计算机科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (2): 175-189.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.200700010

• 人工智能 • 上一篇    下一篇

知识图谱构建技术:分类、调查和未来方向

杭婷婷1,2, 冯钧1, 陆佳民1   

  1. 1 河海大学计算机与信息学院 南京2111002
    2 无人机开发及数据应用安徽高校联合重点实验室 安徽 马鞍山243031
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-02 修回日期:2020-10-29 出版日期:2021-02-15 发布日期:2021-02-04
  • 通讯作者: 冯钧(fengjun@hhu.edu.cn)
  • 作者简介:httsf@hhu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2018YFC0407901);安徽省高等学校自然科学研究重点项目(KJ2019A1277);江苏省研究生科研创新计划(2019B64214)

Knowledge Graph Construction Techniques:Taxonomy,Survey and Future Directions

HANG Ting-ting1,2, FENG Jun1, LU Jia-min1   

  1. 1 School of Computer and Information College,Hohai University,Nanjing 211100,China
    2 Key Laboratory of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Development and Data Application of Anhui Higher Education Institutes,Maanshan, Anhui 243031,China
  • Received:2020-07-02 Revised:2020-10-29 Online:2021-02-15 Published:2021-02-04
  • About author:HANG Ting-ting,born in 1986,Ph.D,lecturer,is a member of China ComputerFederation.Her main research interests include domain knowledge graph construction and information extraction.
    FENG Jun,born in 1969,Ph.D,professor,Ph.D supervisor,is a professional member of China Computer Federation.Her main research interests include data management,domain knowledge discovery research,and water conservancy informatization.
  • Supported by:
    The National Key R&D Program of China(2018YFC0407901),University Natural Science Research of Anhui(KJ2019A1277) and Graduate Research Innovation Support Program of Jiangsu(2019B64214).

摘要: 知识图谱的概念由谷歌于2012年提出,随后逐渐成为人工智能领域的一个研究热点,已在信息搜索、自动问答、决策分析等应用中发挥作用。虽然知识图谱在各领域展现出了巨大的潜力,但不难发现目前缺乏成熟的知识图谱构建平台,需要对知识图谱的构建体系进行研究,以满足不同的行业应用需求。文中以知识图谱构建为主线,首先介绍目前主流的通用知识图谱和领域知识图谱,描述两者在构建过程中的区别;然后,分类讨论图谱构建过程中存在的问题和挑战,并针对这些问题和挑战,分类描述目前图谱构建过程中的知识抽取、知识表示、知识融合、知识推理、知识存储5个层面的解决方法和策略;最后,展望未来可能的研究方向。

关键词: 知识表示, 知识抽取, 知识存储, 知识融合, 知识图谱, 知识推理

Abstract: With the concept of knowledge graph proposed by Google in 2012,it has gradually become a research hotspot in the field of artificial intelligence and played a role in applications such as information retrieval,question answering,and decision analysis.While the knowledge graph shows its potential in various fields,it is easy to find that there is no mature knowledge graph construction platform currently.Therefore,it is essential to research the knowledge graph construction system to meet the application needs of different industries.This paper focuses on the construction of the knowledge graph.Firstly,it introduces the current mainstream general knowledge graphs and domain knowledge graphs and describes the differences between the two in the construction process.Then,it discusses the problems and challenges in the construction of the knowledge graph according to various types.To address the above-mentioned issues and challenges,it describes the five-level solution methods and strategies of knowledge extraction,knowledge representation,knowledge fusion,knowledge reasoning,and knowledge storage in the current graph construction process.Finally,it discusses the possible directions for future research on the knowledge graph and its application.

Key words: Knowledge extraction, Knowledge fusion, Knowledge graph, Knowledge reasoning, Knowledge representation, Know-ledge storage

中图分类号: 

