Computer Science ›› 2021, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (8): 125-133.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.200400143

• Computer Graphics & Multimedia • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Hyperspectral Image Denoising Based on Nonconvex Low Rank Matrix Approximation and TotalVariation Regularization

TAO Xing-peng, XU Hong-hui, ZHENG Jian-wei, CHEN Wan-jun   

  1. School of Computer Science and Technology,Zhejiang University of Technology,Hangzhou 310023,China
  • Received:2020-04-30 Revised:2020-08-24 Published:2021-08-10
  • About author:TAO Xing-peng,born in 1996,postgra-duate.His main research interests include visual analysis and image proces-sing.(txpdyt@163.com)CHEN Wan-jun,born in 1982,lecturer.Her main research interests include model optimization and image proces-sing.
  • Supported by:
    National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFE0126100),National Natural Science Foundation of China (61602413),Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province,China(LY19F030016),Open Research Projects of Zhejiang Lab(2019KD0AD01/007),Scientific Research Fund of the National Health Commission of China(WKJ-ZJ-2102) and Program of Department of Education of Zhejiang Province(Y201941027).

Abstract: Hyperspectral images (HSIs) are often interfered by hybrid noise in the acquisition process,which seriously weakens the performance of subsequent applications of HSIs.In this paper,nonconvex regularizer is used to reconstruct the approximation problem instead of the traditional nuclear norm,which guarantees a tighter approximation of the original sparsity constrained rank function.Then a hybrid noise removal model integrating nonconvex surrogate function,total variation regularization and l2,1 norms together into a unified framework is proposed.The proposed algorithm aims to decompose the degraded HSIs into low rank components and sparse terms in the matrix mode,and uses total variation regularization to maintain edge information and improve the spatial piecewise smoothness of the HSIs.Finally,using the special properties of nonconvex surrogate function,an iterative algorithm based on augmented Lagrangian multiplier method is used for optimization.Extensive experiments on several well-known datasets are conducted for model evaluation,and the results show that the proposed algorithm can not only effectively remove hybrid noise,but also can better maintain the structure and details of the images.Compared with other existing hyperspectral denoising methods,the visual effects and quantitative evaluation results of the proposed algorithm are significantly better.

Key words: Augmented lagrangian multipliers, Hybrid noise, Hyperspectral image, Nonconvex regularizer, Total variation

CLC Number: 

