Computer Science ›› 2026, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (6A): 250700042-8.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.250700042

• Image Processing & Multimedia Technology • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Research on Lightning Arrester Fault Identification Technology Based on Multi-source Image Fusion

WANG Haozhao1, FU Fangda1, WU Yuyi1, WANG Luliang1, YU Yang1, QI Yifan2   

  1. 1 Electric Power Research Institute of Hainan Power Grid Co.,Ltd.,Haikou 570000,China
    2 Wuhan Huizhen Technology Co.,Ltd.,Wuhan 430000,China
  • Online:2026-06-16 Published:2026-06-12
  • About author:WANG Haozhao,born in 1997, master,assistant engineer.His main research interest is online monitoring of transmission lines.
    QI Yifan,born in 1987,Ph.D,engineer.His main research interest is transmission line online monitoring technology.
  • Supported by:
    Funded Project by Electric Power Research Institute of Hainan Power Grid Co.,Ltd.(073000KC23100002).

Abstract: Aiming at the problems of incomplete information representation and easy loss of small-target features in lightning arrester fault detection using traditional single-modality images,this study proposes a lightning arrester fault identification method that integrates the multiscale residual pyramid attention network(MSRPAN) and the lightweight target detection model YOLO11-CGB.MSRPAN extracts multi-scale deep features from multi-modality images and combines the residual attention mechanism to avoid gradient disappearance,enhancing the feature expression ability to address the feature defects of single-modality images.The designed YOLO11-CGB model embeds the convolutional block attention module(CBAM) in the backbone network,uses GhostConv to replace the traditional convolutional layer to reduce the computational complexity,and combines the bidirectional feature pyramid network(BiFPN) to optimize multi-scale feature fusion,improving the small-target detection ability in complex backgrounds.Experiments show that the MSRPAN fusion method is superior to common fusion algorithms such as IHS,Brovey,PCA,WT,and CNN in both subjective and objective evaluations.The YOLO11-CGB model achieves a mean average precision at IoU=0.5(mAP@0.5) of 94.88% and a recall rate of 94% on the self-built dataset.The recognition confidence levels for the damage(P),flashover(S),and crack(L) faults of the fused images can reach up to 0.88,0.85,and 0.84 respectively,which are better than those of single-modality images(infrared and visible-light images).

Key words: Lightning arrester fault identification, Multi-source image fusion, MSRPAN, YOLO11-CGB, CBAM

CLC Number: 