  • TP391.1
[1] AMIT S.Introducing the knowledge graph:things,not things[EB/OL].(2012-05-16) [2020-06-25].https://blog.google/products/search/introducing-knowledge-graph-things-not/.
[2] JI S,PAN S,CAMBRIA E,et al.A survey on knowledgegraphs:Representation,acquisition and applications[J].arXiv:2002.00388,2020.
[3] XU Z L,SHENG Y P,HE L R,et al.Review on knowledge graph techniques[J].Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China,2016,45(4):589-606.
[4] LIU Q,LI Y,DUAN H,et al.Knowledge graph construction techniques[J].Journal of Computer Research and Development,2016,53(3):582-600.
[5] HUANG H Q,YU J,MIAO X,et al.Review on knowledgegraphs[J].Journal of Computer System Application,2019,28(6):1-12.
[6] 搜狗知立方[DB/OL].(2017-03-06) [2020-06-25].http://baike.sogou.com/h66616234.htm.
[7] 百度知心[DB/OL].(2013-20-23) [2020-06-25].http://baike.baidu.com/view/10972128.htm.
[8] NIU X,SUN X,WANG H,et al.Zhishi.me-weaving Chinese linking open data[C]//Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference.2011:205-220.
[9] JIA Y T,WANG Y Z,CHENG X Q,et al.OpenKN:an open knowledge computational engine for network big data[C]//Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining.2014:657-664.
[10] XU B,XU Y,LIANG J Q,et al.CN-DBpedia:A never-ending Chinese knowledge extraction system[C]//Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial,Engineering and Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems.2017:428-438.
[11] MILLER G A.WordNet:a lexical database for English[J].Communications of the ACM,1995,38(11):39-41.
[12] AUER S,BIZER C,KOBILAROV G,et al.DBpedia:A nucleus for a web of open data[M] ∥The semantic web.Berlin:Springer,2007:722-735.
[13] BOLLACKER K,EVANS C,PARITOSH P,et al.Freebase:acollaboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledge[C]//Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data.2008:1247-1250.
[14] HOFFART J,SUCHANEK F M,BERBERICH K,et al.YA-GO2:A spatially and temporally enhanced knowledge base from Wikipedia[J].Artificial Intelligence,2013,194:28-61.
[15] MAHDISOLTANI F,BIEGA J,SUCHANEK F M.YAGO3:A knowledge base from multilingual wikipedias[C]//Proceedings of the CIDR.2013.
[16] WU W T,LI H S,WANG H X,et al.Probase:A probabilistic taxonomy for text understanding[C]//Proceedings of the 2012 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data.2012:481-492.
[17] DONG X,GABRILOVICH E,HEITZ G,et al.Knowledgevault:A web-scale approach to probabilistic knowledge fusion[C]//Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.2014:601-610.
[18] IMDB Official.IMDB[EB/OL].[2020-06-25].http://www.imda.com.
[19] DrugBank Official.DrugBank [EB/OL].[2020-06-25].http://www.drugbank.ca.
[20] ROSPOCHER M,VAN ERP M,VOSSEN P,et al.Buildingevent-centric knowledge graphs from news[J].Journal of Web Semantics,2016,37:132-151.
[21] Acemap Official.Acemap [EB/OL].[2020-06-25].https://www.acemap.info/.
[22] LIN H L,WANG Y Z,JIA Y T,et al.Network big data-oriented knowledge fusion methods:a survey[J].Chinese Journal of Computer,2016,40(1):3-29.
[23] SUN Z,WANG H L.Overview on the advance of the research on named entity recognition[J].New Technology of Library and Information Service,2010,26(6):42-47.
[24] RAUL L F.Extracting company names from text[C]//Proceedings of the 7th IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications.1991:29-32.
[25] CHINCHOR N,MARSH E.Muc-7 information extraction task definition[C]//Proceedings of the 7th Message Understanding Conference.1998:359-367.
[26] LIN Y F,TSAI T,CHOU W C,et al.A maximum entropy approach to biomedical named entity recognition[C]//Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Data Mining in Bioinformatics.2004:56-61.
[27] LIU X H,ZHANG S D,WEI F R,et al.Recognizing named entities in tweets[C]//Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics:Human Language Technologies.2011:359-367.
[28] WHITELAW C,KEHLENBECK A,PETROVIC N,et al.Web-scale named entity recognition[C]//Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management.2008:123-132.
[29] JAIN A,PENNACCHIOTTI M.Open entity extraction fromweb search query logs[C]//Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics.2010:510-518.
[30] LI D M,ZHANG Y,LI D Y,et al.Review of entity relation extraction methods[J].Journal of Computer Research and Development,2020,57(7):1424-1448.
