Computer Science ›› 2026, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (9): 395-404.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.250700112

• Information Security • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Technology Risk Structure Recognition Based on Multi-granularity Semantic Dual Reflection

LI Zhennan1, QIAN Jiayan1, WANG Xinzhi1, ZHANG Hui2   

  1. 1 School of Computer Engineering and Science,Shanghai University,Shanghai 200444,China
    2 School of Safety Science,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China
  • Received:2025-07-21 Revised:2025-10-24 Online:2026-09-15 Published:2026-09-10
  • About author:LI Zhennan,born in 1999,postgra-duate.His main research interests include substructure mining and technology risk recognition.
    WANG Xinzhi,born in 1989,Ph.D,associate professor,is a member of CCF(No.E2829M).Her main research interests include knowledge science and engineering,intelligent decision-ma-king,and substructures recognition in complex networks.
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(72574136).

Abstract: In the context of Sino-US technology competition,the technology field confronts the challenge of managing the non-li-near overlap of traditional and emerging risks,as well as the deep coupling of endogenous vulnerabilities and external threats.Multiple risks are intertwined and concealed in the technological intelligence network.Existing research primarily focuses on detecting individual risk features,with inadequate attention paid to cross-layer risk coupling modeling and dynamic semantic representation.Faced with that,this study proposes a method for recognizing technology risk structures based on multi-granularity semantic dual reflection,and constructs a potential multi-granularity coupled technology risk structure mining framework driven by both knowledge and learning.Firstly,it extracts scientific information layer by layer from multi-source technology texts and constructs a multi-layer and multi-granularity technology network.Next,eight centrality indicators are used to identify explicit risk structures within the multi-layer and multi-granularity network.However,while centrality-based methods offer high accuracy,they have an inherent limitation in covering concealed risk structures.Therefore,this study introduces a dual reflection approach based on substructure facts and large language models(LLMs).By modeling the high-order semantic features of technology risk structures and establishing a dual reflection mechanism,the mining of technology risks carried by key substructures is realized.This method is capable of constructing risk structure feature patterns leveraging adaptive clustering.A dynamic threshold strategy is utilized to screen potentially unreliable prediction results,and they are corrected through a reflection mechanism driven by differences in risk feature patterns.Meanwhile,the pre-trained knowledge of LLMs is used to integrate multi-model evaluation results,realizing the secondary optimization of decisions guided by LLMs.The methods based on centrality and dual reflection are complementary and synergistic,achieving balanced optimization between accuracy and coverage in recognition results.Experimental results on two private datasets(Tech-Graph and Teen-Graph) and one public dataset(Citeseer) demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.The F1 score on the English technology risk structure dataset reaches 99.55%,representing an improvement of 2.88%.

Key words: Risk structures recognition, Substructure recognition, Technology risk feature patterns, Large language models, Dual reflection

CLC Number: 

