计算机科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (2): 175-189.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.200700010
杭婷婷1,2, 冯钧1, 陆佳民1
HANG Ting-ting1,2, FENG Jun1, LU Jia-min1
摘要: 知识图谱的概念由谷歌于2012年提出,随后逐渐成为人工智能领域的一个研究热点,已在信息搜索、自动问答、决策分析等应用中发挥作用。虽然知识图谱在各领域展现出了巨大的潜力,但不难发现目前缺乏成熟的知识图谱构建平台,需要对知识图谱的构建体系进行研究,以满足不同的行业应用需求。文中以知识图谱构建为主线,首先介绍目前主流的通用知识图谱和领域知识图谱,描述两者在构建过程中的区别;然后,分类讨论图谱构建过程中存在的问题和挑战,并针对这些问题和挑战,分类描述目前图谱构建过程中的知识抽取、知识表示、知识融合、知识推理、知识存储5个层面的解决方法和策略;最后,展望未来可能的研究方向。
中图分类号:
[1] AMIT S.Introducing the knowledge graph:things,not things[EB/OL].(2012-05-16) [2020-06-25].https://blog.google/products/search/introducing-knowledge-graph-things-not/. [2] JI S,PAN S,CAMBRIA E,et al.A survey on knowledgegraphs:Representation,acquisition and applications[J].arXiv:2002.00388,2020. [3] XU Z L,SHENG Y P,HE L R,et al.Review on knowledge graph techniques[J].Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China,2016,45(4):589-606. [4] LIU Q,LI Y,DUAN H,et al.Knowledge graph construction techniques[J].Journal of Computer Research and Development,2016,53(3):582-600. [5] HUANG H Q,YU J,MIAO X,et al.Review on knowledgegraphs[J].Journal of Computer System Application,2019,28(6):1-12. [6] 搜狗知立方[DB/OL].(2017-03-06) [2020-06-25].http://baike.sogou.com/h66616234.htm. [7] 百度知心[DB/OL].(2013-20-23) [2020-06-25].http://baike.baidu.com/view/10972128.htm. [8] NIU X,SUN X,WANG H,et al.Zhishi.me-weaving Chinese linking open data[C]//Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference.2011:205-220. [9] JIA Y T,WANG Y Z,CHENG X Q,et al.OpenKN:an open knowledge computational engine for network big data[C]//Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining.2014:657-664. [10] XU B,XU Y,LIANG J Q,et al.CN-DBpedia:A never-ending Chinese knowledge extraction system[C]//Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial,Engineering and Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems.2017:428-438. [11] MILLER G A.WordNet:a lexical database for English[J].Communications of the ACM,1995,38(11):39-41. [12] AUER S,BIZER C,KOBILAROV G,et al.DBpedia:A nucleus for a web of open data[M] ∥The semantic web.Berlin:Springer,2007:722-735. [13] BOLLACKER K,EVANS C,PARITOSH P,et al.Freebase:acollaboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledge[C]//Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data.2008:1247-1250. [14] HOFFART J,SUCHANEK F M,BERBERICH K,et al.YA-GO2:A spatially and temporally enhanced knowledge base from Wikipedia[J].Artificial Intelligence,2013,194:28-61. [15] MAHDISOLTANI F,BIEGA J,SUCHANEK F M.YAGO3:A knowledge base from multilingual wikipedias[C]//Proceedings of the CIDR.2013. [16] WU W T,LI H S,WANG H X,et al.Probase:A probabilistic taxonomy for text understanding[C]//Proceedings of the 2012 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data.2012:481-492. [17] DONG X,GABRILOVICH E,HEITZ G,et al.Knowledgevault:A web-scale approach to probabilistic knowledge fusion[C]//Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.2014:601-610. [18] IMDB Official.IMDB[EB/OL].[2020-06-25].http://www.imda.com. [19] DrugBank Official.DrugBank [EB/OL].[2020-06-25].http://www.drugbank.ca. [20] ROSPOCHER M,VAN ERP M,VOSSEN P,et al.Buildingevent-centric knowledge graphs from news[J].Journal of Web Semantics,2016,37:132-151. [21] Acemap Official.Acemap [EB/OL].