Computer Science ›› 2023, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (11): 49-54.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.221000043

• Database & Big Data & Data Science • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Rumor Detection Model on Social Media Based on Contrastive Learning with Edge-inferenceAugmentation

LIU Nan, ZHANG Fengli, YIN Jiaqi, CHEN Xueqin, WANG Ruijin   

  1. School of Information and Software Engineering,University of Electronic Science and Technology of China,Chengdu 610054,China
  • Received:2022-10-09 Revised:2022-12-30 Online:2023-11-15 Published:2023-11-06
  • About author:LIU Nan,born in 1995.Ph.D.Her main research interests include social network analysis and deep representation learning.YIN Jiaqi,born in 1986,bachelor,engineer.His main research interests include big data and environmental informatization.
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(62271128), Sichuan Regional Innovation Cooperation Project(2020YFQ0018) and Sichuan Science and Technology Program(2022ZDZX0004,2023YFG0029,2023YFG0150,2023ZHCG004,2022YFG0212,2021YFS0391,2021YFG0027).

Abstract: In recent years,in order to deal with various social problems which are caused by the wide spreading of rumors,researchers have developed many deep learning-based rumor detection methods.Although these methods improve detection performance by learning the high-level representation of rumor from its propagation structure,they still suffer the problem of lower reliability and cumulative errors effect,due to the ignoring of edges’ uncertainty when constructing the propagation network.To address such a problem,this paper proposes the edge-inference contrastive learning(EIC) model.EICL first constructs a propagation graph based on timestamps of retweets(comments) for a given message.Then,it augments the event propagation graph to capture the edge uncertainty of the propagation structure by a newly designed edge-weight adjustment strategy.Finally,it employs the contrastive learning technique to solve the sparsity problem of the original dataset and improve the model generalization.Experimental results show that the accuracy of EICL is improved by 2.0% and 3.0% on Twitter15 and Twitter16,respectively,compared with other state-of-the-art baselines,which demonstrate that it can significantly improve the performance of rumor detection on social media.

Key words: Rumor detection, Contrastive learning, Data augmentation, Causal inference

CLC Number: 