[31] HUANG X,ZHU Q M,QIAN L H.Chinese entity relation extraction based on features combination[J].Microelectronics & Computer,2010,27(4):198-200.
[32] SURESH KUMAR G,ZAYARAZ G.Concept relation extrac-tion using naïve Bayes classifier for ontology-based question answering systems[J].Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences,2015,27(1):13-24.
[33] ZELENKO D,AONE C,RICHARDELLA A.Kernel methodsfor relation extraction[J].Journal of Machine Learning Research,2003,3(2):1083-1106.
[34] BUNESCU R C,MOONEY R J.A shortest path dependency kernel for relation extraction[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on human language technology and empirical methods in natural language processing.2005:724-731.
[35] BRIN S.Extracting Patterns and relations from the world wide web[C]//Proceedings of the International Workshop on the World Wide Web and Databases.1998:172-183.
[36] AGICHTEIN E,GRAVANO L.Extracting relations from large plain-text collections[C]//Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Digital Libraries.2000:85-94.
[37] HASEGAWA T,SEKINE S,GRISHMAN R.Discovering relations among named entities from large corpora[C]//Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics.2004:415-422.
[38] BOLLEGALA D T,MATSUO Y,ISHIZUKA M.Relational duality:unsupervised extraction of semantic relations between entities on the web[C]//Proceedings of the International Conference on World Wide Web.2010:151-160.
[39] KUMAR S.A survey of deep learning methods for relation extraction[J].arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.03645,2017.
[40] SOCHER R,HUVAL B,MANNING C D,et al.Semantic compositionality through recursive matrix-vector spaces[C]//Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational natural Language Learning.2012:1201-1211.
[41] ZENG D,LIU K,LAI S,et al.Relation classification via convolutional deep neural network[C]//Proceedings of COLING 2014,the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics:Technical Papers.2014:2335-2344.
[42] XU Y,MOU L,LI G,et al.Classifying relations via long short-term memory networks along shortest dependency paths[C]//Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2015:1785-1794.
[43] ZHANG Y,QI P,MANNING C.Graph convolution over pruned dependency trees improves relation extraction[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2018:2205-2215.
[44] MIWA M,BANSAL M.End-to-End Relation Extraction using LSTMs on Sequences and Tree Structures[C]//Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2016:1105-1116.
[45] ZHENG S,HAO Y,LU D,et al.Joint entity and relation extraction based on a hybrid neural network[J].Neurocomputing,2017,257:59-66.
[46] KATIYAR A,CARDIE C.Going out on a limb:Joint extraction of entity mentions and relations without dependency trees[C]//Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2017:917-928.
[47] ZHENG S,WANG F,BAO H,et al.Joint extraction of entities and relations based on a novel tagging scheme[C]//Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2017:1227-1236.
[48] E H H,ZHANG W J,XIAO S Q,et al.Survey of entity relationship extraction based on deep learning[J].Journal of Software,2019(6):1793-1818.
[49] SURDEANU M,TIBSHIRANI J,NALLAPATI R,et al.Multi-instance multi-label learning for relation extraction[C]//Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning.2012:455-465.
[50] LIN Y,SHEN S,LIU Z,et al.Neural relation extraction with selective attention over instances[C]//Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2016:2124-2133.
[51] JI G L,LIU K,HE S Z,et al.Distant supervision for relation extraction with sentence-level attention and entity descriptions[C]//Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2017:3060-3066.
[52] REN X,WU Z,HE W,et al.CoType:Joint extraction of typed entities and relations with knowledge bases[C]//Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web.2017:1015-1024.
[53] HUANG Y Y,WANG W Y.Deep residual learning for weakly-supervised relation extraction[C]//Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2017:1803-1807.
[54] GUO X Y,HE T T.Survey about research on information extraction[J].Computer Science,2015,42(2):14-17.