[2020-06-25].https://www.acemap.info/. [22] LIN H L,WANG Y Z,JIA Y T,et al.Network big data-oriented knowledge fusion methods:a survey[J].Chinese Journal of Computer,2016,40(1):3-29. [23] SUN Z,WANG H L.Overview on the advance of the research on named entity recognition[J].New Technology of Library and Information Service,2010,26(6):42-47. [24] RAUL L F.Extracting company names from text[C]//Proceedings of the 7th IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications.1991:29-32. [25] CHINCHOR N,MARSH E.Muc-7 information extraction task definition[C]//Proceedings of the 7th Message Understanding Conference.1998:359-367. [26] LIN Y F,TSAI T,CHOU W C,et al.A maximum entropy approach to biomedical named entity recognition[C]//Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Data Mining in Bioinformatics.2004:56-61. [27] LIU X H,ZHANG S D,WEI F R,et al.Recognizing named entities in tweets[C]//Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics:Human Language Technologies.2011:359-367. [28] WHITELAW C,KEHLENBECK A,PETROVIC N,et al.Web-scale named entity recognition[C]//Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management.2008:123-132. [29] JAIN A,PENNACCHIOTTI M.Open entity extraction fromweb search query logs[C]//Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics.2010:510-518. [30] LI D M,ZHANG Y,LI D Y,et al.Review of entity relation extraction methods[J].Journal of Computer Research and Development,2020,57(7):1424-1448. [31] HUANG X,ZHU Q M,QIAN L H.Chinese entity relation extraction based on features combination[J].Microelectronics & Computer,2010,27(4):198-200. [32] SURESH KUMAR G,ZAYARAZ G.Concept relation extrac-tion using naïve Bayes classifier for ontology-based question answering systems[J].Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences,2015,27(1):13-24. [33] ZELENKO D,AONE C,RICHARDELLA A.Kernel methodsfor relation extraction[J].Journal of Machine Learning Research,2003,3(2):1083-1106. [34] BUNESCU R C,MOONEY R J.A shortest path dependency kernel for relation extraction[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on human language technology and empirical methods in natural language processing.2005:724-731. [35] BRIN S.Extracting Patterns and relations from the world wide web[C]//Proceedings of the International Workshop on the World Wide Web and Databases.1998:172-183. [36] AGICHTEIN E,GRAVANO L.Extracting relations from large plain-text collections[C]//Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Digital Libraries.2000:85-94. [37] HASEGAWA T,SEKINE S,GRISHMAN R.Discovering relations among named entities from large corpora[C]//Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics.2004:415-422. [38] BOLLEGALA D T,MATSUO Y,ISHIZUKA M.Relational duality:unsupervised extraction of semantic relations between entities on the web[C]//Proceedings of the International Conference on World Wide Web.2010:151-160. [39] KUMAR S.A survey of deep learning methods for relation extraction[J].arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.03645,2017. [40] SOCHER R,HUVAL B,MANNING C D,et al.Semantic compositionality through recursive matrix-vector spaces[C]//Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational natural Language Learning.2012:1201-1211. [41] ZENG D,LIU K,LAI S,et al.Relation classification via convolutional deep neural network[C]//Proceedings of COLING 2014,the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics:Technical Papers.2014:2335-2344. [42] XU Y,MOU L,LI G,et al.Classifying relations via long short-term memory networks along shortest dependency paths[C]//Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2015:1785-1794. [43] ZHANG Y,QI P,MANNING C.Graph convolution over pruned dependency trees improves relation extraction[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2018:2205-2215. [44] MIWA M,BANSAL M.End-to-End Relation Extraction using LSTMs on Sequences and Tree Structures[C]//Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2016:1105-1116. [45] ZHENG S,HAO Y,LU D,et al.Joint entity and relation extraction based on a hybrid neural