Computer Science ›› 2023, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (7): 347-354.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.220900120

• Interdiscipline & Frontier • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Reconstructing the Right to Algorithm Explanation --Full Algorithm Development Flow Governance and Hierarchical Classification Interpretation Framework

CONG Yingnan1, WANG Zhaoyu2, ZHU Jinqing3   

  1. 1 Business School,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China
    2 School of Law,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China
    3 Beijing Bytedance Network Technology Co.,Ltd,Beijing 100043,China
  • Online:2023-07-15 Published:2023-07-05
  • About author:CONG Yingnan,born in 1985,Ph.D,associate professor,master supervisor,is a member of China Computer Federation.His main research interests include big data on business and law,artificial intelligence,blockchain,Fin-tech,Reg-tech and complex system.ZHU Jinqing,born in 1984,postgra-duate,engineer,is a member of China Computer Federation.His main research interests include database systems,content data analysis,artificial intelligence and knowledge graphs.
  • Supported by:
    Beijing Education Reform Project “Research on the Training Mode of Innovative Talents for French Business Big Data Analysis”(Jingjiaohan [2020] No.427) and Cultivation and Construction Plan of Emerging Disciplines of China University of Political Science and Law.

Abstract: With the rapid development of artificial intelligence,automated decision-making algorithms(ADM) have gradually entered the public domain and increasingly affected social welfare and individual interests.Meanwhile,emerging risks of ADM,such as algorithmic discrimination,algorithmic bias,and algorithm monopoly have raised the demand of governance to algorithm.Faced with information and technology asymmetry among parties involved,traditional legal resources fall short in protecting the rights of users in ADM,which justifies the right to explanation.In addition,the right to algorithm explanation,serving as an important means of algorithm governance,is conductive to making the black box of algorithm moderately transparent,correcting information asymmetry,and balancing the risk burden between the deployer and the user.It has thus become a necessity in regulating ADM deployers and safeguarding the interests of its users.Therefore,the right to explanation has become the focus in both academic and practical realms from home and abroad.However,the right to algorithm explanation in China is faced with the problem of limited eligible parties,insufficient protection scope,and inexplicit content of rights.In this regard,this paper advocates decons-tructing the right to explanation and further reconstructing it from the perspective of machine learning workflow with a hierarchical classification framework.Introducing the concept of machine learning workflow can reasonably extend the scope of the subject and object of the right,while establishing the framework of hierarchical classification can clarify the content and boundary of the right,which considers both individuality and generality of algorithms and balances the efficiency of explanation and the protection of users’ rights.In this way,all parties in ADM can be fully protected,and the development of digital economy can be empo-wered.

Key words: Right to explanation, Algorithm governance, Automated decision making, Protection of personal data

CLC Number: 

