Computer Science ›› 2026, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (7): 414-421.doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.250500059

• Information Security • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Multivariate Mimic Voting Method Based on Anomaly Perception

WANG Jia, GAN Yongqiang   

  1. School of Computer Science and Technology,Xinjiang University,Urumqi 830000,China
  • Received:2025-05-15 Revised:2025-08-15 Online:2026-07-15 Published:2026-07-10
  • About author:WANG Jia,born in 1987,Ph.D,asso-ciate professor,is a member of CCF(No.K8521M).Her main research interests include resource allocation in clouds,tasks scheduling in big data and cyberspace security.
    GAN Yongqiang,born in 2001,postgraduate.His main research interests include cyberspace security and mimic defense.
  • Supported by:
    Key R&D Program of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region(2022B01008),National Natural Science Foundation of China(62363032),Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region(2023D01C20),National Science and Technology Major Project(2022ZD0115803) and “Heaven Lake Doctor” Project(202104120018).

Abstract: In mimic defense system,the security of mimic voter directly affects the system defensive capability.Existing mimic voting algorithms typically either rely on anomaly detection to enhance the perception of error outputs of executors,or depend on heterogeneity or historical confidence to quantify the reliability of executor outputs,which leads to inexact voting output with higher-order common-mode vulnerabilities in dynamic network environments.To address above problem,this paper proposes a multivariable mimic voting based on anomaly perception.Because existing anomaly detection models always focuse on temporal or spatial information,a spatiotemporal anomaly perception model is constructed to more precisely capture the spatiotemporal cha-racteristics of executor output.Simultaneously,with the consideration of decision misjudgment caused by higher-order common-mode vulnerabilities and structural reasons of executors,higher-order heterogeneity and historical confidence are integrated with data consistency to improve the reliability of the voting results.Ultimately,an adaptive optimization strategy is desigened to adjust weight metrics to yield the optimal weighted outcome.Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm achieves an average accuracy of 98.77% on CICIDS and UNSW-NB15 datasets.Especially,a significant improvement of average about 2% over traditional algorithms on UNSW-NB15,demonstrating better stability and generalizability.

Key words: Mimic defense, Voting algorithm, Anomaly detection, Higher-order heterogeneity, Historical confidence

CLC Number: 