network[J].Neurocomputing,2017,257:59-66. [46] KATIYAR A,CARDIE C.Going out on a limb:Joint extraction of entity mentions and relations without dependency trees[C]//Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2017:917-928. [47] ZHENG S,WANG F,BAO H,et al.Joint extraction of entities and relations based on a novel tagging scheme[C]//Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2017:1227-1236. [48] E H H,ZHANG W J,XIAO S Q,et al.Survey of entity relationship extraction based on deep learning[J].Journal of Software,2019(6):1793-1818. [49] SURDEANU M,TIBSHIRANI J,NALLAPATI R,et al.Multi-instance multi-label learning for relation extraction[C]//Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning.2012:455-465. [50] LIN Y,SHEN S,LIU Z,et al.Neural relation extraction with selective attention over instances[C]//Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2016:2124-2133. [51] JI G L,LIU K,HE S Z,et al.Distant supervision for relation extraction with sentence-level attention and entity descriptions[C]//Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2017:3060-3066. [52] REN X,WU Z,HE W,et al.CoType:Joint extraction of typed entities and relations with knowledge bases[C]//Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web.2017:1015-1024. [53] HUANG Y Y,WANG W Y.Deep residual learning for weakly-supervised relation extraction[C]//Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2017:1803-1807. [54] GUO X Y,HE T T.Survey about research on information extraction[J].Computer Science,2015,42(2):14-17. [55] HEARST M A.Automatic acquisition of hyponyms from large text corpora[C]//Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Computational Linguistics.1992:539-545. [56] NISHIHARA Y,SATO K,SUNAYAMA W.Event extraction and visualization for obtaining personal experiences from blogs[C]//Proceedings of the Symposium on Human Interface.2009:315-324. [57] XU FY,USZKOREIT H,LI H.Automatic event and relation detection with seeds of varying complexity[C]//Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Event Extraction and Synthesis.2006:12-17. [58] BORSJE J,HOGENBOOM F,FRASINCAR F.Semi-automatic financial events discovery based on lexicon-semantic patterns[J].International Journal of Web Engineering and Technology,2010,6(2):115-140. [59] COHEN K B,VERSPOOR K,JOHNSON H L,et al.High-precision biological event extraction with a concept recognizer[C]//Proceedings of the Workshop on Current Trends in Biomedical Natural Language Processing:Shared Task.2009:50-58. [60] CAPET P,DELAVALLADE T,NAKAMURA T,et al.A risk assessment system with automatic extraction of event types[C]//Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Information Processing.2008:220-229. [61] DING X,SONG F,QIN B,et al.Research on typical event extraction method in the field of music[J].Journal of Chinese Information Processing,2011,25(2):15-20. [62] ZHAO Y Y,QIN B,CHE W X,et al.Research on Chinese event extraction[J].Journal of Chinese Information Processing,2008,22(1):3-8. [63] LIU M,LIU Y,XIANG L,et al.Extracting key entities and significant events from online daily news[C]//Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning.2008:201-209. [64] LLORENS H,SAQUETE E,NAVARRO-COLORADO B.TimeML events recognition and classification:learning CRF models with semantic roles[C]//Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics.2010:725-733. [65] JUNGERMANN F,MORIK K.Enhanced services for targeted information retrieval by event extraction and data mining[C]//Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Application of Natural Language and Information Systems.2008:335-336. [66] PISKORSKI J,TANEV H,WENNERBERG P O.Extracting violent events from on-line news for ontology