Computer Science ›› 2025, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (12): 260-270.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.241100081

• Artificial Intelligence • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Explanation Method for Entity Alignment Based on Neighborhood Matching Probability andType Quotient Graph

ZHANG Xiaoming, QIU Jingjing, WANG Huiyong   

  1. College of Information Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang 050018, China
  • Received:2024-11-13 Revised:2025-03-04 Online:2025-12-15 Published:2025-12-09
  • About author:ZHANG Xiaoming,born in 1975,Ph.D,professor,is a member of CCF(No.30537M).His main research interests include knowledge graph,semantic computing and multi-modal knowledge fusion.
    WANG Huiyong,born in 1980,Ph.D,associate professor,is a member of CCF(No.42025M).His main research interests include knowledge graph and computer vision.
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province,China(F2022208002) and Shijiazhuang Basic Research Program(241790867A).

Abstract: In recent years,a variety of embedding-based entity alignment methods have emerged,which achieve entity alignment by mapping entities and relations into low-dimensional vector spaces and calculating these vector representations.Although these methods have achieved good performance,there are relatively few studies on their explainability.Therefore,a post hoc explanation algorithm for entity alignment(PE-EA) is proposed to generate explanations for the prediction results of the entity alignment model based on knowledge graph embedding.The method first evaluates the functionality of entities and their relations by calculating their connection counts in the knowledge graph,and then quantifies the importance of the entity neighborhood structure.Subsequently,the entity functionality is combined with the embedding vector to calculate the embedding vector of the relation,and the matching probability of the relation pair is obtained based on it.Then,based on the neighborhood information of the predicted entity pair,the matching probability of the candidate explanation pairs in the neighborhood is calculated,and the explanation triplets of the predicted entity pair are screened out and combined into an explanation subgraph.Furthermore,the concept of type quotient graph is introduced to abstract the explanatory subgraph,compress the data and simplify the explanation generation process,thereby reducing the number of candidate explanations while enhancing the quality and effectiveness of the explanations.On five commonly used experimental datasets,the two evaluation indicators of fidelity and sparsity are used to verify that the explanations generated by the proposed model have high accuracy and simplicity.

Key words: Entity alignment, Explainability, Neighborhood structure, Probabilistic mathching, Type quotient graph

CLC Number: 

