Computer Science ›› 2024, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (10): 302-310.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.230800156

• Computer Graphics & Multimedia • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Order-adaptive Multi-hypothesis Reconstruction for Heterogeneous Image Compressive Sensing

ZHENG Yongxian, LIU Hao, YAN Shuai, CHEN Genlong   

  1. College of Information Science and Technology,Donghua University,Shanghai 201620,China
  • Received:2023-08-24 Revised:2024-01-09 Online:2024-10-15 Published:2024-10-11
  • About author:ZHENG Yongxian,born in 2000,postgraduate,is a member of CCF(No.P8454G).His main research interest is image compression sensing.
    LIU Hao,born in 1977,associate professor,is a member of CCF(No.26679M).His main research interests include multimedia signal processing and intelligent sensing system.
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(62001099).

Abstract: The arrival of the big data era poses challenges for processing and transmitting large amounts of image data.The compressive sensing technology and related algorithms have solved some of these problems to a certain extent.However,existing compressive sensing algorithms still have problems when adapting to heterogeneous image sets.Therefore,it is necessary to design a highly generalized compressive sensing reconstruction algorithm for such image sets.In this paper,an order-adaptive multi-hypothesis reconstruction algorithm is proposed according to a multih-ypothesis prediction mechanism with high generalization.The proposed algorithm preprocesses each block using a window-adaptive linear predictor and changes the size of the multi-hypothesis searching window according to the correlation index obtained from preprocessing.The prediction blocks within the searching window are sorted according to block-wise similarity and different numbers of highly similar prediction blocks are selected from the adaptive searching window for the reconstructed image of multi-hypothesis prediction.Experiments are conducted on a natural image set and two heterogeneous image sets of X-ray chest and brain MRI.At different sampling rates,many experiments and analyses are carried out by comparing the traditional multi-hypothesis compressive sensing reconstruction algorithm and two recent algorithms of multi-hypothesis prediction.The experimental results show a good performance improvement of the proposed algorithm compared to the traditional multihypothesis compressive sensing reconstruction algorithm.On the natural image set,the proposed algorithm maintains a certain recovery quality and achieves an average runtime decrease of 17.5% and 28.7% respectively,compared to two recently proposed algorithms.As compared to two recent proposed algorithms:on the X-ray chest image set,the average PSNR value of proposed algorithm increases by 1.16dB and 1.43dB,and the average runtime decreases by 36.1% and 21.5%,respectively.On the brain MRI image set,the average PSNR value increases by 1.64dB and 1.97dB,and the average runtime decreases by 28.6% and 26.1%,respectively.Overall,the proposed algorithm has low computational complexity and high recovery quality with better tradeoff performance.

Key words: Compressive sensing reconstruction, Multi-hypothesis prediction, Linear predictor, Order-adaptive, Heterogeneous image set

CLC Number: 