  • TP393.08
[1]PETER O,PRADHAN A,MBOHWA C.Industrial Internet of Things(IIoT):Opportunities,Challenges and Requirements in Manufacturing Businesses in Emergingeconomies[J].Procedia Computer Science,2023,217:856-865.
[2]GOYAL S,RAJAWAT A,SOLANKI R,et al.Integrating AI with cyber security for smart industry 4.0 application[C]//2023 International Conference on Inventive Computation Technologies(ICICT).IEEE,2023:1223-1232.
[3]ALOTAIBI L,SEHER S,MOHAMMAD N.Cyberattacks using chatgpt:Exploring malicious content generation through prompt engineering[C]//2024 ASU International Conference in Emerging Technologies for Sustainability and Intelligent Systems(ICETSIS).IEEE,2024:1304-1311.
[4]LI Y,LIU Q.A comprehensive review study of cyber-attacks and cyber security;Emerging trends and recent developments[J].Energy Reports,2021,7:8176-8186.
[5]WU J.Research on cyber mimic defense[J].Journal of Cyber Security,2016,1(4):1-10.
[6]ZHOU D,CHEN H,CHENG G,et al.Design and implementation of adaptive mimic voting device oriented to persistent connection[J].Journal on Communications,2022,43(6):71-84.
[7]WU J.Cyberspace endogenous safety and security[J].Enginee-ring,2022,15:179-185.
[8]CHOI J,GOH K.Dynamics of consensus formation on multiplex networks:the majority-vote model[C]//Proceedings of APS March Meeting.Ridge,NY:American Physical Society,2018.
[9]GUO W.Research on Mimic Architecture and Key Technologies of Distributed Storage System[D].Zhengzhou:Information Engineering University.2019.
[10]LIN S,LIU Q,WANG X.Competitive arbitration model formimic defense system[J]. Computer Engineering,2018,44(4):193-198.
[11]WEI S,ZHANG H,SU Y,et al.Majority voting algorithm and performance analysis based on high level heterogeneity[J].Computer Engineering,2020,46(3):237-245,253.
[12]SHEN C,CHEN S,WU C.Adaptive mimic defensive controller framework based on reputation and dissimilarity[J].Journal on Communications,2018,39(S2):173-180.
[13]PU L,BO Y,YOU W,et al.Heterogeneous executors output decision method for mimic cloud service[J].Journal of Information Engineering University,2020,21(3):344-351.
[14]GAO Z,JIA G,ZHANG W et al.An outlier-based optimization method for anamorphic rulings[J].Computer Application Research,2021,38(7):2066-2071.
[15]YANG X,CHENG G,LIU W,et al.Research on mimetic adjudication method based on deep learning[J].Journal of Communication,2024,45(2):79-89.
[16]WU Z,ZHANG F,GUO W,et al.A mimic arbitration optimization method based on heterogeneous degree of executors[J].Computer Engineering,2020,46(5):12-18.
[17]LU Y,HUANG J,CHENG Z,et al.A MultiIndex Mimic Voting Algorithm Based on Improved AHP-FCE Model[J].Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications,2021,44(2):8-13.
[18]LIU Q,LIN S,GU Z.Heterogeneous redundancies scheduling algorithm for mimic security defense[J].Journal on Communications,2018,39(7):188-198.
[19]JIA H,PAN Y,LIU W H,et al.Dynamic scheduling algorithm for actuators based on high-order heterogeneity[J].Journal on Communication,2022,43(3):233-245.
[20]MOUSTAFA N,SLAY J.UNSW-NB15:a comprehensive dataset for network intrusion detection systems(UNSW-NB15 network data set)[C]//Proceedings of the 2015 Military Communications and Information Systems Conference(MilCIS).Piscataway:IEEE Press,2015:1-6.
[21]SHARAFALDIN I,LASHKARI A,GHORBANI A A.Toward generating a new intrusion detection dataset and intrusion traffic characterization[C]//Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy.SCITEPRESS-Science and Technology Publications,2018:108-116.
[1] CHEN Yifan, DING Cong, CAO Min. Image Anomaly Detection Based on Masked Convolutional Kernel [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(7): 45-53.
[2] XU Jian, CHEN Shijie, FENG Jiancong, YANG Geng. CBT-AD:CNN-BiLSTM-Transformer Hybrid Model for Time Series Anomaly Detection [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(7): 230-241.
[3] JI Wendi, WANG Yongquan. Autoregressive Sequence Reconstruction for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Medical Insurance [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(7): 298-307.
[4] ZHANG Juling, ZHAO Yibing, WANG Sheng, XI Ning, SHE Wenkui. Robust Time Series Anomaly Detection Model Based on Multi-view Cross Filtering [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(6A): 250600105-10.
[5] HUANG Siyang, YAO Ye, ZHU Yian, HAI Duo, XIONG Zhihai. Anomaly Detection and Localization Technology for Gravity Wave Spectral Images Based onPre-trained Networks [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(5): 193-206.
[6] CHEN Peng, HAO Junfeng, XIA Yunni, LI Xi. Novel Multi-task Federated Learning Based Approach for Detecting and Diagnosing Anomalies inCloud Microservices [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(5): 388-403.
[7] XU Jingtao, YANG Yan, JIANG Yongquan. Time-Frequency Attention Based Model for Time Series Anomaly Detection [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(2): 161-169.
[8] LIU Fujie, FANG Xianwen. Anomaly Detection and Repair Methods for Dynamic Adjustment of Business Process [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(2): 207-215.
[9] TANG Chenghai, YANG Yuqing, YANG Haifeng, CAI Jianghui, ZHOU Lichan. Adaptive Data Stream Anomaly Detection Algorithm Based on Variable Density [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(2): 216-226.
[10] HAN Lei, SHANG Haoyu, QIAN Xiaoyan, GU Yan, LIU Qingsong, WANG Chuang. Constrained Multi-loss Video Anomaly Detection with Dual-branch Feature Fusion [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(2): 236-244.
[11] WANG Cheng, JIN Cheng. KAN-based Unsupervised Multivariate Time Series Anomaly Detection Network [J]. Computer Science, 2026, 53(1): 89-96.
[12] SU Shiyu, YU Jiong, LI Shu, JIU Shicheng. Cross-domain Graph Anomaly Detection Via Dual Classification and Reconstruction [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(8): 374-384.
[13] GU Zhaojun, YANG Xueying, SUI He. Improved SVM Model for Industrial Control Anomaly Detection Based on InterferenceSample Distribution Optimization [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(7): 388-398.
[14] YIN Wencui, XIE Ping, YE Chengxu, HAN Jiaxin, XIA Xing. Anomaly Detection of Multi-variable Time Series Data Based on Variational Graph Auto-encoders [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(6A): 240700124-8.
[15] LIAO Sirui, HUANG Feihu, ZHAN Pengxiang, PENG Jian, ZHANG Linghao. DCDAD:Differentiated Context Dependency for Time Series Anomaly Detection Method [J]. Computer Science, 2025, 52(6): 106-117.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!