[55] HEARST M A.Automatic acquisition of hyponyms from large text corpora[C]//Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Computational Linguistics.1992:539-545.
[56] NISHIHARA Y,SATO K,SUNAYAMA W.Event extraction and visualization for obtaining personal experiences from blogs[C]//Proceedings of the Symposium on Human Interface.2009:315-324.
[57] XU FY,USZKOREIT H,LI H.Automatic event and relation detection with seeds of varying complexity[C]//Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Event Extraction and Synthesis.2006:12-17.
[58] BORSJE J,HOGENBOOM F,FRASINCAR F.Semi-automatic financial events discovery based on lexicon-semantic patterns[J].International Journal of Web Engineering and Technology,2010,6(2):115-140.
[59] COHEN K B,VERSPOOR K,JOHNSON H L,et al.High-precision biological event extraction with a concept recognizer[C]//Proceedings of the Workshop on Current Trends in Biomedical Natural Language Processing:Shared Task.2009:50-58.
[60] CAPET P,DELAVALLADE T,NAKAMURA T,et al.A risk assessment system with automatic extraction of event types[C]//Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Information Processing.2008:220-229.
[61] DING X,SONG F,QIN B,et al.Research on typical event extraction method in the field of music[J].Journal of Chinese Information Processing,2011,25(2):15-20.
[62] ZHAO Y Y,QIN B,CHE W X,et al.Research on Chinese event extraction[J].Journal of Chinese Information Processing,2008,22(1):3-8.
[63] LIU M,LIU Y,XIANG L,et al.Extracting key entities and significant events from online daily news[C]//Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning.2008:201-209.
[64] LLORENS H,SAQUETE E,NAVARRO-COLORADO B.TimeML events recognition and classification:learning CRF models with semantic roles[C]//Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics.2010:725-733.
[65] JUNGERMANN F,MORIK K.Enhanced services for targeted information retrieval by event extraction and data mining[C]//Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Application of Natural Language and Information Systems.2008:335-336.
[66] PISKORSKI J,TANEV H,WENNERBERG P O.Extracting violent events from on-line news for ontology population[C]//Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Business Information Systems.2007:287-300.
[67] LIU Z Y,SUN M L,LIN Y K,et al.Knowledge representation learning:A review[J].Journal of Computer Research and Development,2016,53(2):247-261.
[68] BORDES A,WESTON J,COLLOBERT R,et al.Learningstructured embeddings for knowledge bases[C]//Proceedings of the 25th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2011:301-306.
[69] NICKEL M,TRESP V,KRIEGEL H.A three-way model for collective learning on multi-relational data[C]//Proceedings of ICML.2011:809-816.
[70] SOCHER R,CHEN D,MANNING C D,et al.Reasoning with neural tensor networks for knowledge base completion[C]//Proceedings of the International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems.2013:926-934.
[71] BORDES A,USUNIER N,GARCIA-DURAN A.Translatingembeddings for modeling multi-relational data[C]//Proceedings of the International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems.2013:2787-2795.
[72] YANG B,YIH W,HE X,et al.Embedding entities and relations for learning and inference in knowledge bases[C]//Proceedings of International Conference on Learning Representations.2015.
[73] WANG Z,ZHANG J W,FENG J L,et al.Knowledge graph embedding by translating on hyperplanes[C]//Proceedings of the 28th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2014:1112-1119.
[74] LIN Y,LIU Z,SUN M,et al.Learning entity and relation embeddings for knowledge graph completion[C]//Proceedings of the 29th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2015:2181-2187.
[75] JI G L,HE S Z,XU L H,et al.Knowledge graph embedding via dynamic mapping matrix[C]//Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing.2015:687-696.
[76] XIAO H,HUANG M L,HAO Y,et al.TransG:a generativemixture model for knowledge graph embedding[C]//Proceedings of the Computation and Language.2015.
[77] LIN Y K,LIU Z Y,SUN M S.Knowledge representation learning with entities attributes and relations[J].IEEE Signal Processing Letters,2016,23(4):41-52.
[78] MA Z G,NI R Y,YU K H.Recent advances,key techniques and future challenges of knowledge graph[J].Chinese Journal of Engineering,2020,42(10):1254-1266.
