Computer Science ›› 2024, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (6A): 230500157-9.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.230500157

• Artificial Intelligenc • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on Matching Design of Ship Engine and Propeller Based on Improved Moth-Flame Optimization Algorithm

CHEN Zhenlin, LUO Liang, ZHENG Long, JI Shengchen, CHEN Shunhuai   

  1. School of Naval Architecture,Ocean and Energy Power Engineering,Wuhan University of Technology,Wuhan 430063,China
    Key Laboratory of High Performance Marine Technology,Ministry of Education,Wuhan 430063,China
  • Published:2024-06-06
  • About author:CHEN Zhenlin,born in 1998,postgra-duate.His main research interests include intelligent computing and simulation integration.
    LUO Liang,born in 1980,Ph.D,asso-ciate professor.His main researchin-terests include digital ship design,system simulation integration,intelligent computing,and more.
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(52101368).

Abstract: This paper develops an improved moth-flame optimization(IMFO) algorithm for the ship propeller-matching problem,which comprehensively considers propeller efficiency,cavitation,and strength for two existing ships as calculation examples.Genetic algorithm(GA) and the original moth-flame optimization(MFO) algorithm are used as comparison algorithms to analyze the performance of the IMFO-assisted propeller-matching task.Numerical experiment results show that the convergence time of the IMFO algorithm in solving the propeller-matching problem is reduced by 44.24% and 54.14% compared to the GA algorithm in the two examples,and by 23.9% and 23.12% compared to the MFO algorithm,respectively.In addition,in terms of solution accuracy,the IMFO algorithm is slightly better than the GA and MFO algorithms in calculation example 1.In calculation example 2,the IMFO algorithm is improved by 3.66% compared to the GA algorithm and by 0.98% compared to the MFO algorithm.Finally,by visualizing the feasible solution space of the two examples,the performance of the IMFO algorithm is further discussed.The above results demonstrate that the IMFO algorithm has strong global search capability and is competitive and robust in solving the propeller-matching problem.

Key words: Improved moth-flame optimization algorithm, Optimized design, Swarm intelligence optimization algorithm, Matching of ship engine and propeller, Marinepropeller

CLC Number: 

  • U664.33
[1]SHENG Z B,LIU Y Z.Principles of ships(below)[M].Shang-hai Jiaotong University Press,2004.
[2]ZENG Z B,DING E B,TANG D H.Optimal Design of ShipPropeller Based on BP Artificial Neural Network and Genetic Algorithm[J].Ship Mechanics,2010,14(1):20-27.
[3]WANG P,HUANG S,ZHU Z Q.Application of Swarm Intelligence Algorithm in Optimal Design of Propeller Parameters[J].Computer Science,2013,40(2):73-76.
[4]JANG T S,KINOSHITA T,YAMAGUCHI H.A new functional optimization method applied to the pitch distribution of a marine propeller[J].Journal of Marine Science and Technology,2001,6(1):23-30.
[5]TAKEKOSHI Y,KAWAMURA T,YAMAGUCHI H,et al.Study on the design of propeller blade sections using the optimization algorithm[J].Journal of Marine Science and Techno-logy,2005,10(2):70-81.
[6]WANG C,HAN K,SUN C,et al.Optimal Design and Parameter Analysis of Marine Propeller[J].Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Natural Science Edition),2020,448(4):102-107.
[7]ZENG Z.Optimal Design of Propeller Blade Sections of High-Speed Surface Ships under Multiple Operating Conditions[J].China Shipbuilding,2018,59(1):26-35.
[8]HUANG B,XIONG Y,WANG B.Optimization of propellerskew distribution based on particle swarm optimization[J].China Ship Research,2016(6).
[9]LIU C,YE C.A Novel Bionic Swarm Intelligent Optimization Algorithm:Firefly Algorithm[J].Computer Application Research,2011,28(9):3295-3297.
[10]RAJABIOUN R.Cuckoo Optimization Algorithm[J].Applied Soft Computing Journal,2011,11(8):5508-5518.
[11]KARABOGA D,BASTURK B.A powerful and efficient algorithm for numerical function optimization:artificial bee colony(ABC) algorithm[J].Global Optimization,2007,39(3):459-471.
[12]MIRJALILI.S.Moth-flame optimization algorithm:A novel nature-inspired heuristic paradigm[J].Knowledge-Based Systems,2015,89:228-249.
[13]LIU C.Multidisciplinary Optimal Design of Marine PropellerBased on Complex System Modeling Theory[D].Jiangsu University of Science and Technology,2014.
[14]YANG L C,YANG C J,LI X B.Research on Optimal Design of Propeller Based on Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithm and Decision-Making Technology[J].China Shipbuilding,2019,60(3):12.
[15]DOKEROGLU T.A survey on new generation etaheuristic algorithms[J].Computers & Industrial Engineering,2019,137(C):106040-106040.
[1] YIN Ping, TAN Guoge, SONG Wei, XIE Taotao, JIANG Jianbiao, SONG Hongyuan. Comparative Study on Improved Tuna Swarm Optimization Algorithm Based on Chaotic Mapping [J]. Computer Science, 2024, 51(6A): 230600082-10.
[2] XU Chenyang, XUE Liang, WANG Jinlong, ZHU Long. Energy Efficiency Planning with SWIPT-MISO Dynamic Energy Consumption Model [J]. Computer Science, 2023, 50(6A): 220400185-7.
[3] HOU Xinyu, LU Haiyan, LU Mengdie, XU Jie, ZHAO Jinjin. Bidirectional Learning Equilibrium Optimizer Combining Sparrow Search and Random Difference [J]. Computer Science, 2023, 50(11): 248-258.
[4] ZHANG Xin-ming, LI Shuang-qian, LIU Yan, MAO Wen-tao, LIU Shang-wang, LIU Guo-qi. Coyote Optimization Algorithm Based on Information Sharing and Static Greed Selection [J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(5): 217-224.
[5] HUANG Guang-qiu, LU Qiu-qin. Vertical Structure Community System Optimization Algorithm [J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(4): 194-203.
[6] HUANG Guang-qiu,LU Qiu-qin. Protected Zone-based Population Migration Dynamics Optimization Algorithm [J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(2): 186-194.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!