  • TP181
[1]CASTILLO C,POBLETE B,MENDOZA M,et al.InformationCredibility on Twitter[C]//Proceedings of the 20th Interna-tional Conference on World Wide Web.2011:675-84.
[2]KWON S,CHA M,JUNG K,et al.Prominent Features of Ru-mor Propagation in Online Social Media[C]//2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining.2013:1103-1108.
[3]VOSOUGHI S,ROY D,ARAL S.The Spread of True and False News Online[J].Science,2018,359(6380):1146-1151.
[4]MA J,GAO W,PRASENJIT M,et al.Detecting Rumors from Microblogs with Recurrent Neural Networks[C]//Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2016:3818-3824.
[5]KOTTETI C M M,DONG X,QIAN L.Ensemble deep learning on time-series representation of tweets for rumor detection in social media[J].Applied Sciences,2020,10(21):7541.
[6]KHOO L M S,CHIEU H L,QIAN Z,et al.Interpretable rumordetection in microblogs by attending to user interactions[C]//Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2020,34(5):8783-8790.
[7]BIAN T,XIAO X,XU T,et al.Rumor detection on social media with bi-directional graph convolutional networks[C]//Procee-dings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2020,34(1):549-556.
[8]WEI P,XU N,MAO W.Modeling conversation structure andtemporal dynamics for jointly predicting rumor stance and vera-city[J].arXiv:1909.08211,2019.
[9]SHARMA K,QIAN F,JIANG H,et al.Combating fake news:A survey on identification and mitigation techniques[J].ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology(TIST),2019,10(3):1-42.
[10]ZHOU X,ZAFARANI R.A survey of fake news:Fundamental theories,detection methods,and opportunities[J].ACM Computing Surveys(CSUR),2020,53(5):1-40.
[11]LIU X,NOURBAKHSH A,LI Q,et al.Real-time rumor debunking on twitter[C]//Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management.2015:1867-1870.
[12]SHELKE S,ATTAR V.Rumor Detection in Social NetworkBased on User,Content and Lexical Features[J].Multimedia Tools and Applications,2022,81(12):347-368.
[13]ZHANG H,QIAN S,FANG Q,et al.Multi-modal Meta Multi-task Learning for Social Media Rumor Detection[J].IEEE Transactions on Multimedia,2021,24,1449-1459.
[14]MA J,GAO W,WONG K.Rumor Detection on Twitter withTree-structured Recursive Neural Networks[C]//Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computa-tional Linguistics.Association for Computa-tional Linguistics,2018:1980-1989.
[15]CHEN T,LI X,YIN H,et al.Call attention to rumors:Deep attention based recurrent neural networks for early rumor detection[C]//Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.Cham:Springer,2018:40-52.
[16]MISHRA R,SETTY V.Sadhan:Hierarchical attention net-works to learn latent aspect embeddings for fake news detection[C]//Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval.2019:197-204.
[17]RAN H,JIA C,ZHANG P,et al.MGAT-ESM:Multi-channelgraph attention neural network with event-sharing module for rumor detection[J].Information Sciences,2022,592:402-416.
[18]NGUYEN V H,SUGIYAMA K,NAKOV P,et al.Fang:Leve-raging social context for fake news detection using graph representation[C]//Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management.2020:1165-1174.
[19]WANG T,ISOLA P.Understanding contrastive representationlearning through alignment and uniformity on the hypersphere[C]//International Conference on Machine Learning.PMLR,2020:9929-9939.
[20]LIN H,MA J,CHENG M,et al.Rumor detection on twitter with claim-guided hierarchical graph attention networks[J].arXiv:2110.04522,2021.
[21]LIN H,YAN Y,CHEN G.Boosting Low-resource Intent Detection with In-scope Prototypical Networks[C]//ICASSP 2021-2021 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics.Speech and Signal Processing,2021:7623-7627.
[22]GAO T,YAO X,CHEN D.Simcse:Simple contrastive learning of sentence embeddings[J].arXiv:2104.08821,2021.
[23]MOHTARAMI M,GLASS J,NAKOV P.Contrastive language adaptation for cross-lingual stance detection[J].arXiv:1910.02076,2019.
[24]ZHUANG C,MA Q.Dual graph convolutional networks forgraph-based semi-supervised classification[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference.2018:499-508.
[25]MA J,GAO W,WONG K.Detect Rumors in Microblog PostsUsing Propagation Structure Via Kernel Learning[C]//Procee-dings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.Association for Computational Linguistics,2017:708-717.
[26]WEI L,HU D,ZHOU W,et al.Towards propagation uncertainty:Edge-enhanced bayesian graph convolutional networks for rumor detection[J].arXiv:2107.11934,2021.
[1] XU Jie, WANG Lisong. Contrastive Clustering with Consistent Structural Relations [J]. Computer Science, 2023, 50(9): 123-129.
[2] HUANG Lu, NI Lyu, JIN Cheqing. Rectifying Dual Bias for Recommendation [J]. Computer Science, 2023, 50(9): 152-159.
[3] HU Shen, QIAN Yuhua, WANG Jieting, LI Feijiang, LYU Wei. Super Multi-class Deep Image Clustering Model Based on Contrastive Learning [J]. Computer Science, 2023, 50(9): 192-201.
[4] LI Xiang, FAN Zhiguang, LIN Nan, CAO Yangjie, LI Xuexiang. Self-supervised Learning for 3D Real-scenes Question Answering [J]. Computer Science, 2023, 50(9): 220-226.
[5] LIANG Jiayin, XIE Zhipeng. Text Paraphrase Generation Based on Pre-trained Language Model and Tag Guidance [J]. Computer Science, 2023, 50(8): 150-156.
[6] WANG Mingxia, XIONG Yun. Disease Diagnosis Prediction Algorithm Based on Contrastive Learning [J]. Computer Science, 2023, 50(7): 46-52.
[7] ZHANG Tao, CHENG Yifei, SUN Xinxu. Graph Attention Networks Based on Causal Inference [J]. Computer Science, 2023, 50(6A): 220600230-9.
[8] ZENG Wu, MAO Guojun. Few-shot Learning Method Based on Multi-graph Feature Aggregation [J]. Computer Science, 2023, 50(6A): 220400029-10.
[9] WU Jufeng, ZHAO Xungang, ZHOU Qiang, RAO Ning. Contrastive Learning for Low-light Image Enhancement [J]. Computer Science, 2023, 50(6A): 220600171-6.
[10] HUANG Fangwan, LU Juhong, YU Zhiyong. Data Augmentation for Cardiopulmonary Exercise Time Series of Young HypertensivePatients Based on Active Barycenter [J]. Computer Science, 2023, 50(6A): 211200233-11.
[11] WANG Qingyu, WANG Hairui, ZHU Guifu, MENG Shunjian. Study on SQL Injection Detection Based on FlexUDA Model [J]. Computer Science, 2023, 50(6A): 220600172-6.
[12] HAN Xueming, JIA Caiyan, LI Xuanya, ZHANG Pengfei. Dual-attention Network Model on Propagation Tree Structures for Rumor Detection [J]. Computer Science, 2023, 50(4): 22-31.
[13] HE Chao, CHEN Jinjie, JIN Zhao, LEI Yinjie. Automatic Modulation Recognition Method Based on Multimodal Time-Frequency Feature Fusion [J]. Computer Science, 2023, 50(4): 226-232.
[14] KANG Shuming, ZHU Yan. Text Stance Detection Based on Topic Attention and Syntactic Information [J]. Computer Science, 2023, 50(11A): 230200068-5.
[15] LU Qi, YU Yuanqiang, XU Daoming, ZHANG Qi. Improved YOLOv5 Small Drones Target Detection Algorithm [J]. Computer Science, 2023, 50(11A): 220900050-8.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!