[79] Zadeh L A.Fuzzy sets[J].Information and Control,1965,8(3):338-353.
[80] ABDULGHAFOUR M,CHANDRA T,ABIDI M A.Data fu-sion through fuzzy logic applied to feature extraction from multi-sensory images[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.1993:359-366.
[81] GRABISCH M,SUGENO M,MUROFUSHI T.Fuzzy measures and integrals:theory and applications[M].Heidelberg:Physica,2010.
[82] LAO N,MITCHELL T,COHEN W.Random walk inference and learning in a large-scale knowledge base[C]//Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2011:529-539.
[83] ZHUANG Y,LI G L,FENG J H.A survey on entity alignment of knowledge base[J].Journal of Computer Research and Development,2016,53(1):165-192.
[84] NEWCOMBE H B,KENNEDY J M,AXFORD S J,et al.Automatic linkage of vital records[J].Science,1959,130(3381):954-959.
[85] FELLEGI I P,SUNTER A B.A theory for record linkage[J].Journal of the American Statistical Association,1969,64(328):1183-1210.
[86] WINKLER W E,THIBAUDEAU Y.An application of the Fellegi-Sunter model of record linkage to the 1990 US decennial census[M] ∥Washington.DC:US Bureau of the Census,1991.
[87] ELFEKY M G,VERYKIOS V S,ELMAGARMID A K.TAILOR:a record linkage toolbox[C]//Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Data Engineering.2002:17-28.
[88] CHRISTEN P.Automatic training example selection for scalable unsupervised record linkage[C]//Proceedings of the Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.2008:511-518.
[89] CHEN Z Q,KALASHNIKOV D V,MEHROTRA S.Exploiting context analysis for combining multiple entity resolution systems[C]//Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data.2009:207-218.
[90] SARAWAGI S,BHAMIDIPATY A.Interactive deduplicationusing active learning[C]//Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.2002:269-278.
[91] VERYKIOS V S,ELMAGARMID A K,HOUSTIS E N.Automating the approximate record-matching process[J].Information Sciences,2000,126(1-4):83-98.
[92] BHATTACHARYA I,GETOOR L.Collective entity resolution in relational data[J].ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data,2007,1(1):5-40.
[93] LACOSTE-JULIEN S,PALLA K,DAVIES A,et al.Sigma:simple greedy matching for aligning large knowledge bases[C]//Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.2013:572-580.
[94] DOMINGOS P.Multi-relational record linkage[C]//Proceed-ings of the KDD-2004 Workshop on Multi-Relational Data Mining.2004:31-48.
[95] WICK M,SINGH S,MCCALLUM A.A discriminative hierarchical model for fast coreference at large scale[C]//Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2012:379-388.
[96] CHEN R C,BAU C T,YEH C J.Merging domain ontologies based on the WordNet system and fuzzy formal concept analysis techniques[J].Applied Soft Computing,2011,11(2):1908-1923.
[97] RATINOV L,ROTH D,DOWNEY D,et al.Local and global algorithms for disambiguation to Wikipedia[C]//Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics:Human Language Technologies.2011:1375-1384.
[98] BUNESCU R,PA+++++CA M.Using encyclopedic knowledge fornamed entity disambiguation[C]//Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2006.
[99] CUCERZAN S.Large-scale named entity disambiguation based on Wikipedia data[C]//Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning.2007:708-716.
[100] HAN X,SUN L,ZHAO J.Collective entity linking in web text:a graph-based method[C]//Proceedings of the 34th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval.2011:765-774.
[101] SHEN W,WANG J,LUO P,et al.A graph-based approach for ontology population with named entities[C]//Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management.2012:345-354.
[102] RESNIK P.Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy[C]//Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.1995.
[103] PATWARDHAN S,PEDERSEN T.Using WordNet-based context vectors to estimate the semantic relatedness of concepts[C]//Proceedings of the Workshop on Making Sense of Sense:Bringing Psycholinguistics and Computational Linguistics Together.2006.
[104] CHEN H H,LIN M S,WEI Y C.Novel association measures using web search with double checking[C]//Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2006:1009-1016.