  • TP391
[1] ZHANG J N,ZHAO Y.Research on Security Intelligence ofScience and Technology from the Perspective of “Structure-Process-Output” Framework[J].Information Studies:Theory & Application,2022,45(9):7.
[2] ALBERT R,JEONG H,BARABÁSI A L.Error and attack tolerance of complex networks[J].Nature,2000,406(6794):378-382.
[3] WALDROP M M.Complexity:The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos[M].New York:Simon and Schuster,1993.
[4] ALLISON G,KLYMAN K,BARBESINO K,et al.The greattech rivalry:China vs.the US[J].Science Diplomacy Review,2021,3(3):73-76.
[5] KENNEDY S.China’s Uneven High-tech Drive:Implications for the United States[M].Washington:Center for Strategic & International Studies,2020.
[6] ROSSETTI G,CAZABET R.Community discovery in dynamic networks:a survey[J].ACM Computing Surveys,2018,51(2):1-37.
[7] LIU Y,JIN X,ZHANG Y.Identifying risks in temporal supernetworks:an IO-SuperPageRank algorithm[J].Humanities and Social Sciences Communications,2024,11(1):1-21.
[8] FRAGUA Á,JIMÉNEZ-MARTÍN A,MATEOS A.Complexnetwork analysis techniques for the early detection of the outbreak of pandemics transmitted through air traffic[J].Scientific Reports,2023,13(1):18174.
[9] QIAO W,GUO H,DENG W,et al.Complex network-based risk analysis for maritime heavy casualties in China during 2012-2021[J].Ocean Engineering,2024,308:118258.
[10] KIPF T N,WELLING M.Semi-supervised classification withgraph convolutional networks[C] //Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations.2017:1-14.
[11] VELIČKOVIĆ P,CUCURULL G,CASANOVA A,et al.Graph attention networks[C] //Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Learning Representations.2018:1-12.
[12] HAMILTON W,YING Z,LESKOVEC J.Inductive representation learning on large graphs[J].Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems,2017,30:1-11.
[13] TANG J,LI J,GAO Z,et al.Rethinking graph neural networks for anomaly detection[C] //International Conference on Machine Learning.2022:21076-21089.
[14] XIAO C,XU X,LEI Y,et al.Counterfactual graph learning for anomaly detection on attributed networks[J].IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering,2023,35(10):10540-10553.
[15] MESGARAN M,HAMZA A B.Graph fairing convolutionalnetworks for anomaly detection[J].Pattern Recognition,2024,145:109960.
[16] MA J,HE M,WEI Z.Polyformer:Scalable node-wise filters via polynomial graph transformer[C] //Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.2024:2118-2129.
[17] CHEN J,GAO K,LI G,et al.NAGphormer:A tokenized graph transformer for node classification in large graphs[C] //Procee-dings of the 11th International Conference on Learning Representations.2023:1-18.
[18] ZHOU Z,LU Z,WEI X,et al.Tokenphormer:Structure-aware Multi-token Graph Transformer for Node Classification[C] //Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2025:13428-13436.
[19] SHEN T,CAMBRIA E,WANG J,et al.Insight at the right spot:Provide decisive subgraph information to Graph LLM with reinforcement learning[J].Information Fusion,2025,117:102860.
[20] TIAN Y,SONG H,WANG Z,et al.Graph neural prompting with large language models[C] //Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2024:19080-19088.
[21] HE X,BRESSON X,LAURENT T,et al.Harnessing explanations:Llm-to-lm interpreter for enhanced text-attributed graph representation learning[C] //Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Learning Representations.2024:1-22.
[22] JEONG S,PARK J,CHOI M,et al.LLM-powered scene graph representation learning for image retrieval via visual triplet-based graph transformation[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2025,286:127926.
[23] YANG Z,COHEN W,SALAKHUDINOV R.Revisiting semi-supervised learning with graph embeddings[C] //International Conference on Machine Learning.PMLR,2016:40-48.
[24] CHAI Z,YOU S,YANG Y,et al.Can Abnormality be Detected by Graph Neural Networks[C] //Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence(IJCAI).2022:23-29.
[25] WANG X Z,YU H,GUO J Y,et al.Towards Fraud Detection Via Fine-Grained Classification of User Behavior[J].IEEE Transactions on Big Data,2025,11(4):1994-2007.
[26] WU Q,ZHAO W,LI Z,et al.Nodeformer:A scalable graphstructure learning transformer for node classification[J].Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems,2022,35:27387-27401.
[27] WU Q,ZHAO W,YANG C,et al.Sgformer:Simplifying and empowering transformers for large-graph representations[J].Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems,2023,36:64753-64773.
[28] AI G,PANG G,QIAO H,et al.GrokFormer:Graph FourierKolmogorov-Arnold Transformers[J].arXiv:2411.17296,2024.
[1] ZHANG Rongjie, PANG Xiongwen, WANG Fengling. Review of Large Language Model-based Time Series Modeling via Fine-tuning and AgentArchitecture [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(9): 55-70.
[2] GUO Yuyang, SHI Lei, LIU Huan, DONG Yixiang, LI Rui. Domain-adapted and Dynamically Retrieval-augmented Approach for Large-scale History Discipline Model Construction [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(9): 92-100.
[3] HE Jiaojun, LI Xin. Review of Graph Learning Based on Large Language Models:Methods,Benchmarks and Advances [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(9): 1-15.
[4] LI Luozheng, LI Lingbo, YUAN Quan. Survey of Chinese Datasets for LLM Safety Alignment:Landscape and Prospects [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(9): 16-23.
[5] LIU Jing. Review of Music Artificial Intelligence Driven by Large Language Models [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(8): 229-244.
[6] ZHANG Haoran, HAO Wenning, JIN Dawei, CHENG Kai, LIU Junyang. Agentic Retrieval Augmented Generation Framework Based on Retrieval Task Planning and Reflection Mechanism [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(8): 285-297.
[7] CHEN Zhixiang, XIE Zhipeng. Event Causal Data Augmentation Method Based on Large Language Model [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(7): 125-131.
[8] XU Rui, LIU Jin, LIU Xudong, GUAN Jian, DONG Wei. Exploring the Generalization Ability of Prompt-based Large Language Models for TextClassification [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(6A): 250400092-7.
[9] WEI Qing, ZHANG Yupeng, LIU Shaoxun, ZHANG Jinfeng, ZHANG Yuezhong, CHEN Haoyang. Fuzzing Driver Generation Based on Large Language Models [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(6A): 250400113-8.
[10] ZHANG Yongyu, GUO Chenjuan, FEI Xueqin, LI Feng. Study on Financial Text Sentiment Analysis Method Based on Large Language Models with Market Feedback Supervision [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(6A): 250500073-14.
[11] SHI Hongxu, LIU Yi, LIU Kun. Survey of Recommendation Systems Based on Large Language Models [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(6): 281-303.
[12] WANG Shenghui, LI Teng. Innovative Automated Scoring Based on Large Language Models [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(5): 90-98.
[13] LIU Suyi, LIU Qi, GAO Weibo. Agent4Stu:Efficient LLM-based Student Answer Behavior Simulation Agent [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(4): 347-355.
[14] HU Junjie, CHEN Yujie, HU Yikun, WEN Cheng, CAO Jialun, MA Zhi, SU Jie, SUN Weidi, TIAN Cong, QIN Shengchao. Formal Theorem Proving Empowered by Large Language Model:Survey and Perspectives [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(4): 1-23.
[15] XU Cheng, LIU Yuxuan, WANG Xin, ZHANG Cheng, YAO Dengfeng, YUAN Jiazheng. Review of Speech Disorder Assessment Methods Driven by Large Language Models [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(3): 307-320.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!