Computer Science ›› 2021, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (6A): 668-672.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.210300118

• Interdiscipline & Application • Previous Articles    

Research on Intelligent Production Line Scheduling Problem Based on LGSO Algorithm

ZHANG Ju, LI Xue-yun   

  1. School of Vehicle Engineering,Hubei University of Automotive Technology,Shiyan,Hubei 442002,China
    Key Laboratory of Automotive Power Train and Electronics,Hubei University of Automotive Technology,Shiyan,Hubei 442002,China
  • Online:2021-06-10 Published:2021-06-17
  • About author:ZHANG Ju,born in 1988,master,lecturer.Her main research interests include mechanical dynamics and intelligent control.
  • Supported by:
    Scientific Research Project of Hubei Provincial Department of Education(B2019083) and Hubei Key Laboratory Open Fund Project(ZDK1201905).

Abstract: Aiming at the problems of starvation and congestion in the scheduling process of intelligent production line,the objective function and constraint conditions of scheduling problem are established by analyzing the scheduling process.Then a new glowworm swarm optimization algorithm based on Levy flight is proposed.Levy distribution is used to improve the search range and effectiveness of the population.The maximum and minimum fluorescein are taken as boundary constraints to optimize the ite-rative formula of fluorescein,and to improve the rationality of the fluorescein carried by individuals.And the cubic mapping is introduced to optimize the population,so as to improve the comprehensive search ability of the population.The algorithm test results show that LGSO is provided with better solution accuracy,convergence and stability than GSO,SGSO and CGSO.LGSO algorithm is used to solve the scheduling problems of four typical intelligent production lines,and compared with GSO and SGSO.The results show that LGSO is basically better than the other two algorithms in the worst value,the optimal value,the average value and the standard deviation.In the complex path,LGSO has better solution accuracy,convergence speed and stability.Further,the accuracy of the mathematical model and the feasibility of LGSO to solve the scheduling problem are verified by the test.

Key words: Glowworm swarm optimization algorithm, Intelligent production line, Levy flight, Scheduling problem

CLC Number: 