[105] MIKOLOV T,SUTSKEVER I,CHEN K,et al.Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality[C]//Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.2013:3111-3119.
[106] MIKOLOV T,YIH W,ZWEIG G.Linguistic regularities in continuous space word representations[C]//Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics:Human Language Technologies.2013:746-751.
[107] ZENG D J,LIU K,CHEN Y B,et al.Distant supervision for relation extraction via piecewise convolutional neural networks[C]//Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2015:1753-1762.
[108] SANTOS C N,XIANG B,ZHOU B.Classifying relations by ranking with convolutional neural networks[C]//Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2015.
[109] ALLEN J F,FRISCH A M.What’s in a semantic network? [C]//Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics.1982:19-27.
[110] QI G L,GAO H,WU T X.The research advances of knowledge grape[J].Technology in Intelligence Engineering,2017,3(1):4-25.
[111] HORROCKS I.Using an expressive description logic:FaCT or fiction?[J].KR,1998,98:636-645.
[112] LU S Y,HSU K H,KUO L J.A semantic service match approach based on wordnet and SWRL rules[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE 10th International Conference on e-Business Engineering.2013:419-422.
[113] PAULHEIM H,BIZER C.Type inference on noisy RDF data[C]//International Semantic Web-ISWC.2013:510-525.
[114] LEHMANN J.Dl-learner:learning concepts in description logics[J].Journal of Machine Learning Research,2009,10(6):2639-2642.
[115] VÖLKER J,FLEISCHHACKER D,STUCKENSCHMIDT H.Automatic acquisition of class disjointness[J].Journal of Web Semantics,2015,35:124-139.
[116] XIE R B,LIU Z,JIA J,et al.Representation learning of knowledge graphs with entity descriptions[C]//Proceedings of the 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2016:2659-2665.
[117] SHI B,WENINGER T.ProjE:Embedding projection for knowledge graph completion[C]//Proceedings of the 31st AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2017:1236-1242.
[118] TAY Y,TUAN L A,PHAN M C,et al.Multi-task neural network for non-discrete attribute prediction in knowledge graphs[C]//Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management.2017:1029-1038.
[119] SHI B,WENINGER T.Open-world knowledge graph completion[J].Proceedings of the 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence,2018:1957-1964.
[120] DENIS L,ASJA F,JENS L,et al.Neural network-based question answering over knowledge graphs on word and character level[C]//Proceedings of the International World Wide Web Conference Committee.2017:1211-1220.
[121] NEELAKANTAN A,ROTH B,MCCALLUM A.Compositional vector space models for knowledge base completion[C]//Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing.2015:1-16.
[122] DAS R,NEELAKANTAN A,BELANGER D,et al.Chains of reasoning over entities,relations,and text using recurrent neural networks[C]//Proceedings of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics.2017.
[123] GRAVES A,WAYNE G,REYNOLDS M,et al.Hybrid computing using a neural network with dynamic external memory[J].Nature,2016,538(7626):471-476.
[124] SHEN Y,HUANG P S,CHANG M W,et al.Modeling large-scale structured relationships with shared memory for knowledge base completion[C]//Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Representation Learning for NLP.2017:57-68.
[125] GUAN S P,JIN X L,JIA Y T,et al.Knowledge reasoning over knowledge graph:a survey[J].Journal of Software,2018,29(10):74-102.
[126] GARDNER M,MITCHELL T.Efficient and expressive knowledge base completion using subgraph feature extraction[C]//Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.2015:1488-1498.
[127] WANG S,DU Z J,MENG X F.Research progress of large-scale knowledge graph completion technology[J].Scientia Sinica Informationis,2020,50(4):551-575.
[128] NICKEL M,MURPHY K,TRESP V,et al.A review of relational machine learning for knowledge graphs[J].Proceedings of the IEEE,2015,104(1):11-33.
[129] WANG X,ZOU L,WANG C K,et al.Research on knowledge graph data management:a survey[J].Journal of Software,2019,30:1-38.
[130] DB-Engines.DB-Engines Ranking of RDF Stores[EB/OL].(2020-01) [2020-06-25].https://db-engines.com/en/ranking_trend/rdf+store.