  • TP391.41
[1]XIE T,LI S,SUN B.Hyperspectral images denoising via nonconvex regularized low-rank and sparse matrix decomposition[J].IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,2019,29:44-56.
[2]LEE S,NEGISHI M,URAKUBO H,et al.Mu-net:Multi-scale U-net for two-photon microscopy image denoising and restoration[J].Neural Networks,2020,125:92-103.
[3]ZHANG L,WANG J,AN Z.Classification method of CO2 hyperspectral remote sensing data based on neural network[J].Computer Communications,2020,156:124-130.
[4]LI Y,XU J,XIA R,et al.A two-stage framework of target detection in high-resolution hyperspectral images[J].Signal,Image and Video Processing,2019,13(7):1339-1346.
[5]FAN H,LI J,YUAN Q,et al.Hyperspectral image denoising with bilinear low rank matrix factorization[J].Signal Proces-sing,2019,163:132-152.
[6]XING L,CHANG Q,QIAO T.The algorithms about fast non-localmeans based image denoising[J].Acta Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica,English Series,2012,28(2):247-254.
[7]BALOCH G,OZKARAMANLI H.Image denoising via correlation-based sparse representation[J].Signal,Image and Video Processing,2017,11(8):1501-1508.
[8]DABOV K,FOI A,KATKOVNIK V,et al.Image denoising by sparse 3-D transform-domain collaborative filtering[J].IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,2007,16(8):2080-2095.
[9]OTHMAN H,QIAN S E.Noise reduction of hyperspectralimagery using hybrid spatial-spectral derivative-domain wavelet shrinkage[J].IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing,2006,44(2):397-408.
[10]LU C,TANG J,YAN S,et al.Nonconvex nonsmooth low rank minimization via iteratively reweighted nuclear norm[J].IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,2015,25(2):829-839.
[11]LI C,MA Y,HUANG J,et al.Hyperspectral image denoising using the robust low-rank tensor recovery[J].Journal of the Optical Society of America A,2015,32(9):1604-1612.
[12]RENARD N,BOURENNANE S,BLANC-TALON J.Denoising and dimensionality reduction using multilinear tools for hyperspectral images[J].IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters,2008,5(2):138-142.
[13]KONG X,ZHAO Y,XUE J,et al.Hyperspectral Image Denoi-sing Using Global Weighted Tensor Norm Minimum and Nonlocal Low-Rank Approximation[J].Remote Sensing,2019,11(19):2281-2303.
[14]ZHANG H,HE W,ZHANG L,et al.Hyperspectral image restoration using low-rank matrix recovery[J].IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing,2013,52(8):4729-4743.
[15]CANDÉS E J,LI X,MA Y,et al.Robust principal component analysis?[J].Journal of the ACM,2011,58(3):1-37.
[16]HE W,ZHANG H,ZHANG L,et al.Hyperspectral image denoising via noise-adjusted iterative low-rank matrix approximation[J].IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing,2015,8(6):3050-3061.
[17]HE W,ZHANG H,ZHANG L,et al.Total-variation-regularized low-rank matrix factorization for hyperspectral image restoration[J].IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing,2015,54(1):178-188.
[18]WANG Y,PENG J,ZHAO Q,et al.Hyperspectral image restoration via total variation regularized low-rank tensor decomposition[J].IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing,2017,11(4):1227-1243.
[19]HE W,ZHANG H,SHEN H,et al.Hyperspectral image de-noising using local low-rank matrix recovery and global spatial-spectral total variation[J].IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing,2018,11(3):713-729.
[20]ZHENG J,QIN M,ZHOU X,et al.Efficient Implementation of Truncated Reweighting Low-Rank Matrix Approximation[J].IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics,2019,16(1):488-500.
[21]ZHENG J,LOU K,YANG X,et al.Weighted mixed-norm regularized regression for robust face identification[J].IEEE Transac-tions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems,2019,30(12):3788-3802.
[22]YANG Y,ZHENG J,CHEN S,et al.Hyperspectral image restoration via local low-rank matrix recovery and Moreau-enhanced total variation[J].IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters,2019,17(6):1037-1041.
[23]XIE Y,QU Y,TAO D,et al.Hyperspectral image restorationvia iteratively regularized weighted schatten p-norm minimization[J].IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing,2016,54(8):4642-4659.
[24]REHCT B,FAZEL M,PARRILO P A.Guaranteed minimum-rank solutions of linear matrix equations via nuclear norm minimization[J].SIAM Review,2010,52(3):471-501.
[25]CANDÉS E J,PLAN Y.Matrix completion with noise[J].Proceedings of the IEEE,2010,98(6):925-936.
[26]ZHOU Z,LI X,WRIGHT J,et al.Stable principal component pursuit[C]//2010 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.IEEE,2010:1518-1522.
