Computer Science ›› 2026, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (5): 50-58.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.250600135

• Intelligent Education Technology • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Building 3L-S3 Smart Ecosystem:Systemic Transformation of Graduate Education Models andOrganizational Forms in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

DENG Xiaoheng1, YU Zhan2, XU Xuemei1, LI Heng1, ZHANG Hao1, HU Chao1   

  1. 1 School of Electrical Information, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
    2 Undergraduate School, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
  • Received:2025-06-20 Revised:2025-08-29 Published:2026-05-08
  • About author:DENG Xiaoheng,born in 1974,Ph.D,professor,Ph.D supvervisor,is a outstanding member of CCF(No.05789D).His main research interests include AI,edge computing,Internet of Things,big data and online social network analysis.
    YU Zhan,born in 1975,lecturer.Her main research interests include teaching management and education theory.
  • Supported by:
    2025 Graduate Education Reform Project of Central South University(2025jy099) and 2025 Teaching Reform Research Project for Regular Undergraduate Institutions in Hunan Province.

Abstract: Against the backdrop of a new generation of artificial intelligence permeating higher education,China’s graduate education is moving from “scale expansion” toward an “intelligent ecosystem”.Drawing on interim findings from the National Education Sciences Planning Project Graduate Education Models and Organizational Forms in the Age of Artificial Intelligence,this study advances the 3L-S3intelligent education model-an integrated framework of Learning-Lab-Launch(3L) and Smart Campus-Smart Governance-Smart Ethics(S3)-and explores how AI reshapes curricula,research training,organizational structures,and digital governance.A mixed methods design is adopted,combining grounded theory,a large scale survey of 1 862 respondents from the Graduate School of Central South University,an eight nation comparative analysis,and in depth case studies.The model’seffectiveness is further validated with three years of longitudinal data.The results indicate that:1)AI driven competence profiling increases personalized learning gains by 23.6%;2)A digital twin Meta-Lab shortens research cycles by 31.4%;3)Flattened,networked organizational forms have become this key carriers for talent-technology-governance synergy;4)Blockchain-AI collaborative governance raises the accuracy of academic misconduct early warning to 92%.In response,this paper proposes three policy pathways:1)Establishing a National AI Research and Education Center;2)Piloting interdisciplinary conversion master’s programs;3)Creating a Trusted AI Curriculum Consortium.Together,these contributions offer a replicable and assessable new paradigm for driving high quality advancement in China’s graduate education and for modernizing educational governance.

Key words: AI-driven personalized learning, Intelligent transformation of graduate education, Smart campus and digital gover-nance, AI ethics and compliance, 3L-S3 intelligent education model

CLC Number: 

  • G642
[1]SELWYN N.Should Robots Replace Teachers? AI and the Future of Education[J].British Journal of Educational Technology,2019,50(6):3058-3070.
[2]ROLL I,WYLIE R.Evolution and Revolution in Artificial Intelligence in Education[J].International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education,2016,26(2):582-599.
[3]GAŠEVIČ D,DAWSON S,SIEMENS G.Let’s Not Forget:Learning Analytics Are About Learning[J].TechTrends,2015,59(1):64-71.
[4]BUJAK K R,RADU I,CATRAMBONE R,et al.A Psychological Perspective on Augmented Reality in the Mathematics Classroom[J].Computers & Education,2013,68:536-544.
[5]IFENTHALER D,YAU J Y K.Utilising Learning Analytics for Study Success:Reflections on Current Empirical Findings[J].Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning,2020,15(6):3-22.
[6]PANTELIDI V S.Digital Twins in Education:Potential for Design,Implementation and Sustainability[J].British Journal of Educational Technology,2021,52(2):740-754.
[7]Ministry of Education.Action Plan for the Digitalization of Education[J].China Distance Education,2023,12:22-29.
[8]SICILIA M Á,GARCIA M,CORRAL J.Blockchain Technology in Education:A Systematic Review[J].IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies,2020,13(2):112-124.
[9]WEICK K E.Educational Organizations as Loosely CoupledSystems[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1976,21(1):1-19.
[10]DEDE C.A Seismic Shift in Epistemology & Methods:Personalized Learning,Digital Platforms,& the Future of Higher Education[J].Harvard Educational Review,2016,86(4):460-481.
[11]MINTZBERG H.Structure in 5’s:A Synthesis of the Research on Organization Design[J].Management Science,1980,26(3):322-341.
[12]General Office of the Ministry of Education.Action Plan for Improving the Quality of Graduate Education[J].China Higher Education,2020,10:34-40.
[13]YEKOLLU R K,BHIMRAJ G T,SUNIL B S,et al.AI-driven personalized learning paths:Enhancing education through adaptive systems[J].International Conference on Smart Data Intelligence.2024,2:507-517.
[14]HUANG M,CHEN D.Integrating AI in Engineering Curriculum:A Systematic Review[J].IEEE Transactions on Education,2025,68(1):15-28.
[15]MAHMOND C,SORENSEN J T.Artificial Intelligence in Personalized Learning with a Focus on Current Developments and Future Prospects[J].Research and Advances in Education,2024,3(8):25-31.
[16]ZHANG Y,LI X D.Innovation of Graduate Education Models in the Age of Artificial Intelligence[J].Higher Education Research,2021,42(4):15-23.
[17]WANG L J,ZHAO H L.Smart-Campus Construction in Universities from a Digital-Governance Perspective[J].Modern Distance Education,2022,40(3):56-65.
[18]GRELLER W,DRACHSLER H.Translating Learning intoNumbers:A Generic Framework for Learning Analytics[J].Educational Technology & Society,2012,15(3):42-57.
[1] LIU Feng, LIU Yaxuan, CHAI Xinyu, JI Haohan, ZHENG Zhixing. Computational Perception Technologies in Intelligent Education:Systematic Review [J]. Computer Science, 2024, 51(10): 10-16.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!