  • TP182
[1]YANOFSKY N S.Towards a Definition of an Algorithm [J].Journal of Logic and Computation,2011,21(2):253-286.
[2]STEINER C,DIXON W.Automate this:How Algorithms Came to Rule Our World[M].Portfolio/Penguin,2012.
[3]DIETERICH W,MENDOZA C,BRENNAN T.COMPAS Risk Scales:Demonstrating Accuracy Equity and Predictive Parity [R].Northpointe Inc,2016.
[4]ZELEZNIKOW J.An Australian Perspective on Research and Development Required for the Construction of Applied Legal Decision Support Systems [J].Artificial Intelligence and Law,2002,10(4):237-260.
[5]MCPEAK A.Disruptive Technology and the Ethical Lawyer[J].The University of Toledo Law Review,2018,50:457.
[6]PASQUALE F.The Black Box Society:The Secret Algorithm that Control Money and Information[M].Harvard University Press,2015.
[7]ZHENG Z H.The Ethical Crisis and Legal Regulation of theArtificial Intelligence Algorithm[J].Science of Law(Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law),2021,39(1):14-26.
[8]LI J.The Construction of the Right of Algorithmic Interpretation in Public Services[J].Seeking Truth,2021,48(3):110-120.
[9]LV B B.On the Algorithm Explanation Obligation of Personal Information Processors[J].Modern Law Science,2021,43(4):89-101.
[10]ZHANG L H.Regulation of Algorithms in the Age of Artificial Intelligence[M].Shanghai:Shanghai People’s Publishing House,2021.
[11]BRENNAN T,DIETERICH W,EHRET B.Evaluating the Predictive Validity of the COMPAS Risk and Needs Assessment System [J].Criminal Justice and Behavior,2009,36(1):21-40.
[12]BLOCH-WEHBA H.Access to Algorithms[J].Fordham Law Review,2019,88:1265.
[13]CITRON D K,PASQUALE F.The Scored Society:Due Process for Automated Predictions [J].Washington Law Review,2014,89:1.
[14]HARARI Y N.21 Lessons for the 21st Century[M].Random House,2018.
[15]ZHOU W.Algorithmic Conspiracy of Antitrust Regulations[J].Law Science,2020(1):40-59.
[16]JIA K.Artificial Intelligence and Algorithm Governance Re-search[J].Chinese Public Administration,2019(1):17-22.
[17]ZHENG Z H,XU Z X.Legal Regulation and Judicial Review of Algorithmic Discrimination in the Age of Big Data:Take Legal Practice in the U.S.as an Example[J].Journal of Comparative Law,2019(4):111-122.
[18]XIE Z S.Regulating Algorithmic Decision:Focusing on theRight to Explanation of Algorithm[J].Modern Law Science,2020,42(1):179-193.
[19]ZHANG L H.Research on Algorithmic Interpretation Power of Business Automation Decision-making[J].Science of Law(Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law),2018,36(3):65-74.
[20]JIA Z F.The Right of Algorithm Interpretation is not a Legal Right-Comment on Article 25 of Personal Information Protection Law(Draft)[J].Electronics Intellectual Property,2020(12):49-61.
[21]SHAO G S,HUANG Q.Algorithmic Harms and the Right to Explanation[J].Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication,2019,41(12):27-43.
[22]WACHTER S,MITTELSTADT B,FLORIDI L.Why a Right to Explanation of Automated Decision-making Does not Exist in the General Data Protection Regulation [J].International Data Privacy Law,2017,7(2):76-99.
[23]XU K.Taming Algorithms:Historical Evolution and Contemporary System of Algorithm Governance[J].ECUPL Journal,2022,25(1):99-113.
[24]ZHANG L H.The Iteration and Innovation of Algorithm Regulation[J].Legal Forum,2019,34(2):16-26.
[25]ZHANG E D.Background,Logic and Structure of the Right to Explanation of Algorithmic Decision-making in the Age of Big Data[J].Legal Forum,2019,34(4):152-160.
[26]AMERSHI S,BEGEL A,BIRD C,et al.Software Engineering for Machine Learning:A Case Study[C]//2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering:Software Engineering in Practice(ICSE-SEIP).IEEE,2019:291-300.
[27]Microsoft.The Team Data Science Process[EB/OL].(2022-03-03) [2022-04-26].https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-science-process/overview.
[28]FAYYAD U,PIATETSKY-SHAPIRO G,SMYTH P.TheKDD Process for Extracting Useful Knowledge from Volumes of Data [J].Communications of the ACM,1996,39(11):27-34.
[29]WIRTH R,HIPP J.CRISP-DM:Towards a Standard ProcessModel for Data Mining[C]//Proceedings of the 4th Interna-tional Conference on the Practical Applications of Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.2000:29-40.
[30]PAN S J,YANG Q.A Survey on Transfer Learning [J].IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering,2009,22(10):1345-1359.
[31]HOGAN B.The Presentation of Self in the Age of Social Media:Distinguishing Performances and Exhibitions Online [J].Bulletin of Science,Technology & Society,2010,30(6):377-386.