population[C]//Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Business Information Systems.2007:287-300. [67] LIU Z Y,SUN M L,LIN Y K,et al.Knowledge representation learning:A review[J].Journal of Computer Research and Development,2016,53(2):247-261. [68] BORDES A,WESTON J,COLLOBERT R,et al.Learningstructured embeddings for knowledge bases[C]//Proceedings of the 25th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2011:301-306. [69] NICKEL M,TRESP V,KRIEGEL H.A three-way model for collective learning on multi-relational data[C]//Proceedings of ICML.2011:809-816. [70] SOCHER R,CHEN D,MANNING C D,et al.Reasoning with neural tensor networks for knowledge base completion[C]//Proceedings of the International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems.2013:926-934. [71] BORDES A,USUNIER N,GARCIA-DURAN A.Translatingembeddings for modeling multi-relational data[C]//Proceedings of the International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems.2013:2787-2795. [72] YANG B,YIH W,HE X,et al.Embedding entities and relations for learning and inference in knowledge bases[C]//Proceedings of International Conference on Learning Representations.2015. [73] WANG Z,ZHANG J W,FENG J L,et al.Knowledge graph embedding by translating on hyperplanes[C]//Proceedings of the 28th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2014:1112-1119. [74] LIN Y,LIU Z,SUN M,et al.Learning entity and relation embeddings for knowledge graph completion[C]//Proceedings of the 29th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2015:2181-2187. [75] JI G L,HE S Z,XU L H,et al.Knowledge graph embedding via dynamic mapping matrix[C]//Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing.2015:687-696. [76] XIAO H,HUANG M L,HAO Y,et al.TransG:a generativemixture model for knowledge graph embedding[C]//Proceedings of the Computation and Language.2015. [77] LIN Y K,LIU Z Y,SUN M S.Knowledge representation learning with entities attributes and relations[J].IEEE Signal Processing Letters,2016,23(4):41-52. [78] MA Z G,NI R Y,YU K H.Recent advances,key techniques and future challenges of knowledge graph[J].Chinese Journal of Engineering,2020,42(10):1254-1266. [79] Zadeh L A.Fuzzy sets[J].Information and Control,1965,8(3):338-353. [80] ABDULGHAFOUR M,CHANDRA T,ABIDI M A.Data fu-sion through fuzzy logic applied to feature extraction from multi-sensory images[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.1993:359-366. [81] GRABISCH M,SUGENO M,MUROFUSHI T.Fuzzy measures and integrals:theory and applications[M].Heidelberg:Physica,2010. [82] LAO N,MITCHELL T,COHEN W.Random walk inference and learning in a large-scale knowledge base[C]//Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2011:529-539. [83] ZHUANG Y,LI G L,FENG J H.A survey on entity alignment of knowledge base[J].Journal of Computer Research and Development,2016,53(1):165-192. [84] NEWCOMBE H B,KENNEDY J M,AXFORD S J,et al.Automatic linkage of vital records[J].Science,1959,130(3381):954-959. [85] FELLEGI I P,SUNTER A B.A theory for record linkage[J].Journal of the American Statistical Association,1969,64(328):1183-1210. [86] WINKLER W E,THIBAUDEAU Y.An application of the Fellegi-Sunter model of record linkage to the 1990 US decennial census[M] ∥Washington.DC:US Bureau of the Census,1991. [87] ELFEKY M G,VERYKIOS V S,ELMAGARMID A K.TAILOR:a record linkage toolbox[C]//Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Data Engineering.2002:17-28. [88] CHRISTEN P.Automatic training example selection for scalable unsupervised record linkage[C]//Proceedings of the Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.2008:511-518. [89] CHEN Z Q,KALASHNIKOV D V,MEHROTRA S.Exploiting context analysis for combining multiple entity resolution systems[C]//Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data.2009:207-218. [90] SARAWAGI S,BHAMIDIPATY A.Interactive deduplicationusing active learning[C]//Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.2002:269-278. [91] VERYKIOS V S,ELMAGARMID A K,HOUSTIS E N.Automating the approximate record-matching process[J].Information Sciences,2000,126(1-4):83-98. [92] BHATTACHARYA I,GETOOR L.Collective entity resolution in relational data[J].ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data,2007,1(1):5-40. [93] LACOSTE-JULIEN S,PALLA K,DAVIES A,et al.Sigma:simple greedy matching for aligning large knowledge bases[C]//Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.2013:572-580. [94] DOMINGOS P.Multi-relational record linkage[C]//Proceed-ings of the KDD-2004 Workshop on Multi-Relational Data Mining.2004:31-48. [95] WICK M,SINGH S,MCCALLUM A.A discriminative hierarchical model for fast coreference at large scale[C]//Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2012:379-388. [96] CHEN R C,BAU C T,YEH C J.Merging domain ontologies based on the WordNet system and fuzzy formal concept analysis techniques[J].Applied Soft Computing,2011,11(2):1908-1923. [97] RATINOV L,ROTH D,DOWNEY D,et al.Local and global algorithms for disambiguation to Wikipedia[C]//Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics:Human Language Technologies.2011:1375-1384. [98] BUNESCU R,PA+++++CA M.Using encyclopedic knowledge fornamed entity disambiguation[C]//Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2006. [99] CUCERZAN S.Large-scale named entity disambiguation based on Wikipedia data[C]//Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning.2007:708-716. [100] HAN X,SUN L,ZHAO J.Collective entity linking in web text:a graph-based method[C]//Proceedings of the 34th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval.2011:765-774. [101] SHEN W,WANG J,LUO P,et al.A graph-based approach for ontology population with named entities[C]//Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management.2012:345-354. [102] RESNIK P.Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy[C]//Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.1995. [103] PATWARDHAN S,PEDERSEN T.Using WordNet-based context vectors to estimate the semantic relatedness of concepts[C]//Proceedings of the Workshop on Making Sense of Sense:Bringing Psycholinguistics and Computational Linguistics Together.2006. [104] CHEN H H,LIN M S,WEI Y C.Novel association measures using web search with double checking[C]//Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2006:1009-1016. [105] MIKOLOV T,SUTSKEVER I,CHEN K,et al.Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality[C]//Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.2013:3111-3119. [106] MIKOLOV T,YIH W,ZWEIG G.Linguistic regularities in continuous space word representations[C]//Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics:Human Language Technologies.2013:746-751. [107] ZENG D J,LIU K,CHEN Y B,et al.Distant supervision for relation extraction via piecewise convolutional neural networks[C]//Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2015:1753-1762. [108] SANTOS C N,XIANG B,ZHOU B.Classifying relations by ranking with convolutional neural networks[C]//Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2015. [109] ALLEN J F,FRISCH A M.What’s in a semantic network? [C]//Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics.1982:19-27. [110] QI G L,GAO H,WU T X.The research advances of knowledge grape[J].Technology in Intelligence Engineering,2017,3(1):4-25. [111] HORROCKS I.Using an expressive description logic:FaCT or fiction?