  • TM854
[1] WEI B Q,ZUO Y,LIU Y D,et al.Novel MOA Fault Detection Technology Based on Small Sample Infrared Image[J].Electronics,2021,10(15):1748-1761.
[2] WEN K Y.Research on online monitoring technology of arrester status for small sample infrared images[D].Nanchang:East China Jiaotong University,2021.
[3] LI P,ZHANG J T,TAO Q,et al.Fault diagnosis method for arrester in infrared images based on improved U-Net[J].Measurement,2024(236):114996-114008.
[4] ARAUJO B V S,RODRIGUES G A,DE OLIVEIRA J H P,et al.Monitoring ZnO surge arresters using convolutional neural networks and image processing techniques combined with signal alignment[J].Measurement,2025,248:116889-116903.
[5] HU T S,LIU H,LIU G,et al.Infrared Image Fault Detection Method of Lightning Arrester Based on Improved YOLOv3[J].Infrared Technology,2023,45(11):1256-1261.
[6] TANG D L,LIAO Q,LI K F,et al.Damage Identification Me-thod of Substation Arrester Based on Positive Sample Learning[J].Electronic Design Engineering,2023,31(11):6-9,15.
[7] JIANG G Q,WANG S X,WANG L J,et al.Insulator Infrared and Visible Image Fusion Method Based on Joint Sparse and Guided Filtering[J].Infrared Technology,2017,39(6):523-528.
[8] SHI J,ZHANG J,ZHONG H H.Fault Detection of CatenaryInsulator Based on Gradient Image Fusion[J].Infrared Techno-logy,2023,45(10):1106-1117.
[9] HUANG Z,ZHONG Z,SUN L,et al.Mask R-CNN with pyra-mid attention network for scene text detection[C]//2019 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision(WACV).IEEE,2019:764-772.
[10] WU X,WANG J,YANG X,et al.A gridless doa estimationmethod based on residual attention network and transfer lear-ning[J].IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology,2024,73(6):9103-9108.
[11] BHUYAN P,SINGH P K,DAS S K.Res4net-CBAM:A deep cnn with convolution block attention module for tea leaf disease diagnosis[J].Multimedia Tools and Applications,2024,83(16):48925-48947.
[12] WANG T,ZHANG S.DSC-Ghost-Conv:A compact convolution module for building efficient neural network architectures[J].Multimedia Tools and Applications,2024,83(12):36767-36795.
[13] ZHANG H,DU Q,QI Q,et al.A recursive attention-enhanced bidirectional feature pyramid network for small object detection[J].Multimedia Tools and Applications,2023,82(9):13999-14018.
[14] MOEZ E,BENN A.Clustering based on Hybridization of Gene-tic Algorithm and Improved K-Means(GA-IKM) in an IoT Network[J].International Journal of Wireless & Mobile Networks,2024,16(6):19-35.
[15] ZHONG W,WU S,QIANG Z,et al.Face Mask-Wearing Detection Model Based on Loss Function and Attention Mechanism[J].Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience,2022,24(52):291-305.
[16] JINDAL H,BHARTI M,KASANA S S,et al.An ensemble mosaicing and ridgelet based fusion technique for underwater panoramic image reconstruction and its refinement[J].Multimedia Tools and Applications,2023,82(22):33719-33771.
[17] JINDAL H,BHARTI M,KASANA S S,et al.An ensemble mosaicing and ridgelet based fusion technique for underwater panoramic image reconstruction and its refinement[J].Multimedia Tools and Applications,2023,82(22):33719-33771.
[18] AHMAD M,KHURSHEED F.A novel image tamper detection approach by blending forensic tools and optimized CNN:Sealion customized firefly algorithm[J].Multimedia Tools and Applications,2022,81(2):2577-2601.
[19] TEVARAMANI S S,RAVI J.Image steganography perfor-mance analysis using discrete wavelet transform and alpha blen-ding for secure communication[J].Global Transitions Procee-dings,2022,3(1):208-214.
[20] LIU X,ZHANG Y,BAO F,et al.Kernel-blending connection approximated by a neural network for image classification[J].Computational Visual Media,2020,6:467-476.
[21] LI Y J,LIU C A,LI S J.Text localization and recognition of Chinese characters in natural scenes based on improved faster R-CNN[J].Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems,2023,45(5):8623-8636.
[22] JIA F.Occlusion target recognition algorithm based on improved YOLOv4[J].Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering,2024,24(6):3799-3811.
[23] LI Y,YUAN X,WANG B,et al.Design of wheat ear detection in natural environment based on improved YOLOv5s[J].Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering,2024,24(6):3517-3530.
[24] LI L,ZHANG Y J,SHENG J,et al.Yarn target detection of a braiding machine based on the YOLO algorithm[J].Textile Research Journal,2024,94(23):2863-2875.
[25] SU J,QIN B,SUN F,et al.Identification of Pine Wilt-Diseased Trees Using UAV Remote Sensing Imagery and Improved PWD-YOLOv8n Algorithm[J].Drones,2024,8(8):404-421.
[26] ALKHAMMASHH E.Multi-Classification Using YOLOv11and Hybrid YOLO11n-MobileNet Models:A Fire Classes Case Study[J].Fire,2025,8(1):17-28.
[1] ZHAO Junjie, ZHOU Xiaojing, LI Jiaxing. Improved YOLOV7 for Fall Detection [J]. Computer Science, 2024, 51(6A): 230800039-6.
[2] LI Jun, LIU Nian, ZHANG Shiyi. Study on Detection Method of Bridge Crack Based on YOLOv5 [J]. Computer Science, 2024, 51(11A): 231200063-7.
[3] JIANG Bo, WAN Yi, XIE Xianzhong. Improved YOLOv5s Lightweight Steel Surface Defect Detection Model [J]. Computer Science, 2023, 50(11A): 230900113-7.
[4] JIANG Ke, SHI Jianqiang, CHEN Guangwu. Railway Track Detection Method Based on Improved YOLOv5s [J]. Computer Science, 2023, 50(11A): 230200101-6.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!