计算机科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6A): 102-105.

• 智能计算 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于D-S证据理论的直觉模糊群决策信息集结方法

臧翰林, 李艳玲   

  1. 火箭军工程大学 西安710025
  • 出版日期:2019-06-14 发布日期:2019-07-02
  • 作者简介:臧翰林(1993-),男,硕士生,主要研究方向为群决策、决策理论等;李艳玲(1972-),女,博士,教授,主要研究方向为数据挖掘、决策理论等。

Intuitionistic Fuzzy Group Decision Making Information Aggregation Method Based on D-S Evidence Theory

ZANG Han-lin, LI Yan-ling   

  1. Rocket Force University of Engineering,Xi' an 710025,China
  • Online:2019-06-14 Published:2019-07-02

摘要: 在处理直觉模糊多属性群决策问题时,可根据D-S证据理论完成信息的集结。利用直觉模糊熵和模糊偏好关系确定权重,通过加权-证据融合的方法得到专家对方案集的融合证据。在专家信息集结方面,结合欧氏证据距离求解证据间的冲突度,得到专家权重,并将群体专家对方案集的证据信息进行修正和融合。最后结合算例证明了所提方法具有很高的实用价值。

关键词: D-S证据理论, 冲突度, 多属性群决策, 模糊偏好关系, 欧氏证据距离

Abstract: When dealing with the intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making problem,the information aggregation can be completed according to the D-S evidence theory.The weights are determined by using the intuitionistic fuzzy entropy and fuzzy preference relationship.Weighted-evidence fusion method is used to obtain the expert’s fusion evidence for the solution set.In the expert information aggregation,the Euclidean evidence distance is used to solve the degree of conflict between the evidences,and the expert weights are obtained.Evidence information of group experts on program sets are corrected and integrated.Finally,combined with examples,it is proved that the proposed method has high practical value.

Key words: Degree of conflict, D-S evidence theory, Euclidean evidence distance, Fuzzy preference relation, Group decision-making of multi-attribute

中图分类号: 

  • C93
[1]DEMPSTER A P.Upper and lower probabililities induced by a multivalued mapping[J].Annuals of Mathematical Statistics,1967,38(4):325-339.
[2]杨风暴,王肖霞.D-S证据理论的冲突证据合成方法[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2010:139-221.
[3]江红莉,何建敏,庄亚明,等.基于直觉模糊集和证据理论的群决策方法[J].控制与决策,2012,27(5):752-756.
[4]郭军,宋建社,杨檬,等.基于证据理论的多任务抢修重要度决策[J].系统工程与电子技术,2011,33(3):581-584.
[5]陈云翔,蔡忠义,张诤敏,等.基于证据理论和直觉模糊集的群决策信息集结方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2015,37(3):594-598.
[6]史超,程咏梅,潘泉.基于直觉模糊和证据理论的混合型偏好信息集结方法[J].控制与决策,2012,27(8):1163-1168.
[7]HAN D Q,DEZERT J,YANG Y.New distance measures of evidencebased on belief intervals[C]∥International Conference on Belief Functions.Springer,2014:432-441.
[8]曲婉嘉,王鸿超,徐忠林,等.基于D-S证据融合的雷达毁伤评估研究[J].战术导弹技术,2017,1(17):104-108.
[9]李登峰.直觉模糊集决策与对策分析方法[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2012:21-34.
[10]SZMIDT E,KACPRZYK J.Entropy for intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2001,118(3):467-477.
[11]WU J Z,ZHANG Q.Multicriteria decision making method based on intuitionistic fuzzy weighted entrpy[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2011,38(3):916-922.
[12]TANINO T.Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision ma-king[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1984,12(84):117-131.
[13]LEE L W.Group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relationsbased on the additive consistency and the order consistency[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2012,39(14):11666-11676.
[14]IRPINO A,VERDE R.Dynamic clustering of interval data usinga wasserstein-based distance[J].Pattern Recognition Letters,2008,29(11):1648-1658.
[15]刘晓东.雷达抗干扰效能评估指标体系及方法研究[D].成都:电子科技大学,2008.
[1] 戴宗明, 胡凯, 谢捷, 郭亚.
基于直觉模糊集的集成学习算法
Ensemble Learning Algorithm Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets
计算机科学, 2021, 48(6A): 270-274. https://doi.org/10.11896/jsjkx.200700036
[2] 徐聪, 潘小东.
基于正态云相似度的语言型多属性群决策方法
Linguistic Multi-attribute Group Decision Making Method Based on Normal Cloud Similarity
计算机科学, 2019, 46(6): 218-223. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2019.06.033
[3] 贾伟, 华庆一, 张敏军, 陈锐, 姬翔, 王博.
基于冲突度和协同过滤的移动用户界面模式推荐
Mobile User Interface Pattern Recommendation Based on Conflict Degree and Collaborative Filtering
计算机科学, 2018, 45(10): 202-206. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2018.10.037
[4] 庞继芳,宋鹏.
专家权重完全未知的区间直觉不确定语言多属性群决策方法
Multi-attribute Group Decision Making Method for Interval-valued Intuitionistic Uncertain Language with Completely Unknown Experts’ Weights
计算机科学, 2018, 45(1): 47-54. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2018.01.007
[5] 寇 广,汤光明,徐梓椋.
网络安全态势感知中D-S证据理论冲突证据的修正研究
Research on Revising Conflict Evidence of D-S Evidence Theory in Network Security Situation Awareness
计算机科学, 2015, 42(7): 200-203. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2015.07.044
[6] 刘永星,赵涓涓,常晓敏.
基于数据融合的无线传感器网络林火监控算法
Forest Fire Monitoring Algorithm Based on Wireless Sensor Network Data Fusion
计算机科学, 2015, 42(11): 158-163. https://doi.org/10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2015.11.033
[7] 林国平,梁吉业,钱宇华.
基于多粒度视角下的D-S证据理论融合策略
Multigranulation View Based Fusing Strategy of D-S Evidence
计算机科学, 2014, 41(2): 45-48.
[8] 江涛.
基于D-S证据理论的信息融合算法
Information Fusion Algorithm Based on D-S Evidence Theory
计算机科学, 2013, 40(Z11): 120-124.
[9] 陈超,陈性元,汪永伟,王义功.
冲突可衡量多源信息融合技术研究
Research on Conflict-measurable Multiple Information Fusion Technology
计算机科学, 2013, 40(9): 111-115.
[10] 张龙昌.
面向大群体用户的模糊服务选择
Big Group-oriented Fuzzy Web Service Selection
计算机科学, 2013, 40(6): 57-62.
[11] 陈鸿昶,程国振,伊鹏.
基于多尺度特征融合的异常流量检测方法
Anomaly Traffic Detection Based on Multi-resolution Feature Fusion
计算机科学, 2012, 39(2): 42-46.
[12] 蒋黎明,何加浪,张宏.
D-S证据理论中一种新的冲突证据融合方法
New Fusion Approach for Conflicting Evidence in D-S Theory of Evidence
计算机科学, 2011, 38(4): 236-238.
[13] .
情感机器人的情感模型研究

计算机科学, 2008, 35(6): 158-162.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!