  • TP391
[1]HUANG P,ZHANG M,ZHONG Z,et al.Representation Lear-ning for Entity Alignment in Knowledge Graph:A Design Space Exploration[C]//2024 IEEE 40th International Confe-rence on Data Engineering(ICDE).IEEE,2024:3462-3475.
[2]ZHANG T C,TIAN X,SUN X H,et al.Overview on Know-ledge Graph Embedding Technology Research[J].Journal of Software,2023,34(1):277-311.
[3]ZHU B,WANG R,WANG J,et al.A survey:knowledge graph entity alignment research based on graph embedding[J].Artificial Intelligence Review,2024,57(9):1-58.
[4]VAN DER VELDEN B H M,KUIJF H J,GILHUIJS K G A,et al.Explainable artificial intelligence(XAI) in deep learning-based medical image analysis[J].Medical Image Analysis,2022,79:102470.
[5]CHOWDHURY T,RAHIMI R,ALLAN J.Equi-explanationmaps:concise and informative global summary explanations[C]//Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness,Accountability,and Transparency.2022:464-472.
[6]LAMPRIDIS O,GUIDOTTI R,RUGGIERI S.Explaining sentiment classification with synthetic exemplars and counter-exemplars[C]//International Conference on Discovery Science.Cham:Springer,2020:357-373.
[7]DOU H,ZHANG L M,HAN F,et al.Survey on Convolutional Neural Network Interpretability[J].Journal of Software,2024,35(1):159-184.
[8]FAN Y,YAO Y,JOE W C.Gcn-se:Attention as explainability for node classification in dynamic graphs[C]//2021 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining(ICDM).IEEE,2021:1060-1065.
[9]LI X,SAÚDE J.Explain graph neural networks to understand weighted graph features in node classification[C]//International Cross-Domain Conference for Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction.Cham:Springer,2020:57-76.
[10]ROSSI A,FIRMANI D,MERIALDO P,et al.Explaining linkprediction systems based on knowledge graph embeddings[C]//Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Management of Data.2022:2062-2075.
[11]CHEN M,TIAN Y,YANG M,et al.Multilingual knowledge graph embeddings for cross-lingual knowledge alignment[C]//Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence(IJCAI).2017:1511-1517.
[12]SUN Z,HU W,ZHANG Q,et al.Bootstrapping entity alignment with knowledge graph embedding[C]//IJCAI.2018.
[13]WANG Z,LV Q,LAN X,et al.Cross-lingual knowledge graph alignment via graph convolutional networks[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2018:349-357.
[14]MAO X,WANG W,WU Y,et al.Boosting the speed of entityalignment 10×:Dual attention matching network with norma-lized hard sample mining[C]//Proceedings of the Web Confe-rence 2021.2021:821-832.
[15]MAO X,WANG W,WU Y,et al.From alignment to assignment:Frustratingly simple unsupervised entity alignment[C]//Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2021:2843-2853.
[16]JI G S,ZHU Y C,WANG Y,et al.Multi-depth joint entityalignment based on textualinformationmulti-depth joint entity alignment based on textual information[J].Applied Intelligence,2023,51:8896-8912.
[17]MAO X,WANG W,WU Y,et al.LightEA:A Scalable,Robust,and Interpretable Entity Alignment Framework via Three-view Label Propagation[C]//Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2022:825-838.
[18]LUO Y,CHEN Z,GUO L,et al.ASGEA:Exploiting LogicRules from Align-Subgraphs for Entity Alignment[J].arXiv:2402.11000,2024.
[19]XU C,CHENG J,ZHANG F.P-NAL:an Effective and Interpretable Entity Alignment Method[C]//Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2024:13752-13772.
[20]TRISEDYA B D,SALIM F D,CHAN J,et al.i-Align:an interprtable knowledge graph alignment model[J].Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery,2023,37(6):2494-2516.
[21]YING Z,BOURGEOIS D,YOU J,et al.Gnnexplainer:Generating explanations for graph neural networks[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems.2019:9244-9255.
[22]LUO D,CHENG W,XU D,et al.Parameterized explainer for graph neural network[J].Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems,2020,33:19620-19631.
[23]YUAN H,YU H,WANG J,et al.On explainability of graph neural networks via subgraph explorations[C]//International Conference on Machine Learning.PMLR,2021:12241-12252.
[24]PEZESHKPOUR P,TIAN Y,SINGH S.Investigating robust-ness and interpretability of link prediction via adversarial modifications[C]//Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computa tional Linguistics:Human Language Technologies.2019:3336-3347.
[25]ZHAO D,WAN G,ZHAN Y,et al.KE-X:Towards subgraph explanations of knowledge graph embedding based on know-ledge information gain[J].Knowledge-Based Systems,2023,278:110772.
[26]RIBEIRO M T,SINGH S,GUESTRIN C.“Why shouldi trust you?” Explaining the predictions of any classifier[C]//Procee-dings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.2016:1135-1144.
[27]LUNDBERG S M,LEE S I.Aunified approach to interpreting model predictions[J].Advances in Neural Information Proces-sing Systems,2017,30:4768-4777.
[28]TIAN X,SUN Z,HU W.Generating Explanations to Understand and Repair Embedding-based Entity Alignment[C]//2024 IEEE 40th International Conference on Data Engineering(ICDE).IEEE,2024:2205-2217.
[29]XIN K,SUN Z,HUA W,et al.Informed multi-context entity alignment[C]//Proceedings of the Fifteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining.2022:1197-1205.
[30]ČEBIRIĆ Š,GOASDOUÉ F,KONDYLAKIS H,et al.Summarizing semantic graphs:a survey[J].The VLDB Journal,2019,28:295-327.
[31]SUN Z,HU W,LI C.Cross-lingual entity alignment via joint attribute-preserving embedding[C]//International Semantic Web Conference.Cham:Springer,2017:628-644.
[32]ZHANG R,TRISEDYA B D,LI M,et al.A benchmark andcomprehensive survey on knowledge graph entity alignment via representation learning[J].The VLDB Journal,2022,31(5):1143-1168.
[33]ZENG K,LI C,HOU L,et al.A comprehensive surveyof entity alignment for knowledge graphs[J].AI Open,2021,2:1-13.
[34]POPE P E,KOLOURI S,ROSTAMI M,et al.Explainabilitymethods for graph convolutional neural networks[C]//Procee-dings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.2019:10772-10781.
[1] LI Zhikang, DENG Yichen, YU Dunhui, XIAO Kui. Relationship and Attribute Aware Entity Alignment Based on Variant-attention [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(11): 230-236.
[2] CHEN Fuqiang, KOU Jiamin, SU Limin, LI Ke. Multi-information Optimized Entity Alignment Model Based on Graph Neural Network [J]. Computer Science, 2023, 50(3): 34-41.
[3] CHI Tang, CHE Chao. Entity Alignment Method Combining Iterative Relationship Graph Matching and Attribute Semantic Embedding [J]. Computer Science, 2023, 50(11A): 230200041-6.
[4] CHAO Le-men, WANG Rui. Data Science Platform:Features,Technologies and Trends [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(8): 1-12.
[5] YANG Ru-han, DAI Yi-ru, WANG Jian, DONG Jin. Humans-Cyber-Physical Ontology Fusion of Industry Based on Representation Learning [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(5): 190-196.
[6] WANG Zhi-juan and LI Fu-xian. Survey on Cross-language Named Entity Translation Pairs Extraction [J]. Computer Science, 2017, 44(Z6): 14-18.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!