[32]CONG Y N,WANG Z Y,ZHU J Q.Insights into Dataset and Algorithm Related Problems in Artificial Intelligence for Law[J].Computer Science,2022,49(4):74-79.
[33]ISARAN E T.When an Algorithm Helps Send You to Prison[EB/OL].(2017-10-26) [2022-04-26].https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/26/opinion/algorithm-compas-sentencing-bias.html.
[34]ZUO W M.Will the Era of AI Judges Come-Based on the Comparison and Outlook of Judicial Artificial Intelligence Between China and Foreign Countries[J].Tribune of Political Science and Law,2021,39(5):3-13.
[35]SHEN W X.On the Construction and Systematization of thePersonal Information Right[J].Journal of Comparative Law,2021(5):1-13.
[36]WEN Y.The Nature and Prospect of Algorithmic Rights-The Theoretical Separation and Functional Compatibility Based on Algorithmic Rights and Personal Information Rights[J].Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition),2022,36(1):54-63.
[37]RAVEN B H.Social influence and power[R].California University Los Angeles,1964.
[38]ZHANG L H.Function and Realization of the Algorithm Interpretation Rights in Business Automated Decisions[J].Journal of Soochow University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition),2020,41(2):51-60.
[39]GUNNING D,STEFIK M,CHOI J,et al.XAI—ExplainableArtificial Intelligence [J].Science Robotics,2019,4(37):eaay7120.
[40]VLADECK D C.Machines without Principals:Liability Rulesand Artificial Intelligence [J].Washington Law Review,2014,89(1):117.
[41]SU Y.An Interpretation and Specification of the Obligations of Optimizing the Explainability and Transparency of Algorithm[J].Science of Law(Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law),2022,40(1):133-141.
[1] KONG Jiabin, LYU Jianwen, LIU Jiangnan, DU Wenxuan. Recognition Method of Component Names in Patent Documents Based on the Algorithm of Word Frequency Difference and Library of Left-segmentation Words [J]. Computer Science, 2023, 50(7): 229-236.
[2] YANG Ye, WU Weizhi, ZHANG Jiaru. Optimal Scale Selection and Rule Acquisition in Inconsistent Generalized Decision Multi-scale Ordered Information Systems [J]. Computer Science, 2023, 50(6): 131-141.
[3] LI Yanyan, QIN Keyun. Topological Properties of Generalized Rough Approximation Operators Based on Objects [J]. Computer Science, 2023, 50(2): 173-177.
[4] RAN Hong, HOU Ting, HE Long-yu, QIN Ke-yun. Fuzzy Rough Sets Model Based on Fuzzy Neighborhood Systems [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(11A): 211100224-5.
[5] WANG Jie, LI Xiao-nan, LI Guan-yu. Adaptive Attention-based Knowledge Graph Completion [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(7): 204-211.
[6] FANG Lian-hua, LIN Yu-mei, WU Wei-zhi. Optimal Scale Selection in Random Multi-scale Ordered Decision Systems [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(6): 172-179.
[7] XU Si-yu, QIN Ke-yun. Topological Properties of Fuzzy Rough Sets Based on Residuated Lattices [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(6A): 140-143.
[8] CAI Xiao-juan, TAN Wen-an. Improved Collaborative Filtering Algorithm Combining Similarity and Trust [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(6A): 238-241.
[9] CONG Ying-nan, WANG Zhao-yu, ZHU Jin-qing. Insights into Dataset and Algorithm Related Problems in Artificial Intelligence for Law [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(4): 74-79.
[10] WANG Zi-yin, LI Lei-jun, MI Ju-sheng, LI Mei-zheng, XIE Bin. Attribute Reduction of Variable Precision Fuzzy Rough Set Based on Misclassification Cost [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(4): 161-167.
[11] LI Yan-yan, QIN Ke-yun. On Topological Properties of Generalized Rough Approximation Operators [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(3): 263-268.
[12] ZHAO Yang, NI Zhi-wei, ZHU Xu-hui, LIU Hao, RAN Jia-min. Multi-worker and Multi-task Path Planning Based on Improved Lion Evolutionary Algorithm forSpatial Crowdsourcing Platform [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(11A): 30-38.
[13] XU Jin. Construction and Application of Knowledge Graph for Industrial Assembly [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(6A): 285-288.
[14] DING Ling, XIANG Yang. Chinese Event Detection with Hierarchical and Multi-granularity Semantic Fusion [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(5): 202-208.
[15] LU Xun, LI Yan-yan, QIN Ke-yun. Relationship Among Three Types of Rough Approximation Pairs [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(4): 49-53.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!