  • TN919.8
[1]DO T T,TRAN T D,GAN L.Fast compressive sampling withstructurally random matrices[C]//2008 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics,Speech and Signal Processing.IEEE,2008:3369-3372.
[2]GAN L.Block compressed sensing of natural images[C]//2007 15th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing.IEEE,2007:403-406.
[3]MUN S,FOWLER J E.Block compressed sensing of imagesusing directional transforms[C]//2009 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing(ICIP).IEEE,2009:3021-3024.
[4]FOWLER J E,MUN S,TRAMEL E W.Multiscale block compressed sensing with smoothed projected landweber reconstruction[C]//2011 19th European Signal Processing Conference.IEEE,2011:564-568.
[5]CHEN C,TRAMEL E W,FOWLER J E.Compressed-sensingrecovery of images and video using multihypothesis predictions[C]//2011 Conference Record of the forty fifth Asilomar Conference on Signals,Systems and Computers(ASILOMAR).IEEE,2011:1193-1198.
[6]LIU H,SUN R.Iterative progressive-hypothesis prediction for forward interframe reconstruction of video compressive sensing[C]//2022 IEEE 24th International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing(MMSP).IEEE,2022:1-6.
[7]GU H,YAMAN B,MOELLER S,et al.Revisiting $\ell $1-waveletcompressed-sensing MRI in the era of deep learning[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2022,119(33):e2201062119.
[8]ZHA Z,WEN B,YUAN X,et al.Image restoration via reconci-liation of group sparsity and low-rank models[J].IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,2021,30:5223-5238.
[9]FENG Z,ZHOU Y,ZUO M J,et al.Atomic decomposition and sparse representation for complex signal analysis in machinery fault diagnosis:A review with examples[J].Measurement,2017,103:106-132.
[10]ZHA Z,YUAN X,ZHOU J,et al.Image restoration via simultaneous nonlocal self-similarity priors[J].IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,2020,29:8561-8576.
[11]ZHANG J,ZHAO D,GAO W.Group-based sparse representation for image restoration[J].IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,2014,23(8):3336-3351.
[12]XU J,ZHANG L,ZUO W,et al.Patch group based nonlocalself-similarity prior learning for image denoising[C]//Procee-dings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.IEEE,2015:244-252.
[13]ZHA Z,YUAN X,WEN B,et al.From rank estimation to rank approximation:Rank residual constraint for image restoration[J].IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,2019,29:3254-3269.
[14]GU S,ZHANG L,ZUO W,et al.Weighted nuclear norm minimization with application to image denoising[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.IEEE,2014:2862-2869.
[15]ZHA Z,YUAN X,WEN B,et al.A benchmark for sparse co-ding:When group sparsity meets rank minimization[J].IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,2020,29:5094-5109.
[16]ZHA Z,WEN B,YUAN X,et al.A hybrid structural sparsification error model for image restoration[J].IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems,2022,33(9):4451-4465.
[17]KALLUMMIL S,KALYANI S.Generalized residual ratiothresholding[J].Signal Processing,2022,197:108531.
[18]KULKARNI K,LOHIT S,TURAGA P,et al.Reconnet:Non-iterative reconstruction of images from compressively sensed measurements[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.IEEE,2016:449-458.
[19]CHOWDHURTY M E H,RAHMAN T,KHANDAKAR A,et al.Can AI help in screening viral and COVID-19 pneumonia?[J].IEEE Access,2020,8:132665-132676.
[20]MENZE B H,JAKAB A,BAUER S,et al.The multimodal braintumor image segmentation benchmark(BRATS)[J].IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging,2014,34(10):1993-2024.
[1] WU Liuchen, ZHANG Hui, LIU Jiaxuan, ZHAO Chenyang. Defect Detection of Transmission Line Bolt Based on Region Attention Mechanism andMulti-scale Feature Fusion [J]. Computer Science, 2023, 50(6A): 220200096-7.
[2] LI Fa-guang, YILIHAMU·Yaermaimaiti. Real-time Detection Model of Insulator Defect Based on Improved CenterNet [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(5): 84-91.
[3] HE Quan-qi, YU Fei-hong. Review of Low Power Architecture for Wireless Network Cameras [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(6A): 369-373.
[4] XU Yi-fei, XIONG Shu-hua, SUN Wei-heng, HE Xiao-hai, CHEN Hong-gang. HEVC Post-processing Algorithm Based on Non-local Low-rank and Adaptive Quantization Constraint Prior [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(5): 155-162.
[5] LIU Dong, WANG Ye-fei, LIN Jian-ping, MA Hai-chuan, YANG Run-yu. Advances in End-to-End Optimized Image Compression Technologies [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(3): 1-8.
[6] TIAN Wei, LIU Hao, CHEN Gen-long, GONG Xiao-hui. Cross Subset-guided Adaptive Measurement for Block Compressive Sensing [J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(12): 190-196.
[7] CAI Yu-han,XIONG Shu-hua,SUN Wei-heng,Karn PRADEEP,HE Xiao-hai. Video Compression Algorithm Combining Frame Rate Up-conversion with HEVC Standard Based on Motion Vector Refinement [J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(2): 76-82.
[8] ZHANG Jing-jing, ZHANG Ai-hua, JI Hai-feng. Image Compression Encoding Based on Wavelet Transform and Fractal [J]. Computer Science, 2019, 46(8): 310-314.
[9] XU Jing-yao, WANG Zu-lin, XU Mai. Deep Learning Based Fast VideoTranscoding Algorithm [J]. Computer Science, 2019, 46(3): 113-118.
[10] GUO Hong-wei, LUO Hong-jun, LIU Shuai, NIU Lin, YANG Bo. Improved R-λ Model Based Rate Control Algorithm [J]. Computer Science, 2019, 46(3): 142-147.
[11] ZHAO Zhen-bing, CUI Ya-ping, QI Yin-cheng, DU Li-qun, ZHANG Ke, ZHAI Yong-jie. Detection Method of Insulator in Aerial Inspection Image Based on Modified R-FCN [J]. Computer Science, 2019, 46(3): 159-163.
[12] HENG Yang, CHEN Feng, XU Jian-feng, TANG Min. Application Status and Development Trends of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Fast Imaging Based on Compressed Sensing Theory [J]. Computer Science, 2019, 46(1): 36-44.
[13] DU Xiu-li, HU Xing, CHEN Bo, QIU Shao-ming. Multi-hypothesis Reconstruction Algorithm of DCVS Based on Weighted Non-local Similarity [J]. Computer Science, 2019, 46(1): 291-296.
[14] LIU Jing-hua, CHEN Jing. Whole Frame Loss Concealment Method for Stereo Video Basedon Disparity Consistence [J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(6): 270-274.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!