[J].KR,1998,98:636-645. [112] LU S Y,HSU K H,KUO L J.A semantic service match approach based on wordnet and SWRL rules[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE 10th International Conference on e-Business Engineering.2013:419-422. [113] PAULHEIM H,BIZER C.Type inference on noisy RDF data[C]//International Semantic Web-ISWC.2013:510-525. [114] LEHMANN J.Dl-learner:learning concepts in description logics[J].Journal of Machine Learning Research,2009,10(6):2639-2642. [115] VÖLKER J,FLEISCHHACKER D,STUCKENSCHMIDT H.Automatic acquisition of class disjointness[J].Journal of Web Semantics,2015,35:124-139. [116] XIE R B,LIU Z,JIA J,et al.Representation learning of knowledge graphs with entity descriptions[C]//Proceedings of the 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2016:2659-2665. [117] SHI B,WENINGER T.ProjE:Embedding projection for knowledge graph completion[C]//Proceedings of the 31st AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2017:1236-1242. [118] TAY Y,TUAN L A,PHAN M C,et al.Multi-task neural network for non-discrete attribute prediction in knowledge graphs[C]//Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management.2017:1029-1038. [119] SHI B,WENINGER T.Open-world knowledge graph completion[J].Proceedings of the 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence,2018:1957-1964. [120] DENIS L,ASJA F,JENS L,et al.Neural network-based question answering over knowledge graphs on word and character level[C]//Proceedings of the International World Wide Web Conference Committee.2017:1211-1220. [121] NEELAKANTAN A,ROTH B,MCCALLUM A.Compositional vector space models for knowledge base completion[C]//Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing.2015:1-16. [122] DAS R,NEELAKANTAN A,BELANGER D,et al.Chains of reasoning over entities,relations,and text using recurrent neural networks[C]//Proceedings of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2017. [123] GRAVES A,WAYNE G,REYNOLDS M,et al.Hybrid computing using a neural network with dynamic external memory[J].Nature,2016,538(7626):471-476. [124] SHEN Y,HUANG P S,CHANG M W,et al.Modeling large-scale structured relationships with shared memory for knowledge base completion[C]//Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Representation Learning for NLP.2017:57-68. [125] GUAN S P,JIN X L,JIA Y T,et al.Knowledge reasoning over knowledge graph:a survey[J].Journal of Software,2018,29(10):74-102. [126] GARDNER M,MITCHELL T.Efficient and expressive knowledge base completion using subgraph feature extraction[C]//Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2015:1488-1498. [127] WANG S,DU Z J,MENG X F.Research progress of large-scale knowledge graph completion technology[J].Scientia Sinica Informationis,2020,50(4):551-575. [128] NICKEL M,MURPHY K,TRESP V,et al.A review of relational machine learning for knowledge graphs[J].Proceedings of the IEEE,2015,104(1):11-33. [129] WANG X,ZOU L,WANG C K,et al.Research on knowledge graph data management:a survey[J].Journal of Software,2019,30:1-38. [130] DB-Engines.DB-Engines Ranking of RDF Stores[EB/OL].(2020-01) [2020-06-25].https://db-engines.com/en/ranking_trend/rdf+store. [131] DB-Engines.DB-Engines Ranking of Graph DBMS.[EB/OL].(2020-01) [2020-06-25].https://dbengines.com/en/ranking_trend/graph+dbms. [132] ZOU L,ÖZSU M T,CHEN L.gStore:a graph-based SPARQL query engine[J].The VLDB journal,2014,23(4):565-590. [133] OpenLink Software [EB/OL].(2015-01-01) [2020-06-25].OpenLink Virtuoso.https://virtuoso.openlinksw.com/. [134] Stardog Union.Stardog - The Knowledge Graph Platform for the Enterprise [EB/OL].(2017-02-03) [2020-06-25].http://www.stardog.com/. [135] Franz Inc.Allegro Graph [EB/OL].(2018-05-07) [2020-06-25].https://franz.com/agraph/allegrograph/. [136] Spmallette.Titan-Distributed Graph Database [EB/OL].