计算机科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6A): 102-105.
臧翰林, 李艳玲
ZANG Han-lin, LI Yan-ling
摘要: 在处理直觉模糊多属性群决策问题时,可根据D-S证据理论完成信息的集结。利用直觉模糊熵和模糊偏好关系确定权重,通过加权-证据融合的方法得到专家对方案集的融合证据。在专家信息集结方面,结合欧氏证据距离求解证据间的冲突度,得到专家权重,并将群体专家对方案集的证据信息进行修正和融合。最后结合算例证明了所提方法具有很高的实用价值。
中图分类号:
[1]DEMPSTER A P.Upper and lower probabililities induced by a multivalued mapping[J].Annuals of Mathematical Statistics,1967,38(4):325-339. [2]杨风暴,王肖霞.D-S证据理论的冲突证据合成方法[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2010:139-221. [3]江红莉,何建敏,庄亚明,等.基于直觉模糊集和证据理论的群决策方法[J].控制与决策,2012,27(5):752-756. [4]郭军,宋建社,杨檬,等.基于证据理论的多任务抢修重要度决策[J].系统工程与电子技术,2011,33(3):581-584. [5]陈云翔,蔡忠义,张诤敏,等.基于证据理论和直觉模糊集的群决策信息集结方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2015,37(3):594-598. [6]史超,程咏梅,潘泉.基于直觉模糊和证据理论的混合型偏好信息集结方法[J].控制与决策,2012,27(8):1163-1168. [7]HAN D Q,DEZERT J,YANG Y.New distance measures of evidencebased on belief intervals[C]∥International Conference on Belief Functions.Springer,2014:432-441. [8]曲婉嘉,王鸿超,徐忠林,等.基于D-S证据融合的雷达毁伤评估研究[J].战术导弹技术,2017,1(17):104-108. [9]李登峰.直觉模糊集决策与对策分析方法[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2012:21-34. [10]SZMIDT E,KACPRZYK J.Entropy for intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2001,118(3):467-477. [11]WU J Z,ZHANG Q.Multicriteria decision making method based on intuitionistic fuzzy weighted entrpy[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2011,38(3):916-922. [12]TANINO T.Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision ma-king[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1984,12(84):117-131. [13]LEE L W.Group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relationsbased on the additive consistency and the order consistency[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2012,39(14):11666-11676. [14]IRPINO A,VERDE R.Dynamic clustering of interval data usinga wasserstein-based distance[J].Pattern Recognition Letters,2008,29(11):1648-1658. [15]刘晓东.雷达抗干扰效能评估指标体系及方法研究[D].成都:电子科技大学,2008. |
[1] | 戴宗明, 胡凯, 谢捷, 郭亚. 基于直觉模糊集的集成学习算法 Ensemble Learning Algorithm Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets 计算机科学, 2021, 48(6A): 270-274. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.200700036 |
[2] | 徐聪, 潘小东. 基于正态云相似度的语言型多属性群决策方法 Linguistic Multi-attribute Group Decision Making Method Based on Normal Cloud Similarity 计算机科学, 2019, 46(6): 218-223. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2019.06.033 |
[3] | 贾伟, 华庆一, 张敏军, 陈锐, 姬翔, 王博. 基于冲突度和协同过滤的移动用户界面模式推荐 Mobile User Interface Pattern Recommendation Based on Conflict Degree and Collaborative Filtering 计算机科学, 2018, 45(10): 202-206. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2018.10.037 |
[4] | 庞继芳,宋鹏. 专家权重完全未知的区间直觉不确定语言多属性群决策方法 Multi-attribute Group Decision Making Method for Interval-valued Intuitionistic Uncertain Language with Completely Unknown Experts’ Weights 计算机科学, 2018, 45(1): 47-54. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2018.01.007 |
[5] | 寇 广,汤光明,徐梓椋. 网络安全态势感知中D-S证据理论冲突证据的修正研究 Research on Revising Conflict Evidence of D-S Evidence Theory in Network Security Situation Awareness 计算机科学, 2015, 42(7): 200-203. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2015.07.044 |
[6] | 刘永星,赵涓涓,常晓敏. 基于数据融合的无线传感器网络林火监控算法 Forest Fire Monitoring Algorithm Based on Wireless Sensor Network Data Fusion 计算机科学, 2015, 42(11): 158-163. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2015.11.033 |
[7] | 林国平,梁吉业,钱宇华. 基于多粒度视角下的D-S证据理论融合策略 Multigranulation View Based Fusing Strategy of D-S Evidence 计算机科学, 2014, 41(2): 45-48. |
[8] | 江涛. 基于D-S证据理论的信息融合算法 Information Fusion Algorithm Based on D-S Evidence Theory 计算机科学, 2013, 40(Z11): 120-124. |
[9] | 陈超,陈性元,汪永伟,王义功. 冲突可衡量多源信息融合技术研究 Research on Conflict-measurable Multiple Information Fusion Technology 计算机科学, 2013, 40(9): 111-115. |
[10] | 张龙昌. 面向大群体用户的模糊服务选择 Big Group-oriented Fuzzy Web Service Selection 计算机科学, 2013, 40(6): 57-62. |
[11] | 陈鸿昶,程国振,伊鹏. 基于多尺度特征融合的异常流量检测方法 Anomaly Traffic Detection Based on Multi-resolution Feature Fusion 计算机科学, 2012, 39(2): 42-46. |
[12] | 蒋黎明,何加浪,张宏. D-S证据理论中一种新的冲突证据融合方法 New Fusion Approach for Conflicting Evidence in D-S Theory of Evidence 计算机科学, 2011, 38(4): 236-238. |
[13] | . 情感机器人的情感模型研究 计算机科学, 2008, 35(6): 158-162. |
|