  • O221
[1] LIU Y Z,LI M G,DU H.Robust H-∞ control of NCS with delay and packet dropout[J].Control and Decision,2014,29(3):517-522.
[2] AHMADI E,ZANDIEH M,FARROKH M,et al.A multi objective optimization approach for flexible job shop scheduling problem under random machine breakdown by evolutionary algorithms[J].Computers & Operations Research,2016,73:56-66.
[3] FANG D J,HUANG Z Y.Method of parallel optimization of facility layout and production scheduling for reconfigurable hybrid flow production line[J].Logistics Technology,2019,38(7):117-122.
[4] EBRAHIMIPOUR V,NAJJARBASHI A,SHEIKHALISHAHI M.Multi-objective modeling for preventive maintenance scheduling in a multiple production line[J].Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing,2013,26(1):1-12.
[5] FLETCHER M,DEEN S M.Task rescheduling in multi-agent manufacturing[C]//Tenth International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications.IEEE Computer Society,1999.
[6] LU Z Q,HU X M,ZHU H W.Dynamic scheduling method for aircraft moving assembly line under uncertain supply of material[J].Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science),2019,47(5):723-730,738.
[7] MAO Y N,TANG Q H,ZHANG L P,et al.Mathematic model for automated mixed production line scheduling problem with multi-capacity machines[J].Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems,2019,25(7):1717-1728.
[8] LI H,ZHANG Y,YE Q H,et al,Research on flexible production line scheduling with lot streaming and setup times [J].Industrial Engineering and Management,2020,25(3):179-187.
[9] JIA Z H,CHEN H P,SUN Y H.Hybrid particle swarm optimization for flexible job-shop scheduling[J].Journal of System Simulation,2007(20):4743-4747.
[10] ŠUCHA B L,ZDENĚK P H.Solving the Resource Constrained Project Scheduling Problem using the parallel Tabu Search designed for the CUDA platform[M].Academic Press,Inc.2015.
[11] THOMAS P R,SALHI S.A Tabu Search Approach for the Resource Constrained Project Scheduling Problem[J].Journal of Heuristics,1998,4(2):123-139.
[12] ZDENĚK H,SUCHA P.Time symmetry of resource constrained project scheduling with general temporal constraints and take-give resources[J].Annals of Operations Research,2016,248:209-217.
[13] ZENG B,LI M F,ZHANG Y,et al.Research on assembly sequence planning based on firefly algorithm[J].Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2013,49(11):177-184.
[14] HUANG Q,ZHOU Q H,ZHANG Q,et al.Layout optimization of dip dyeing workshop based on system layout planning-genetic algorithm[J].Journal of Textile Research,2020,41(3):84-90.
[15] WU Q D,MA Y M,LI L,et al.Data-driven dynamic scheduling method for semiconductor production line[J].Control Theory & Applications,2015,32(9):1233- 1239.
[16] ZHU G Y,XU W J.Multi-objective flexible job shop scheduling method for machine tool component production line considering energy consumption and quality [J].Control and Decision,2019,34(2):252-260.
[17] LUO T H,LIANG S,HE Z Y,et al.Path planning of robot based on glowworm swarm optimization algorithm of scene understanding[J].Journal of Computer Applications,2017,37(12):3608-3613.
[18] HAO X Y,HE X S,XUE J J.A cuckoo initialization of fireflyalgorithm and its engineering application[J].Computer Technology and Development,2018,28(12):167-170,175.
[19] NIU H F,SONG W P,NING A P.Hybrid search algorithm on particle swarm optimization and levy flight[J].Journal of Taiyuan University of Science and Technology,2016,37(1):6-11.
[20] WANG X W,YAN Y X,GU X S.Welding robot path planning based on Levy-PSO[J].Control and Decision,2017,32(2):373-377.
[21] YU S H,SU S B.Research and application of chaotic glowworm swarm optimization algorithm[J].Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science & Technology,2014,8(3):352-358.
[1] FAN Xing-ze, YU Mei. Coverage Optimization of WSN Based on Improved Grey Wolf Optimizer [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(6A): 628-631.
[2] LI Yang, LI Wei-gang, ZHAO Yun-tao, LIU Ao. Grey Wolf Algorithm Based on Levy Flight and Random Walk Strategy [J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(8): 291-296.
[3] ZHANG Yan, QIN Liang-xi. Improved Salp Swarm Algorithm Based on Levy Flight Strategy [J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(7): 154-160.
[4] ZHENG You-lian, LEI De-ming, ZHENG Qiao-xian. Novel Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm for Solving Many-objective Scheduling [J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(7): 186-191.
[5] CHEN Meng-hui, CAO Qian-feng and LAN Yan-qi. Heuristic Algorithm Based on Block Mining and Recombination for Permutation Flow-shop Scheduling Problem [J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(6A): 108-113.
[6] DONG Hail, XU Xiao- peng, XIE Xie. Solving Multi-flexible Job-shop Scheduling by Multi-objective Algorithm [J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(12): 239-244.
[7] MAO Xiao, HE Li-fang and WANG Qing-ping. Multilevel Color Image Segmentation Based on Improved Glowworm Swarm Optimization Algorithm [J]. Computer Science, 2017, 44(Z6): 206-211.
[8] ZHANG Li-hong and YU Shi-ming. Improved GSO Algorithm for Solving PFSP [J]. Computer Science, 2016, 43(8): 240-243.
[9] ZUO Yi, GONG Mao-guo, ZENG Jiu-lin and JIAO Li-cheng. Hybrid Multi-objective Algorithm for Solving Flexible Job Shop Scheduling Problem [J]. Computer Science, 2015, 42(9): 220-225.
[10] WEI Jia-yin QIN Yong-bin XU Dao-yun. DRPFSP Algorithm for Solving Permutation Flow Shop Scheduling Problem [J]. Computer Science, 2015, 42(7): 68-73.
[11] CHENG Mei-ying, NI Zhi-wei and ZHU Xu-hui. Overview on Glowworm Swarm Optimization or Firefly Algorithm [J]. Computer Science, 2015, 42(4): 19-24.
[12] QIAN Wei-yi,HOU Hui-chao and JIANG Shou-yong. New Self-adaptive Cuckoo Search Algorithm [J]. Computer Science, 2014, 41(7): 279-282.
[13] ZHOU Ji-hua,YE Chun-ming and SHENG Xiao-hua. Research on Permutation Flow-shop Scheduling Problem by Intelligent Water Drop Algorithm [J]. Computer Science, 2013, 40(9): 250-253.
[14] REN Wei. Optimization Algorithm for Vehicle Scheduling Problem Based on Quantum Immune [J]. Computer Science, 2013, 40(5): 233-236.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!