[27]CHEN Y,GUO Y,WANG Y,et al.Denoising of hyperspectral images using nonconvex low rank matrix approximation[J].IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing,2017,55(9):5366-5380.
[28]RUDIN L I,OSHER S,FATEMI E.Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms[J].Physica D:Nonlinear Phenomena,1992,60(1/2/3/4):259-268.
[29]YAN J,PENG H,YU Y,et al.Compressive sensing of windspeed based on non-convex ℓp-norm sparse regularization optimization for structural health monitoring[J].Engineering Structures,2019,194:346-356.
[30]MA R,MIAO J,NIU L,et al.Transformed ℓ1 regularization for learning sparse deep neural networks[J].Neural Networks,2019,119:286-298.
[31]LIU G,LIN Z,YAN S,et al.Robust recovery of subspace structures by low-rank representation[J].IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,2012,35(1):171-184.
[32]XIE T,LI S,SUN B.Hyperspectral images denoising via non-convex regularized low-rank and sparse matrix decomposition[J].IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,2019,29:44-56.
[33]CHENG D,YANG J,WANG J,et al.Double-noise-dual-prob-lem approach to the augmented Lagrange multiplier method for robust principal component analysis[J].Soft Computing,2017,21(10):2723-2732.
[34]BECK A,TEBOULLE M.Fast gradient-based algorithms forconstrained total variation image denoising and deblurring problems[J].IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,2009,18(11):2419-2434.
[35]WANG Z,BOVIK A C,SHEIKH H R,et al.Image quality assessment:from error visibility to structural similarity[J].IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,2004,13(4):600-612.
[1] XU Tian-hui, GUO Qiang, ZHANG Cai-ming. Time Series Data Anomaly Detection Based on Total Variation Ratio Separation Distance [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(9): 101-110.
[2] ZHENG Jian-wei, HUANG Juan-juan, QIN Meng-jie, XU Hong-hui, LIU Zhi. Hyperspectral Image Denoising Based on Non-local Similarity and Weighted-truncated NuclearNorm [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(9): 160-167.
[3] WU Yong, LIU Yong-jian, TANG Tang, WANG Hong-lin, ZHENG Jian-cheng. Hyperspectral Image Denoising Based on Robust Low Rank Tensor Restoration [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(11A): 303-307.
[4] MO Cai-wang, CHANG Kan, LI Heng-xin, LI Ming-hong, QIN Tuan-fa. Color Image Super-resolution Algorithm Based on Inter-channel Correlation and Nonlocal Self-similarity [J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(6): 138-143.
[5] WANG Yan, WANG Li. Local Gabor Convolutional Neural Network for Hyperspectral Image Classification [J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(6): 151-156.
[6] ZHANG Xian,YE Jun. Hyperspectral Images Denoising Based on Non-local Similarity Joint Low-rank Representation [J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(1): 170-175.
[7] LIN Wei-jun, ZHAO Liao-ying, LI Xiao-run. Real-time Sub-pixel Object Detection for Hyperspectral Image Based on Pixel-by-pixel Processing [J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(6): 259-264.
[8] CHEN Cheng, CHANG Kan, MO Cai-wang, LI Tian-yi and QIN Tuan-fa. Single Video Super-resolution Algorithm Based on Non-local Means and Total Variation Minimization [J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(3): 263-267.
[9] XU Min-da, LI Zhi-hua. Improved Image Reconstruction Algorithm Based on L1-Norm and TV Regularization [J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(12): 210-216.
[10] LI Chang-li, ZHANG Lin, FAN Tang-huai. Hyperspectral Image Classification Based on Adaptive Active Learning and Joint Bilateral Filtering [J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(12): 223-228.
[11] REN Shou-gang, WAN Sheng, GU Xing-jian, WANG Hao-yun, YUAN Pei-sen, XU Huan-liang. Hyperspectral Image Classification Based on Multi-scale Discriminative Spatial-spectral Features [J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(12): 243-250.
[12] ZOU Li, CAI Xi-biao, SUN Jing, SUN Fu-ming. Hyperspectral Unmixing Algorithm Based on Dual Graph-regularized Semi-supervised NMF [J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(12): 251-254.
[13] DOU Li-yun, XU Dan, LI Jie, CHEN Hao and LIU Yi-cheng. Image Inpainting Based on Dual-tree Complex Wavelet Transform [J]. Computer Science, 2017, 44(Z6): 179-182.
[14] ZHAO Yang, WANG Wei, DONG Rong, WANG Jing-shi and TANG Min. Compressed Sensing Recovery Algorithm for Region of Interests of MRI/MRA Images Based on NLTV and NESTA [J]. Computer Science, 2017, 44(9): 308-314.
[15] LIU Xiao-yuan, YI Yang, YANG Lei and WANG Bin. Research of Document Image Super Resolution Algorithm Based on Directional Bilateral Total Variation Regularization [J]. Computer Science, 2017, 44(11): 301-304.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!