(2017-01-01) [2020-06-25].http://titan.thinkaurelius.com/. [137] Callidus Software Inc.OrientDB - Multi-Model Database [EB/OL].(2017-12-20) [2020-06-25].http://orientdb.com/. [138] The Neo4j Team.The Neo4j Manual v3.4[EB/OL].(2018-05-16) [2020-06-25].https://neo4j.com/docs/developer-manual/current/. [139] HARTIG O.Reconciliation of RDF* and property graphs[J].arXiv:1409.3288,2014. [140] WANG K,HE R,WANG L,et al.Joint feature selection and subspace learning for cross-modal retrieval[J].IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,2015,38(10):2010-2023. |
[1] | 饶志双, 贾真, 张凡, 李天瑞. 基于Key-Value关联记忆网络的知识图谱问答方法 Key-Value Relational Memory Networks for Question Answering over Knowledge Graph 计算机科学, 2022, 49(9): 202-207. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.220300277 |
[2] | 吴子仪, 李邵梅, 姜梦函, 张建朋. 基于自注意力模型的本体对齐方法 Ontology Alignment Method Based on Self-attention 计算机科学, 2022, 49(9): 215-220. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.210700190 |
[3] | 孔世明, 冯永, 张嘉云. 融合知识图谱的多层次传承影响力计算与泛化研究 Multi-level Inheritance Influence Calculation and Generalization Based on Knowledge Graph 计算机科学, 2022, 49(9): 221-227. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.210700144 |
[4] | 徐涌鑫, 赵俊峰, 王亚沙, 谢冰, 杨恺. 时序知识图谱表示学习 Temporal Knowledge Graph Representation Learning 计算机科学, 2022, 49(9): 162-171. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.220500204 |
[5] | 秦琪琦, 张月琴, 王润泽, 张泽华. 基于知识图谱的层次粒化推荐方法 Hierarchical Granulation Recommendation Method Based on Knowledge Graph 计算机科学, 2022, 49(8): 64-69. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.210600111 |
[6] | 王杰, 李晓楠, 李冠宇. 基于自适应注意力机制的知识图谱补全算法 Adaptive Attention-based Knowledge Graph Completion 计算机科学, 2022, 49(7): 204-211. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.210400129 |
[7] | 马瑞新, 李泽阳, 陈志奎, 赵亮. 知识图谱推理研究综述 Review of Reasoning on Knowledge Graph 计算机科学, 2022, 49(6A): 74-85. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.210100122 |
[8] | 邓凯, 杨频, 李益洲, 杨星, 曾凡瑞, 张振毓. 一种可快速迁移的领域知识图谱构建方法 Fast and Transmissible Domain Knowledge Graph Construction Method 计算机科学, 2022, 49(6A): 100-108. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.210900018 |
[9] | 杜晓明, 袁清波, 杨帆, 姚奕, 蒋祥. 军事指控保障领域命名实体识别语料库的构建 Construction of Named Entity Recognition Corpus in Field of Military Command and Control Support 计算机科学, 2022, 49(6A): 133-139. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.210400132 |
[10] | 熊中敏, 舒贵文, 郭怀宇. 融合用户偏好的图神经网络推荐模型 Graph Neural Network Recommendation Model Integrating User Preferences 计算机科学, 2022, 49(6): 165-171. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.210400276 |
[11] | 钟将, 尹红, 张剑. 基于学术知识图谱的辅助创新技术研究 Academic Knowledge Graph-based Research for Auxiliary Innovation Technology 计算机科学, 2022, 49(5): 194-199. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.210400195 |
[12] | 朱敏, 梁朝晖, 姚林, 王翔坤, 曹梦琦. 学术引用信息可视化方法综述 Survey of Visualization Methods on Academic Citation Information 计算机科学, 2022, 49(4): 88-99. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.210300219 |
[13] | 梁静茹, 鄂海红, 宋美娜. 基于属性图模型的领域知识图谱构建方法 Method of Domain Knowledge Graph Construction Based on Property Graph Model 计算机科学, 2022, 49(2): 174-181. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.210500076 |
[14] | 李嘉明, 赵阔, 屈挺, 刘晓翔. 基于知识图谱的区块链物联网领域研究分析 Research and Analysis of Blockchain Internet of Things Based on Knowledge Graph 计算机科学, 2021, 48(6A): 563-567. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.200600071 |
[15] | 黄梅根, 刘川, 杜欢, 刘佳乐. 基于知识图谱的认知诊断模型及其在教辅中的应用研究 Research on Cognitive Diagnosis Model Based on Knowledge Graph and Its Application in Teaching Assistant 计算机科学, 2021, 48(6A): 644-648. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.200700163 |
|