[131] DB-Engines.DB-Engines Ranking of Graph DBMS.[EB/OL].(2020-01) [2020-06-25].https://dbengines.com/en/ranking_trend/graph+dbms.
[132] ZOU L,ÖZSU M T,CHEN L.gStore:a graph-based SPARQL query engine[J].The VLDB journal,2014,23(4):565-590.
[133] OpenLink Software [EB/OL].(2015-01-01) [2020-06-25].OpenLink Virtuoso.https://virtuoso.openlinksw.com/.
[134] Stardog Union.Stardog - The Knowledge Graph Platform for the Enterprise [EB/OL].(2017-02-03) [2020-06-25].http://www.stardog.com/.
[135] Franz Inc.Allegro Graph [EB/OL].(2018-05-07) [2020-06-25].https://franz.com/agraph/allegrograph/.
[136] Spmallette.Titan-Distributed Graph Database [EB/OL].(2017-01-01) [2020-06-25].http://titan.thinkaurelius.com/.
[137] Callidus Software Inc.OrientDB - Multi-Model Database [EB/OL].(2017-12-20) [2020-06-25].http://orientdb.com/.
[138] The Neo4j Team.The Neo4j Manual v3.4[EB/OL].(2018-05-16) [2020-06-25].https://neo4j.com/docs/developer-manual/current/.
[139] HARTIG O.Reconciliation of RDF* and property graphs[J].arXiv:1409.3288,2014.
[140] WANG K,HE R,WANG L,et al.Joint feature selection and subspace learning for cross-modal retrieval[J].IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,2015,38(10):2010-2023.
[1] 饶志双, 贾真, 张凡, 李天瑞.
基于Key-Value关联记忆网络的知识图谱问答方法
Key-Value Relational Memory Networks for Question Answering over Knowledge Graph
计算机科学, 2022, 49(9): 202-207. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.220300277
[2] 吴子仪, 李邵梅, 姜梦函, 张建朋.
基于自注意力模型的本体对齐方法
Ontology Alignment Method Based on Self-attention
计算机科学, 2022, 49(9): 215-220. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.210700190
[3] 孔世明, 冯永, 张嘉云.
融合知识图谱的多层次传承影响力计算与泛化研究
Multi-level Inheritance Influence Calculation and Generalization Based on Knowledge Graph
计算机科学, 2022, 49(9): 221-227. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.210700144
[4] 徐涌鑫, 赵俊峰, 王亚沙, 谢冰, 杨恺.
时序知识图谱表示学习
Temporal Knowledge Graph Representation Learning
计算机科学, 2022, 49(9): 162-171. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.220500204
[5] 秦琪琦, 张月琴, 王润泽, 张泽华.
基于知识图谱的层次粒化推荐方法
Hierarchical Granulation Recommendation Method Based on Knowledge Graph
计算机科学, 2022, 49(8): 64-69. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.210600111
[6] 王杰, 李晓楠, 李冠宇.
基于自适应注意力机制的知识图谱补全算法
Adaptive Attention-based Knowledge Graph Completion
计算机科学, 2022, 49(7): 204-211. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.210400129
[7] 马瑞新, 李泽阳, 陈志奎, 赵亮.
知识图谱推理研究综述
Review of Reasoning on Knowledge Graph
计算机科学, 2022, 49(6A): 74-85. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.210100122
[8] 邓凯, 杨频, 李益洲, 杨星, 曾凡瑞, 张振毓.
一种可快速迁移的领域知识图谱构建方法
Fast and Transmissible Domain Knowledge Graph Construction Method
计算机科学, 2022, 49(6A): 100-108. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.210900018
[9] 杜晓明, 袁清波, 杨帆, 姚奕, 蒋祥.
军事指控保障领域命名实体识别语料库的构建
Construction of Named Entity Recognition Corpus in Field of Military Command and Control Support
计算机科学, 2022, 49(6A): 133-139. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.210400132
[10] 熊中敏, 舒贵文, 郭怀宇.
融合用户偏好的图神经网络推荐模型
Graph Neural Network Recommendation Model Integrating User Preferences
计算机科学, 2022, 49(6): 165-171. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.210400276
[11] 钟将, 尹红, 张剑.
基于学术知识图谱的辅助创新技术研究
Academic Knowledge Graph-based Research for Auxiliary Innovation Technology
计算机科学, 2022, 49(5): 194-199. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.210400195
[12] 朱敏, 梁朝晖, 姚林, 王翔坤, 曹梦琦.
学术引用信息可视化方法综述
Survey of Visualization Methods on Academic Citation Information
计算机科学, 2022, 49(4): 88-99. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.210300219
[13] 梁静茹, 鄂海红, 宋美娜.
基于属性图模型的领域知识图谱构建方法
Method of Domain Knowledge Graph Construction Based on Property Graph Model
计算机科学, 2022, 49(2): 174-181. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.210500076
[14] 李嘉明, 赵阔, 屈挺, 刘晓翔.
基于知识图谱的区块链物联网领域研究分析
Research and Analysis of Blockchain Internet of Things Based on Knowledge Graph
计算机科学, 2021, 48(6A): 563-567. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.200600071
[15] 黄梅根, 刘川, 杜欢, 刘佳乐.
基于知识图谱的认知诊断模型及其在教辅中的应用研究
Research on Cognitive Diagnosis Model Based on Knowledge Graph and Its Application in Teaching Assistant
计算机科学, 2021, 48(6A): 644-648. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.200700163
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!