfo:A transfer learning approach for neural network based conversational agents[J].arXiv:1901.08149,2019.
[1] XIN Yuan-xue, SHI Peng-fei, XUE Rui-yang. Moving Object Detection Based on Region Extraction and Improved LBP Features [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(7): 233-237.
[2] YAO Dong, LI Zhou-jun, CHEN Shu-wei, JI Zhen, ZHANG Rui, SONG Lei, LAN Hai-bo. Task-oriented Dialogue System and Technology Based on Deep Learning [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(5): 232-238.
[3] YU Xiao-ming, HUANG Hua. Research on Application of Improved GAN Network in Generating Short Video [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(11A): 625-629.
[4] ZHAO Bo, YANG Ming, TANG Zhi-wei and CAI Yu-xin. Intelligent Video Surveillance Systems Based on FPGA [J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(6A): 609-611.
[5] WANG Qia, QI Yong. Method for Traffic Video Background Modeling Based on Inter-frame Difference and Statistical Histogram [J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(10): 174-179.
[6] ZHU Xuan, WANG Lei, ZHANG Chao, MEI Dong-feng, XUE Jia-ping, CAO Qing-wen. Moving Object Detection Based on Continuous Constraint Background Model Deduction [J]. Computer Science, 2019, 46(6): 311-315.
[7] ZHAO Peng, JIANG Yu-zhong, ZHAI Qi, LI Chun-teng. Improved FCME Algorithm Based on Binary Searching by Mean and Its Applicationsin E/SLF Channel Noise Detection [J]. Computer Science, 2019, 46(6): 118-123.
[8] MA Xiao-di, WU Xi-yin, JIN Zhong. Salient Object Detection Based on Dictionary and Weighted Low-rank Recovery [J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(6A): 146-150.
[9] SONG Yan-qiu, LI Gui-jun, LI Hui-jia. Community Label Detection Algorithm Based on Potential Background Information [J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(6A): 314-317.
[10] QIAN Ji-de, CHEN Bin, QIAN Ji-ye, ZHAO Heng-jun, CHEN Gang. Machine Vision Based Inspection Method of Mura Defect for LCD [J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(6): 296-300.
[11] YUAN Xiao-yan, WANG An-zhi, WANG Ming-hui. Saliency Object Detection Algorithm Integrating Focusness Feature of Frequency Domain Information [J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(10): 261-266.
[12] CHEN Bing-cai, WANG Xi-bao, YU Chao, NIAN Mei, TAO Xin, PAN Wei-min, LU Zhi-mao. Saliency Detection Based on Surroundedness and Markov Model [J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(10): 272-275.
[13] GAO Fei, FENG Min-qiang, WANG Min-qian, LU Shu-fang and XIAO Gang. Research on People Counting Based on Hot Area [J]. Computer Science, 2017, 44(Z6): 173-178.
[14] ZHANG Wen-ya, XU Hua-zhong and LUO Jie. Moving Objects Detection under Complex Background Based on ViBe [J]. Computer Science, 2017, 44(9): 304-307.
[15] HE Jian-ying. Canonical Basis Based on Decision Implication of Decision Context [J]. Computer Science, 2017, 44(8): 290-295.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!