Computer Science ›› 2025, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (12): 209-214.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.241000148
• Artificial Intelligence • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Xianglong, WANG Yisong, XIE Zhongtao
CLC Number:
| [1]WANG Y S,LIU H,ZHANG Y,et al.What’s new in the evolu-tion of propositional knowledge bases?[J].Journal of Guizhou University,2024,41(1):1-19. [2]GELFOND M,LIFSCHITZ V.The stable model semantics for logic programming[C]//Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference and Symposium of Logic Programming.Washington:MIT,1988:1070-1080. [3]WANG Y S,YOU J H.Answer Set Programming:A System Perspective [J].Chinese Association for Artificial Intelligence,2025,7:22-30. [4]FANG Y L,ZHAO L Z,QIAN J Y.Existence of Answer Sets of Normal Logic Programs[J].Computer Science,2011,38(12):213-220. [5]EITER T,GOTTLOB G.On the Computational Cost of Dis-junctive Logic Programming:Propositional Case[J].Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence,1995,15(3/4):289-323. [6]CALIMERI F,FABER W,LEONE N,et al.Declarative andComputational Properties of Logic Programs with Aggregates[C] // Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.Scotland:Professional Book Center,2005:406-411. [7]MUMICK I S,PIRAHESH H,RAMAKRISHNAN R.TheMagic of Duplicates and Aggregates[C]//16th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases.Queensland:Morgan Kaufmann,1990:264-277. [8]ALVIANO M,FABER W,GEBSER M.Aggregate Semanticsfor Propositional Answer Set Programs[J].Theory and Practice of Logic Programming,2023,23(1):157-194. [9]FABER W,PFEIFER G,LEONE N.Semantics and complexity of recursive aggregates in answer set programming[J].Artificial Intelligence,2011,175(1):278-298. [10]GELFOND M,ZHANG Y L.Vicious Circle Principle,Aggregates,and Formation of Sets in ASP Based Languages[J].Artificial Intelligence,2019,275:28-77. [11]PELOV N,DENECKER M,BRUYNOOGHE M.Well-founded and stable semantics of logic programs with aggregates[J].Theory and Practice of Logic Programming,2007,7(3):301-353. [12]DANTSIN E,EITER T,GOTTLOB G,et al.Complexity and Expressive Power of Logic Programming[C]//Proceedings of Twelfth Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity.IEEE,1997:82-101. [13]FERRARIS P.Logic Programs with Propositional Connectives and Aggregates[J].ACM Transactions on Computational Logic,2011,12(4):25:1-25:40. [14]LIU L N,PONTELLI E,SON T C,et al.Logic Programs with Abstract Constraint Atoms:the Role of Computations[J].Artificial Intelligence,2010,174(3/4):295-315. [15]SON T C,PONTELLI E,TU P H.Answer Sets for Logic Programs with Arbitrary Abstract Constraint Atoms[J].Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research,2007,29:353-389. [16]LIU L N,TRUSZCZYNSKI M.Properties and Applications of Programs with Monotone and Convex Constraints[J].Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research,2006,27:299-334. [17]SHEN Y D,YOU J H,YUAN L Y.Characterizations of stable model semantics for logic programs with arbitrary constraint atoms[J].Theory and Practice of Logic Programming,2009,9(4):529-564. [18]FABER W,LEONE N,PFEIFER G.Recursive Aggregates inDisjunctive Logic Programs:Semantics and Complexity[C] // Logics in Artificial Intelligence 9th European Conference.Springer,2004:200-212. [19]WANG Y S,EITER T,ZHANG Y L,et al.Witnesses for Answer Sets of Logic Programs[J].ACM Transactions on Computational Logic,2023,24(2):1-46. [20]ALVIANO M,TRIEU L L,SON T C,et al.Explanations forAnswer Set Programming[C]//Proceedings of 39th Internatio-nal Conference on Logic Programming.London:Imperial College London,2023:27-40. [21]EITER T,GEIBINGER T.Explaining Answer-Set Program-ming with abstract Constraint Atoms[C] //Proceedings of the 32th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2023:3193-3202. |
| [1] | CHENG Zhiyu, CHEN Xinglin, WANG Jing, ZHOU Zhongyuan, ZHANG Zhizheng. Retrieval-augmented Generative Intelligence Question Answering Technology Based on Knowledge Graph [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(1): 87-93. |
| [2] | HUANG Hua-wei, LI Chun-hua. Security Analysis of A Key Exchange Protocol Based on Tropical Semi-ring [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(6A): 571-574. |
| [3] | HAN Jie, CHEN Jun-fen, LI Yan, ZHAN Ze-cong. Self-supervised Deep Clustering Algorithm Based on Self-attention [J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(3): 134-143. |
| [4] | YOU Ling, GUAN Zhang-jun. Low-complexity Subcarrier Allocation Algorithm for Underwater OFDM Acoustic CommunicationSystems [J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(6A): 387-391. |
| [5] | ZHU Kai, WU Guo-qing, YUAN Meng-ting. On Hardness of Approximation for Optimized Problem of Synchronizing Partially Specified Deterministic Finite Automata [J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(5): 14-21. |
| [6] | WU Tian-tian,WANG Jie. Belief Coordination for Multi-agent System Based on Possibilistic Answer Set Programming [J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(2): 201-205. |
| [7] | YU Jian-jun, WU Chun-ming. Computational Complexity Analysis of Virtual Network Mapping Problem [J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(11): 87-91. |
| [8] | LU Zhao and ZHU Xiao-shu. Research on Image Processing Algorithm Based on Compressed Sensing [J]. Computer Science, 2017, 44(6): 312-316. |
| [9] | CEN Yue-feng, WANG Wan-liang, YAO Xin-wei, WANG Chao-chao and PAN Tie-qiang. Decision Tree Based Coding Unit Splitting Algorithm for HEVC [J]. Computer Science, 2016, 43(4): 308-312. |
| [10] | LIU Zhen and ZHANG Zhi-zheng. Learning Action Models Described in Action Language B by Combining ILP and ASP [J]. Computer Science, 2015, 42(1): 220-226. |
| [11] | HE Kun,YAO Peng-cheng and LI Li-wen. Complete Algorithm for 2D Rectangular Packing Problem [J]. Computer Science, 2014, 41(8): 55-59. |
| [12] | . Computational Complexity of Probabilistic Inference in Icing Graphical Model [J]. Computer Science, 2013, 40(2): 253-256. |
| [13] | ZHAO Ling-zhong,ZHAI Zhong-yi and QIAN Jun-yan. Framework for Model Checking CSP with Traces of Processes [J]. Computer Science, 2013, 40(11): 181-186. |
| [14] | . Existence of Answer Sets of Normal Logic Programs [J]. Computer Science, 2011, 38(12): 213-220. |
| [15] | . Answer Set Programming Based Verification of Semantic Web Service Composition [J]. Computer Science, 2011, 38(12): 131-134. |
|
||